The case of Brexit: How to open a critical juncture without an exogenous shock?

Abstract

The article examines Brexit through the historical institutionalist scholarship on European integration, critical junctures and institutional change. It finds that the concepts of path dependence, and critical junctures that emerge from exogenous shocks, as well as most processes of endogenous institutional transformation cannot fully account for Brexit. How can a Member State leave the European Union, if membership in the organisation produces path-dependent effects and there is no exogenous shock? To answer the question, the article introduces the concept of a hybrid critical juncture – a period of increased contingency and uncertainty that is created gradually by a combination of exogenous and endogenous causes and agency. The article examines the events that led to the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU to demonstrate how the hybrid critical juncture concept explains Brexit. The analysis contributes to understanding potential future European disintegration and incremental institutional transformation broadly defined.

Keywords

Brexit critical junctures historical institutionalism institutional change path dependence process tracing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2018) Brexit means Brexit: Theresa May and post-referendum British politics. British Politics 13(1): 105–120.

Aminzade

(1992) Historical sociology and time. Sociological Method and Research 20(1): 456–480.

Armstrong

(2017) Brexit Time: Leaving the EU – How, Why and When? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bale

(2015) Five Year Mission: The Labour Party Under Ed Miliband. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Becker

Fetzer

Novy

(2017) Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Economic Policy 33(92): 601–650.

Bennett

Checkel

(eds) (2015) Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blyth

(1997) Any more bright ideas? The ideational turn of comparative political economy. Comparative Politics 29(2): 229–250.

Blyth

(2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.

Boffey

(2019) Cameron did not think EU referendum would happen, says Tusk. The Guardian, 21 January. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/21/donald-tusk-warned-david-cameron-about-stupid-eu-referendum-bbc (accessed 29 January 2024).

10.

Büthe

(2016) Historical institutionalism and institutional development in the EU: The development of supranational authority over government subsidies (state aid). In: Rixen

Viola

Zürn

(eds) Historical Institutionalism and International Relations: Explaining Institutional Development in World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.37–66.

11.

Byrne

Randall

Theakston

(2017) Evaluating British prime ministerial performance: David Cameron’s premiership in political time. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19(1): 202–220.

12.

Cameron

(2012) David Cameron: We need to be clear about the best way of getting what is best for Britain. The Telegraph, 30 June. Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/9367479/David-Cameron-We-need-to-be-clear-about-the-best-way-of-getting-what-is-best-for-Britain.html (accessed 6 January 2021).

13.

Cameron

(2013) EU speech at Bloomberg. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/eu-speech-at-bloomberg (accessed 6 January 2022).

14.

Cameron

(2019) For the Record. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

15.

Campbell

(2004) Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

16.

Capoccia

(2015) Critical junctures and institutional change. In: Mahoney

Thelen

(eds) Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp.147–179.

17.

Capoccia

(2016) When do institutions ‘bite’? Historical institutionalism and the politics of institutional change. Comparative Political Studies 49(8): 1095–1127.

18.

Capoccia

Kelemen

(2007) The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics 59(3): 341–369.

19.

Capoccia

Ziblatt

(2010) The historical turn in democratization studies: A research agenda for Europe and beyond. Comparative Political Studies 43(8/9): 931–968.

20.

Clarke

Goodwin

White

(2017) Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Colantone

Stanig

(2018) Global competition and Brexit. American Political Science Review 112(2): 201–218.

22.

Collier

Munck

(2017) Building blocks and methodological challenges: A framework for studying critical junctures. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 15(1): 3.

23.

Collier

(1991) Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

24.

Conservative Party Manifesto (2010). Available at: http://media.conservatives.s3.amazonaws.com/manifesto/cpmanifesto2010_lowres.pdf (accessed 6 January 2022).

25.

Conservative Party Manifesto (2015). Available at: https://www.theresavilliers.co.uk/sites/www.theresavilliers.co.uk/files/conservativemanifesto2015.pdf (accessed 6 January 2022).

26.

Daddow

(2015) Performing euroscepticism: The UK press and Cameron’s Bloomberg speech. In: Tournier-Sol

Gifford

(eds) The UK Challenge to Europeanization: The Persistence of British Euroscepticism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.151–171.

27.

Dommett

(2015) The theory and practice of party modernisation: The Conservative Party under David Cameron 2000–2015. British Politics 10(20): 249–266.

28.

Donnelly

Hogan

(2012) Understanding policy change using a critical junctures theory in comparative context: The cases of Ireland and Sweden. Policy Studies Journal 40(2): 324–350.

29.

Dunlop

James

Radaelli

(2020) Can’t get no policy learning: The Brexit fiasco through the lens of policy learning. Journal of European Public Policy 27(5): 703–722.

30.

Eatwell

Goodwin

(2018) National Populism: The Revolt against Liberal Democracy. London: Penguin Random House.

31.

Evans

Menon

(2017) Brexit and British Politics. London: Polity.

32.

Fabbrini

(2019) The Brexit negotiations and the May government. European Journal of Legal Studies. Available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/64668 (accessed 12 January 2024).

33.

Falleti

Lynch

(2009) Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies 42(9): 1143–1166.

34.

Fetzer

(2019) Did austerity cause Brexit? American Economic Review 109(11): 3849–3886.

35.

FitzGibbon

(2015) Extra-parliamentary eurosceptic actors in the UK. In: Tournier-Sol

Gifford

(eds) The UK Challenge to Europeanization: The Persistence of British Euroscepticism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.172–188.

36.

Garret

Lange

(1995) Internationalization, institutions and political change. International Organization 49(4): 627–655.

37.

George

Bennett

(2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

38.

Gerschewski

(2021) Explanations of institutional change: Reflecting on a ‘Missing Diagonal’. American Political Science Review 115(1): 218–233.

39.

Glencross

(2016) Why the UK Voted for Brexit: David Cameron’s Great Miscalculation (Palgrave studies in European politics). Berlin: Springer.

40.

Goldsmith Weil

(2017) Using critical junctures to explain continuity: The case of milk in neoliberal Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research 36(1): 52–67.

41.

Greener

(2005) The potential of path dependence in political studies. Politics 25(1): 62–72.

42.

Greif

Laitin

(2004) A theory of endogenous institutional change. American Political Science Review 98(4): 633–652.

43.

Grzymala-Busse

(2011) Time will tell? Temporality and the analysis of causal mechanisms and processes. Comparative Political Studies 44(9): 1267–1297.

44.

Hacker

(1998) The historical logic of national health insurance: Structure and sequence in the development of British, Canadian and US medical policy. Studies in American Political Development 12(1): 57–130.

45.

Hacker

(2002) The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Hacker

(2005) Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment. In: Streeck

Thelen

(eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.40–82.

47.

Hall

(1989) The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton NJ: Princeton Univeristy Press.

48.

Hall

(1993) Policy paradigms, social learning and the state. Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–296.

49.

Hay

(2020) Brexistential angst and the paradoxes of populism: On the contingency, predictability and intelligibility of seismic shifts. Political Studies 68(1): 187–206.

50.

Helm

(2012) Ed Miliband set for decision on Europe. The Observer, 19 May. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/may/20/ed-miliband-eu-membership-referendum (accessed 20 July 2020).

51.

Héretier

(2007) Explaining Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

52.

Hertner

Keith

(2017) Europhiles or Eurosceptics? Comparing the European policies of the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats. British Politics 12(1): 63–89.

53.

HM Government (2010) The coalition: Our programme for government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-coalition-documentation (accessed 6 January 2022).

54.

HM Government (2011) European Union Act 2011. 2011 (c. 12). The National Archives. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/12/contents (accessed 6 January 2022).

55.

HM Government (2015) European Union Referendum Act 2015. 2015 (c. 36). The National Archives. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/36/contents/enacted (accessed 6 January 2022).

56.

Hobolt

(2018) Brexit and the 2017 UK general election. Journal of Common Market Studies 56(9): 39–50.

57.

Hogan

(2006) Remoulding the critical junctures approach. Canadian Journal of Political Science 39(3): 657–679.

58.

Hogan

Doyle

(2006) The importance of ideas: An a priori critical juncture framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science 40(4): 883–910.

59.

Hundal

(2012) Ed Miliband knows a referendum on the EU makes sense. The Guardian, 23 May. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/may/23/ed-miliband-referendum-eu-labour (accessed 6 January 2022).

60.

Kaufman

(2017) Great transformation but no critical juncture? Latin America in the twenty-first century. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 15(1): 16–17.

61.

Kiran

(2012) Ed M: Labour doesn’t back an EU referendum. Financial Times, 7 June. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/e9dea3cf-cf91-303c-978d-ffee85fb903f (accessed 6 January 2022).

62.

Kohli

(1997) Can democracies accommodate ethnic nationalism? The rise and decline of self-determination movements in India. Journal of Asian Studies 56(2): 325–344.

63.

Krasner

(1984) Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics 16(2): 223–246.

64.

Loughlin

Viney

(2015) The coalition and the constitution. In: Seldon

Finn

(eds) The Coalition Effect, 2010–2015. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp.59–86.

65.

Mahoney

(2000) Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society 29(1): 507–548.

66.

Mahoney

Thelen

(2010) A theory of gradual institutional change. In: Mahoney

Thelen

(eds) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–37.

67.

Mahoney

Thelen

(2015) Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science. In: Mahoney

Thelen

(eds) Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp.3–38.

68.

Moravcsik

(2005) Sequencing and path dependence in European integration. In: Conference on the sequencing of regional economic integration: Issues in the breadth and depth of economic integration in the Americas, Mendoza College of Business, Notre Dame, IL, September. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/561a/6f0dd6dc5bac50bfd141f0e06daebff0e9f1.pdf accessed 6 January 2022).

69.

Norris

Ingelhart

(2020) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

70.

Official Journal of the European Union (2020) EU-UK trade and cooperation agreement – notification by the union. EUR-Lex, 31 December. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A22020X1231%2802%29&qid=1641676158266 (accessed 8 January 2022).

71.

Oliver

(2017) Unleashing Demons: The Inside Story of Brexit. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

72.

O’Rourke

(2018) A Short History of Brexit. London: Penguin Random House.

73.

Page

(2006) Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(10): 87–115.

74.

Pierson

(1996) The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123–163.

75.

Pierson

(2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press.

76.

Putnam

(1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42(3): 427–460.

77.

Riker

(1984) The heresthetics of constitution-making: The presidency in 1787, with comments on determinism and rational choice. American Political Science Review 78(1): 1–16.

78.

Rinscheid

Eberlein

Emmenegger

, et al. (2020) Why do junctures become critical? Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective. Regulation and Governance 14(4): 653–673.

79.

Rixen

Viola

(2015) Putting path dependence in its place: Towards a taxonomy of institutional change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 27(2): 301–323.

80.

Rosamond

(2016) Brexit and the problem of European disintegration. Journal of Contemporary European Research 12(4): 865–871.

81.

Schickler

(2001) Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the US Congress. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press.

82.

Schnapper

(2015a) The elephant in the room: Europe in the 2015 British general Election. French Journal of British Studies 20(3): 1–10.

83.

Schnapper

(2015b) The labour party and Europe from Brown to Miliband: Back to the future? Journal of Common Market Studies 53(1): 157–173.

84.

Schnapper

(2017) Brexit and the risk of European disintegration. In: da Costa Cabral

Renato Gonçalves

Cunha Rodrigues

(eds) After Brexit. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.83–100.

85.

Shaw

(2017) The quintessentially democratic act? Democracy, political community and citizenship in and after the UK’s EU referendum of June 2016. Journal of European Integration 39(5): 559–574.

86.

Shipman

(2016) All Out War: The Full Story of Brexit. Glasgow: William Collins.

87.

Slater

Simmons

(2010) Informative regress: Critical antecedents in comparative politics. Comparative Political Studies 43(7): 886–917.

88.

Sobolewska

Ford

(2020) Brexitland: Identity, Diversity and the Reshaping of British Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

89.

Soifer

(2012) The causal logic of critical junctures. Comparative Political Studies 45(12): 1572–1597.

90.

Stinchcombe

(1968) Constructing Social Theories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

91.

Streeck

Thelen

(2005) Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In: Streeck

Thelen

(eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–39.

92.

Szucko

(2020) Brexit and the differentiated European (dis)integration. Contexto Internacional 42(3): 621–645.

93.

Tarrow

(2017) The world changed today! Can we recognize critical junctures when we see them? Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 15(1): 9–11.

94.

The Economist (2017) Arron banks, bankroller of Brexit, faces investigation over his donations. The Economist, 4 November. Available at: https://www.economist.com/britain/2017/11/02/arron-banks-bankroller-of-brexit-faces-investigation-over-his-donations (accessed 6 January 2022).

95.

Thelen

(2003) How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In: Mahoney

Rueschemeyer

(eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp.208–240.

96.

Thelen

(2004) How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.

97.

Thompson

(2017) Inevitability and contingency: The political economy of Brexit. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19(3): 434–449.

98.

Uberoi

(2016) European Union referendum 2016. Briefing Paper, Number CBP 7639. House of Commons Library, 29 June. Available at: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7639/ (accessed 6 January 2022).

99.

Vail

(2015) Between one-nation toryism and neoliberalism: The dilemmas of British conservatism and Britain’s evolving place in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies 53(1): 106–122.

100.

Vollaard

(2014) Explaining European disintegration. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1142–1159.

101.

Vollaard

(2018) European Disintegration: A Search for Explanations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

102.

Walker

(2021) Brexit timeline: Events leading to the UK’s exit from the European Union. UK Parliament: House of Commons Library, 6 January. Available at: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7960/ (accessed 6 January, 2021).

103.

Webber

(2014) How likely is it that the European Union will disintegrate? A critical analysis of competing theoretical perspectives. European Journal of International Relations 20(2): 341–365.

104.

Wheeler

(2017) Why wasn’t 2015 the ‘Brexit election’? BBC News, 8 May. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-39717750 (accessed 28 June, 2021).

105.

Wintour

(2018) Russian bid to influence Brexit vote detailed in new US Senate report. The Guardian, 10 January. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/10/russian-influence-brexit-vote-detailed-us-senate-report (accessed 28 June 2021).

106.

Zappettini

(2019) The Brexit referendum: How trade and immigration in the discourses of the official campaigns have legitimised a toxic (inter)national logic. Critical Discourse Studies 16(4): 403–416.

107.

Zappettini

Krzyżanowski

(2019) The critical juncture of Brexit in media & political discourses: From national-populist imaginary to cross-national social and political crisis. Critical Discourse Studies 16(4): 381–388.