Contemporary political theory demonstrates a turn towards data-sensitive research. Waldron, Shapiro, Carens, Blau and Floyd emphasise the importance of grounding political theory in empirical data. Political scientists developed methods aimed at improving the ways in which political institutions are studied. What can empirical political theory borrow from this literature, that would advance its aim to precisely evaluate political institutions? It is suggested to naturalise within political theory political-science methods. We point to three methods: the usage of case studies, avoiding sampling by the dependent variable and process tracing. In order to demonstrate their relevance, we re-read three studies in contemporary political theory (by Walzer, Spinner-Halev and Wenar), in light of the noted methods. If empirical political theory aims to fulfil its own stated goals and evaluate the desirability of political institutions according to reliable data regarding their functionality, it would greatly benefit from naturalising the methods of political science.
AckerlyBA (2000) Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AckerlyBACabreraLFormanF, et al. (2021) Unearthing grounded normative theory: Practices and commitments of empirical research in political theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Epub ahead of print 10 March. DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2021.1894020.
3.
Aristotle (2009) The Politics (ed StalleyRF). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BaderinA (2014) Two forms of realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory13(2): 132–153.
5.
BaderinA (2021) The continuity of ethics and political theory. The Journal of Politics83(4): 1734–1746.
6.
BarryB (1990) Social criticism and political philosophy. Philosophy & Public Affairs19(4): 360–373.
7.
BeitzCR (1989) Political Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BennettA (2010) Process tracing and causal inference. In: BradyHECollierD (eds) Rethinking Social Inquiry, 2nd edn.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.207–220.
9.
BennettAElmanC (2006) Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science9: 455–476.
10.
BlauA (2015) The irrelevance of (Straussian) hermeneutics. In: SchroderW (ed.) Reading between the Lines.Berlin: De Gruyter, pp.29–56.
11.
BlauA (ed.) (2017) Methods in Analytical Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Box-SteffensmeierJMBradyHECollierD (2008) Introduction. In: Box-SteffensmeierJMBradyHECollierD (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.3–34.
13.
CarensJH (2000) Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
CarensJH (2004) A contextual approach to political theory. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice7(2): 117–132.
15.
CarensJH (2013) The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
CollierD (2011) Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics44(4): 823–830.
17.
CollierDMahoneyJ (1996) Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics49(1): 56–91.
18.
CollierP (2007) The Bottom Billion. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
DahlRA (1958) Political theory: Truth and consequences. World Politics11(1): 89–102.
20.
DahlRA (2006 [1956]) A Preface to Democratic Theory (expanded edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
De TocquevilleA (2002 [1835/1840]) Democracy in America (trans. MansfieldHCWinthropD). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
De VausD (2001) Research Design in Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.
23.
DowdingK (2015) The Philosophy and Methods of Political Science. New York: Macmillan.
24.
DowdingK (2020) The relationship between political philosophy and political science. Australian Journal of Political Science55(4): 432–444.
25.
DryzekJSHonigBPhillipsA (2011) Overview of political theory. In: GoodinR (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Science.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.62–89.
26.
DworkinR (1986) Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
DworkinR (2004) Hart’s postscript and the character of political philosophy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies24(1): 1–37.
28.
FloydJ (2017) Is Political Philosophy Impossible? Thoughts and Behaviour in Normative Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
FloydJ (2019) What’s the Point of Political Philosophy?Cambridge: Polity Books.
30.
FloydJ (2022) Political philosophy’s methodological moment and the rise of public political philosophy. Society59: 129–139.
31.
GalstonWA (2010) Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory9(4): 385–411.
32.
GeddesB (1990) How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis2: 131–150.
33.
GeertzC (1973) Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
34.
GerringJ (2001) Social Science Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
GerringJ (2004) What is a case study and what is it good for?American Political Science Review98(2): 341–354.
36.
GerringJ (2012) Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
GerringJYesnowitzJ (2006) A normative turn in political science?Polity38(1): 101–133.
38.
HamlinA (2017) Positive political theory. In: BlauA (ed.) Methods in Analytical Political Theory.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.192–216.
39.
HamlinAStemplowskaZ (2012) Theory, ideal theory and the theory of ideals. Political Studies Review10(1): 48–62.
40.
HempelC (1966) Philosophy of Natural Science. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
HerzogL (2012) Ideal and non-ideal theory and the problem of knowledge. Journal of Applied Philosophy29(4): 271–288.
42.
HerzogLZackaB (2019) Fieldwork in political theory: Five arguments for an ethnographic sensibility. British Journal of Political Science49(2): 763–784.
43.
JohnsonJ (2014) Models among the political theorists. American Journal of Political Science58(3): 547–560.
44.
KingGKeohaneROVerbaS (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
KřepelováT (2019) A methodological turn in political philosophy: Making political philosophy more scientific?Public Reason11(1): 77–92.
46.
LægaardS (2015) Multiculturalism and contextualism: How is context relevant for political theory?European Journal of Political Theory14(3): 259–276.
47.
LægaardS (2019) Contextualism in normative political theory and the problem of critical distance. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice22(4): 953–970.
48.
LevyJT (2016) There is no such thing as ideal theory. Social Philosophy and Policy33(1–2): 312–333.
49.
LevyJT (2018) Political libertarianism. In: HendersonT (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Classical Liberal Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.153–175.
50.
LijphartA (1968) The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
51.
LijphartA (2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
MahoneyJ (2012) The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research41(4): 570–597.
53.
MahoneyJGoertzG (2004) The possibility principle: Choosing negative cases in comparative research. American Political Science Review98(4): 653–669.
54.
MandalS (2018) Out of Shah Bano’s shadow: Muslim women’s rights and the Supreme Court’s triple talaq verdict. Indian Law Review2(1): 89–107.
55.
MansfieldHC (2010) Tocqueville: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
MillerD (2013) Justice for Earthlings: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
ModoodTThompsonS (2018) Revisiting contextualism in political theory: Putting principles into context. Res Publica24(3): 339–357.
58.
MoellendorfD (2014) The Moral Challenge of Dangerous Climate Change: Values, Poverty, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
NefdtRM (2021) Scientific models and political theory: The ideal theory debate revisited. Theoria87(6): 1585–1608.
60.
NussbaumMC (1999) Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
OkinSM (1998) Feminism and multiculturalism: Some tensions. Ethics108(4): 661–684.
62.
PerezN (2020) What are data good for anyway? A typology of usages of data in contemporary political theory. Social Theory and Practice46(2): 339–364.
63.
PerezNFoxJ (2018) Normative theorizing and political data: Toward a data-sensitive understanding of the separation between religion and state in political theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24(4): 485–509.
64.
RazJ (1986) The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
65.
RogowskiR (1995) The role of theory and anomaly in social-scientific inference. American Political Science Review89(2): 467–470.
66.
ScaveniusT (2019) Fact-sensitive political theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22(1): 5–17.
67.
SenA (2009) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
ShapiroI (2002) Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or what’s wrong with political science and what to do about it. Political Theory30(4): 596–619.
69.
SkocpolT (1979) States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Spinner-HalevJ (2001) Feminism, multiculturalism, oppression, and the state. Ethics112(1): 84–113.
71.
Spinner-HalevJ (2012) Enduring Injustice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
StolzenbergNM (1993) ‘He drew a circle that shut me out’: Assimilation, indoctrination, and the paradox of a liberal education. Harvard Law Review106(3): 581–667.
73.
WaldronJ (2016) Political Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
WalzerM (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
75.
WalzerM (1985) Interpretation and Social Criticism (The Tanner Lectures). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76.
WalzerM (1987) The Company of Critics: Social Criticism and Political Commitment in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.
