Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this article, we examine the impact of the democracy and human rights promotion efforts that are supposed to bolster positive attitudes among the public abroad and act as a tool to reach hearts and minds. Yet, we suggest that a salient in-group versus out-group dichotomy within a society could activate a reactive devaluation bias, and hence, conditions how individuals perceive and react to foreign actors and their policies depending on the source country and its links with in- and out-groups within the target state. By employing an original public opinion survey from Lebanon, we find that identities, and the level of attachment to the identity, affect individuals’ attitudes towards human rights and democracy promotion efforts. Our results offer important policy implications: practitioners should comprehensively reconsider the benefits of hearts and minds tools, as pre-existing attitudes are the main drivers of how these policies will be evaluated by the public abroad.

Keywords

democracy promotion foreign policy human rights identity Lebanon public opinion abroad

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aras

(2009) The Davutoğlu era in Turkish foreign policy. Insight Turkey 11(3): 127–142.

Bahout

(2014) Lebanon at the brink: The impact of the Syrian Civil War. Middle East brief no. 76. Waltham, MA: Crown Center for Middle East Studies.

Barzegar

(2008) Iran and Shia crescent: Myths and realities. Brown Journal of World Affairs 15: 87–100.

Bilgin

Bilgiç

(2011) Turkey’s ‘new’ foreign policy toward Eurasia. Eurasian Geography and Economics 52(2): 173–195.

Brewer

(2011) Identity and conflict. In: Bar-Tal

(ed.) Intergroup Conflicts and Their Resolution: A Social Psychological Perspective. New York: Psychology Press, pp.125–143.

Bush

Jamal

(2014) Anti-Americanism, authoritarian politics, and attitudes about women’s representation: Evidence from a survey experiment in Jordan. International Studies Quarterly 59(1): 34–35.

Carter

(1978) State of the union address. Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs.

Central Intelligence Agency (2012) World Factbook. McLean, VA: Central Intelligence Agency.

Chiozza

(2009) Anti-Americanism and the American World Order. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.

10.

Choi

Kim Ebner

James

(2020) Human rights institutionalization and US humanitarian military intervention. International Interactions 46(4): 606–635.

11.

Cingranelli

Pasquarello

(1985) Human rights practices and the distribution of U.S. foreign aid to Latin American countries. American Journal of Political Science 29: 539–563.

12.

Corstange

Marinov

(2012) Taking sides in other people’s elections: The polarizing effect of foreign intervention. American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 655–670.

13.

Coser

(1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Routledge.

14.

Davutoglu

(2000) Strategic Depth: Turkey’s International Position. Istanbul: Kure Yayinlari.

15.

Department of State (2006) Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2006. Report for The Committee on Foreign Relations US Senate and The Committee on Foreign Affairs US House of Representative, Volume II

16.

Dietrich

(2006) US human rights policy in the post-cold war era. Political Science Quarterly 121(2): 269–294.

17.

El Husseini

(2010) Hezbollah and the axis of refusal: Hamas, Iran and Syria. Third World Quarterly 31(5): 803–815.

18.

Gallarotti

Al-Filali

(2012) Saudi Arabia’s soft power. International Studies 49(3–4): 233–261.

19.

Gillis

(2016) Why Lebanon’s power struggle is fueled by a loss of Saudi support. Newsweek, 13 May. Available at: http://www.newsweek.com/lebanons-power-struggle-fueled-oss-saudi-support-505565l (accessed 4 August 2018).

20.

Goldsmith

Horiuchi

(2012) In search of soft power: Does foreign public opinion matter for US foreign policy? World Politics 64(3): 555–585.

21.

Goldsmith

Horiuchi

Inoguchi

(2005) American foreign policy and global opinion who supported the war in Afghanistan? Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(3): 408–429.

22.

Gonzalez

(2009) The Sunni-Shia Conflict: Understanding Sectarian Violence in the Middle East. Orange, CA: Nortia Press.

23.

Gramsci

(1992) Prison Notebooks (ed J

Buttigieg

). New York: Columbia University Press.

24.

Hewstone

Rubin

Willis

(2002) Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology 53: 575–604.

25.

Huddy

(2013) From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In: Huddy

Sears

Levy

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.737–773.

26.

Israyelyan

(2015) Turkey: From ‘zero problems’ to ‘precious loneliness’. Foreign Policy Journal, 19 June. Available at: https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2015/06/19/turkey-from-zero-problems-to-precious-loneliness/ (accessed 10 July 2017).

27.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 363–391.

28.

Kalin

(2011) Soft power and public diplomacy in Turkey. Perceptions 15(3): 5–23.

29.

Kirisci

(2005) A Friendlier Schengen visa system as a tool of ‘soft power’: The experience of Turkey. European Journal of Migration and Law 7(4): 343–367.

30.

Kunda

(1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–498.

31.

Lau

Redlawsk

(2001) Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951–971.

32.

Lee

Chagas

Novotny

(2010) Brazil and the framework convention on tobacco control: Global health diplomacy as soft power. PLoS Medicine 7(4): e1000232.

33.

Lodge

Taber

(2000) Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In: McCubbins

(eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.183–213.

34.

Maoz

Ward

Katz

, et al. (2002) Reactive devaluation of an ‘Israeli’ vs. ‘Palestinians’ peace proposal. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(4): 515–546.

35.

Morgenthau

Thompson

Clinton

(2005) Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. McGraw-Hill Education; 7th edition

36.

Nizameddin

(2008) Squaring the Middle East triangle in Lebanon: Russia and the Iran-Syria-Hezbollah Nexus. Slavonic and East European Review 86: 475–500.

37.

Norton

(2007) The role of Hezbollah in Lebanese domestic politics. The International Spectator 42(4): 475–491.

38.

Nye

(2004) Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly 119(2): 255–270.

39.

Obama

(2011) ‘A moment of opportunity’ speech 19 May 2011. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/19/remarks-president-barack-obama-prepared-delivery-moment-opportunity (accessed 11 February 2017).

40.

Oniş

(2011) Multiple faces of the ‘new’ Turkish foreign policy: Underlying dynamics and a critique. Insight Turkey 13(1): 47–65.

41.

ORSAM (2010) Basbakan Erdogan’in Beyrut Ziyareti Isıgında Turkiye-Lubnan Iliskileri. Ortadogu Analiz Cilt -Sayi 2: 24.

42.

Patrick

(2016) Saudi Arabian Foreign Policy: Conflict and Cooperation. London: I. B. Tauris.

43.

Popkin

(1991) The Reasoning Voter. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

44.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

, et al. (1994) Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67(4): 741–763.

45.

Ross

(1995) Reactive devaluation in negotiation and conflict resolution. In: Arrow

Mnookin

Ross

, et al. (eds) Barriers to Conflict Resolution. New York: WW Norton, pp.27–42.

46.

Ross

Stillinger

(1991) Barriers to conflict resolution. Negotiation Journal 7(4): 389–404.

47.

Ross

Ward

(1996) Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In: Brown

Reed

Turiel

(eds) Values and Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.103–135.

48.

Salamey

(2009) Failing consociationalism in Lebanon and integrative options. International Journal of Peace Studies 14(2): 83–105.

49.

Spears

(2011) Group identities: The social identity perspective. In: Schwartz

Luycks

Vignoles

(eds) Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Cham: Springer, pp.201–224.

50.

Tajfel

(1981) Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

51.

Tajfel

(1982) Social Identity Theory and Intergroup Relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

52.

Tajfel

Turner

(1979) Integrative Theory of Group Conflict in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

53.

Thompson

(2005) China’s soft power in Africa: From the ‘Beijing consensus’ to health diplomacy. China Brief 5. Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/chinas-soft-power-in-africa-from-the-beijing-consensus-to-health-diplomacy/#:~:text=While%20university%20scholarships%20promote%20closer,to%20be%20seen%20providing%20public (accessed 14 May 2021).

54.

Tokdemir

(2017) Winning hearts & minds (!) The dilemma of foreign aid in anti-Americanism. Journal of Peace Research 54(6): 819–832.

55.

Tokdemir

Akcinaroglu

Ozen

, et al. (2020) ‘Wars of others’: National cleavages and attitudes toward external conflicts. International Interactions 46(6): 953–986.

56.

Tsygankov

(2006) If not by tanks, then by banks? The role of soft power in Putin's foreign policy. Europe-Asia Studies 58(7): 1079–1099.

57.

US Department of State (1987) Dictionary of International Relations Terms. Washington, DC: US Department of State.

58.

White House (2006) National Security Strategy 2006. Washington, DC: White House. Available at: http://nssarchive.us/national-security-strategy-2006/ (accessed 12 March 2019).

59.

White House (2010) National Security Strategy 2010. Washington, DC: White House. Available at: http://nssarchive.us/national-security-strategy-2010/ (accessed 12 March 2019).

60.

White House (2014) National Security Strategy 2014. Washington, DC: White House. Available at: http://nssarchive.us/national-security-strategy-2014/ (accessed 12 March 2019).

61.

Zaharna

(2009) Mapping out a spectrum of public diplomacy initiatives: Information and relational communication frameworks. In: Snow

Taylor

(eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge, pp.86–100.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.43 MB

‘You are not my type’: The role of identity in evaluating democracy & human rights promotion

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material