AskimJ (2007) How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences73(3): 453–472.
2.
BarkerA (ed.) (1982) Quangos in Britain: Government and the Networks of Public Policy-making. London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
3.
ChristensenTLaegreidP (2008) NPM and beyond: Structure, culture and demography. International Review of Administrative Sciences74(1): 7–23.
4.
DanSPollittC (2013) Searching for impacts in performance-oriented management reform. Public Performance and Management Review37(1): 7–32.
5.
DeaconDMonkW (2000) Executive stressed: News reporting of quangos in Britain. International Journal of Press/Politics5(3): 45–66.
6.
FlindersMDommettKTonkissK (2014) Bonfires and barbecues: Coalition governance and the politics of quango reform. Contemporary British History28(1): 56–80.
7.
HinnaADe NitoEMangiaG (2010) Board of directors within public organisations: A literature review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics5(3): 131–156.
8.
JamesO (2003) The Executive Agency Revolution in Whitehall: Public Interest Versus Bureaushaping Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
9.
KickertWJM (2001) Public management of hybrid organizations: Governance of quasi-autonomous quangos. International Public Management Journal4: 135–150.
10.
KoprićIKovačPMusaA (2012) Agencies in three South Eastern European Countries: Politics, expertise and law. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy5(2): 17–44.
11.
MairPKopeckyPSpirovaM (eds) (2012) Party Patronage and Party Government: Public Appointments and Political Control in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
MajoneG (2001) Two logics of delegation: Agency and fiduciary relations in EU governance. European Union Politics2(1): 103–122.
13.
OvermanS (2016) Great expectations of autonomous agencies. PhD Dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
14.
PetersBG (2018) The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration, 7th edn.New York: Routledge.
15.
PollittC (2005) Ministries and agencies: Steering, meddling, neglect and dependency. In: PainterMPierreJ (eds) Challenges to State Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.112–136.
16.
PollittCBouckaertG (2017) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – Into the Age of Austerity, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
PollittCTalbotCCaulfieldJ, et al. (2004) Agencies: How Governments Do Things through Semi-autonomous Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
18.
SchillemansT (2008) Accountability in the Shadow of Hierarchy: The Horizontal Accountability of Agencies. Public Organization Review8: 175–194.
19.
TonkissKvan ThielSVerhoestK, et al. (2015) How are arm’s length relationships instrumentalised in Europe: A three country comparison. Paper to be presented at MPSA conference, Chicago, IL, 16–19 April.
20.
Van DoorenWBouckaertGHalliganJ (2015) Performance Management in the Public Sector, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
21.
Van ThielS (2001) Quangos: Trends, Causes and Consequences. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
22.
Van ThielSLeeuwFL (2002) The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review25(3): 267–281.
23.
Van ThielS (2011) The empty nest syndrome: Dutch ministries after the separation of policy and administration. In: Van de WalleSGroeneveldSM (eds) New Steering Concepts in Public Management. Bingly: Emerald, pp.25–40.
24.
Van ThielS (2012) Comparing agencies across countries. In: VerhoestKVan ThielSBouckaertG, et al. (eds) Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.18–26.
25.
Van ThielS (2015) Boards of public sector organizations: A typology with Dutch illustrations. International Journal of Public Sector Management28(4/5): 322–334.
26.
VerhoestKVan ThielSBouckaertG, et al. (eds) (2012) Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
27.
VerschuereB (2009) The role of public agencies in the policy making process: Rhetoric versus reality. Public Policy and Administration24(1): 22–46.
28.
VibertF (2007) The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
WilksS (2007) Boardization and corporate governance in the UK as a response to depoliticization and failing accountability. Public Policy and Administration22(4): 443–460.