FioretosO (2011) Historical institutionalism in international relations. International Organization65(2): 367–399.
2.
FioretosO (ed.) (2017) International Politics and Institutions in Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
FioretosOFalletiTSheingateA (eds) (2016) Historical institutionalism in political science. In: FioretosOFalletiTSheingateA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–33.
4.
GoldsteinJGulottyR (2017) The limits of institutional reform in the United States and the global trade regime. In: FioretosO (ed.) International Politics and Institutions in Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.196–213.
5.
GreifALaitinDD (2004) A theory of endogenous institutional change. American Political Science Review98(4): 633–652.
HallPATaylorRC (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies44(5): 936–957.
8.
IkenberryGJ (1988a) Conclusion: An institutional approach to American foreign economic policy. International Organization42(1): 219–243.
9.
IkenberryGJ (1988b) Reasons of State: Oil Politics and the Capacities of American Government. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
IkenberryGJ (1992) A world economy restored: Expert consensus and the Anglo-American postwar settlement. International Organization46(1): 289–321.
11.
IkenberryGJ (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
IkenberryGJ (2008) The rise of China and the future of the West: Can the liberal system survive?Foreign Affairs87: 23–37.
13.
IkenberryGJ (2009) Liberal internationalism 3.0: America and the dilemmas of liberal world order. Perspectives on Politics7(1): 71–87.
14.
IkenberryGJ (2011) Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
IkenberryGJ (2017) The rise, character, and evolution of international order. In: FioretosO (ed.) International Politics and Institutions in Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.59–75.
16.
IkenberryGJ (2018) Reflections on After Victory. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Epub ahead of print 10 August. DOI: 10.1177/1369148118791402.
17.
IkenberryGJSkocpolT (1987) Expanding social benefits: The role of social security. Political Science Quarterly102(3): 389–416.
KeohaneRO (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
KeohaneRO (1993) Institutional theory and the realist challenge after the cold war. In: BaldwinD (ed.) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.269–300.
21.
MahoneyJ (2000) Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society29(4): 507–548.
22.
MarchJGOlsenJP (1983) The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review78(3): 734–749.
23.
MearsheimerJJ (1990) Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security15(1): 5–56.
24.
PatrickS (2017) The Sovereignty Wars: Reconciling America with the World. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
25.
PetersonJ (2018) Present at the destruction? The liberal order in the Trump era. International Spectator53(1): 28–44.
RodrikD (2018) Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy1(1–2): 12–33.
28.
SkocpolTIkenberryGJ (1983) The political formation of the American welfare state in historical and comparative perspective. Comparative Social Research6(1): 5–87.
29.
SnidalD (1985) The limits of hegemonic stability theory. International Organization39(4): 579–614.
30.
SpiroP (2000) The new sovereigntists: American exceptionalism and its false prophets. Foreign Affairs79(6): 9–15.
31.
ZürnM (2018) A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.