How should prime ministerial and party leadership be understood and assessed? One leading approach posits that we should assess them in terms of whether they achieve statecraft, that is, winning and maintain office in government. This article supplements and then assesses that theory by drawing from Pawson and Tilley’s concept of the realistic interview, in which practitioners are deployed as co-researchers to assess and revise theory. Unprecedented interviews with British party leaders were therefore undertaken. The article provides new empirical support for the framework because many of the key generative mechanisms identified within the neo-statecraft model were present in an analysis of the interviews. The interviews also allowed the limitations of the model to be demarcated. Statecraft focuses purely on cunning leadership where the aim is to maximise power and influence. This approach differs from leadership by conscience where the aim is to achieve normative goals.
ArcherM (1982) Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. British Journal of Sociology33: 455–483.
2.
ArcherM (1995) Realist Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AshdownP (2010) A Fortunate Life: The Autobiography of Paddy Ashdown. London: Aurum.
4.
BennisterMHartPWorthyB (2015) Assessing the authority of political office-holders: the leadership capital index. West European Politics38(3): 417–440.
5.
BerryJM (2003) Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. PS: Political Science and Politics35(4): 679–682.
6.
BhaskarR (2008) A Realist Theory of Science. New York: Taylor & Francis.
7.
BlairT (2010) A Journey. London: Hutchinson.
8.
BlondelJ (1987) Political Leadership: Towards a General Analysis. London: SAGE.
9.
BraunVClarkeV (2012) Thematic analysis. In: CooperH (ed.) The Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, p. 57–71.
10.
BullerJJamesTS (2012) Statecraft and the assessment of national political leaders: the case of new labour and Tony Blair. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations14(4): 534–555.
11.
BulpittJ (1983) Territory and Power in the United Kingdom. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
12.
BulpittJ (1986) The discipline of the new democracy: Mrs. Thatcher’s domestic statecraft. Political Studies34(1): 19–39.
13.
BulpittJ (1988) Rational politicians and conservative statecraft in the open polity. In: BrydP (ed.) British Foreign Policy under Thatcher. Deddington: Philip Allan, pp.180–205.
BulpittJ (1996) Historical politics: leaders, statecraft and regime in Britain at the accession of Elizabeth II. In: Hampster-MonkIStaynerJ (eds) Contemporary Political Studies, vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.1093–1106.
16.
ByrneCTheakstonK (2018) Understanding the power of the prime minister: Structure and agency in models of prime ministerial power. British Politics. Epub ahead of print 26March. DOI: 10.1057/s41293-018-0087-7.
17.
ByrneCRandallNTheakstonK (2017) Evaluating British prime ministerial performance: David Cameron’s premiership in political time. British Journal of Politics and International Relations19(1): 202–220.
18.
ClarkeCJamesTS (2015) British Labour Leaders. London: Biteback.
19.
ClarkeCJamesTSBaleTet al. (2015) British Conservative Leaders. London: Biteback.
20.
ElgieR (1995) Political Leadership in Liberal Democracies. Basingstoke: Macmillan Houndmills.
21.
FoleyM (2013) Political Leadership: Themes, Contexts, and Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
GreensteinFI (2009) The Presidential Difference: Leadership Style from FDR to Barack Obama, 3rd edn.Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
23.
GriffithsS (2016) Statecraft as a straightjacket: A reply to Gamble and Hayton. Parliamentary Affairs69(3): 735–743.
24.
HagueW (2005) William Pitt the Younger: A Biographer. London: Harper Press.
25.
HagueW (2012) William Wilberforce: The Life of the Great Anti-slave Trade Campaigner. London: Harper Press.
26.
HayC (2002) Political Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
HelmsL (2012) Comparative Political Leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
HeppellT (2014) The Tories: From Winston Churchill to David Cameron. London: Bloomsbury.
29.
JamesTS (2012) Elite Statecraft and Election Administration: Bending the Rules of the Game. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
JamesTS (2016) Neo-statecraft, historical institutionalism and institutional change. Government and Opposition51(1): 84–110.
31.
JessopB (2001) Institutional re(turns) and the strategic–relational approach. Environment and Planning A33: 1213–1235.
32.
JessopB (2005) Critical realism and the strategic-relational approach. New Formations56: 40–53.
33.
JosephJWightC (2010) Scientific Realism and International Relations:. Springer.
34.
KaneJPatapanH (2014) Good democratic leadership. In: KaneJPatapanH (eds) Good Democratic Leadership: On Prudence and Judgment in Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–14.
35.
KingGKeohaneRVerbaS (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
McEvoyJ (2006) Elite interviewing in a divided society: Lessons from Northern Ireland. Politics26(3): 184–191.
37.
McKennaD (2015) UK Local Government and Public Participation: A Discourse on Incompatibility. PhD Thesis, Swansea University.
38.
MillerKDTsangEWK (2011) Testing management theories: Critical realist philosophy and research methods. Strategic Management Journal32(2): 139–158.
RhodesRAW (1988) Beyond Westminister and Whitehall. London: Unwin Hyman.
41.
RhodesRAWTiernanA (2013) From core executives to court politics: From a bucket of rice to a bowl of jelly. Paper presented at the 63rd Political Studies Annual Conference, Cardiff, 25–27March.
42.
RhodesRAWHartP (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
RichardsD (1996) Elite interviewing: Approaches and pitfalls. Politics16(3): 199–204.
44.
Royal Holloway Group PR3710 (2015) British MPs on British PMs: Parliamentary evaluations of prime ministerial success. Politics35(2): 111–127.
45.
SayerA (2010) Method in Social Sciences, 2nd edn.Abingdon: Routledge.
46.
SmithSPJohnstonRB (2014) How critical realism clarifies validity issues in information systems theory-testing research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems26(1): 5–28.
