This article offers a theoretical and empirical investigation of marginality of actors and ideas in democratic systems. We do so with respect to the extensive public debate that ensued from the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attacks of January 2015. Using content analytical data retrieved from The Guardian, we assess the degree and nature of marginality as indicated by the presence of different types of intervention in the public debate. Our findings show that women have very limited visibility; religious and minority groups—particularly Muslims—are sidestepped; and actors challenging the dominant securitisation narrative are systematically neglected by those holding dominant positions. We argue for greater attention to the problem of marginality and introduce the Maximin principle of marginality as a means to address this issue in analyses of democratic systems.
BächtigerANiemeyerSEbloMSteenbergenMRSteinerJ (2010) Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities. Journal of Political Philosophy18(1): 32–63.
2.
BakerPGabrielatosCMceneryT (2013) Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics34: 255–278.
3.
Barnard-WillsD (2011) UK news media discourses of surveillance. The Sociological Quarterly52: 548–567.
4.
BerkhoutJRuedinDVan Der BrugWet al. (2015) Research design. In: Van Der BrugWD’amatoGReudinDet al. (eds) The Politicisation of Migration. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 19–31.
BillsonJM (1988) No owner of soil: The concept of marginality revisited on its sixtieth birthday. International Review of Modern Sociology18: 183–204.
7.
BleichEStonebrakerHNisarHet al. (2015) Media portrayals of minorities: Muslims in British newspaper headlines, 2001–2012. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41: 942–962.
8.
BohmanJ (2007) Political communication and the epistemic value of diversity: Deliberation and legitimation in media societies. Communication Theory17: 348–355.
9.
BoswellJ (2015) Toxic narratives in the deliberative system: How the ghost of Nanny stalks the obesity debate. Policy Studies36: 314–328.
10.
BrownKE (2010) Contesting the securitization of British Muslims: Citizenship and resistance. Interventions12: 171–182.
11.
Castelli GattinaraP (2016) The Politics of Migration in Italy. London: Routledge.
12.
Castelli GattinaraP (2017) Framing exclusion in the public sphere: Far-right mobilisation and the debate on Charlie Hebdo in Italy. South European Society and Politics22: 345–364.
13.
ChambersS (2009) Rhetoric and the public sphere has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy?Political Theory37: 323–350.
14.
CinalliMGiugniM (2013a) Political opportunities, citizenship models and political claim-making over Islam. Ethnicities13: 147–164.
15.
CinalliMGiugniMG (2013b) Public discourses about Muslims and Islam in Europe. Ethnicities13: 131–146.
16.
CinalliMO’FlynnI (2014) Public deliberation, network analysis and the political integration of Muslims in Britain. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations16: 428–451.
17.
CuratoNOngJC (2015) Inclusion as deliberative agency the selective representation of poor women in debates and documentaries about reproductive health. Television & New Media16: 576–594.
18.
DavidsonSElstubSJohnsRet al. (2016) Rating the debates: The 2010 UK party leaders’ debates and political communication in the deliberative system. British Politics12: 183–208.
19.
Della PortaD (2016) Discursive critical juncture: Debating the Charlie Hebdo attacks. In: Proceedings of the Charlie Hebdo critical juncture: European public spheres before and after the Paris attacks, conference, Florence, 20–21 October.
20.
DolezalMHelblingMHutterS (2010) Debating Islam in Austria, Germany and Switzerland: Ethnic citizenship, church–state relations and right-wing populism. West European Politics33: 171–190.
DryzekJS (1990) Discursive democracy: politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge, UK; New York, Cambridge University Press.
23.
DryzekJS (2009) Democratization as deliberative capacity building. Comparative Political Studies42: 1379–1402.
24.
DryzekJS (2010) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
DryzekJS (2011) Global democratization: Soup, society, or system?Ethics & International Affairs25: 211–234.
26.
EastonD (1953) Political System. New York: Knopf.
27.
ElstubSErcanSMendonçaRF (2016) The Fourth Generation of Deliberative Democracy. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
28.
FassinD (2015) In the name of the republic: Untimely meditations on the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attack. Anthropology Today31: 3–7.
29.
FelicettiA (2016) Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements: Transition Initiatives in the Public Sphere. Rowman & Littlefield International.
30.
FerreeMM (2002) Shaping Abortion Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
FraserN (1990) Rethinking the public sphere. Social Text25–26: 56–80.
32.
FraserN (2014) Transnationalizing the Public Sphere. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
33.
FungA (2013) The principle of affected interests: An interpretation and defense. In: SmithRNagelJH (eds) Representation: Elections and beyond. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 236–268.
HabermasJ (2006) Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? the impact of normative theory on empirical research1. Communication Theory16: 411–426.
36.
HeathADemirevaN (2014) Has multiculturalism failed in Britain?Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 161–180.
37.
HertzbergBR (2015) Chains of persuasion in the deliberative system: Addressing the pragmatics of religious inclusion. The Journal of Politics77: 889–900.
38.
HowellLSingerJB (2017) Pushy or a princess? Women experts and British broadcast news. Journalism Practice11: 1062–1078.
39.
HussainYBagguleyP (2012) Securitized citizens: Islamophobia, racism and the 7/7 London bombings. The Sociological Review60: 715–734.
40.
HutterS (2014a) Protest event analysis and its offspring. In: della PortaD (ed.) Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 335–367.
41.
HutterS (2014b) Protesting Culture and Economics in Western Europe: New Cleavages in Left and Right Politics. Minneapolis, MN; London: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
HuysmansJ (2006) The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.
43.
InglehartRNorrisP (2000) The developmental theory of the gender gap: Women’s and men’s voting behavior in global perspective. International Political Science Review21: 441–463.
44.
JonesDBaumgartnerF (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.
45.
KarlM (1995) Women and Empowerment: Participation and Decision Making. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
46.
KingdonJW (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
47.
KittilsonMCSchwindt-BayerLA (2012) The Gendered Effects of Electoral Institutions: Political Engagement and Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
KoopmansR (2004) Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society33: 367–391.
49.
KoopmansRStathamP (1999) Political claims analysis. Mobilization4(2): 203–221.
50.
KoopmansRStathamP (2010) The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
KoopmansRStathamPGiugniMet al. (2005) Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Minneapolis, MN; London: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
KriesiHGrandeEDolezalMet al. (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
KuyperJW (2016) Systemic representation: Democracy, deliberation, and nonelectoral representatives. American Political Science Review110: 308–324.
54.
LindekildeLMouritsenPZapata- BarreroR (2009) The Muhammad Cartoons Controversy in Comparative Perspective. London: SAGE.
55.
LischkaJA (2017) Explicit terror prevention versus vague civil liberty: How the UK broadcasting news (de) legitimatise online mass surveillance since Edward Snowden’s revelations. Information, Communication & Society20: 665–682.
56.
McCombsM (2004) Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
57.
MachhillMBeilerMFischerC (2006) Europe-topics in Europe’s media. European Journal of Communication21: 57–88.
58.
ManinB (1987) On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory15: 338–368.
59.
MansbridgeJJBohmanJChambersSet al. (2012) A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In: ParkinsonJMansbridgeJ (eds) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.
60.
MeerNModoodT (2009) The multicultural state we’re in: Muslims, ‘multiculture’ and the ‘civic re-balancing’ of British multiculturalism. Political Studies57: 473–497.
61.
MooreKMasonPLewisJMW (2008) Images of Islam in the UK: The representation of British Muslims in the national print news media 2000–2008. Available at: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/53005/
62.
NäsströmS (2011) The challenge of the all-affected principle. Political Studies59: 116–134.
63.
OwenDSmithG (2015) Survey article: Deliberation, democracy, and the systemic turn. Journal of Political Philosophy23: 213–234.
64.
PageBI (1996) Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
ParkinsonJ (2006a) Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
ParkinsonJ (2006b) Rickety bridges: Using the media in deliberative democracy. British Journal of Political Science36: 175–183.
67.
ParkinsonJ (2012) Democratizing deliberative systems. In: ParkinsonJMansbridgeJ (eds) Deliberative Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–172.
68.
ParkinsonJMansbridgeJ (eds) (2012) Deliberative Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69.
PelletierPDrozda-SenkowskaE (2016) The Charlie Hebdo terror attack in Paris: Follow-up of French citizens’ terrorist threat perception and its aftermath. International Review of Social Psychology29: 85–98.
70.
PhillipsA (2003) Recognition and the Struggle for Political Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
PageB (1996) I. Who deliberates?: Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72.
PooleE (2011) Change and continuity in the representation of British Muslims before and after 9/11: The UK context. Global Media Journal4: 49–62.
73.
RavallionM (2015) The Economics of Poverty: History, Measurement, and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74.
RawlsJ (1997) The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review64: 765–807.
75.
RichardsonJE (2004) (Mis) Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
76.
RichardsonJE (2009) ‘Get shot of the lot of them’: Election reporting of Muslims in British newspapers. Patterns of Prejudice43: 355–377.
77.
RiedyCKentJ (2015) Australian climate action groups in the deliberative system. Environmental Politics24: 363–381.
78.
RudyRMPopovaLLinzDG (2011) Contributions to the content analysis of gender roles: An introduction to a special issue. Sex Roles64: 151–159.
79.
SaeedA (2007) Media, racism and Islamophobia: The representation of Islam and Muslims in the media. Sociology Compass1: 443–462.
80.
SandersLM (1997) Against deliberation. Political Theory25: 347–376.
81.
SnidermanPPetersenMBSlothuusRet al. (2014) Paradoxes of Liberal Democracy: Islam, Western Europe, and the Danish Cartoon Crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82.
TitleyGFreedmanDKhiabanyGet al. (eds) (2017) After Charlie Hebdo: Terror, Racism and Free Speech. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
83.
WarrenME (2017) A problem-based approach to democratic theory. American Political Science Review111: 39–53.
84.
WesslerH (2008) Investigating deliberativeness comparatively. Political Communication25: 1–22.
85.
WilliamsM (2000) The uneasy alliance of group representation and deliberative democracy. In: KymlickaWNormanW (eds) Citizenship in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 124–154.
86.
YoungIM (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
