A return of the repressed: Symptom,fantasy and campaigns for justice for Guantánamo detainees post-2010

Abstract

The article develops a theory of the symptom and argues for a symptomal analysis of contemporary political situations, in particularly those that resonate with exception. By focusing on Guantánamo detainees and habeas corpus petitions, the article analyses the language of law and public attitude towards the closure of the facility. The article shows how the legal situation of detainees post-2010 is determined not by the binary distinctions (identity/difference, normal/exceptional) but by attempts to eliminate these binaries and bring detainees under the normal rule of law. The attempts to bring the detainees under the normal rule of law are social fantasies, that is different narratives, which determine how we understand and engage with the law in Guantanamo. Fantasies are always fragmented at their core, and Al-Adahi case with the lack of public response to it reveals this fissure in the form of ‘the return of the repressed’. In doing so, the article shows how the overcoming of the exception is a fantasy of modern politics and points to the moment the repressed truth is revealed.

Keywords

Guantánamo Jacques Lacan law public opinion social fantasy symptom US

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agamben

(2005) State of Exception. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.

Al-Adahi v. Obama (2010) Supreme Court of the United States. December.

Aradau

(2007) Law transformed: Guantánamo and the ‘other’ exception. Third World Quarterly 28(3): 489–501.

Aradau

Huysmans

(2014) Critical methods in International Relations: The politics of techniques, devices and acts. European Journal of International Relations 20(3): 596–619.

Blakeley

(2013) Human rights, state wrongs, and social change: The theory and practice of emancipation. Review of International Studies 39(3): 599–613.

Bosteels

(2005) The obscure subject: Sovereignty and geopolitics in Carl Schmitt’s the nomos of the earth. The South Atlantic Quarterly 104(1): 295–305.

Boumediene v. Bush (2008) Supreme Court of the United States. 12 June.

Bowman

Rugg

(2011) Attitudes towards the war on terror and the war in Afghanistan: A 10 years review. AEI Public Opinion Studies. Available at: http://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Attitudes-Towards-the-War-on-Terror-and-the-War-in-Afghanistan-August-2011.pdf (accessed 10 December 2016).

Braden v. 30th Juridical Circuit Court (1973).

10.

CAGE (n.d.) Guantánamo. Available at: https://cage.ngo/guantanamo/ (accessed 10 December 2016).

11.

CEJIL (2013) 25 NGOs Urge Obama to close Guantánamo. Available at: https://www.cejil.org/en/25-ngos-urge-obama-close-guantanamo (accessed 10 December 2016).

12.

Center for Constitutional Rights (n.d.) Guantánamo. Available at: https://ccrjustice.org/home/what-we-do/issues/guantanamo# (accessed 10 December 2016).

13.

Cheung-Blunden

(2016) Anxiety as a barrier to information processing in the event of a cyberattack. Political Psychology 37(3): 387–400.

14.

Close Guantánamo (2015) One week in Gitmo. Available at: http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/blog/one-week-gitmo (accessed 10 December 2016).

15.

Denbeaux

Hafetz

(2012) No hearing Habeas: D.C. circuit restricts meaningful review. Center for Policy and Research at Seton Hall University School of Law. Available at: http://law.shu.edu/ProgramsCenters/PublicIntGovServ/policyresearch/upload/hearing-habeas.pdf (accessed 10 December 2016).

16.

Denniston

(2010) Sweeping U.S. victory on detainees. In: SCOTUSblog: Supreme Court of the United States Blog, 13 July. Available at: http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/07/sweeping-us-victory-on-detainees/ (accessed 15 July 2017).

17.

Epstein

(2013) Theorizing agency in Hobbes’s wake: The rational actor, the self or the speaking subject? International Organization 67(2): 287–361.

18.

Fletcher

(2004) Black hole in Guantánamo Bay. Journal of International Criminal Justice 2(1): 121–132.

19.

Foster

(2008) Author’s interview with the founder of International Justice Network, human rights organization. New York, 8 October 2008.

20.

Foucault

(2002) Governmentality. In: Rabinow

(ed.) The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984. London: Penguin Books, pp.201–222.

21.

Gregory

(2006) The black flag: Guantánamo bay and the space of exception. Geografiska Annaler B 88(4): 405–427.

22.

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006) Supreme Court of the United States. 29 June.

23.

Holsti

(2011) Exceptionalism in American foreign policy: Is it exceptional? European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 381–404.

24.

Human Rights First (n.d.) Close Guantánamo. Available at: http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/campaigns/close-guantanamo (accessed 10 December 2016).

25.

Human Rights Watch (n.d.) Guantánamo. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/topic/terrorism-counterterrorism/guantanamo (accessed 10 December 2016).

26.

Hussain

(2003) The Jurisprudence of Emergency: Colonialism and the Rule of Law. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

27.

Huysmans

(2008) The jargon of exception: On Schmitt, Agamben and the absence of political society. International Political Sociology 2(2): 165–183.

28.

Inayatullah

(2011) Autobiographical International Relations. London: Routledge.

29.

Iyer

Hornsey

Vanman

et al . (2015) Fight and fight: Evidence of aggressive capitulations in the face of fear messages from terrorists. Political Psychology 36(6): 631–648.

30.

Johns

(2005) Guantánamo bay and the annihilation of the exception. European Journal of International Law 16(4): 613–635.

31.

Kadidal

Hussain

(2016) CCR staff live from Gitmo. Center for Constitutional Rights. Available at: https://ccrjustice.org/home/blog/2016/11/04/ccr-staff-live-gitmo# (accessed 10 December 2016).

32.

Lacan

(1977) Seminar XI: Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. New York: Karnac Books.

33.

Lacan

(1990) Television: A Challenge to the Psychoanalytic Establishment. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

34.

Lacan

(1997) Seminar III: Psychosis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

35.

Lacan

(1999) Seminar XX: Encore. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

36.

Lacan

(2006) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

37.

Lacan

(2007) Seminar XVII: The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

38.

Lacan

(2014) Seminar X: Anxiety. Cambridge: Polity Press.

39.

Leopold

(2012) Latif autopsy report calls Gitmo death a suicide: Questions remain. Truthout. Available at: http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/12967-latif-autopsy-report-calls-gitmo-death-a-suicide-mystery-endures (accessed 1 October 2016).

40.

Mandelbaum

(2016) State, nation, society: The congruency fantasy and in/security of the body-national/social. Critical Studies on Security 4(2): 187–201.

41.

Martin

(2016) Capturing desire: Rhetorical strategies and the affectivity of discourse. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18(1): 143–160.

42.

Miller

J-A

(1991) Reflections on the Formal Envelope of the Symptom. Lacanian Ink 4: 13–21.

43.

Miller

J-A

(2006 [1966]) Suture: Elements of the logic of the signifier. The Symptom: Online journal for Lacan.com. Available at: http://www.lacan.com/symptom8_articles/miller8.html

44.

Moore

(2015) Americans still want to keep Guantánamo open. YouGov US. 21 January. Available at: https://today.yougov.com/news/2015/01/21/guantanamo/ (accessed 4 November 2016).

45.

Motha

(2006) Guantánamo bay, abandoned being and the constitution of jurisdiction. In: McVeigh

(ed.) Jurisprudence of Jurisdiction. London: UCL Press, pp.63–83.

46.

Neal

(2006) Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards the archaeology of exception. Security Dialogue 37(1): 31–46.

47.

Neal

(2012) Normalization and legislative exceptionalism: Counterterrorist lawmaking and the changing times of security emergencies. International Political Sociology 6(3): 260–276.

48.

Obama v. Latif (2011) United States Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia. 14 October.

49.

Political Tracker (2010) Available at: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/29/cnn-poll-big-shift-on-closing-of-guantanamo-bay-facility/ (accessed 15 November 2016).

50.

Presidential Military Order (2001) Detention, treatment, and trial of certain non-citizens in the war against terrorism. 13 November . Available at: https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/mo-111301.htm (accessed 31 July 2017).

51.

Ralph

(2009) The laws of war and the state of American exception. Review of International Studies 35(3): 631–649.

52.

Rasch

(2003) Human rights as geopolitics: Carl Schmitt and the legal form of American supremacy. Cultural Critique 54: 120–147.

53.

Rasmussen Reports (2015) Voters strongly suspect released Gitmo prisoners will attack U.S. Rasmussen Reports, 19 January. Available at: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/january_2015/voters_strongly_suspect_released_gitmo_prisoners_will_attack_u_s (accessed 4 November 2016).

54.

Rasul v. Bush (2004) Supreme Court of the United States. 29 June.

55.

Reid-Henry

(2007) Exceptional sovereignty? Guantánamo bay and the re-colonial present. Antipode 39(4): 627–648.

56.

Reprieve (n.d.) Guantánamo bay. Available at: http://www.reprieve.org.uk/topic/guantanamo-bay/ (accessed 10 December 2016).

57.

Rumsfeld

(2002) United States Defense Secretary, speech on 27 January 2002. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/americas/01/27/rumsfeld.guantanamo/ (accessed 1 July 2017).

58.

Salter

Mutlu

(2012) Research Methods in Critical Security Studies. London: Routledge.

59.

Savage

(2012) Investigation said to question how detainees died of overdose. The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/29/us/yemeni-detainee-at-guantanamo-died-of-overdose.html?_r=0 (accessed 15 November 2016).

60.

Scheuerman

(1994) Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

61.

Scott

Ambler

(2007) Does legality really matter? Accounting for the decline of the US foreign policy legitimacy following the 2003 invasion of Iraq. European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 67–87.

62.

Shepherd

(2012) Critical Approaches to Security. London: Routledge.

63.

Stafford-Smith

(2007) Bad Men: Guantánamo Bay and the Secret Prison. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

64.

Steyn

(2004) Guantánamo bay: The legal black hole. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 53(1): 1–15.

65.

Thórisdóttir

Jost

(2011) Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effects of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology 32(5): 785–811.

66.

Tomšič

Zevnik

(2015) Introduction. In: Tomšič

Zevnik

(eds) Jacques Lacan between Psychoanalysis and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.1–12.

67.

United Nations (UN) (2006) Situation of detainees at Guantanamo bay. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/16_02_06_un_guantanamo.pdf (accessed 25 July 2017).

68.

United States Congress (2006) US Military Commissions Act. 17 October. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/PL-109-366.pdf (accessed 5 August 2017).

69.

Valentino

Hutchings

Banks

et al . (2008) Is a worried citizen and good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology 29(2): 247–273.

70.

Wagner

(2013) Obama’s failed promise to close Gitmo: A timeline. The Atlantic. 28 January. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/01/obama-closing-guantanamo-timeline/318980/ (accessed 17 December 2016).

71.

Wagstaff

(2014) Terror Detention and the Rule of Law: US and UK Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

72.

Walker

RBJ

(1992) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

73.

Weaver

(2007) Report from Guantánamo. Notre Dame Lawyer: 6–9. Available at: http://www3.nd.edu/~ndlaw/alumni/ndlawyer/spring07/guantanamo.pdf (accessed 10 December 2016).

74.

Wilber

(2009) The detention charges are far off for many. The Washington Post, 31 July. Available at: http://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-washington-post/20090731/281621006342187 (accessed 5 August 2017).

75.

Wolfowitz

(2004) Memorandum for the secretary of the navy: Order establishing combatant status review tribunals. US Department of Defence, 7 July.

76.

Wood

(2008) Report from Guantánamo: A need for prosecutorial discretion. JURIST. 10 October. Available at: http://www.jurist.org/hotline/2008/10/report-from-guantanamo-need-for.php (accessed 10 December 2016).

77.

f Worthington

(2012) The supreme court abandons the Guantánamo prisoners. Available at: http://www.cageprisoners.com (accessed 4 December 2016).

78.

Worthington

(2017) Prisoners: Who is still held? Close Guantánamo. Available at: http://www.closeguantanamo.org/Prisoners (accessed 31 July 2017).

79.

YouGov (2011) Guantánamo: Keep it open but try the prisoners. YouGov US. Available at: https://today.yougov.com/news/2011/01/26/guantanamo-keep-it-open-try-prisoners/ (accessed 2 December 2016).

80.

Zevnik

(2011) Becoming-animal, becoming-hetainee: Encountering human rights discourse in guantánamo. Law & Critique 22(2): 155–169.

81.

Zevnik

(2016) Lacan, Deleuze and World Politics: Rethinking the Ontology of the Political Aubject. London: Routledge.

82.

Zevnik

(2017) Post-racial society as social fantasy: Black communities trapped between racism and a struggle for political recognition. Political Psychology 38(4): 621–635.

83.

Žižek

(1999) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso Books.

84.

Žižek

(2008) Enjoy Your Symptom. London: Routledge.

85.

Žižek

(2014) The Most Sublime Hysteric: Hegel with Lacan. Cambridge: Polity Press.