Explaining electoral fraud in an advanced democracy: Fraud vulnerabilities,opportunities and facilitating mechanisms in British elections

Abstract

Explanatory theories of electoral fraud are usually developed for new and failing democracies. However, while rarer, electoral fraud does happen in advanced democracies. Because data on fraud in advanced democracies are scarce, single instances of fraud are studied in isolation and offer very little generalisability. This study uses a unique comparative dataset of 35 in-depth, semi-structured interviews from eight locations, only half of which experienced allegations of fraud. We show that theories of why and how fraud happens in developing democracies can be extended to an advanced democracy. We also provide a detailed description of two micro-mechanisms, which facilitate fraud taking place and thus provide a causal link between the structural vulnerability to fraud and the direct opportunities for fraud to take place. The case study of Britain focuses mostly on the biraderi structures within the British South Asian communities, but we offer ways in which these structures generalise more broadly.

Keywords

biraderi electoral campaigning electoral fraud political parties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akhtar

(2013) British Muslim Politics: Examining Pakistani Biraderi Networks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Alvarez

Hall

(2008) Electronic Elections: The Perils and Promises of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Alvarez

Hall

Hyde

(2008) Introduction. In: Alvarez

Hall

Hyde

(eds) Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, pp.1–18.

Beaulieu

(2016) Electronic voting and perceptions of electoral fraud and fairness. Journal of Experimental Political Science 3(1): 18–31.

Beber

Scacco

(2012) What the numbers say: A digit-based test for election fraud. Political Analysis 20(2): 211–234.

Birch

Watt

(2004) Remote electronic voting: Free, fair and secret? Political Quarterly 75(1): 60–72.

Cabinet Office (2016) A Democracy That Works for Everyone: A Clear and Secure Democracy: Government Responses to Sir Eric Pickles’ Review of Electoral Fraud. London: Cabinet Office.

Charsley

Van

Benson

(2012) Marriage-related migration to the UK. International Migration Review 46(4): 861–890.

Clark

(2015) Public administration and the integrity of the electoral process in British elections. Public Administration 93(1): 86–102.

10.

Clark

(2016) Identifying the determinants of electoral integrity and administration in advanced democracies: The case of Britain. European Political Science Review. Epub ahead of print 29 March. DOI: 10.1017/S1755773916000060.

11.

Clark

James

(2017) Poll workers. In: Norris

Nai

(eds) Election Watchdogs: Transparency, Accountability and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (2007) Application to initiate a monitoring procedure to investigate electoral fraud in the United Kingdom (AS/Mon 38).

13.

DeRooij

(2014) Shamed into voting: How our nearest and dearest motivate us to turn out. In: Cowley

Ford

(eds) Sex Lies and the Ballot Box. London: Biteback Publishing, pp.51–54.

14.

Durose

Richardson

Combs

(2013) ‘Acceptable difference’: Diversity, representation and careerism in UK politics. Parliamentary Affairs 66(2): 246–267.

15.

Electoral Commission (2013) Electoral Fraud in the UK: Evidence and Issues Paper. London: Electoral Commission.

16.

Electoral Commission (2014) Electoral Fraud in the UK: Final Report and Recommendations. London: Electoral Commission.

17.

Fieldhouse

Cutts

(2008) Mobilisation or marginalisation? Neighbourhood effects on Muslim electoral registration in Britain in 2001. Political Studies 56(2): 333–354.

18.

Fisher

Heath

Sanders

. (2015) Candidate ethnicity and vote choice in britain. British Journal of Political Science 45(4): 883–905.

19.

Fisman

Miguel

(2007) Corruption, norms, and legal enforcement: Evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. Journal of Political Economy 115(6): 1020–1048.

20.

Fukumoto

Horiuchi

(2011) Making outsiders’ votes count: Detecting electoral fraud through a natural experiment. American Political Science Review 105(3): 586–603.

21.

Gans-Morse

Mazzuca

Nichter

(2014) Varieties of clientelism: Machine politics during elections. American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 415–432.

22.

Garbaye

(2005) Getting into Local Power: The Politics of Ethnic Minorities in British and French Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.

23.

Guest

MacQueen

Namey

(2012) Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.

24.

Holland

Palmer-Rubin

(2015) Beyond the machine: Clientelist brokers and interest organizations in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 48(9): 1186–1223.

25.

Hyde

(2008) How international election observers detect and deter fraud. In: Alvarez

Hall

Hyde

(eds) Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, pp.201–215.

26.

James

(2011) Fewer costs more votes? United Kingdom innovations in election administration 2000-2007 and the effect on voter turnout. Election Law Journal 10(1): 37–52.

27.

James

(2013) Fixing failures of UK electoral management. Electoral Studies 32(4): 597–608.

28.

Jensen

Justesen

(2014) Poverty and vote buying: Survey-based evidence from Africa. Electoral Studies 33: 220–232.

29.

Leemann

Bochsler

(2014) A systematic approach to study electoral fraud. Electoral Studies 35: 33–47.

30.

Lehoucq

(2003) Electoral fraud: Causes, types and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science 6: 233–256.

31.

Mawrey

(2015) Judgement in the High Court of Justice M/350/14 Queen’s Bench Division in the matter of the representation of the People Act 1983 and in the matter of a Mayoral Election for the London Borough of Tower Hamlets held on 22 May 2014. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/judgment.pdf

32.

Mebane

(2006) Election forensics: Vote counts and Benford’s law. In: Proceedings of the 2006 summer meeting of the political methodology society, UC-Davis, Davis, CA, 20–22 July.

33.

Mebane

(2008) Election forensics: The second digit Benford’s law test and recent American presidential elections. In: Alvarez

Hall

Hyde

(eds) Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, pp.162–181.

34.

Metropolitan Police Authority (2006) Electoral offences in London following the local elections of May 2006, report by Assistant Commissioner Specialist Operations. London: MPA. Available at: http://policeauthority.org/Metropolitan/committees/mpa/2006/061026/14/index.html (accessed 28 January 2016).

35.

Minnite

(2010) The Myth of Voter Fraud. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

36.

Neill

(1952) The election in Northern Ireland. In: Butler

(ed.) The British General Election of 1951. London: Macmillan, pp.220–235.

37.

Nichter

(2008) Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Political Science Review 102(1): 19–31.

38.

Norris

(2015) Why Elections Fail? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

39.

Norris

Frank

Martínez i Coma

(eds) (2014) Advancing Electoral Integrity. New York: Oxford University Press.

40.

Peace

Akhtar

(2015) Biraderi, bloc votes and Bradford: Investigating the respect party’s campaign strategy. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 17(2): 224–243.

41.

Pickles

(2016) Securing the Ballot. London: Cabinet Office.

42.

Piliavsky

(ed.) (2014) Patronage as Politics in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

43.

Purdam

(2001) Democracy in practice: Muslims and the labour party at the local level. Politics 21(3): 147–157.

44.

Saglie

Segaard

(2016) Internet voting and the secret ballot in Norway: Principles and popular understandings. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26(2): 155–169.

45.

Shaw

(2000) Kinship and Continuity: Pakistani Families in Britain. London: Routledge.

46.

Sobolewska

Fieldhouse

Cutts

(2013) Who takes the black vote for granted? Electoral campaign and ethnic targeting: The case of Britain. Parliamentary Affairs 66(2): 329–344.

47.

Sobolewska

Heath

(2014) Voter engagement in the UK: the case of ethnic minorities. Written evidence submitted to Political and Constitutional Reform Committee (House of Commons). Available at: http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/voter-engagement-in-theuk/written/6513.html

48.

Sobolewska

Wilks-Heeg

Hill

. (2015) Understanding electoral fraud vulnerability in Pakistani and Bangladeshi origin communities in England. A view of local activists. Available at: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/181257/Understanding-Electoral-Fraud-Jan-2015.pdf

49.

Stewart

(2006) A banana republic? The investigation into electoral fraud by the Birmingham election court. Parliamentary Affairs 59(4): 654–667.

50.

Stokes

(2005) Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review 99(3): 315–325.

51.

Stokes

Dunning

Nareno

(2013) Brokers Voters and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

52.

Thrasher

Borisyuk

Rallings

(2013) BAME candidates in local elections in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs 66(2): 286–304.

53.

Weingrod

(1968) Patrons, patronage, and political parties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 10(4): 377–400.

54.

White

(2014) Electoral offences since 2010, House of Commons Library. Standard note: SN/PC/06255, 29 July 2014. London: House of Commons Library.

55.

Wilks-Heeg

(2008) Purity of Elections in the UK: Causes for Concern. York: Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust.

56.

Wilks-Heeg

(2009) Treating voters as an afterthought? The legacies of a decade of electoral modernisation in the United Kingdom. Political Quarterly 80(1): 101–110.

57.

Ziblatt

(2009) Shaping democratic practice and the causes of electoral fraud: The case of nineteenth-century Germany. American Political Science Review 103(1): 1–21.