The present article traces the mastering of time as a demand for controlling the future within the onset of social thought, addressing the treatment of time by modern institutions to demonstrate the future-making process they deploy. Based on the former, it explores the acceleration theorizing as a milestone example of time mastery, along with the seemingly contrary claims of deceleration. The article asserts that, despite their apparent differences, both temporalities are driven by a convergent future orientation, challenging the prevailing dichotomy that often separates them. Finally, the article explores the mastery of time as a limit for the future. It is argued that the contemporary threat of ‘the end of the world’ does not necessarily refer to the collapse of the planet, but rather to the demise of a linear future along the rise of a hinged temporality.
AggerB. (2004). Speeding Up Fast Capitalism. Cultures, Jobs, Families, Schools, Bodies. Routledge.
2.
AllenA. (2016). The end of progress: Decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. Columbia University Press.
3.
BastianM.Bayliss HawittR. (2022). Multi-species, ecological and climate change temporalities: Opening a dialogue with phenology. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 6(2), 1074–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221111784
4.
BeckertJ. (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard University Press.
5.
BeckertJ.SuckertL. (2021). The future as a social fact. The analysis of perceptions of the future in sociology. Poetics, 84, 101499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101499
6.
Beck, H. (2019). The moment of rupture: Historical consciousness in interwar German thought. University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
BirthK. (2012). Objects of Time. How Things Shape Temporality. Palgrave.
8.
BlumenbergH. (1986). Lebenszeit und Weltzeit. Suhrkamp.
9.
BonneuilC.FressozJ.-B. (2017). The Shock of the Anthropocene. Verso.
10.
ChakrabartyD. (2021). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. The Chicago University Press.
11.
CittonY. (2019). Ralentizar o acelerar. Algunos dilemas de las izquierdas del siglo XXI. Revista Nueva Sociedad, 279, 159–171.
12.
ClarkN.SzerszynskiB. (2021). Planetary Social Thought: The Anthropocene Challenge to the Social Sciences. Polity Press.
13.
ContrerasF. (1919). El Mundonovismo. In La varillita de virtud, 101–115. Ed. Minerva.
14.
CuzzocreaV.MandichG. (2016). Students’ narratives of the future: Imagined mobilities as forms of youth agency?Journal of Youth Studies, 19(4), 552–567. doi:10.1080/13676261.2015.1098773
15.
DanowskiD.Viveiros de CastroE. (2016). The Ends of the World. Polity.
16.
DelantyG. (2021). Imagining the future: Social struggles, the post-national domain and major contemporary social transformations. Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783320969860
17.
ECLAC (2025). The Data Revolution: Enhancing Information to Promote Sustainable Development. ECLAC Statistical Briefings.
18.
FryxellA. (2019). Time and the modern: Current trends in the history of modern temporalities. Past and Present, 243, 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtz012
GartnerW.BirdB.StarrJ. (1992). Acting as if: Differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 13–32. doi:10.1177/104225879201600302
21.
GlezosS. (2012). Speed and Politics. Routledge.
22.
HarootunianH. (2017). Marx After Marx. History and Time in the Expansion of Capitalism. Columbia University Press.
23.
HartogF. (2016). Regimes of Historicity. Presentism and Experiences of Time. Columbia University Press.
24.
HartogF. (2020). Chronos: L’Occident aux prises avec le Temps. Gallimard.
25.
HarveyD. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Wiley-Blackwell.
26.
HassanR. (2009). Empires of Speed. Time and the Acceleration of Politics and Society. Brill.
27.
HölscherL. (1999). Die Entdeckung der Zukunft. Wallstein Verlag.
28.
HorkheimerM.AdornoT. W. (2002 [1944]). Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press.
29.
HouskováA. (1987). Tipo de la novela mundonovista. Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana, 13(26), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/4530335
30.
JarzabkowskiP.BalogunJ.SeidlD. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60, 5–27. doi:10.1177/0018726707075703
31.
JordheimH. (2014). Introduction: Multiple times and the work of synchronization. History and Theory, 53(4), 498–518. doi:10.1111/hith.10728
32.
KernS. (1983). The Culture of Time and Space, 1880–1918. Harvard University Press.
33.
Komporozos-AthanasiouA. (2020). Re-imagining the future in finance capitalism. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13, 261–264. 10.1080/17530350.2020.1726794
34.
KoselleckR. (2004). Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time. Columbia University Press.
35.
KoselleckR. (2006). Estructuras de repetición en el Lenguaje y en la Historia. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 134, 17–34.
36.
LamontM.MolnárV. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
37.
LatourB. (2017a). Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Polity.
38.
LatourB. (2017b). Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Polity.
39.
LevineR. (2006). A Geography of Time. The temporal Misadventures of a Social Psychologist, or How Every Culture Keeps Time Just a Little Bit Differently. Oneworld.
40.
LöwithK. (1957). Meaning in History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History. University of Chicago Press.
41.
LuhmannN. (1976). The future cannot begin: Temporal structures in modern society. Social Research, 43(1), 130–152. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970217.
42.
McNeillJ.EngelkeP. (2016). The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945. Harvard University Press.
43.
OomenJ.HoffmanJ.HajerM. (2022). Techniques of futuring: On how imagined futures become socially performative. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(2), 252–270. doi:10.1177/1368431020988826
44.
Pinto-BazurcoJ. (2020). The Precautionary Principle. International Institute for Sustainable Development.
45.
PostoneM. (2009). Time, Labor, and Social Domination. A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
46.
RosaH. (2003). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. Constellations, 10, 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00309
47.
RosaH. (2013). Social Acceleration. A New Theory of Modernity. Columbia University Press.
48.
RosaH. (2020). The Uncontrollability of the World. Polity.
SuckertL. (2022). Back to the future. Sociological perspectives on expectations, aspirations and imagined futures. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes De Sociologie, 63(3), 393–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975622000339
51.
ThompsonE. P. (1967). Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past and Present, 38, 56–97. doi:10.1093/past/38.1.56
52.
ThompsonN.ByrneO. (2022). Imagining futures: Theorizing the practical knowledge of future-making. Organization Studies, 43(2), 247–268. 10.1177/01708406211053222
53.
TorresF. (2016). A secular acceleration: Theological foundations of the sociological concept “social acceleration”. Time and Society, 25(3), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15622395
54.
Torres, F. (2022). Temporal regimes: Materiality, politics, technology. Routledge.
55.
Torres, F. (2024). Historical time and acceleration. A constitutive bond. International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity, 12(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1163/22130624-20230012
56.
Torres, F., & Gros, A. (2022). Slowing down society? Theoretical reflections on social deceleration in pandemic times (and beyond). KronoScope, 22(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685241-20221505 (2022.
WenzelM.KrämerH.KochJ.ReckwitzA. (2020). Future and organization studies: On the rediscovery of a problematic temporal category in organizations. Organization Studies, 41, 1441–1455. doi:10.1177/0170840620912977
