In his book Rethinking European Modernity. Reason, Power and Coloniality, Schelkshorn lays the foundation for a new philosophical interpretation of European modernity, which critically responds to intra-European debates (Critical Theory, Heidegger, Blumenberg, Frankfurt discourse theory, Civilization theory) on the one hand, and the critique of modernity by postcolonial philosophies in Latin America on the other hand. In the light of the metatheory of ‘de-limitations’ (Entgrenzungen), cultural upheavals triggered by the astronomical revolution and Europe's transoceanic expansion are reinterpreted in detailed studies of philosophies of the Renaissance and seventeenth century rationalist thought. From this perspective, European modernity appears as an amalgam of rational achievements, power syndromes and particular cultural dimensions. This forum examines several aspects of Schelkshorn's outstanding contribution, especially those related to modernity, coloniality, social theory and intercultural philosophy.
ÁrnasonJ. P. (2003). Civilizations in dispute: Historical questions and theoretical traditions. Brill.
2.
ÁrnasonJ. P. (2023). Interpretations and counterarguments: Replies to my interlocutors. International Journal of Social Imaginaries, 2(2023), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1163/27727858-8797765
3.
AscioneG. (2024). Concept formation in global studies. Post-western approaches to critical human knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield.
4.
BarbierE. B. (2011). Scarcity and frontiers. How economies have developed through natural resource exploitation. Cambridge University Press.
CésaireA. (2000). Discourse on colonialism. Trans. Joan Pinkham. Monthly Review Press.
8.
DunajĽ. (2021). Critical hermeneutics 2.0: A necessary update of the ‘new German ideology’. Berlin Journal of Critical Theory. 5(2), 69–98.
9.
DunajĽ (2025). Tribunals, trials, and windows. De-orwellizing western perspectives on China. In DunajĽSigurðssonG. (Eds.), Imaginary worlds and imperial power. The case of China (pp. 267–296). SUNY Press.
10.
DunajĽSmithJ.MertelK. C. M. (eds.). (2023). Civilization, modernity, and critique. Engaging Johann P. Arnason’s macro-social theory. Routledge.
11.
DusselE. (2007). Política de la liberación. Historial mundial y crítica. Trotta.
12.
GilliesD. (2015). Perché la rivoluzione copernicana ha avuto luogo in Europa e non in Cina? In PecereP. (Ed.), Il libro della natura. Vol. 1. Scienze e filosofia da Copernico a Darwin (pp. 29–65). Carocci.
13.
GraeberD.WengrowD. (2021). The dawn of everything. A new history of humanity. Allen Lane.
14.
HabermasJ. (1983/1987). Theory of communicative action (Vol. 1-2). Beacon Press.
15.
HabermasJ. (2002). Religion and rationality: Essays on reason. God and Modernity MIT Press.
16.
HabermasJ. (2008). Religion in the public sphere: Cognitive presuppositions for the ‘public use of reason’ in religious and secular citizens. In Between naturalism and religion (pp. 114–147). Polity Press.
17.
HabermasJ. (2019). Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 1: Die okzidentale Konstellation von Glauben und Wissen; vol. 2: Vernünftige Freiheit. Spuren des Diskurses über Glauben und Wissen. Suhrkamp.
18.
HabermasJ. (2023). Also a history of philosophy, volume 1: The project of a genealogy of postmetaphysical thinking. Polity.
19.
HabermasJ. (2024). Also a history of philosophy, volume 2: The occidental constellation of faith and knowledge. Polity.
20.
HabermasJ. (2025). Also a history of philosophy, volume 3: Rational freedom. Traces of the discourse on faith and knowledge. Polity.
21.
Hecht, M. (1998). Modernität und Bürgerlichkeit. Max Webers Freiheitslehre im Vergleich mit den politischen Ideen von Alexis de Tocqueville und Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Duncker & Humblot Press.
22.
HonnethA. (2023). Preface. In DunajĽSmithJ.MertelK. C. M. (Eds.), Civilization, modernity, and critique: Engaging Jóhann P. Árnason’s macro-social theory (pp. 1–5). Routledge.
23.
HoquetT. (2025). Histoire (dé)coloniale de la philosophie française. Presses Universitaires de France/Humensis.
24.
HorkheimerM.AdornoT. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment, trans. E. Jephcott. Stanford University Press.
25.
JaspersK. (1953). The origin and goal of history. Yale University Press.
26.
JevonsW. S. (1865). The coal question. An inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal mines. Macmillan.
27.
JoasH. (2013) The axial age discourse as religious discourse. In Bellah/Joas (Eds.), The axial age and its consequences (pp. 9–29). Harvard University Press.
KöglerH.-H. (2023). Tradition of transcendence. A hermeneutic appropriation of the axial age discourse. In DunajĽSmithJ.MertelK. C. M. (Eds.), Civilization, modernity, and critique: Engaging Jóhann P. Árnason’s macro-social theory (pp. 133–161). Routledge.
33.
KöglerH.-H. (2025). The relation between reason and religion in late Habermas. In OuthwaiteW.RayL. (Eds.), The Elgar companion on Habermas (Elgar P.H.) (pp. 209–241). Edward Elgar Publishing.
34.
KoyamaM.RubinJ. (2022). How the world became rich. The historical origins of economic growth. Polity.
35.
LandesD. S. (1969). The unbound prometheus. Technological change and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the present. Cambridge University Press.
36.
MeadowsD. H., et al. (1972). Limits to growth. Universe.
37.
MerchantC. (1980). The death of nature. Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. Harper & Row.
38.
MignoloW. (2011). The darker side of western modernity. Global Futures, Decolonial Options.
39.
MignoloW. ([1991] 2005). The idea of Latin America. Wiley-Blackwell.
40.
NovosádF. (2004). Alchýmia dejín. Slovensko v dobe neurčitosti [The Alchemy of History. Slovakia in a Time of Uncertainty]. Iris.
41.
PirieF. (2021). The rule of laws. A 4000-year quest to order the world. Profile.
42.
RockströmJ., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232
SchelkshornH. (1997). Diskurs und Befreiung. Studien zur philosophischen Ethik von Karl-Otto Apel und Enrique Dussel. Rodopi.
45.
Schelkshorn, H. (2009). Entrgenzungen. Ein europäischer Beitrag zum philosophischen Diskurs über die Moderne. Velbrück.
46.
SchelkshornH. (2018). The ideology of the new right and religious conservativism. Towards an ethical critique of the new politics of authoritarianism. Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation, Heft 7, 124–141. https://doi.org/10.14220/jrat.2018.4.issue-2
47.
SchelkshornH. (2019/2020). Dialogische Vernunft und die Grundlagen interkultureller Ethik. Thesen zu einer Revision der Diskursethik. In: Topologik 26 (2019/20): ApelK-O (Ed.), Vita e pensiero/Leben und Denken (vol. 2, pp. 118–150).
48.
SchelkshornH. (2023). The axial age and multiple modernities. Philosophical reflections on the universal claims of European civilization. In DunajĽSmithJ.MertelK. C. M. (Eds.), Civilization, modernity, and critique: Engaging Jóhann P. Árnason’s macro-social theory (pp. 117–132). Routledge.
49.
SchelkshornH. (2024a). Rethinking European modernity. Reason, power, and coloniality in early modern thoughtBloomsbury.16
50.
SchelkshornH. (2024b). Jaspers’ Theorie der Achsenzeit im Disput der interkulturellen Philosophie. In AtesM.DunajĽ (Eds.), Interkulturelle Phänomenologie. Georg Stengers Werk im Gespräch (pp. 289–304). Karl Alber.
51.
SchnädelbachH. (2009). Das Projekt “Aufklärung” – Aspekte und Probleme. In ReschkeR. (Ed.), Nietzscheforschung – Jahrbuch der Nietzschegesellschaft, Sonderband 2. Nietzsche- Radikalaufklärer oder radikaler Gegenaufklärer? (pp. 45–53). Akademie-Verlag.
52.
SieferleR. P. (2010 [1982]). Subterranean forests. Energy systems and the industrial revolution. The White Horse Press.
53.
SkinnerQ. (2025). Liberty as independence. The making and unmaking of a political ideal. Cambridge University Press.
54.
Steinmetz-JenkinsD. (2025). Jürgen Habermas still believes in modernity. A conversation with the German theorist about the history of Western philosophy and more. The Nation, July 7, 2025. https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/jurgen-habermas-qa/
55.
TaylorC. (1992). Sources of the self. Harvard University Press.
56.
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. (2025). Press release: The prize in economic sciences 2025, 13 October 2025.
57.
WagnerP. (2025a). Nostalgia for the light. The ecological emergency, the social sciences, and a (qualified) defence of human exceptionalism. Social Science Information, 64(3/4). https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184251405605
WrigleyE. A. (2010). Energy and the english industrial revolution. Cambridge University Press.
60.
WrigleyE. A. (2016). The path to sustained growth. England’s transition from an organic economy to an industrial revolution. Cambridge University Press.
