This article develops an analytic of ontopolitical apparatuses through an ethnomethodologically informed study of the methodological reality practices that constitute everyday existence. Building on John Law's call for methodological interference in “reality-making practices,” we foreground how being is stabilized not by foundational ontologies but by professional and mundane ontography—the performative inscriptions through which worlds are enacted and made accountable. Drawing on Dorothy Smith's sociology of extralocal relations of ruling and Karen Barad's agential realism, we argue that texts, practices, and materialities are not representational but discursive-material doings that reproduce the One-World World. Automobility serves as an exemplary technoscientific ontopolitical apparatus: a hegemonic formation that organizes subjects and objects into an ontocratic order, administering being through infrastructures and mundane reasoning—the infratextures of automobility. Its violence, routinely eventified as “accidents,” exemplifies the reflexive repair work through which disjunctures are normalized. We conclude by considering how alternative practices might interfere with ontographic forgetting and enable counter-ontopolitics.
AdornoT. W. (2010). Minima Moralia: Reflections on a damaged life. Verso.
2.
AgambenG. (2009). What is an apparatus and other essays. Stanford University Press.
3.
AgambenG. (2017). The omnibus homo sacer. Stanford University Press.
4.
AlthusserL. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 121–173). Monthly Review Press.
ArendtH. (1958). The human condition. Chicago University Press.
7.
ArendtH. (1994). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Penguin Classics. (1965).
8.
AustinJ. L. (1965). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
9.
BaradK. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
10.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
11.
BeckerU. J.BeckerT.GerlachJ. (2012). The true costs of automobility: External costs of cars overview on existing estimates in EU-27.
12.
BhaskarR. (1978). A realist theory of science. Humanities Press.
13.
BogostI. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. University of Minnesota Press.
BucsuházyK.MatuchováE.ZůvalaR.MoravcováP.KostíkováM.MikulecR. (2020). Human factors contributing to the road traffic accident occurrence. Transportation Research Procedia, 45, 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.057
ButlerJ. (2015). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Routledge.
21.
CassN.ManderscheidK. (2018). The autonomobility system: Mobility justice and freedom under sustainability. In CookN.ButzD. (Eds.), Mobilities, mobility justice and social justice (pp. 101–115). Routledge.
22.
ChenisbestB.JähnN.Le CozJ.-Y. (1998). European Accident Causation Methodology (EACS).
23.
CrawleyS. L.WhitlockM.EarlesJ. (2021). Smithing queer empiricism: Engaging ethnomethodology for a queer social science. Sociological Theory, 39(3), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751211026357
24.
CulverG. (2018). Death and the car: On (auto)mobility, violence, and injustice. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 17(1), 144–170. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v17i1.1580
EscobarA. (2007). The ‘ontological turn’ in social theory. A Commentary on ‘Human geography without scale’, by Sallie Marston, John Paul Jones II and Keith Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00243.x
GraeberD. (2015). Radical alterity is just another way of saying “reality”: A reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(2), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.2.003
42.
HarmanG. (2011). The quadruple object. Zero Books.
HetheringtonK. (2019). Infrastructure, environment, and life in the anthropocene. Duke University Press.
45.
HosseiniK.StefaniecA. (2023). A wolf in sheep's clothing: Exposing the structural violence of private electric automobility. Energy Research & Social Science, 99, 103052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103052
46.
HusserlE. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
47.
IhdeD. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. State University of New York Press.
48.
KallinikosJ. (1995). The architecture of the invisible: Technology is representation. Organization: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Organization, Theory, and Society, 2(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084952
LawJ.MolA. (2002). Local entanglements or utopian moves: An inquiry into train accidents. In ParkerM. (Ed.), Utopia and organization (pp. 82–105). Blackwell.
LegacyC.ClementsR.WoodcockI.WhittenJ. (2024). Proposing an ethics of care: Tracing Victoria's transport planning history. Geographical Research, 62(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12663
LynchM. (2013). Ontography: Investigating the production of things, deflating ontology. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 444–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713475925
59.
LynchM. (2019). Ontography as the study of locally organized ontologies. ZMK Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung, 10(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.28937/1000108239
60.
ManderscheidK. (2012). Automobilität als raumkonstituierendes Dispositiv der Modeme. In FüllerH.MichelB. (Eds.), Die Ordnung der Räume (pp. 145–178). Westphälisches Dampfboot.
61.
ManderscheidK. (2014). The movement problem, the car and future mobility regimes: Automobility as dispositif and mode of regulation. Mobilities, 9(4), 604–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.961257
62.
MartensK. (2016). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. Routledge.
63.
MassumiB. (2015). Ontopower: War, powers, and the state of perception. Duke University Press.
MinerP.SmithB. M.JaniA.McNeillG.Gathorne-HardyA. (2024). Car harm: A global review of automobility's harm to people and the environment. Journal of Transport Geography, 115, 103817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103817
PollnerM. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge University Press.
76.
PollnerM. (1991). Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096110
RandellR.BožičI. R.BraunR.KotaškováE.NedbálkováK.NěmečekK.PaulT.SzalóC. (Forthcoming). Walking in the spatial order of automobility. In SnellgroveM. (Ed.), Leisured walking: Mobilities, encounters and critical engagements. Routledge.
79.
RandellR.BraunR. (2022). Automobility studies. In GlăveanuV. P. (Ed.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of the possible (pp. 151–157). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_11
80.
RaymondC. M.RautioP.FagerholmN.AaltonenV. A.AnderssonE.CelermajerD.ChristieM.HällforsM.SaariM. H.MishraH. S.LechnerA. M.Pineda-PintoM.SchlosbergD. (2025). Applying multispecies justice in nature-based solutions and urban sustainability planning: Tensions and prospects. npj Urban Sustainability, 5(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00191-2
81.
RortyR. (1982). Philosophy as a kind of writing: An essay on Derrida. In Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972-1980. University of Minnesota Press.
82.
SchmittC. (2003). The nomos of the earth in the international law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Telos Press. (1950).
83.
SchmittC. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. University of Chicago Press.
84.
SeoS. A. (2019). Policing the open road: How cars transformed American freedom. Harvard University Press.
SmithD. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto University Press.
90.
SmithD. E. (2001). Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 7(2), 159–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10245280108523557
91.
SmithD. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. AltaMira.
92.
ToulminS. E. (2013). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. Univ. of Chicago Press.
WoolgarS. (2022). The value of strident agnosticism: Dorothy Pawluch and the endurance of ontological gerrymandering. The American Sociologist, 53(1), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09524-x
102.
WoolgarS.LezaunJ. (2013). The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies?Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713488820
103.
WoolgarS.PawluchD. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems: Constructionist Readings, 32(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/800680
104.
ZhangY.LiuT.BaiQ.ShaoW.WangQ. (2018). New systems-based method to conduct analysis of road traffic accidents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54, 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.019
