Drawing on classical sociological perspectives from Durkheim, Parsons, Marx, and Polanyi, alongside the newer Institutional Anomie Theory, this paper explores how market dominance penetrates and reshapes institutions, cultural values and social relations, thereby fostering a state of anomie. As the crisis of global financial capitalism intensifies, capitalism increasingly adopts authoritarian forms – shifting from anomie to order. The paper argues that these anomic tendencies inherent in capitalist societies contribute to the rise of libertarian authoritarianism – a right-wing countermovement that merges libertarian ideals with authoritarian governance and closely aligned with the growing influence of Big Tech. Libertarian authoritarianism is a dual-crisis response: First, to the structural crises of capitalist markets and the erosion of democratic institutions; second, to the cultural crisis of individuality under hegemonic market logic. The paper concludes by exploring the potential for a progressive countermovement, emphasising the importance of political agency in resisting authoritarian trajectories.
AtzmüllerR.DécieuxF. (2020). “The origins of our time” Articulations between neoliberal social-policy reforms and the shift to the far-right through the light of Polanyi’s theory of fascism. Social Work & Society, 18(1), 1–11. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:464-sws-2116
3.
BankM.DuffyF.LeyendeckerV.SilvaM. (2021). The Lobby Network: Big Tech's Web of Influence in the EU. Corporate Europe Observatory and Lobby Control.
BielińskiJ.HövermannA. (2021). Perceived marketization in Poland: Translating key concepts of institutional anomie theory to the micro level. European Journal of Criminology, 20(1), 20-42.https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370821996853.
6.
BloomP. (2023). Authoritarian Capitalism in the Age of Globalization (2.th ed.). Edward Elgar.
BullB. (2025). The rise of authoritarian capitalism: What does it mean for businesses that seek peace?Business Horizons, 68(4), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.02.013.
BurawoyM. (2018). Marxism after Polanyi. In BondP.BurawoyM.CockJ.DesaiA.GlaserD.JaraM.LuxtonM.NgwaneT.PillayD.SatgarV.SaulJ.VeriavaA.WilliamsM. (Eds.), Marxisms in the 21st Century: Crisis, Ctique and Struggle (pp. 34–52). Wits University Press.
11.
BurawoyM. (2019). Afterword: Resolving Polanyi's paradox. In DaleG.HolmesC.MarkantōnatouM. (Eds.), Karl Polanyi's Political and Economic Thought (pp. 213–225). Agenda Publishing.
12.
BurawoyM. (2021). Going public with Polanyi in the era of trump. In HossfeldL.KellyE. B.HossfeldC. (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Public Sociology (pp. 11–22). Routledge.
13.
BurgiN. (2014). Societies without citizens: The anomic impacts of labor market restructuring and the erosion of social rights in Europe. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(3), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014530927
14.
ChenL. S. (2022). Getting China’s political economy right: State, business, and authoritarian capitalism. Perspectives on Politics, 20(4), 1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759272200247X
15.
ChristophersB. (2016). For real: Land as capital and commodity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12111
16.
ChueriJ. (2022). An emerging populist welfare paradigm? How populist radical right‐wing parties are reshaping the welfare state. Scandinavian Political Studies, 45(4), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12230
CouldryN.MejiasU. A. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating it for Capitalism. Stanford Uni. Press.
19.
DemirovicA. (2018). Autoritärer Populismus als neoliberale Krisenbewältigungsstrategie. PROKLA. Zeitschrift Für Kritische Sozialwissenschaft, 48(190), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v48i190.30
20.
DenhamD. (2005). Marx, Durkheim and Weber on Market Society. Frontiers of Sociology.
21.
DörreK. (2019). “Take back control!”: Marx, Polanyi und die populistische Revolte von Rechts. Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 44(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-019-00340-9
22.
DucuingC. (2024). Data as a Contested Commodity. De Gruyter.
DurkheimÉ. (1987 [1897]). Der Selbstmord (2 Vol. 431). Suhrkamp.
25.
DurkheimÉ. (1992 [1893]). Über soziale Arbeitsteilung: Studie über die Organisation höherer Gesellschaften: (N. Luhmann, Ed.). Vol. 1005). Suhrkamp.
26.
FraserN. (2012). Can society be commodities all the way down? Post-Polanyian reflections on capitalist crisis. FMSH-WP-2012-18, halshs-00725060.
27.
FrommE. ((1971[1966]). Marx's Concept of Man. Continuum.
28.
FuchsC. (2017). The Relevance of Franz L. Neumann’s Critical Theory in 2017: “Anxiety and Politics” in the New Age of Authoritarian Capitalism. TripleC, 15(2), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.903
GiddensA. (1971). Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: an Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge Univ. Press.
33.
Gonzalez-VicenteR. (2024). In the name of the nation: Authoritarian practices, capital accumulation, and the radical simplification of development in China’s global vision. Globalizations, 21(6), 1041–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2121061
34.
GopikrishnaP.PremrajJ. A.ManikandanA.VinothkumarM.AjayendraR.RajaS.DasiganC. C. E.NivardhanR.HarishD.RushikesavaA. A.KoushikM. S. (2024). A Study on Techno-Nationalism, an Emerging Trend in the 21st Century India. Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 6(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.6.1.5
35.
GrabherG.KönigJ. (2020). Disruption, embedded. A Polanyian framing of the platform economy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/10443 (95-118 Pages / Sociologica, Vol 14, No 1 (2020)).
36.
GregorJ. A. (2006). The Search for Neofascism: The Use and Abuse of Social Science. Cambridge Univ. Press.
37.
GroßE-M., HövermannA.MessnerS. F. (2018). Marketized mentality, competitive/egoistic school culture, and delinquent attitudes and behavior: An application of institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 56(2), 333–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12173
38.
GuinanJ.HannaT. M. (2017). Polanyi against the whirlwind. Renewal, 25(1), 5–12.
39.
HallS. (2014). Popular-demokratischer oder Autoritärer Populismus. In Rego DiazV.KoivistoJ.LauggasI. (Eds.), Ausgewählte Schriften / Stuart Hall: Vol. 5. Populismus, Hegemonie, Globalisierung (1. Auflage, pp. 101–120). Argument Verlag.
40.
HallS.CritcherC.JeffersonT.ClarkeJ.RobertsB. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. Macmillan.
41.
HechingerE. (2022). Rechts und Radikal Liberal. Zur inneren Verwandtschaft von Rechtsextremismus und Libertarismus. Soziologiemagazin, 15(1-2022), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.3224/soz.v15i1.04
42.
HolmesC. (2018). Polanyi in Times of Populism: Vision and Contradiction in the History of Economic Ideas. RIPE Series in Global Political Economy. Routledge.
43.
HortonJ. (1964). The dehumanization of anomie and alienation: a problem in the ideology of sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 15(4), 283. https://doi.org/10.2307/588861
44.
HughesL. A.SchaibleL. M.GibbsB. R. (2015). Economic dominance, the “American Dream,” and homicide: a cross‐national test of institutional anomie theory. Sociological Inquiry, 85(1), 100–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12065
45.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2023). The Global State of Democracy 2023: The New Checks and Balances. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2023.78
46.
KhanalS.ZhangH.TaeihaghA. (2025). Why and how is the power of Big Tech increasing in the policy process? The case of generative AI. Policy and Society, 44(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae012
47.
KimS-W.PridemoreW. A. (2005). Social change, institutional anomie and serious property crime in transitional Russia. British Journal of Criminology, 45(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azh082
48.
KuttnerR. L. (2019). Can Democracy Survive Global Capitalism?(First published as a Norton paperback). W.W. Norton & Company.
49.
LacherH. (2007). The slight transformation: Contesting the legacy of Karl Polanyi. In BuğraA.AğartanK. (Eds.), Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 49–67). Palgrave Macmillan US.
50.
LacherH. (2019). Karl Polanyi, the “Always-Embedded Market Economy,” and the Re-writing of “the Great Transformation”. Theory and Society, 48(5), 671–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09359-z
51.
LangthalerE.SchüßlerE. (2019). Commodity studies with Polanyi: Disembedding and re-embedding labour and land in contemporary capitalism. Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 44(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-019-00339-2
52.
LimS. H. (2021). Look up rather than down: Karl Polanyi’s fascism and radical right-wing ‘populism’. Current Sociology, 71(3), 526-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211015715.
53.
LindmanJ.MakinenJ.KasanenE. (2023). Big Tech's power, political corporate social responsibility and regulation. Journal of Information Technology, 38(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962221113596
54.
LodhiA. (2018). Marxian ‘alienation’, polanyian ‘fictitious commodification’, and ‘Keynes’‘Love of money’: An enquiry into the diminution of ‘the social’ in contemporary economic thought. SSRN Electronic Journal. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3166770
55.
LukesS. (1967). Alienation and Anomie. In LaslettP. (Ed.), Philosophy, Politics and Society (third series, pp. 74–95). Blackwell.
56.
LuzM. R. S.CompagnoliR. V.FernandezR. G. (2024). Socialism, Fascism and Neoliberalism: Karl Polanyi's Institutionalism and the Democratic Question in the XXI Century. Real-World Economics Review (108), 83–102.
57.
MarxK. (1959 [1844]). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. In StruikD. J. (Ed.), Gesamtausgabe.Progress Publishers.
58.
MarxK. (1976). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (B. Fowkes, Trans.). Volume 1. Penguin books.
59.
MarxK. (2017 [1859]). Das Kapital: Erster Band : Neue Textausg. mit historisch-kritischem Apparat (T. Kuczynski, Ed.). VSA: Verl.
60.
MessnerS. F. (2018). Contemporary Political Currents, Institutional Imbalance, and Crime: Precursors of a ‘Great Retrogression?Presidential Plenary, Seventy-fourth Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
61.
MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: A cross-national application of institutional-anomie theory. Social Forces, 75(4), 1393–1416. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580676
62.
MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR. (2007 [1994]). Crime and the American Dream (4. Aufl.). The Wadsworth Series in Criminological Theory. Thomson/Wadsworth.
63.
MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR.HövermannA. (2019). Institutional anomie theory: An evolving research program. In KrohnM. D.HendrixN.Penly HallG.LizotteA. J. (Eds.), Handbook on Crime and Deviance (2nd ed. 2019, pp. 161–177). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_9
64.
MessnerS. F.ThomeH.RosenfeldR. (2008). Institutions, anomie, and violent crime: Clarifying and elaborating institutional-anomie theory. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/ijcv.35
65.
MillettK. (2021). On the meaning and contemporary significance of fascism in the writings of Karl Polanyi. Theory and Society, 50(3), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09428-8
66.
MuddeC. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
67.
MuddeC. (2016). The Study of Populist Radical Right Parties: Towards a Fourth Wave (Working Paper).
NickelA. (2022). Institutional Anomie, Market-Based Values and Anti-Immigrant Attitudes: A Multilevel Analysis in 28 European Countries. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.11576/ijcv-5126 (International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), Bd. 16 (2022)).
72.
NickelA.GroßE. (2023). Assessing Regional Variation in support for the Radical Right-Wing Party ‘Alternative for Germany’ (AfD) – A Novel Application of Institutional Anomie Theory Across German Districts. Social Sciences, 12(7), 412. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070412
73.
ØversveenE. (2022). Capitalism and alienation: Towards a Marxist theory of alienation for the 21st century. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(3), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211021579
74.
ParsonsT. (1942). Some sociological aspects of the fascist movements. Social Forces, 21(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2570546
75.
ParsonsT. (1954). Essays in Sociological Theory (Revised ed.). The Full Press.
76.
ParsonsT. (1973 [1945]). Systematische Theorie in der Soziologie. Gegenwärtiger Stand und Ausblick (1945). In RüschemeyerD. (Ed.), Beiträge zur soziologischen Theorie (3., unveränd. Aufl., pp. 31–52). Luchterhand.
77.
PatelR.McMichaelP. (2004). Third Worldism and the lineages of global fascism: the regrouping of the global South in the neoliberal era. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185426
78.
PioreM. J. (2008). Second Thoughts: On Economics, Sociology, Neoliberalism, Polanyi’s Double Movement and Intellectual Vacuums (MIT IPC Working Paper), 08-004.
79.
PolanyiK. (1935). The essence of fascism. In LewisJ.PolanyiK.KitchinD. K. (Eds.), Christianity and the Social Revolution (pp. 359–394). Gollanz.
80.
PolanyiK. (1947). Our Obsolete Market Mentality: Civilization Must Find a New Thought Pattern. Commentary, 3, 109–117.
81.
PolanyiK. (2001 [1944]). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (2. Beacon paperback ed.). Beacon Press. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10014733
82.
PolanyiK. (2005). Die geistigen Voraussetzungen des Faschismus. In CangianiM.Polanyi-LevittK.ThomasbergerC. (Eds.), Menschliche Freiheit, politische Demokratie und die Auseinandersetzung zwischen Sozialismus und Faschismus: Vol. 3. Chronik der großen Transformation: Artikel und Aufsätze (1920-1945) (3 Vol. 1, pp. 216–221).
83.
RosenfeldR.MessnerS. F. (2011). The intellectual origins of institutional-anomie theory. In CullenF. T.JonsonC. L.MyerA. J.AdlerF. (Eds.), The origins of American Criminology (pp. 121–135). Routledge.
84.
RuthS. P. (2018). Populism and the erosion of horizontal accountability in Latin America. Political Studies, 66(2), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723511
85.
SandbrookR. (2017). The Second Time Around? Polanyi and Today’s Fascist Tendency. Peace Magazine (July/September).
86.
SandbrookR. (2018). Karl Polanyi and the formation of this generation's new left. IPPR Progressive Review, 25(1), 76–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12079
87.
SandbrookR. (2022). Polanyi's double movement and capitalism today. Development and Change, 53(3), 647–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12699
88.
ScheiringG. (2018). Lessons From the Political Economy of Authoritarian Capitalism in Hungary (Challenging Authoritarianism Series), 1.
SelwynB.MiyamuraS. (2013). Class struggle or embedded markets? Marx, Polanyi and the meanings and possibilities of social transformation. New Political Economy, 19(5), 639–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.844117
92.
SharonT. (2021). Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech’s newfound role as global health policy makers. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(S1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09547-x
93.
SimsB. A. (1997). Crime, punishment, and the American dream: Toward a Marxist integration. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427897034001002
94.
SmorodinskayaN. V.KatukovD. D. (2024). Moving Towards Technological Sovereignty: A New Global Trend and the Russian Specifics. Baltic Region, 16(3), 108–135. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2024-3-6
95.
SoltyI. (2015). Der Name der Zeit. Autoritärer Kapitalismus?. LuXemburg, 7(1), 114–115.
96.
StandingG. (2014). Understanding the precariat through labour and work. Development and Change, 4(5), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12120
ThomeH. (2007). Explaining the long-term trend in violent crime: A heuristic scheme and some methodological considerations. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 1(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2753
WacquantL. (2011). Die neoliberale Staatskunst: Workfare, Prisonfare und soziale Unsicherheit. In DollingerB.Schmidt-SemischH. (Eds.), Gerechte Ausgrenzung? (pp. 77–109). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94083-0_3
106.
WallersteinI.CollinsR.MannM.DerluguianG.CalhounC. (Eds.). (2013). Does Capitalism have a Future?. Oxford University Press.
YoungJ. C. (2019). The new knowledge politics of digital colonialism. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space, 51(7), 1424–1441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19858998
