The relation between democracy and truth is deeply contested. While some political thinkers argue that truth is essential to democratic flourishing, others warn that it threatens the conflictual logic of democracy. I develop a sociological perspective on this question by constructing an analytical framework for studying democratic truth-telling as a practice. Drawing on Foucault, I argue that democratic truth-telling is marked by a tension between the truth-teller's ascendancy and the commitment to equality among citizens. This tension is managed through pacts between the truth-teller and their audience, which adjust relations of ascendancy to relations of equality. I theorise three pacts in the case of activist truth-tellers and show how they lead to distinct dynamics in the public. Instead of delineating the proper relation between democracy and truth, the role of sociology may be to cultivate an openness to the multiple ways in which truth-telling figures in democracies.
AlexanderJ. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford University Press.
3.
ArendtH. (1968). Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. The Viking Press.
4.
AttariS. Z.KrantzD. H.WeberE. U. (2016). Statements about climate researchers’ carbon footprints affect their credibility and the impact of their advice. Climate Change, 138(1-2), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1713-2
5.
BakuninM. (1916). God and the state. Mother Earth Publishing Association.
6.
BaldwinL. V. (2022). The arc of truth: The thinking of Martin Luther King Jr. Fortress Press.
7.
BenjaminW. (2003). On some motifs in Baudelaire. In EilandH.JenningsM. W. (Eds.), Walter Benjamin: Selected writings volume 4 1938–1940 (pp. 313–355). The Belknap Press.
8.
BennettJ. (2002). Thoreau’s nature: Ethics, politics, and the wild. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
9.
BittnerV. (2024). Iconic extensions and memetic audiences: The MAGA Hat as a site of conflict in the US public sphere. Cultural Sociology, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755231225690
10.
BlokkerP. (2014). Luc Boltanski and democratic theory: Fragility, auto-nomos, and critique as democracy’s end. Thesis Eleven, 124(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513614549432
11.
BogadL. M. (2016). Tactical performance: The theory and practice of serious play. Routledge.
12.
BolandT. (2019). The spectacle of critique: From philosophy to cacophony. Routledge.
13.
BolandT.Moore-PonceJ. (2024). Confessional critiques: Parrhesia and avowal in contemporary anti-racist discourses. European Journal of Social Theory, 27(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310231179150
14.
BoltanskiL. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Polity Press.
15.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton University Press.
16.
ButlerJ. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. Fordham University Press.
17.
ChambersS. (2021). Truth, deliberative democracy, and the virtues of accuracy: Is fake news destroying the public sphere?Political Studies, 69(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890811
18.
ConnollyW. E. (1995). The ethos of pluralization. University of Minnesota Press.
19.
DeweyJ. (1927). The public and its problems. Holt.
20.
DouglasM. (1990). Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus, 119(4), 1–16.
21.
DraytonT. (2021). Can I join in? Playful performance and alternative political realities. In KoubováA.UrbanP.RussellW.MacLeanM. (Eds.), Play and democracy (pp. 108–124). Routledge.
22.
DuncombeS. (2019). Dream or nightmare: Reimagining progressive politics in an age of fantasy. The New Press.
23.
DuncombeS.HarrebyeS. (2022). The Copenhagen experiment: Testing the effectiveness of creative vs. conventional forms of activism. Social Movement Studies, 21(6), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1967125
ElkinsJ. (2012). Concerning practices of truth. In ElkinsJ.NorrisA. (Eds.), Truth and democracy (pp. 19–53). University of Pennsylvania Press.
26.
EmersonR. W. (1950). An address. In AtkinsonB. (Ed.), The complete essays and other writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson (pp. 66–84). Random House.
27.
EnrothH. (2023). Crisis of authority: The truth of post-truth. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 36(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-021-09415-6
28.
EstlundD. (2009). Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton University Press.
29.
EyalG. (2019). The crisis of expertise. Polity Press.
30.
FarkasJ.SchouJ. (2018). Post-truth, fake news and democracy: Mapping the politics of falsehood. Routledge.
31.
FolkersA. (2016). Daring the truth: Foucault, parrhesia and the genealogy of critique. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414558885
32.
FoucaultM. (2005). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982. Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
FoucaultM. (2010). The government of self and others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983. Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
FoucaultM. (2011). The courage of the truth (The government of self and others II): Lectures at the Collège de France 1983–1984. Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
FoucaultM. (2014). On the government of the living: Lectures at the Collège de France 1979–1980. Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
FoucaultM. (2019). Discourse and truth & Parrēsia. The University of Chicago Press.
37.
FrankA. W. (2009). Tricksters and truth tellers: Narrating illness in an age of authenticity and appropriation. Literature and Medicine, 28(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2009.a402245
38.
FrickerM. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
39.
GandhiM. K. (1993). An autobiography: The story of my experiments with truth. Dover Publications.
GiddensA. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Polity Press.
42.
GierynT. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
43.
Gøtzsche-AstrupJ. (2023a). The constitution of political contention: The case of protests and riots at the turn of the 19th century. Current Sociology, 71(7), 1348–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921221084359
44.
Gøtzsche-AstrupJ. (2023b). Becoming an activist: Individualisation and a democratic contentious ethos in ‘how to’ books. Sociology, 57(3), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221107495
GraeberD. (2009). Direct action: An ethnography. AK Press.
47.
HabermasJ. (2022). Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341
48.
HarrebyeS. (2016). Social change and creative activism in the 21st century: The mirror effect. Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
HerzogL. (2023). Citizen knowledge: Markets, experts, and the infrastructure of democracy. Oxford University Press.
KingM. L.Jr. (1986). I see the promised land. In WashingtonJ. M. (Ed.), A testament of hope: The essential writings and speeches of Martin Luther King (pp. 279–286). HarperOne.
53.
KoopmanC.MatzaT. (2013). Putting Foucault to work: Analytic and concept in Foucaultian inquiry. Critical Inquiry, 39(4), 817–840. https://doi.org/10.1086/671357
54.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
55.
LeggS. (2016). Subject to truth: Before and after governmentality in Foucault’s 1970s. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(5), 858–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816633474
LorenziniD. (2023). The force of truth: Critique, genealogy, and truth-telling in Michel Foucault. The University of Chicago Press.
58.
LuxonN. (2014). Authority, interpretation and the space of the Parrhesiastic encounter. Materiali Foucaultiani, III(5–6), 71–90.
59.
MarchartO. (2007). Post-foundational political thought: Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh University Press.
60.
MarchartO. (2018). Thinking antagonism: Political ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh University Press.
61.
MartínezM. A. (2024). Activist research as a methodological toolbox to advance public sociology. Sociology, 58(4), 832–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231219207
62.
McIntyreL. (2018). Post-truth. The MIT Press.
63.
MelucciA. (1985). The symbolic challenge of contemporary movements. Social Research, 52(4), 789–816.
64.
MillerP. A. (2021). Foucault’s seminars on antiquity: Learning to speak the truth. Bloomsbury Academic.
65.
MouffeC. (1993). The return of the political. Verso.
NordensvardJ.KetolaM. (2022). Populism as an act of storytelling: Analyzing the climate change narratives of Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg as populist truth-tellers. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 861–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1996818
OlesenT. (2021). Democracy’s autonomy dilemma: Whistleblowing and the politics of disclosure. Sociological Theory, 39(4), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751211054874
71.
OwenD.WoodfordC. (2012). Foucault, cavell and the government of self and others. On truth-telling, friendship and an ethics of democracy. Iride, 25(2), 299–316.
72.
PosseltG.SeitzS. (2024). Truth and its political forms: An explorative cartography. Contemporary Political Theory, 23(4), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-023-00669-7
73.
RawlsJ. (1993). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.
74.
RosanvallonP. (2013). The society of equals. Harvard University Press.
75.
SamoilenkoS. A.CookJ. (2023). Developing and ad hominem typology for classifying climate misinformation. Climate Policy, 24(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2245792
76.
SchneiderJ.SchwarzeS.BsumekP. K.PeeplesJ. (2016). Under pressure: Coal industry rhetoric and neoliberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
77.
SchudsonM. (1978). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. Basic Books.
78.
SharpeM. (2007). A question of two truths? Remarks on parrhesia and the ‘political-philosophical’ difference. Parrhesia, 2, 89–108.
79.
StarrB. (2023). Wise (teen) anger on Twitter: Greta Thunberg uses “bio warfare” to reshape oppressive anger norms. Rhetoric Review, 42(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2023.2210796
80.
StrassheimJ. (2023). Neoliberalism and post-truth: Expertise and the market model. Theory, Culture & Society, 40(6), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221119726
81.
TaylorC. (2016). The language animal: The full shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity. The Belknap Press.
TaylorC. (2024). Cosmic connections: Poetry in the Age of Disenchantment. The Belknap Press.
84.
ThomassenB. (2013). Anthropology and social theory: Renewing dialogue. European Journal of Social Theory, 16(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431012463809
85.
TillyC. (2008). Contentious performances. Cambridge University Press.
86.
TocquevilleA. (2010). Democracy in America. Liberty Fund.
87.
UrbinatiN. (2014). Democracy disfigured: Opinion, truth, and the people. Harvard University Press.
WeiskopfR.Tobias-MierschY. (2016). Whistleblowing, parrhesia and the contestation of truth in the workplace. Organization Studies, 37(11), 1621–1640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655497
91.
WestbrookR. B. (2005). Democratic hope: Pragmatism and the politics of truth. Cornell University Press.
92.
WilliamsB. (2003). Truth & truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton University Press.
93.
YazadihaH. (2023). The struggle for the people’s king: How politics transforms the memory of the Civil Rights Movement. Princeton University Press.
