This article criticizes the pragmatist theory of progress developed by Rahel Jaeggi and argues for a psychologist alternative. In her theory, Jaeggi rejects both moralist and historicist understandings of progress, arguing that progress should be regarded as a non-teleological process of experience enrichment. However, by identifying progress with problem-solving activities, Jaeggi explicitly makes a parallelist argument between social-moral and scientific progress, which is highly questionable. In this analysis, I argue that Jaeggi's analogy fails. And by referring to Kuhn's notion of incommensurability, I demonstrate a more radical, psychologist approach, which departs from any idea of experience enrichment in history. The lack of a sufficient account of progress is not the failure of Kuhn. In contrast, it is his very own insight.
AllenA. (2016). The end of progress: Decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. Columbia University Press.
2.
AllenA.JaeggiR.Von RedeckerE. (2016). Progress, normativity, and the dynamics of social change. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 37(2), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj201637216
3.
AndersonE. (2014). Social movements, experiments in living, and moral progress: Case studies from Britain’s abolition of slavery. The Lindley lecture. University of Kansas.
Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford University Press.
6.
BoddeE. (2020). The Lebensform as organism: Clarifying the limits of immanent critique. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 47(9), 1060–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720948402
7.
ChenY. (2024). The genesis and transformation of social consciousness: An attempt at the construction of social naturalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
JaeggiR. (2018a). Critique of forms of life. Harvard University Press.
24.
JaeggiR. (2018b). Resistance to the perpetual danger of relapse: Moral progress and social change. In AllenA.MendietaE. (Eds.), From alienation to forms of life: The critical theory of Rahel Jaeggi (pp. 15–40). The Pennsylvania State University Press.
25.
JaeggiR. (2021). Progress as the dynamics of crisis. In KitcherP. (Ed.), Moral progress (pp. 119–136). Oxford University Press.
26.
JaeggiR. (2023). Fortschritt und Regression. Suhrkamp Verlag.
27.
KernA. (2017). Sources of knowledge: On the concept of a rational capacity for knowledge. Harvard University Press.
28.
KitcherP. (2011). The ethical project. Harvard University Press.
29.
KitcherP. (2021). Moral progress. Oxford University Press.
30.
KuhnT. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.
31.
KuhnT. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. The University of Chicago Press.
32.
KuhnT. (2024). ‘Does knowledge “grow”?’. In ShanY. (Ed.), Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s legacy (pp. 321–339). Springer.
33.
KuukkanenJ. (2024). Kuhn, progress, and knowing-how: An epistemological-functional account of scientific progress. In ShanY. (Ed.), Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s legacy (pp. 77–101). Springer.
34.
LakatosI. (1980). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Volume 1: Philosophical papers. Cambridge University Press.
LaudanL. (1978). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. University of California Press.
37.
MarxK.EngelsF. (1976). Manifesto of the communist party. In Karl Marx Friedrich Engels collected works (MECW). Volume 06 (pp. 477–519). Lawrence & Wishart.
SearleJ. (1995). The construction of social reality. Penguin.
42.
SearleJ. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford University Press.
43.
SingerP. (2011). The expanding circle: Ethics, evolution, and moral progress. Princeton University Press.
44.
ThompsonM. (2001). Two forms of practical generality. In MorrisC.RipsteinA. (Eds.), Practical rationality and preference. Essays for David Gauthier (pp. 121–152). Cambridge University Press.
45.
WellmerA. (1991). The persistence of modernity. Polity Press.
