This article looks at the contribution of secularisation debates to a critical theory of society. As the relations between the ‘religious’ and ‘secular’ aspects of modern life grow more vexing, it argues critical theory must eschew its previous secularisation-as-progress metanarrative. Instead, processes of secularisation are better understood as those relationships between public and private beliefs and practices that take place at the boundaries between modern society’s commitment to procedural institutions and substantive value commitments. The article then revisits four different understandings of secularisation that, coming from a variety of intellectual traditions, help us redefine it beyond an exclusive focus on institutional religions: normative questions on the rise and decline of autonomous values; temporal questions on the self-positing of modernity as an historical epoch; political questions on the desacralisation of modern sovereignty and practical questions on the non-technological dimensions of technology. This framework is put to the test in relation to the procedural challenge of democratic fallibility and the substantive challenge of planetary survival.
AdornoT.HorkheimerM. (2007). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press.
2.
AlmogY. (2019). Secularism and hermeneutics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
3.
ApelK. O. (1987). The problem of a macroethic of responsibility to the future in the crisis of technological civilization: An attempt to come to terms with Hans Jonas’ “principle of responsibility”. Man and World, 20, 3–40.
4.
ArendtH. (1994). The origins of totalitarianism. Harvest.
5.
AsadT. (2003). Formations of the secular. Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press.
6.
BalibarE. (2018). Secularism and cosmopolitanism. Critical hypotheses on religion and politics. Columbia University Press.
7.
BatnitzkyL. (2011). How Judaism became a religion. An introduction to modern Jewish thought. Princeton University Press.
8.
BenjaminW. (2015). Illuminations. The Bodley House.
9.
BenthamJ. (1988). The principles of morals and legislation. Prometheus.
10.
BermeoN. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.
11.
BlumenbergH. (1983). The legitimacy of the modern age. MIT Press.
12.
BrowneS. (2019). UN reform. 75 years of challenge and change. Edward Elgar.
13.
BrunkhorstH. (2014). Critical theory of legal revolutions. Bloomsbury.
14.
CasanovaJ. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. The University of Chicago Press.
15.
CastellsM. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell.
16.
ChapmanA.AhmedA. (2021). Climate justice, humans rights, and the case for reparations. Health and Human Rights Journal, 23(2), 81–94.
17.
CherniloD. (2013). The natural law foundations of modern social theory: A quest for universalism. Cambridge University Press.
18.
CherniloD. (2017a). The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(1), 44–60.
19.
CherniloD. (2017b). Debating humanity. Towards a philosophical sociology. Cambridge University Press.
20.
CherniloD. (2021). One globalisation or many? Risk society in the age of the Anthropocene. Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 12–26.
21.
ChoJ.AhmedS.HilbertM.LiuB.LuuJ. (2020). Do search algorithms endanger democracy? An experimental investigation of algorithm effects on political polarization. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(2), 150–172.
22.
CohenJ. (1986). An epistemic conception of democracy. Ethics, 96(1), 26–38.
23.
ConnollyW. E. (2017). Facing the planetary. Entangled humanism and the politics of swarming. Duke University Press.
24.
CrouchC. (2020). Post-democracy after the crisis. Polity Press.
25.
CrutzenP. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 23.
26.
DelantyG. (2020). Critical theory and social transformation. Crises of the present and future possibilities. Routledge.
27.
DimitrovaA.MatthesJ. (2018). Social media in political campaigning around the world: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 333–342.
28.
FineR. (2001). Political investigations: Hegel, Marx, Arendt. Routledge.
29.
FullerS. (2011). Humanity 2.0: What it means to be human past, present and future. Palgrave.
30.
GlackenC. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian shore. Nature and culture in Western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century. University of California Press.
31.
GordonP. E. (2020). Migrants of the profane. Critical theory and the question of secularization. Yale University Press.
32.
HabermasJ. (1987). Theory of communicative action: The critique of functionalist reason. Polity.
33.
HabermasJ. (1996). Between facts and norms. The MIT Press.
34.
HabermasJ. (2008). Between naturalism and religion. Polity Press.
35.
HarawayD. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Free Association Books.
36.
HarringtonA. (2007). Habermas’s theological turn?Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(1), 45–61.
37.
HeideggerM. (1993). Letter on humanism. In HeideggerM. (Ed.), Basic writings. Routledge.
38.
HonnethA. (2004). The struggle for recognition. Polity Press.
39.
HonnethA. (2014). Freedom’s right. The social foundations of democratic life. Polity Press.
40.
HonnethA.JoasH. (1988). Social action and human nature. Cambridge University Press.
41.
IllouzE. (2021). The end of love. A sociology of negative relations. Polity Press.
42.
IngleH.MikulewiczM. (2020) Mental health and climate change: tackling invisible injustice. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(4), e128–e130.
43.
JamesW. (1996) Some problems of philosophy. Nebraska University Press.
44.
JoasH. (2013). The sacredness of the person. A new genealogy of human rights. Georgetown University Press.
45.
JoasH. (2021). The power of the sacred. An alternative to the narrative of disenchantment. Oxford University Press.
46.
JonasH. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search for an ethics for the technological age. The University of Chicago Press.
47.
JonasH. (2001). The phenomenon of life. Towards a philosophical biology. Northwestern University Press.
48.
KantorowiczE. (2016). The king’s two bodies. A study in medieval political theology. Princeton University Press.
49.
LatourB. (2017). Facing Gaia. Eight lectures on the new climate regime. Polity Press.
50.
LevitskyS.ZiblattD. (2018). How democracies die. Crown.
51.
LöwithK. (1964). Meaning in history. The University of Chicago Press.
52.
LyotardJ-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. The University of Minnesota Press.
53.
MarcuseH. (1964). One dimensional man. Beacon Press.
54.
MarxK. (1975). Early writings. Pelican.
55.
MilanovicB. (2018). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Harvard University Press.
56.
MouffeC. (1993). The return of the political. Verso.
57.
RosaH. (2013). Social acceleration. A new theory of modernity. Columbia University Press.
58.
RosaH. (2019). Resonance. A sociology of our relationship to the world. Polity.
59.
SchmittC. (2005). Political theology. Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. The University.
60.
SchwartzbergM. (2015). Epistemic democracy and its challenges. Annual Review of Politics, 18, 187–203.
61.
SpinozaB. (2007). Theological-political treatise. Cambridge University Press.
62.
SpohnU. (2015). A difference in kind? Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor on post-secularism. The European Legacy, 20(2), 1–16.
63.
TaylorC. (2007). A secular age. Harvard University Press.
64.
TeschkeB. (2003). The myth of 1648. Class, geopolitics and the making of modern international relations. Verso.
65.
TurnerC. (2020). Secularization. Routledge.
66.
Van der MeulenS.BruinsmaM. (2019). Man as “aggregate of data”. What computers shouldn’t do. AI & Society, 34, 343–354.
67.
VatterM. (2021). Divine democracy. Political theology after Carl Schmitt. Oxford University Press.
68.
WeberM. (2001). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Routledge.
69.
WebsterF. (2002). Theories of the information society. Routledge.
