Some environmental activists occasionally use the argument that poverty is ‘no excuse’ for not going green and denounce discourses putting forward social conditions as unduly exculpatory. Employing participant observation among middle-class activists mobilising to diffuse environmental lifestyles in socially diverse suburbs near Paris (France), the article explores their relation to the working class and examines the consequences of their endeavours on local class relations. It describes the tension between their goal of mainstreaming environmental reflexivity and the stubborn existence of material inequalities and constraints. While their efforts are configured by a moral economy of environmental responsibility which assigns an undifferentiated moral obligation to consume sustainably to all individuals, they make sense of social differences by drawing on culturalist representations of poverty and folk social theories. These sense-making practices enhance rather than alleviate attributions of blame against working-class people and contribute to reinforcing the activists’ dominant symbolic position.
AnantharamanM. (2017). Elite and ethical: The defensive distinctions of middle-class bicycling in Bangalore, India. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(3), 864–886.
3.
AnantharamanM.KennedyE. H.MiddlemissL.BradburyS. (2019). Who participates in community-based sustainable consumption projects and why does it matter? A constructively critical approach. In IsenhourC.MartiskainenM.MiddlemissL. (Eds.), Power and politics in sustainable consumption research and practice (pp. 178–200). Routledge.
4.
AspeC.JacquéM. (2012). Environnement et société: Une analyse sociologique de la question environnementale. Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
5.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. SAGE.
6.
BenfordR. D.SnowD. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
7.
BoströmM.LidskogR.UgglaY. (2017). A reflexive look at reflexivity in environmental sociology. Environmental Sociology, 3(1), 6–16.
8.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
10.
BrandmayrF. (2021). Social science as apologia. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(3), 319–337.
11.
BrusadelliN.MartellY. (2017). Les ‘villages des alternatives’. Formes d’engagement en tension dans les classes moyennes salariées. In HigeléJ. P.JacquotL. (Eds.), Figures de L’engagement. Objets, formes, trajectoires (pp. 157–176). Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
12.
BüchsM.SaundersC.WallbridgeR.SmithG.BardsleyN. (2015). Identifying and explaining framing strategies of low carbon lifestyle movement organisations. Global Environmental Change, 35, 307–315.
13.
CarfagnaL. B.DuboisE. A.FitzmauriceC.OuimetteM. Y.SchorJ. B.WillisM.LaidleyT. (2014). An emerging eco-habitus. The reconfiguration of high cultural capital practices among ethical consumers. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2), 158–178.
14.
CohenM. J. (2001). The emergent environmental policy discourse on sustainable consumption. In CohenM. J.MurphyJ. (Eds.), Exploring sustainable consumption (pp. 21–37). Elsevier.
15.
ColombiD. (2020). Où va l’argent des pauvres: Fantasmes politiques, réalités sociologiques. Payot.
16.
CombyJ. B. (2015). La question climatique. Genèse et dépolitisation d’un problème public. Raisons d’agir.
17.
ConnollyJ.ProtheroA. (2008). Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 117–145.
18.
de MoorJ. (2017). Lifestyle politics and the concept of political participation. Acta Politica, 52(2), 179–197.
19.
Dubuisson-QuellierS. (2015). From targets to recruits: the status of consumers within the political consumption movement. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 404–412.
20.
EvansD. M. (2019). What is consumption, where has it been going, and does it still matter?The Sociological Review, 67(3), 499–517.
21.
FassinD. (2001). Culturalism as ideology. In Makhlouf ObermeyerC. (Ed.), Cultural perspectives on reproductive health (pp. 300–317). Oxford University Press.
FuchsD.Di GiulioA.GlaabK.LorekS.ManiatesM.PrincenT.RøpkeI. (2016). Power: The missing element in sustainable consumption and absolute reductions research and action. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 298–307.
24.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press.
25.
GilbertP. (2017). The working classes in contemporary France. Books & ideas.
26.
GinsburgerM. (2020). De la norme à la pratique écocitoyenne. Position sociale, contraintes matérielles et diversité des rapports à l'écocitoyenneté. Revue Française de Sociologie. 61(1), 43–78.
GraeberD. (2011). Consumption. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 489–511.
29.
GrossmannM.CreamerE. (2017). Assessing diversity and inclusivity within the transition movement: An urban case study. Environmental Politics, 26(1), 161–182.
30.
InglehartR. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton University Press.
31.
JacobsenE.DulsrudA. (2007). Will consumers save the world? The framing of political consumerism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 20(5), 469–482.
32.
KennedyE. H.GivensJ. (2019). Eco-habitus or eco-powerlessness? Examining environmental concern across social class. Sociological Perspectives, 62(5), 646–667.
33.
Le GoffJ. (2017). Des effets des discours positifs sur les angoisses liées au changement climatique. Nouvelle Revue De Psychosociologie, 24(2), 145–156.
34.
MacGregorS. (2019). Finding transformative potential in the cracks? The ambiguities of urban environmental activism in a Neoliberal City. Social Movement Studies, 0(0), 1–17. doi:10.1080/14742837.2019.1677224
35.
MalierH. (2019). Greening the poor: The trap of moralization. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 1661–1680.
36.
ManiatesM. F. (2001). Individualization: Plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world?Global Environmental Politics, 1(3), 31–52.
37.
MaslowA. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper.
38.
OllitraultS. (1996). Science et militantisme: Les transformations d’un échange circulaire. Le cas de l’écologie française. Politix, 9(36), 141–162.
39.
OllitraultS. (2015). Militer pour la planète: Sociologie des écologistes. Res publica. Presses universitaires de Rennes.
RabhiP. (2017). The power of restraint. Actes Sud.
42.
RoseN. (1992). Governing the enterprising self. In HeelasP.MorrisP. (Eds.), The values of the enterprise culture: The moral debate (pp. 141–164). Routledge.
43.
RumpalaY. (2011). ‘Sustainable consumption’ as a new phase in a governmentalization of consumption. Theory and Society, 40(6), 669.
44.
SchorJ. B. (2007). In defense of consumer critique: Revisiting the consumption debates of the twentieth century. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 16–30.
45.
SharpG. (1973). The politics of nonviolent action. Porter Sargent.
46.
ShoveE. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285.
47.
ShoveE.WardeA. (2002). Inconspicuous consumption: The sociology of consumption, lifestyles and the environment. In DunlapR. (Ed.), Sociological theory & the environment: Classical foundations, contemporary insights (pp. 230–251). SAGE.
48.
UrryJ. (2010). Consuming the planet to excess. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3), 191–212.
49.
VeblenT. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. MacMillan.
50.
WhittakerM.SeguraG. M.BowlerS. (2005). Racial/ethnic group attitudes toward environmental protection in California: Is ‘environmentalism’ still a white phenomenon?Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 435–447.
