The aim of this article is to investigate the Habermasian way of problematizing the European political situation through consideration of the conceptual framework within which he develops his proposal. I begin by clarifying various conceptual difficulties that emerge when thinking about politics within the European Union. I then focus on the concept of popular sovereignty as procedure, which Habermas develops in Between Facts and Norms against the historical backdrop of the nation state. In the debate regarding European constitutionalization, the concept of popular sovereignty as procedure first assumes a critical function (made possible owing to its desubstantializing effect) against proponents of the no demos thesis. More recently, Habermas has advanced a concept of shared/divided sovereignty, which becomes indispensable when we consider Europe as a democratic federation. The conclusions hereby drawn disclose two problematic aspects of Habermas’s recent proposal. Respectively, these concern the viability of his approach and the questionable plausibility of this proposed federation’s ability to uphold democracy in terms of self-determination.
BalibarE. (2004). We, the people of Europe? Reflections on transnational citizenship. Princeton University Press.
2.
BaumanZ. (2004). Europe: An unfinished adventure. Polity.
3.
BeckU.GrandeE. (2007). Cosmopolitan Europe. Polity.
4.
BeckU.GrandeE. (2008). Cosmopolitanism. Europe’s way out of crisis. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(1), 67–85.
5.
BehrH.StivachtisY. A. (Eds.) (2016). Revisiting the European Union as empire. Routledge.
6.
BlokkerP. (2008). Europe ‘united in diversity’: From a central European identity to post-nationality?European Journal of Social Theory, 11(2), 257–274.
7.
CacciariM. (2016). Europe and empire: On the political forms of globalization. Fordham University Press.
8.
ChenevalF.SchimmelfennigF. (2012). The case for demoicracy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 334–350.
9.
CohenJ. L. (2012). Globalization and sovereignty: Rethinking legality, legitimacy, and constitutionalism. Oxford University Press.
10.
DelantyG. (2009). The cosmopolitan imagination: The renewal of critical social theory. Cambridge University Press.
11.
DusoG. (2010). Thinking about politics beyond modern concepts. CR: The New Centennial Review, 10(2), 73–97.
12.
EriksenE. O. (2014). The normativity of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
FerraraA. (2014). The democratic horizon: Hyperpluralism and the renewal of political liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
14.
FosterR. (2015). Mapping European empire: Tabulae Imperii Europaei. Routledge.
15.
GrimmD. (1995). Does Europe need a constitution?European Law Journal, 1(3), 282–302.
16.
GrimmD. (2015). Sovereignty: The origin and future of a political and legal concept. Columbia University Press.
17.
GrimmD. (2017). The constitution of European democracy. Oxford University Press.
18.
GüntherK. (2017). Divided sovereignty, nation and legal community. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), 213–222.
19.
HabermasJ. (1989). Ist der Herzschlag der Revolution zum Stillstand gekommen? Volkssouveränität als Verfahren: Ein normativer Begriff von Öffentlichkeit? [Has the heartbeat of Revolution come to a standstill? Popular sovereignty as procedure: A normative concept of the public sphere?] In Forum für Philosophie Bad Homburg (Ed.), Die Ideen von 1789 in der deutschen Rezeption[The ideas of 1789 in the German reception]. Suhrkamp, 7–36.
20.
HabermasJ. (1992). Further reflections on the public sphere. In CalhounC. (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere. MIT Press, 421–461.
21.
HabermasJ. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.
22.
HabermasJ. (1998). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. MIT Press.
23.
HabermasJ. (2001a). Constitutional democracy: A paradoxical union of contradictory principles?Political Theory, 29(1), 766–781.
24.
HabermasJ. (2001b). The postnational constellation: Political essays. MIT Press.
25.
HabermasJ. (2006a). The divided west. Polity Press.
26.
HabermasJ. (2006b). Time of transitions. Polity Press.
27.
HabermasJ. (2008). Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays. Polity Press.
28.
HabermasJ. (2009a). Europe. The faltering project. Polity.
29.
HabermasJ. (2009b). Philosophische texte band 4: Politische theorie [Philosophical texts volume 4: Political theory]. Suhrkamp.
30.
HabermasJ. (2011). Zur Verfassung Europas. Ein Essay [On the constitution of Europe. An essay]. Suhrkamp.
31.
HabermasJ. (2012). The crisis of the European Union. A response. Polity.
32.
HabermasJ. (2013). Im Sog der Technokratie: Kleine Politische Schriften XII [In the wake of technocracy: Small political writings XII]. Suhrkamp.
33.
HabermasJ. (2015a). Democracy in Europe: Why the development of the EU into a transnational democracy is necessary and how it is possible. European Law Journal, 21(4), 546–557.
34.
HabermasJ. (2015b). The lure of technocracy. Polity Press.
35.
HabermasJ. (2017). Citizen and state equality in a supranational political community: Degressive proportionality and the pouvoir constituant mixte. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), 171–182.
36.
HofmannH. (2014). Über Volkssouveränität: Eine begriffliche Sondierung [On popular sovereignty: A conceptual exploration]. JuristenZeitung, 69(18), 861–912.
37.
JohnsonP. (2008). Globalizing democracy: Reflections on Habermas’s radicalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(1), 71–86.
38.
KrischN. (2010). Beyond constitutionalism: The pluralist structure of postnational law. Oxford University Press.
39.
KummM. (2008). Why Europeans will not embrace constitutional patriotism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(1), 117–136.
40.
LacroixJ. (2009). Does Europe need common values? Habermas vs Habermas. European Journal of Political Theory, 8(2), 141–156.
41.
MarksG. (2011). Europe and its empires: From Rome to the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 1–20.
42.
MausI. (1995). Liberties and popular sovereignty: On Jürgen Habermas’s reconstruction of the system of rights. Cardozo Law Review, 17(4-5), 825–882.
43.
MüllerJ. W. (2007). Constitutional patriotism. Princeton University Press.
44.
Müller-DoohmS. (2010). Nation state, capitalism, democracy: Philosophical and political motives in the thought of Jürgen Habermas. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(4), 443–457.
45.
NiesenP. (2017). The ‘mixed’ constituent legitimacy of the European federation. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), 183–192.
46.
OuthwaiteW. (2009). Habermas: A critical introduction. Polity.
47.
PatbergM. (2017). The levelling up of constituent power in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), 203–212.
48.
PerjuV. (2018). Double sovereignty in Europe? A critique of Habermas’s defense of the nation-state. Texas International Law Journal, 53(1), 49–75.
49.
PerjuV. (2019). The asymmetries of pouvoir constituant mixte. European Law Journal, 25(5), 515–520.
50.
RosanvallonP. (2011). Democratic legitimacy: Impartiality, reflexivity, proximity. Princeton University Press.
51.
ScuccimarraL. (2014). Espace public et constellation post-nationale: Lire Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit à l’époque globale [Public sphere and postnational constellation: Reading The structural transformations of the public sphere in the global era]. Philonsorbonne [En ligne], 8, 177–187.
52.
WalkerN. (2019). Habermas’s European constitution: Catalyst, reconstruction, refounding. European Law Journal, 25(5), 508–514.
53.
ZielonkaJ. (2006). Europe as empire: The nature of the enlarged European Union. Oxford University Press.
