The 1989 revolutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the subsequent transitions have commonly been interpreted in political terms, as movements towards democracy, or in economic terms, as escape from the command economy towards the free market. We revisit the problem to suggest a different reading. We argue that in the legitimization crisis of real socialism, a pivotal role was played by the burden of social oversaturation and bureaucratic arbitrariness, which met its desired alternative in social imaginaries of impersonal, objective social system. For the citizens of Central and East European countries, this fantasy was matched by the promise of the free market, which was morally contrasted to the experience of daily life under late socialism. We argue that this desire to escape from arbitrariness to objectivity is a particularly strong motive in the imaginary of modernity which found one of its historical manifestations in the disappointment with real socialism.
AlexanderJ. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford University Press.
2.
AlexanderJ. C.SmithP. (1993). The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies. Theory and Society, 22(2), 151–207.
3.
ArendtH. (1990). On revolution. Penguin. (Original work published 1963)
4.
BeissingerM. R.KotkinS. (2014). Historical legacies of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BermanM. (1988). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. Penguin Books.
6.
BlokkerP. (2005). Post-communist modernization, transition studies, and diversity in Europe. European Journal of Social Theory, 8(4), 503–525.
7.
BrierR. (2009). Historicizing 1989: Transnational culture and the political transformation of East-Central Europe. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(3), 337–357.
8.
BrzostekB. (2007). Za progiem. Codzienność w przestrzeni publicznej Warszawy lat 1955-1970. Trio.
9.
CastoriadisC. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. MIT Press.
10.
CBOS. (1990). Nowy ład gospodarczy w opinii pracowników gospodarki uspołecznionej. CBOS.
11.
ChelceaL.DrutaO. (2016). Zombie socialism and the rise of neoliberalism in post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(4–5), 521–544.
12.
DangerfieldM. (1997). Ideology and the Czech transformation: Neoliberal rhetoric or neoliberal reality?East European Politics, Societies, and Cultures, 11(3), 436–469.
13.
EngelsF. (1934). Anti-duhring. Lawrence and Wishart.
14.
FehérF.HellerA.MárkusG. (1986). Dictatorship over needs: An analysis of Soviet societies. Basil Blackwell.
15.
FryeN. (1957). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton University Press.
16.
GoffmanE (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17.
17.
HanleyS. (1999). The new right in the new Europe? Unravelling the ideology of ‘Czech Thatcherism’. Journal of Political Ideologies, 4(2), 163–189.
18.
HillmarT. (2019). The temporal logic of deservingness: Inequality beliefs in two postsocialist societies. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 1–16.
19.
HirtS. (2012). Iron curtains: Gates, suburbs and privatization of space in the post-socialist city. Wiley-Blackwell.
20.
HolýL. (2001). Malý český člověk a skvělý český národ: Národní identita a postkomunistická transformace společnosti. SLON.
21.
HontI. (2015). Politics in commercial society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith. Harvard University Press.
22.
HrabaJ. (1985). Consumer shortages in Poland: Looking beyond the queue into a world of making do. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(3), 387–404.
23.
JamesonF. (1998). The cultural turn: Selected writings on the postmodern, 1983-1998. Verso.
24.
KallioJ.NiemeläM. (2014). Who blames the poor? Multilevel evidence of support for and determinants of individualistic explanation of poverty in Europe. European Societies, 16(1), 112–135.
25.
KantI. (1991). Political writings (NisbetH. B., Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
26.
KennedyM. D.GaltzN. (1996). From Marxism to postcommunism: Socialist desires and East European rejections. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 437–458.
27.
KinderD. R.KiewietD. R. (1981). Sociotropic politics: The American case. British Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 129–161.
28.
KitscheltH. (1995). Formation of party cleavages in post-communist democracies: Theoretical propositions. Party Politics, 1(4), 447–472.
29.
KluegelJ. R.MasonD. S. (2004). Fairness matters: Social justice and political legitimacy in post-communist Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 56(6), 813–834.
30.
KluegelJ. R.MasonD. S.WegenerB. (1999). The legitimation of capitalism in the postcommunist transition: Public opinion about market justice, 1991–1996. European Sociological Review, 15(3), 251–283.
31.
KnapíkJ.FrancM. (2011). Průvodce kulturním děním a životním stylem v českých zemích 1948-1967. Academia.
KubikJ. (2013). From transitology to contextual holism: A theoretical trajectory of postcommunist studies. In KubikJ.LinchA. (Eds.), Postcommunism from within: Social justice, mobilization, and hegemony (pp. 27–94). NYU Press.
34.
LefortC. (2007). Complications: Communism and the dilemmas of democracy. Columbia University Press.
35.
LockeJ. (2003). Two treatises of government and a letter concerning toleration. Yale University Press. (Original work published 1689)
36.
McIntoshM. E.Mac IverM. A. (1992). Coping with freedom and uncertainty: Public opinion in Hungary, Poland, and Czechoslovakia 1989–1992. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4(4), 375–391.
37.
MacphersonC. B. (1972). The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford University Press.
38.
MadejK. (2006). Administracja terenowa w działaniu (1956–1970). In KottS.KulaM.LindenbergerT. (Eds.), Socjalizm w życiu powszednim. Dyktatura a społeczeństwo w PRL i NRD (pp. 153–165). Trio; Zenter für Zeithistorische Forschung.
39.
MarxK. (1962). Speech at the anniversary of the ‘People’s Paper’. In: Marx/Engels selected works (Vol. 1) (pp. 359–360). Foreign Languages Publishing Press. (Original work published 1856)
40.
MarxK.EngelsF. (1969). Manifesto of the Communist Party. In: Marx/Engels selected works (Vol. 1) (pp. 98–137). Progress Publishers. (Original work published 1848)
41.
MarxK.EngelsF. (1962). The German ideology. Foreign Languages Publishing Press. (Original work published 1932)
42.
MazurekM. (2010). Antropologia niedoboru w NRD i PRL 1971–1989. ATUT.
43.
MilgramS.LibertyH. J.ToledoR.WackenhutJ. (1986). Response to intrusion into waiting lines. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 683.
44.
MožnýI. (2009). Proč tak snadno. Některé rodinné důvody sametové revoluce. SLON.
45.
NormanD. A. (2010). Living with complexity. MIT press.
46.
NullmeierF.BiegońD. (2017). Justifying and criticizing the capitalist market economy: A typology of legitimation criteria. In SchneiderS.SchmidtkeH.HaunssS.GronauJ. (Eds.), Capitalism and its legitimacy in the times of crisis (pp. 37–60). Palgrave.
47.
PerottinoM. (2016). The disappearance of politics, or depolitization the Czech way. Sociální Studia/Social Studies, 13(1), 45–56.
48.
PittawayM. (2004). Eastern Europe 1939-2000. Arnold.
49.
PospěchP. (2019). The spectre of the queue: Resignifying the past in the post-communist Czech Republic. American Journal of Cultural Sociology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-019-00068-9
50.
PullmannM. (2011). Konec experimentu: Přestavba a pád komunismu v Československu. Scriptorium.
51.
RayL. (2009). At the end of the post-communist transformation? Normalization or imagining utopia?European Journal of Social Theory, 12(3), 321–336.
52.
Saint-SimonC. H. (1976). On the industrial system. In IonescuG. (Ed.), The political thought of Saint-Simon (pp. 153-181). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1821)
53.
SmithA. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1759)
54.
SmithA. (1979). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Vol. 1). Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1776)
55.
SmithP. (1998). Barbarism and civility in the discourses of fascism, communism and democracy: Variations on a set of themes. In AlexanderJ. C. (Ed.), Real civil societies (pp. 115–137). Sage.
56.
StaniszkisJ. (1984). Poland’s self-limiting revolution. Princeton University Press.
57.
StaniszkisJ. (2006a). Ontologia socjalizmu. Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej.
58.
StaniszkisJ. (2006b). O władzy i bezsilności. Wydawnictwo Literackie.
59.
StreeckW. (2017). How will capitalism end?Verso.
60.
SzcześniakM. (2016). Normy widzialności. Tożsamość w czasach transformacji. Fundacja Bęc Zmiana, Instytut Kultury Polskiej UW.
61.
TarkowskiJ. (1983). Patronage in a centralized, socialist system: The case of Poland. International Political Science Review, 4(4), 495–518.
VarghaZ. (2014). Clocks, clerks, customers: Queue management systems, post-socialist sensibilities, and performance measurement at a retail bank. In De VaujanyF. X.MitevN.LanirayP.VaastE. (Eds.), Materiality and time (pp. 124–144). Palgrave Macmillan.
64.
WagnerP. (1994). A sociology of modernity: Liberty and discipline. Routledge.
65.
WeltrowskaJ. (2002). Economic change and social polarization in Poland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(1), 47–52.
66.
WittenbergJ. (2015). Conceptualizing historical legacies. East European Politics, Societies, and Cultures, 29(2), 366–378.
67.
ŽižekS. (1997). The supposed subjects of ideology. Critical Quarterly, 39(2), 39–59.
68.
ŽižekS. (2002). Lenin’s choice. In LeninV. I. (Ed.), Revolution at the gates: A selection of writings from February to October 1917 (pp. 165–336). Verso.
69.
ŽižekS. (2004). On belief. Routledge.
70.
ŽižekS. (2011). Did somebody say totalitarianism? Five interventions in the (mis)use of a notion. Verso.
