Social theories of giving have often been shaped by anthropological accounts that present it as a form of pre-market reciprocal exchange, yet this exchangist discourse obscures important contemporary giving practices. This article discusses two types of giving that confound the exchangist model: (1) sharing practices within the family; and (2) free gifts to strangers. Once we reject understandings of giving derived from analyses of non-modern economies, it is possible to see that the gift economy is not a rare survival but rather is a central element of contemporary society and indeed the contemporary economy. The task for social theory is not to anachronize giving but to make sense of the variety and complexity of actual contemporary giving practices. This article offers the categories of free and positional gifts as a contribution to this analysis.
AdloffFMauS (2006) Giving, social ties, reciprocity in modern society. European Journal of Sociology47(1): 93–123.
2.
AndersonC (2009) Free: The Future of a Radical Price. New York: Random House.
3.
BarmanE (2007) An institutional approach to donor control. American Journal of Sociology112(5): 1416–57.
4.
BerkingH (1999) Sociology of Giving. London: Sage.
5.
Bird-DavidNDarrA (2009) Commodity, gift and mass-gift. Economy and Society38(2): 304–25.
6.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BourdieuP (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
ChealDJ (1988) The Gift Economy. London: Routledge.
9.
DerridaJ (1997) The time of the king. In: SchriftAD (ed.) The Logic of the Gift. New York: Routledge, pp. 121–47.
10.
DouglasM (2002) Foreword: no free gifts. In: MaussMThe Gift. London: Routledge, pp. ix–xxiii.
11.
Elder-VassD (2007) Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action. Sociological Theory25
(4): 325–46.
12.
Elder-VassD (2010) The Causal Power of Social Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Elder-VassD (2012) The Reality of Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Elder-VassD (2014a) Commerce, community and digital gifts. In: GarnettRFLewisPEalyL (eds) Commerce and Community. London: Routledge, pp. 236–52.
15.
Elder-VassD (2014b) Giving and social transformation. Journal of Critical Realism13(3): 26–85.
16.
FuchsC (2008) Internet and Society. New York: Routledge.
17.
Gibson-GrahamJK (2006) The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
GillespieT (2007) Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
GodboutJ (2000) Homo donator versus homo oeconomicus. In: VandeveldeA (ed.) Gifts and Interests. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 23–46.
20.
GodboutJCailléA (1998) The World of the Gift. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
21.
GoldsmithJLWuT (2006) Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a Borderless World. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
GraeberD (2011) Debt: The First 5,000 Years. New York: Melville House.
23.
HealyK (2006) Last Best Gifts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
HeathSCalvertE (2013) Gifts, loans and intergenerational support for young adults. Sociology47(6): 1120–35.
25.
IronmongerD (1996) Counting outputs, capital inputs and caring labor: estimating gross household product. Feminist Economics2(3): 37–64.
26.
KomterAE (2005) Social Solidarity and the Gift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Lainer-VosD (2013) Sinews of the Nation. Cambridge: Polity.
28.
LernerJTiroleJ (2002) Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics50(2): 197–234.
29.
MaussM ([1950] 2002) The Gift. London: Routledge.
30.
MaussM ([1967] 2007) Manual of Ethnography. New York: Berghahn Books/Durkheim Press.
31.
McClainNMearsA (2012) Free to those who can afford it. Poetics40: 133–49.
32.
MearsA (2014) The elite potlatch: gifts, girls, and distinction among the global VIP. Paper presented at ISA World Congress of Sociology, Yokohama, Japan, 16 July 2014.
33.
MertonRK (1973) The normative structure of science. In: MertonRKThe Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 267–80.
34.
MillerD (1998) A Theory of Shopping. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
MirowskiP (2001) Refusing the gift. In: CullenbergSAmariglioJRuccioDF (eds) Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 431–58.
36.
NelsonRR (2005) The Limits of Market Organization. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37.
OsteenM (2002a) Introduction. In: OsteenMThe Question of the Gift: Essays across Disciplines. London: Routledge, pp. 1–41.
38.
OsteenM (2002b) The Question of the Gift: Essays across Disciplines. London: Routledge.
39.
O’SullivanD (2009) Wikipedia: A New Community of Practice?Farnham: Ashgate.
40.
PolanyiK ([1957] 2001) The economy as instituted process. In: GranovetterMSwedbergR (eds) The Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 31–50.
41.
PyyhtinenO (2014) The Gift and its Paradoxes. Farnham: Ashgate.
42.
SahlinsM (1974) Stone Age Economics. London: Tavistock.
ShirkyC (2009) Here Comes Everybody. London: Penguin.
45.
SilberI (1998) Modern philanthropy: reassessing the viability of a Maussian perspective. In: JamesWAllenNJ (eds) Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 134–50.
46.
StrangeloveM (2005) The Empire of Mind: Digital Piracy and the Anti-Capitalist Movement. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
47.
TestartA (1998) Uncertainties of the ‘obligation to reciprocate’: a critique of Mauss. In: JamesWAllenNJ (eds) Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 97–110.
48.
TitmussR (1997) The Gift Relationship. New York: The New Press.
49.
WeberS (2004) The Success of Open Source. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
