The present article develops a new approach to intellectual history and sociology of knowledge. Its point of departure is to investigate the conditions under which social thinkers assume the iconic reputation. What does it take to become ‘a founding father’ of a humanistic discipline? How do social thinkers achieve the status of a trans-disciplinary star? Why some intellectuals attract tremendous attention and ‘go down in history’ despite personal and professional failures, while others enjoy only limited recognition or simply sink into oblivion, even if they have met all the standards of their day? Quite a few sociologists have tackled this elusive issue. Pierre Bourdieu, Michele Lamont and Randall Collins are among those who fleshed out strong explanatory frameworks. This project adds to this body of knowledge by emphasizing cultural factors that these authors downplayed in their seminal accounts, despite being aware of their significance. By showing why these underdeveloped aspects of their works need to be incorporated into the debate and how this can be achieved, this article introduces a new theorization of the iconic, lasting intellectual reputation substantiated by evidence from the lifeworks of Bronisław Malinowski and Michel Foucault. As such, it aims, minimally, to make sociology of knowledge decisively ‘cultural’. Maximally, it seeks to demonstrate that the iconic success of intellectual intervention in social theory depends on carefully performed and contingently mediated engagement with the binary systems of symbolic classification.
AdamsJClemensESOrloffA (2005) Introduction: social theory, modernity, and the three waves of historical sociology. In: AdamsJClemensESOrloffA (eds) Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–72.
2.
AlexanderJC (2003) The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
AlexanderJCSmithP (2011) Introduction: The rise and fall and rise of Clifford Geertz. In: AlexanderJCSmithPNortonM (eds) Interpreting Clifford Geertz: Cultural Investigations in the Social Sciences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–6.
4.
Bachmann-MedickD (2007) Cultural Turns: Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
5.
BartonF (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific by MalinowskiB. Man, 22: 189–90.
6.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BourdieuP (1988) Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
BourdieuP (1991) The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BourdieuP (1994) Academic Discourse. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
BourdieuP (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
CampbellSF (2002) The Art of Kula. Oxford: Berg.
12.
CliffordJ (1988) Predicament of Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
CollinsR (2002) On the acrimoniousness of intellectuals’ disputes. Common Knowledge8(1): 47–70.
14.
CollinsR (2004) Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
DeleuzeG (1988) Foucault. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
17.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (2000) Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
18.
DreyfusHLRabinowP (1983) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
19.
FaubionJD (1998) Introduction. In: FoucaultMAesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. New York: The New Press, pp. xiii–xlv.
20.
FirthR (ed.) (1957) Man and Culture. An Evaluation of the Work of Bronisław Malinowski. New York: Harper and Row.
21.
FoucaultM (1998) Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. Ed. FaubionJD. New York: The New Press.
22.
FoucaultM (2000) Preface. In: DeleuzeGGuattariFAnti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. xi–xiv.
23.
GeertzC (2000a) Available Light. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
GeertzC (2000b) Dzielo i zycie. Antropolog jako autor [Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author]. Warszawa: KR.
25.
GellnerE (1998) Language and Solitude: Wittgenstein, Malinowski and the Habsburg Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GinsbergM (1924) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Economica11: 239–41.
27.
GuttingG (ed.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HaddonAC (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific by Bronisław Malinowski. Nature110: 473–4.
29.
HamiltonRF (1996) The Social Misconstruction of Reality:. Validity and Verification in Scholarly Community. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
HogbinHI (1946) The Trobriand Islands, 1945. Letter to the Editor. Man67: 72.
31.
IngramD (2003) Foucault and Habermas. In: GuttingG (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–84.
32.
JohnstonBV (1995) Pitirim A. Sorokin: An Intellectual Biography. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
33.
JudtT (2008) Reappraisals. New York: The Penguin Press.
34.
KendallGWickhamG (1999) Using Foucault’s Methods. London: Sage.
35.
KolakowskiL (1988) Metaphysical Horror. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
36.
KoppersW (1923) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Anthropos18: 585–7.
37.
Kubica-HellerG (2001) Preface. In: MalinowskiB (2001) Dziennik w scislym znaczeniu tego wyrazu (Diary–Complete Original Text). Edited by Grazyna Kubica-Heller. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
38.
LamontM (1987) How to become a dominant French philosopher: the case of Jacques Derrida. The American Journal of Sociology93(3): 584–622.
39.
LamontM (1989) Slipping the world back: Bourdieu on Heidegger. Contemporary Sociology18(5): 781–3.
40.
LemertCCGillanG (1999) Michel Foucault. Teoria spoleczna i transgresja [Michel Foucault. Social Theory and Transgression]. Warszawa: PWN.
41.
MacleanI (1999) The process of intellectual change: a post-Foucauldian hypothesis. In: NeubauerJ (ed.). Cultural History After Foucault. New York: Aldine Gruyter, pp. 163–77.
42.
MarcusGEFischerMM (1999) Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
43.
MalinowskiB (1929) The Sexual Life of Savages. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
44.
MalinowskiB (1960) The problem of meaning in primitive language. In: OgdenCKRichardsIA (eds) The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 296–336.
45.
MalinowskiB (1961) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: Dutton.
46.
MalinowskiB (2001) Dziennik w scislym znaczeniu tego wyrazu [Diary – Complete Original Text]. Krakow: Edited by Grazyna Kubica-Heller. Krakow:Wydawnictwo Literackie.
47.
NeubauerJ (ed.) (1999) Cultural History After Foucault. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
48.
ParasE (2006) Foucault 2.0. New York: Other Press.
49.
PayneHC (1981) Malinowski’s style. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 125(6).
50.
RichardsAI (1957) The concept of culture in Malinowski’s work. In: FirthR (ed.) Man and Culture: An Evaluation of the Work of Bronisław Malinowski. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 15–33.
51.
RileyAT (2005) Renegade Durkheimianism and the Transgressive left sacred. In: AlexanderJCSmithP (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 274–301.
52.
RousseauG (1999) No sex please, we’re Americans: erotophobia, liberation, and cultural history. In: NeubauerJ (ed.) Cultural History After Foucault. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 3–37.
53.
SahlinsM (2000) Culture in Practice. New York: Zone Books.
54.
SaidE (1996) Representations of the Intellectual. New York: Vintage Books.
55.
SchwiedlandE (1923) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. The Economic Journal33(132): 558–60.
56.
ShilsE (1982) The Constitution of Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
57.
ShustermanR (2000) Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
58.
SimpsonD (2002) Situatedness, or, Why We Keep Saying Where We’re Coming From. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
59.
SlugaH (2003) Foucault’s encounter with Heidegger and Nietzsche. In: GuttingG (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 210–40.
60.
SmithP (2008) Punishment and Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
61.
SmithPAlexanderJC (2005) Introduction: the new Durkheim. In: AlexanderJCSmithP (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–41.
62.
StrenskiI (1987) Four Theories of Myth in Twentieth-Century History: Cassirer, Eliade, Lévi-Strauss and Malinowski. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
WhiteH (1987) The Content of the Form. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
65.
WhitebookJ (2003) Against interiority: Foucault’s struggle with psychoanalysis. In: GuttingG (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 312–48.
66.
WolinR (1998) Between fact and interpretation: on the social misconstruction of reality. Theory & Society27(5): 709–23.
67.
YoungMW (2004) Malinowski: Odyssey of an Anthropologist 1884–1920. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
