Recent years (pre-Obama) of transatlantic rifts should not deceive us into ignoring the great attraction that the United States has exerted, and continues to exert, on Europeans. This article, first, seeks to uncover the normative assumptions that underpin the US as an exemplar or polity model for the EU, as seen from a European perspective. Second, it briefly considers whether the traits that Europeans find attractive about the US as a polity model have much real bearing on the EU, not in terms of how Europeans would want the EU to be but in terms of how the EU presently is. The point is to get a sense of the empirical distance that Europeans would have to travel if they were to transpose what they find attractive about the US to the EU. Are the features Europeans hold up as attractive about the US also available in Europe? These two undertakings set the stage for the third and most original, endeavour, which is to consider whether there are entities that are more compatible with what we currently find in Europe. The case singled out here is another American state, namely Canada. A clarification and critical assessment of what is referred to here as ‘Europe’s American Dream’ are intended to serve as a kind of mirror for Europeans to consider whether the European project is: (a) one of emulating the US; (b) a unique experiment; or (c) an EU that is closer to Canada than the US. If the reality of Canada is more proximate to the reality of the EU, should then Canada instead serve as Europe’s American Dream?
Ackerman, Bruce ( 1991) We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
2.
Banting, Keith G. ( 2005) ‘Canada as Counter-Narrative, Multiculturalism, Recognition and Redistribution’, paper presented at the seminar ‘The Ties that Bind: Accommodating Complex Diversity in Canada and the European Union’, Brussels, Belgium, 17-19 November.
3.
Block, Fred ( 2007) ‘Understanding the Diverging Trajectories of the United States and Western Europe: A Neo-Polanyian Analysis’, Politics & Society35(1): 3-33.
4.
Bohman, James ( 2004) ‘Constitution Making and Democratic Innovation: The European Union and Transnational Governance’, European Journal of Political Theory3(3): 315-37.
5.
Boniface, P. ( 2000) ‘Reflections on America as a World Power: AEuropean View’, Journal of Palestine Studies29(3): 5-15.
6.
Brunkhorst, Hauke ( 2004) ‘A Polity without a State? European Constitutionalism between Evolution and Revolution’, in E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez (eds) Developing a Constitution for Europe, pp. 88-105. London: Routledge .
7.
Cairns, Alan C. ( 2003) ‘The Canadian Experience of a Charter of Rights’ , in E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez (eds) The Chartering of Europe: The Charter of Fundamental Rights and its Constitutional Implications, pp. 93-111. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
8.
Chambers, Simone ( 1998) ‘Contract or Conversation. Theoretical Lessons from the Canadian Constitutional Crisis’, Politics and Society26(1):143-72.
9.
Cooper, Andrew F. ( 1997) Canadian Foreign Policy. Scarborough , ON: Prentice Hall.
10.
Daalder, Ivo H. ( 2005) ‘The End of Atlanticism’, in T. Lindberg (ed.) Beyond Paradise and Power , pp. 39-60. New York: Routledge.
Duchêne, François (1972) ‘Europe’s Role in World Peace’, in R. Mayne (ed.) Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, pp. 32-47. London : Collins.
13.
-- ( 1973) ‘The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence’, in M. Kohnstamm and W. Hager (eds) A Nation Writ Large? Foreign-Policy Problems Before the Community, pp.1-21. London: Macmillan.
14.
Elazar, Daniel J. ( 2001) ‘The United States and the European Union: Models for Their Epochs’, in K. Nicolaidis and R. Howse (eds) The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union, pp. 31-54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Fossum, John E. ( 2003) ‘The European Union - In Search of an Identity’ , European Journal of Political Theory2(3): 319-40.
16.
Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustín J. (2005) ‘The Constitution’s Gift? A Deliberative Democratic Analysis of Constitution Making in the European Union’, European Law Journal11(4): 380-410.
17.
Gilpin, Robert ( 1981) War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
-- ( 1987) The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Goffman, Erving ( 1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Goodhart, David ( 2004). ‘Too Diverse?’, Prospect February: 30-7.
21.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 2004) ‘America and the World - A Conversation with Jürgen Habermas’, with Eduardo Mendieta. http://www.logosjournal.com/habermas_america.pdf (accessed 12 August 2009).
22.
Holland, Martin ( 1996) ‘Jean Monnet and the Federal Functionalist Approach to European Unity’, in P. Murray and P. Rich (eds) Visions of European Unity , pp. 93-108. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23.
Kagan, Robert ( 2002) ‘Power and Weakness’, Policy Review113, June/July.
24.
-- ( 2003) Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Knopf.
25.
Keohane, Robert ( 1980) ‘The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes’, in O. Holsti, R.M. Siverson and A. George (eds) Change in the International System, pp. 132-62.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
Kymlicka, Will ( 1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon.
27.
-- ( 1998) Finding our Way. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
-- ( 2007) Multicultural Odysseys. Oxford: Oxford University Press
29.
Linklater, Andrew. ( 1998) The Transformation of Political Community. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Lipset, Seymour Martin ( 1979) The First New Nation. New York: Norton & Company, Inc.
31.
-- ( 1990) Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.
32.
-- ( 1996) American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: Norton & Company, Inc.
33.
Majone, Giandomenico ( 1996) Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
34.
-- ( 2005) Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
Manners, Ian ( 2002) ‘Normative Power Europe - A Contradiction in Terms?’ , Journal of Common Market Studies40(2): 235-58.
36.
-- ( 2006) ‘Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads’, Journal of European Public Policy13(2): 182-99.
37.
Mead, Walter R. ( 2002) Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How it Changed the World. London: Routledge .
38.
Menéndez, Agustín J. (2004) ‘Three Conceptions of the European Constitution’, in E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez (eds) Developing a Constitution for Europe, pp. 109-28. London: Routledge .
39.
-- ( 2008) ‘Is European Union Law a Pluralist Legal Order?’ , in A.J. Menéndez and J.E. Fossum (eds) The Post-Sovereign Constellation, ARENA Report No 4/08, pp. 233-314.
40.
Milward, Alan. S. ( 1992) The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London: Routledge.
41.
Möllers, Christoph ( 2004) ‘The Politics of Law and the Law of Politics: Two Constitutional Traditions in Europe’, in E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez (eds) Developing a Constitution for Europe, pp.129-39. London: Routledge .
42.
Moravcsik, Andrew ( 1998) The Choice for Europe. London: UCL Press.
43.
Morton, F.L. and Knopff, R. ( 2000) The Charter Revolution and the Court Party. Peter-borough, ON: Broadview Press.
44.
Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Howse, Robert, eds (2001) The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union, pp. 31-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Norman, Wayne ( 2001) ‘Justice and Stability in Multination States’ , in J. Tully and A. Gagnon (eds) Struggles for Recognition in Multinational Societies, pp. 90-109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Nossal, Kim Richard ( 2003) ‘The World We Want? The Purposeful Confusion of Values, Goals, and Interests in Canadian Foreign Policy’. Available at: http://www.cdfai.org/PDF/The%20World%20We%20Want.pdf
47.
Oakeshott, Michael ( 1975) ‘The Vocabulary of the Modern European State’ , Political Studies2-3: 319-41 and 4: 409-15.
48.
Offe, Claus ( 2005) Reflections on America: Tocqueville, Weber and Adorno in the United States. Cambridge: Polity Press.
49.
Reid, T.R. ( 2004) The United States of Europe. New York : The Penguin Press.
50.
Rein, M. and Schön, D. ( 1993) ‘Reframing Policy Discourse’, in F. Fisher and J. Forrester (eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis, pp. 145-66. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
51.
Rifkin, Jeremy ( 2004) The European Dream. Cambridge: Polity Press.
52.
Russell, Peter H. ( 1993) Constitutional Odyssey: Can Canadians Become a Sovereign People?, 2nd edn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
53.
Salmon, T. and Nicoll, W. ( 1997) Building European Union: A Documentary History and Analysis . Manchester: Manchester University Press.
54.
Sjursen, H. (ed.) (2007) Civilian or Military Power? European Foreign Policy in Perspective. London: Routledge.
55.
Smith, Michael ( 2004) ‘Between Two Worlds? The European Union, the United States and World Order’, International Politics41: 95-117.
56.
Stephanson, Anders ( 1995) Manifest Destiny, American Expansion and the Empire of Right. New York: Hill and Wang.
57.
Tocqueville, Alexis de ( 1969) Democracy in America, 2 vols. New York : Harper & Row Publishers.
58.
Weiler, J.H.H. ( 1999) The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
-- ( 2001) ‘Federalism without Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg’, in K. Nicolaidis and R. Howse (eds) The Federal Vision, pp. 54-71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
