Radical uncertainty plays a major role in the transformation of the social production of knowledge by questioning the centrality of scientific-technical expertise. Important changes are occurring in the discursive and social divisions characterizing the production and management of knowledge, but the ability of these innovations to cope with the challenge of radical uncertainty is doubtful. This seems to call for a reassessment of the forms of knowledge-related social cooperation, but the late modern public sphere does not provide favourable conditions for this endeavour. Is there a way out of this impasse? The answer is difficult and conditional on many factors. However, Dewey's theory of inquiry and of the public sphere may offer a useful standpoint for further investigation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, R. (1998) `Environmental Regulation and Business `Self-regulation' ' , Policy Sciences31: 177-197 .
2.
Arendt, A. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
3.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. London: Sage .
4.
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1994) Individualisierung in modernen Gesellschaften. Perspektiven und Kontroversen einer subjektorientierten Soziologie, in U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (eds) Riskante Freiheiten: Individualisierung in modernen Gesellschaften. pp. 10-39. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp .
5.
Benhabib, S. (1992) `Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas', in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. pp. 73-98. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
6.
Bucchi, M. (1998) Science and the Media. London: Routledge .
7.
Buchanan, A. (1996) `Choosing Who Will Be Disabled: Genetic Intervention and the Morality of Inclusion' , Social Philosophy and Policy13(2): 18-46 .
8.
Buttel, F. (2000) `Reflections on the Potentials of Ecological Modernization as a Theory' , Natures, Sciences, Sociétés8(1): 5-12 .
9.
Carlsson, I. and Ramphal, S., eds (1995) Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
10.
Clark, J. and Murdoch, J. (1997) `Local Knowledge and the Precarious Extension of Scientific Networks: A Reflection on Three Case Studies' , Sociologia Ruralis37(1): 38-60 .
11.
Cohen, J. (1993) `Moral Pluralism and Political Consensus', in D. Copp, J. Hampton and J.E. Roemer (eds) The Idea of Democracy. pp. 270-291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
12.
Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. (1997) `Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy' , European Law Journal3(4): 313-342 .
13.
Dehousse, R. (1997) `Regulation by Networks in the European Community: The Role of European Agencies' , Journal of European Public Policy4(2): 246-261 .
14.
De Marchi, B. (2001) `Public Involvement in Risk Issues in the European Union: New Directions in Governance' , paper presented at the IPAA QLD 2001 State Conference, Corporate Governance - Building Trust and Credibility, 24 August, Brisbane.
15.
De Marchi, B. and Pellizzoni, L. (2002) `Genetic Technologies: Questions about Risk and Democracy' , Journal of BioLaw and Business, Bio-Ethix Special Supplement: 67-76 .
16.
Dewey, J. (1927, 1981-92) `The Public and its Problems', in J. Bodyston (ed.) John Dewey: The Later Works, vol. 2 (1925-7). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press .
17.
Dewey, J. (1938, 1981-92) `Logic: The Theory of Inquiry', in J. Bodyston (ed.) John Dewey: The Later Works, vol. 12 (1938). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press .
18.
Diani, M. and Donati, P. (1998) `Mutamenti organizzativi nei movimenti ambientalisti europei: un modello di analisi' , Quaderni di Scienza Politica5(3): 377-406 .
19.
Dryzek, J. (1996) `Strategies of Ecological Democratization', in W. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft (eds) Democracy and the Environment. pp. 108-123. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
20.
Eder, K. (1996) `The Institutionalisation of Environmentalism: Ecological Discourse and the Second Transformation of the Public Sphere', in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity. pp. 203-223. London: Sage .
21.
Eurobarometer (2000) `The Europeans and Biotechnology', Eurobarometer 52.1. Brussels .
22.
European Commission (2000a) Science, Society and the Citizen in Europe (working document SEC(2000) 1973). Brussels: European Commission .
23.
European Commission (2000b) The Commission and Non-Governmental Organisations: Building a Stronger Partnership. Discussion paper by an inter-departmental working group, March. Brussels: European Commission .
24.
European Commission (2001) European Governance: A White Paper (COM(2001) 428). Brussels: European Commission .
25.
Festenstein, M. (2001) `Inquiry as Critique: On the Legacy of Deweyan Pragmatism for Political Theory' , Political Studies49: 730-748 .
26.
Foucault, M. (1971) L'Ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard .
27.
Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (1992) `The Good, the True and the Post-modern' , Futures24(10): 963-976 .
28.
Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (1993) `Science for the Post-normal Age' , Futures25(7): 739-755 .
29.
Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J., eds (1999) `Post-normal Science' , Futures31(7) (special issue).
30.
Funtowicz, S., Shepherd, I., Wilkinson, D. and Ravetz, J. (2000) `Science and Governance in the European Union: A Contribution to the Debate' , Science and Public Policy27(5): 327-336 .
31.
Gallopin, G., Funtowicz, S., O'Connor, M. and Ravetz, J. (2001) `Science for the 21st Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific Core' , International Journal of Social Science168: 220-229 .
32.
Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity .
33.
Giddens, A. (1994) `Living in a Post-traditional Society', in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. pp. 56-109. Cambridge: Polity Press .
34.
Greimas, A. and Courtès, J. (1979) Sémiotique: Dictionnaire raisonné de la thèorie du langage. Paris: Hachette .
35.
Haas, P., ed. (1992) `Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination' , International Organization46(1) (special issue).
36.
Habermas, J. (1983) Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp .
37.
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
38.
Habermas, J. (1996a) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity .
39.
Habermas, J. (1996b) `Replik auf Beiträge zu einem Symposion der Cardozo Law School', in J. Habermas Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp .
40.
Hajer, M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
41.
Holmes, T. and Scoones, I. (2000) Participatory Environmental Policy Processes: Experiences from North and South (Working Paper 113). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies .
42.
Honneth, A. (1998) `Democracy as Reflective Cooperation: John Dewey and the Theory of Democracy Today' , Political Theory26(6): 763-783 .
43.
Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science. London: Routledge .
44.
Irwin, A., Rothstein, H., Yearley, S. and McCarthy, E. (1997) `Regulatory Science - Towards a Sociological Framework' , Futures29(1): 17-31 .
45.
Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (1996) `Introduction', in A. Irwin and B. Wynne (eds) Misunderstanding Science? pp. 1-17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
46.
Jamison, A. (1996) `The Shaping of the Global Environmental Agenda: The Role of Nongovernmental Organisations', in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity. pp. 224-245. London: Sage .
47.
Jasanoff, S.et al., eds (1995) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London: Sage .
48.
Joerges, C. and Everson, M. (2000) `Challenging the Bureaucratic Challenge', in E. Eriksen and J. Fossum (eds) Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation? pp. 164-188. London: Routledge .
49.
Johnson, P. (2001) `Habermas's Search for the Public Sphere' , European Journal of Social Theory4(2): 215-236 .
50.
Kohler-Koch, B. (2000) `Framing: The Bottleneck of Constructing Legitimate Institutions' , Journal of European Public Policy7(4): 513-531 .
51.
Kreher, A. (1997) `Agencies in the European Community - A Step Towards Administrative Integration in Europe' , Journal of European Public Policy4(2): 225-245 .
52.
Landes, J. (1995) `The Public and the Private Sphere: A Feminist Reconsideration', in J. Meehan (ed.) Feminists Read Habermas. London: Routledge .
53.
Latouche, S. (1999) Le Défi de Minerve: Rationalité occidentale et raison méditerranéenne. Paris: La Découverte .
54.
Latour, B. (1991) Nous n'avons jamais été modernes. Paris: La Découverte .
55.
Laville, J.L. (1994) L'Économie solidaire. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer .
56.
Lebessis, N. and Paterson, J. (1999) Improving the Effectiveness and Legitimacy of EU Governance (Forward Studies Unit working paper). Brussels: European Commission .
57.
Leroy, P. (2001) `La sociologie de l'environnement en Europe: Évolution, champs d'action et ambivalences' , Natures, Sciences, Sociétés9(1): 29-39 .
58.
Levidow, L., Carr, S. and Wield, D. (2000) `Genetically Modified Crops in the European Union: Regulatory Conflicts as Precautionary Opportunities' , Journal of Risk Research3(3): 189-208 .
59.
Levidow, L. and Marris, C. (2001) `Science and Governance in Europe: Lessons from the Case of Agricultural Biotechnology' , Science and Public Policy28(5): 345-360 .
60.
Liberatore, A. (2001) Democratising Expertise and Establishing Scientific Reference Systems (Report of the Working Group 1b, White Paper on Governance, Work Area 1, `Broadening and Enriching the Public Debate on European Matters', May). Brussels: European Commission.
61.
Lyotard, J.F. (1983) Le Différend. Paris: Editions de Minuit .
62.
Majone, G. (1997) `The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information' , Journal of European Public Policy4(2): 262-275 .
63.
Mayntz, R. (1999) `La teoria della governance: sfide e prospettive' , Rivista italiana di scienza politica29(1): 3-21 .
64.
Merton, R.K. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
65.
Nowotny, H. (2000) `Transgressive Competence. The Narrative of Expertise' , European Journal of Social Theory3(1): 5-21 .
66.
Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon .
67.
Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press .
68.
Pellizzoni, L. (1999) `Reflexive Modernisation and Beyond: Knowledge and Value in the Politics of Environment and Technology' , Theory, Culture & Society16(4): 99-125 .
69.
Pellizzoni, L. (2001a) `Democracy and the Governance of Uncertainty: The Case of Agricultural Gene Technologies' , Journal of Hazardous Materials86: 205-222 .
70.
Pellizzoni, L. (2001b) `The Myth of the Best Argument: Power, Deliberation, and Reason' , British Journal of Sociology52(1): 59-86 .
71.
Pellizzoni, L. (2003, forthcoming) `Uncertainty and Participatory Democracy' , Environmental Values12(2).
72.
Pellizzoni, L. and Ungaro, D. (2000) `Technological Risk, Participation and Deliberation: Some Results from Three Italian Case Studies' , Journal of Hazardous Materials78(1-3): 261-280 .
73.
Popper, K. (1956) Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
74.
Radaelli, C. (1995) `The Role of Knowledge in the Policy Process' , Journal of European Public Policy2(2): 159-183 .
75.
Radaelli, C. (1999a) `Harmful Tax Competition in the EU: Policy Narratives and Advocacy Coalitions' , Journal of Common Market Studies37(4): 661-682 .
76.
Radaelli, C. (1999b) Technocracy in the European Union. Harlow: Longman .
77.
Rawls, J. (1993a) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press .
78.
Radaelli, C. (1993b) `The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus', in D. Copp, J. Hampton and J.E. Roemer (eds) The Idea of Democracy. pp. 245-269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
79.
Radaelli, C. (1997) `The Idea of Public Reason Revisited' , University of Chicago Law Review64(3): 765-807 .
80.
Rhodes, R. (1996) `The New Governance: Governing Without Government' , Political Studies44: 652-667 .
81.
Roe, E. (1994) Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
82.
Sabatier, P. (1998) `The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe' , Journal of European Public Policy5(1): 98-130 .
83.
Schön, D. and Rein, M. (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books .
84.
Spaargaren, G., Mol, A. and Buttel, F., eds (2000) Environment and Global Modernity. London: Sage .
85.
Stehr, N. (1994) Knowledge Society. London: Sage .
86.
Stirling, A. (1999) On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk (ESTO project report). Seville: European Commission JRC-Institute for Prospective Technological Studies .
87.
Teubner, G., ed. (1997) Global Law without a State. Aldershot: Dartmouth Gower .
88.
Weingart, P. (1999) `Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics' , Science and Public Policy26(3): 151-161 .
89.
Wynne, B. (1992) `Uncertainty and Environmental Learning' , Global Environmental Change2(2): 111-127 .
90.
Wynne, B. (1995) `Public Understanding of Science', in S. Jasanoffet al. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. pp. 361-388. London: Sage .
91.
Wynne, B. (1996) `May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View on the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide', in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity. pp. 44-83. London: Sage .
92.
Wynne, B. (2001) `Expert Discourse of Risk and Ethics on Genetically Manipulated Organisms: The Weaving of Public Alienation' , Notizie di Politeia62: 51-76 .
93.
Yearley, S. (1992) `Green Ambivalence about Science: Legal-rational Authority and the Scientific Legitimation of a Social Movement' , British Journal of Sociology43(4): 511-532 .
94.
Wynne, B. (1996) Sociology, Environmentalism, Globalization. London: Sage .
95.
Wynne, B. (2000) `Making Systematic Sense of Public Discontents with Expert Knowledge: Two Analytical Approaches and a Case Study' , Public Understanding of Science9: 105-122 .
96.
Young, I.M. (1989) `Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship' , Ethics99(2): 250-274 .
