Transgressive Competence

Abstract

Relying on a powerful collective narrative through which political, legal and social decision-making is guided in the name of science, the authority of scientific experts reaches beyond the boundaries of their certified knowledge base. Therefore, expertise constitutes and is constituted by transgressive competence. The author argues that (1) changes in the decision-making structure of liberal Western democracies and changes in the knowledge production system diminish the authority of scientific expertise while increasing the context-dependency of expertise - thereby altering the nature of its predictive claims; (2) the societal distribution of expertise, while displaying emancipatory features of empowerment of citizens, also raises issues of quality control; and (3) in order to regain a balance between public and private, i.e. individual-based societally distributed expertise, future expert systems will need to adopt a longer time-perspective. The author also reflects on directions in which future expert systems might evolve.

Keywords

expertise individualized decision-maker quality control reflexive modernization social distribution of knowledge

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beer, Gillian (1996) Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ezrahi, Yaron (1994) The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Felt, Ulrike (1997) Wissenschaft auf der Bühne der Öffentlichkeit. Die `alltägliche' Popularisierung der Naturwissenschaften in Wien, 1900-1938. Wien: Habilitationschrift an der Ground- und Integrativwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Wien.

Gibbons, M. , Limoges, C. , Nowotny, H. , Schwarztman, S. , Scott, P. , Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

Granovetter, Marc S. (1973) `The Strength of Weak Ties', American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360-1380.

Hicks, Diana M. and Katz, J. Sylvan (1996) `Where is Science Going?', Science, Technology & Human Values 21(4): 379-406.

Jasanoff, Sheila (1997) `Public Knowledge, Private Fears', Social Studies of Science 27: 350-355.

Nowotny, Helga (1991) `Knowledge for Certainty: Poverty, Welfare Institutions and the Institutionalization of Social Science', in P. Wagner and B. Wittrock (eds) discourses on Society. The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines, pp. 23-41. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Nowotny, Helga (1999) Es ist so. Es könnte auch anders sein. Ueber das veränderte Verhältnis von Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

10.

Pestre, Dominique (1996) `The Production of Knowledge Between Academia and Market. Comments by a Historian on the New Production of Knowledge', unpublished manuscript.

11.

Porter, Theodore M. (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

12.

Roqueplo, Philippe (1997) Entre savoir et décision, l'expertise scientifique. Paris: INRA.

13.

Strathern, Marilyn (1997) `From Improvement to Enhancement: An Anthropological Comment on the Audit Culture', Founder's Memorial Lecture, Girton College, Cambridge, unpublished manuscript.

14.

Van den Daele, Wolfgang (1996) `Objektives Wissen als politische Ressource: Experten und Gegenexperten im Diskurs', in Wolfgang van den Daele and Friedhelm Neidhardt (eds) Kommunikation und Entscheidung, pp. 297-326. Berlin: WZB Jahrbuch. Edition Sigma.

15.

Wynne, Brian (1996) `Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science', in Alan Irwin and Brian Wynne (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.