Although interracial interactions often elicit identity threat, cues within and surrounding the encounter can promote identity safety. Across three studies, Black and Latinx Americans (N = 907) generated and evaluated relational identity-safety cues—words, body language, and behaviors during recalled and imagined interactions with White people that made them feel valued, respected, and less likely to be stereotyped. Participants generated distinct cues when imagining a race-relevant conversation with a White individual, including support (e.g., “expressing empathy”) and racism disapproval (e.g., “condemns racism”), compared to anticipating a non-race-relevant conversation, which elicited friendliness (e.g., “smiling”), comfort (e.g., “relaxed demeanor”), and similarity cues (e.g., “enjoy the same hobbies”). Corroborating these open-ended results with a preregistered experiment, participants anticipated experiencing more identity safety when imagining a White person exhibit support and racism disapproval cues during a discussion of racial injustice (vs. a non-race-relevant topic). This research highlights the subtle but powerful interpersonal signals from White Americans that foster racially minoritized people’s identity safety during general and race-relevant interactions.
ApfelbaumE. P.PaukerK.AmbadyN.SommersS. R.NortonM. I. (2008). Learning (not) to talk about race: When older children underperform in social categorization. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1513–1518. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012835
2.
AppiahO.EvelandW. P.BullockO. M.CodutoK. D. (2021). Why we can’t talk openly about race: The impact of race and partisanship on respondents’ perceptions of intergroup conversations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220967978
AveryD. R.HernandezM.HeblM. R. (2004). Who’s watching the race? Racial salience in recruitment advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02541.x
5.
BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018474
6.
BrownK. T. (2015). Perceiving allies from the perspective of non-dominant group members: Comparisons to friends and activists. Current Psychology, 34(4), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9284-8
7.
BrownK. T.OstroveJ. M. (2013). What does it mean to be an ally?: The perception of allies from the perspective of people of color. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(11), 2211–2222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12172
8.
BurnsM. D.GranzE. L. (2023). “Sincere White people, work in conjunction with us”: Racial minorities’ perceptions of White ally sincerity and perceptions of ally efforts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(2), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211059699
9.
ChaneyK. E.CipollinaR.SanchezD. T. (2023). Perceptions of White women’s stigma-based solidarity claims and disingenuous allyship. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15(5), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231188757
10.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2018). We are in this together: How the presence of similarly stereotyped allies buffer against identity threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.005
11.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2021). Dual cues: Women of color anticipate both gender and racial bias in the face of a single identity cue. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(7), 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220942844
12.
CheryanS.PlautV. C.DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
13.
ChouT.AsnaaniA.HofmannS. G. (2012). Perception of racial discrimination and psychopathology across three U.S. ethnic minority groups. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025432
14.
CipollinaR.SanchezD. T. (2023). Racial identity safety cues and healthcare provider expectations. Stigma and Health, 8(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000265
15.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026481
16.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the psychological foundations of conflict and coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415611252
17.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276
18.
DebrosseR.ThaiS.BrievaT. (2023). When skinfolk are kinfolk: Higher perceived support and acceptance characterize close same-race (vs. interracial) relationships for people of color. Journal of Social Issues, 79(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12534
19.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.ValidzicA.MatokaK.JohnsonB.FrazierS. (1997). Extending the benefits of recategorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure, and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1327
20.
DovidioJ. F.GluszekA.JohnM.-S.DitlmannR.LagunesP. (2010). Understanding bias toward Latinos: Discrimination, dimensions of difference, and experience of exclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 66(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01633.x
21.
DovidioJ. F.HeblM.RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2006). Nonverbal communication, race, and intergroup interaction. In ManusovV.PattersonM. L. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 481–500). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976152.n25
22.
DroogendykL.WrightS. C.LubenskyM.LouisW. R. (2016). Acting in solidarity: Cross-group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12168
23.
EmersonK. T. U.MurphyM. C. (2014). Identity threat at work: How social identity threat and situational cues contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the workplace. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(4), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035403
24.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
25.
GreenD. J.WoutD. A.MurphyM. C. (2021). Learning goals mitigate identity threat for Black individuals in threatening interracial interactions. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(2), 201–213. http://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000331
26.
HallW.SchmaderT.AdayA.InnessM.CroftE. (2018). Climate control: The relationship between social identity threat and cues to an identity-safe culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000137
27.
HildebrandL. K.JusufC. C.MonteithM. J. (2020). Ally confrontations as identity-safety cues for marginalized individuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2692
28.
HoloienD. S.BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.AlegreJ. M. (2015). Do you really understand? Achieving accuracy in interracial relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000003
29.
JohnsonI. R.PietriE. S. (2020). An ally you say? Endorsing White women as allies to encourage perceptions of allyship and organizational identity-safety among Black women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220975482
30.
JohnsonI. R.PietriE. S. (2022). Ally endorsement: Exploring allyship cues to promote perceptions of allyship and positive STEM beliefs among White female students. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(3), 738–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221080467
31.
JohnsonI. R.PietriE. S.FulliloveF.MowrerS. (2019). Exploring identity-safety cues and allyship among Black women students in STEM environments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319830926
32.
KroeperK. M.WilliamsH. E.MurphyM. C. (2020). Counterfeit diversity: How strategically misrepresenting gender diversity dampens organizations’ perceived sincerity and elevates women’s identity threat concerns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(3), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000348
33.
KrukM.MatsickJ. L. (2021). A taxonomy of identity safety cues based on gender and race: From a promising past to an intersectional and translational future. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 7(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000304
34.
KunstmanJ. W.TuschererT.TrawalterS.LloydE. P. (2016). What lies beneath? Minority group members’ suspicion of Whites’ egalitarian motivation predicts responses to Whites’ smiles. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216652860
35.
LaCosseJ.PlantE. A. (2020). Internal motivation to respond without prejudice fosters respectful responses in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1037–1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000219
36.
LaCosseJ.TuschererT.KunstmanJ. W.PlantE. A.TrawalterS.MajorB. (2015). Suspicion of White people’s motives relate to relative accuracy in detecting external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.003
37.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
38.
LeeR. T.PerezA. D.BoykinC. M.Mendoza-DentonR. (2019). On the prevalence of racial discrimination in the United States. PLoS One, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210698
39.
LivingstoneA. G.RodriguezL. F.RothersA. (2020). “They just don’t understand us”: The role of felt understanding in intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 633–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000221
40.
LloydE. P.KunstmanJ. W.TuschererT.BernsteinM. J. (2017). The face of suspicion: Suspicion of Whites’ motives moderates mental representations of Whites. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 953–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617699251
41.
MajorB.KunstmanJ. W.MaltaB. D.SawyerP. J.TownsendS. S.MendesW. B. (2016). Suspicion of motives predicts minorities’ responses to positive feedback in interracial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.007
42.
MajorB.SawyerP. J.KunstmanJ. W. (2013). Minority perceptions of Whites’ motives for responding without prejudice: The perceived internal and external motivation to avoid prejudice scales. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213475367
43.
MallettR. K.HuntsingerJ. R.SinclairS.SwimJ. K. (2008). Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208095400
44.
MarkusH. R.SteeleC. M.SteeleD. M. (2000). Colorblindness as a barrier to inclusion: Assimilation and nonimmigrant minorities. Daedalus, 129(4), 233–259.
45.
MarshburnC. K.CamposB. (2021). Seeking just us: A mixed methods investigation of racism-specific support among Black college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 48(1), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/00957984211034961
46.
MillessK. M.WoutD. A.MurphyM. C. (2022). Diversity or representation? Sufficient factors for Black Americans’ identity safety during interracial interactions. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 28(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000492
47.
MoserC. E.BranscombeN. R. (2022). Male allies at work: Gender-equality supportive men reduce negative underrepresentation effects among women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211033748
48.
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
49.
MurphyM. C.TaylorV. J. (2012). The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat. In InzlichtM.SchmaderT. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 17–33). Oxford University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732449.001.0001
50.
MurphyM. C.TaylorV. J.SteeleC. M. (2024). Stereotype threat: A situated theory of social cognition. In HugenbergK.JohnsonK.CarlstonD. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of social cognition, (2nd ed., pp. 409–441). Oxford University Press.
51.
OstroveJ. M.BrownK. T. (2018). Are allies who we think they are?: A comparative analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12502
52.
PearsonA. R.WestT. V.DovidioJ. F.PowersS. R.BuckR.HenningR. (2008). The fragility of intergroup relations: Divergent effects of delayed audiovisual feedback in intergroup and intragroup interaction. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1272–1279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02236.x
53.
PietriE. S.DrawbaughM. L.LewisA. N.JohnsonI. R. (2019). Who encourages Latina women to feel a sense of identity-safety in STEM environments?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103827
54.
PlantE. A. (2004). Responses to interracial interactions over time. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264244
55.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
56.
RadkeH. R. M.KutlacaM.BeckerJ. C. (2022). Disadvantaged group members’ evaluations and support for allies: Investigating the role of communication style and group membership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(6), 1437–1456. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211010932
RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2006). Interracial interactions: A relational approach. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 121–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38003-3
59.
RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2007). Negotiating interracial interactions: Costs, consequences, and possibilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00528.x
60.
RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2012). Stereotype threat in interracial interactions. In InzlichtM.SchmaderT. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 231–245). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732449.003.0015
61.
RosenblumM.Jacoby-SenghorD. S.BrownN. D. (2022). Detecting prejudice from egalitarianism: Why Black Americans don’t trust White egalitarians’ claims. Psychological Science, 33(6), 889–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211054090
62.
SaguyT.TroppL. R.HawiD. (2012). The role of group power in intergroup contact. In HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 113–131). Psychology Press.
63.
SanchezK. L.KalksteinD. A.WaltonG. M. (2021). A threatening opportunity: The prospect of conversations about race-related experiences between Black and White friends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(5), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000369
64.
SchmaderT.BlockK.LickelB. (2015). Social identity threat in response to stereotypic film portrayals: Effects on self-conscious emotion and implicit ingroup attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12096
65.
SheltonJ. N. (2003). Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006002003
66.
SimonS.ShafferE.NeelR.ShapiroJ. (2019). Exploring Blacks’ perceptions of Whites’ racial prejudice as a function of intergroup behavior and motivational mindsets. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618778584
SyedM.NelsonS. C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3(6), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815587648
69.
TaylorV. J.GarciaR. L.SheltonJ. N.YantisC. (2018). “A threat on the ground”: The consequences of witnessing stereotype-confirming ingroup members in interracial interactions. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000190
70.
TaylorV. J.YantisC.BonamC.HartA. (2021). What to do? Predicting coping strategies following ingroup members’ stereotypical behaviors in interracial interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(7), 1084–1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220960269
71.
TrawalterS.HigginbothamG. D.HendersonK. (2022). Social psychological research on racism and the importance of historical context: Implications for policy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(6), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221114092
72.
TrawalterS.RichesonJ. A. (2008). Let’s talk about race, baby! When Whites’ and Blacks’ interracial contact experiences diverge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1214–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.013
73.
TrawalterS.RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2009). Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309345850
74.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O’ConnellG. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917
75.
WinslowM. P.AaronA.AmadifeE. N. (2011). African Americans’ lay theories about the detection of prejudice and nonprejudice. Journal of Black Studies, 42(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934709357025
76.
WoutD. A.MurphyM. C.BarnettS. (2014). When having Black friends isn’t enough: How threat cues undermine safety cues in friendship formation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 844–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614535820
77.
WoutD. A.MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M. (2010). When your friends matter: The effect of White students’ racial friendship networks on meta-perceptions and perceived identity contingencies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1035–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.003
78.
YantisC.GreenD.TaylorV. J. (2025). The role of racial shared reality in Black Americans’ identity-safety during interracial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 118, Article 104734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104734
79.
ZouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
