Abstract
In five studies conducted in Spain and the US, we tested whether rightists (vs. leftists) were more vulnerable to experiencing a threat to the moral self and were more likely to polarize when faced with negative moral stereotypes about environmentalism. Studies 1a–b established that the moral stereotype held by rightists about leftists regarding environmental issues was more positive than vice versa. Additionally, rightists had a more negative meta-stereotype than vice versa. Studies 2a–2b revealed that exposing participants to negative (vs. neutral) stereotypes about their groups’ morality in environmentalism led rightists (but not leftists) to experience a threat to their moral self-concept and polarized their environmental positions and voting intentions. Study 3 experimentally attenuated moral threats, buffering the effects observed in Study 2b. We conclude that the moral threat posed by negative moral stereotypes is key to understanding the polarization of environmental issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
