Constructive competition: An experimental study on calibrating competitive intensity and winner selection rules

Abstract

Winner-take-all tournaments may have the advantage of raising the motivation to do one’s best, but also the disadvantage of jeopardizing cooperation. Such tournaments can be costly in terms of loss of cooperation, and we ask: Are there conditions under which they don’t have these negative effects? Can competition be calibrated to be compatible with subsequent cooperation? There is one theory that deals with this question: the theory of constructive competition, based on the shifting salience of competitiveness. It includes attention to the rules by which the winner is selected but remains so far without much empirical evidence. We elaborated and tested this theory experimentally and confronted it with a rival theory about the negative effect of losing in the competition on subsequent cooperativeness. We find that the predictions from the shifting salience theory of constructive competition fit the empirical results well and that they outperformed those of the relative deprivation and frustrated loser theory.

Keywords

tournaments constructive competition competitive intensity random selection shifting salience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abell

(1996). A model of the informal structure (culture) of organizations: Help, trust, rivalry and team spirit. Rationality and Society, 8(4), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346396008004005

Ackermann

K. A.

Murphy

R. O.

(2019). Explaining cooperative behavior in public goods games: How preferences and beliefs affect contribution levels. Games, 10(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/g10010015

Barker

J. L.

Barclay

(2016). Local competition increases people’s willingness to harm others. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.02.001

Barker

J. L.

Barclay

Reeve

H. K.

(2012). Within-group competition reduces cooperation and payoffs in human groups. Behavioral Ecology, 23(4), 735–741. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars020

Bengtsson

Kock

(2000). “Coopetitive” relationships in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00067-X

Bengtsson

Kock

(2014). Coopetition—Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.02.015

Berger

Combet

(2017). Late school tracking, less class bias in educational decision-making? The uncertainty reduction mechanism and its experimental testing. European Sociological Review, 33(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw054

Berger

Diekmann

(2015). The logic of relative frustration: Boudon’s competition model and experimental evidence. European Sociological Review, 31(6), 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv071

Berger

Osterloh

Rost

(2020). Focal random selection closes the gender gap in competitiveness. Science Advances, 6(47), Article eabb2142. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb2142

10.

Berger

Osterloh

Rost

Ehrmann

(2020). How to prevent leadership hubris? Comparing competitive selections, lotteries, and their combination. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), Article 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101388

11.

Berkowitz

(1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59

12.

Birkinshaw

(2001). Strategies for managing internal competition. California Management Review, 44(1), 21–38.

13.

Boudon

(1982 [1977]). The unintended consequences of social action. Macmillan.

14.

Brandenburger

Nalebuff

(2021). The rules of coopetition. Harvard Business Review, 99(1), 48–57.

15.

Brandts

Riedl

(2020). Market interaction and efficient cooperation. European Economic Review, 121, Article 103318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103318

16.

Brandts

Riedl

van Winden

(2009). Competitive rivalry, social disposition, and subjective well-being: An experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 93(11–12), 1158–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.07.010

17.

Breuer

Scharkow

Quandt

(2015). Sore losers? A re-examination of the frustration-aggression hypothesis for colocated video game play. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000020

18.

Buchanan

T. W.

Preston

S. D.

(2014). Stress leads to prosocial action in immediate need situations. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00005

19.

Buckert

Schwieren

Kudielka

B. M.

Fiebach

C. J.

(2017). How stressful are economic competitions in the lab? An investigation with physiological measures. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62, 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.07.004

20.

Butterfield

K. D.

Treviño

L. K.

Weaver

G. R.

(2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 983–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700537004

21.

Cagiltay

Ozcelik

N. S.

(2015). The effect of competition on learning in games. Computers & Education, 87, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.001

22.

Carlstedt

R. A.

(2004). Critical moments during competition. Psychology Press.

23.

Christy

P. R.

Gelfand

D. M.

Hartmann

D. P.

(1971). Effects of competition-induced frustration on two classes of modeled behavior. Developmental Psychology, 5(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031079

24.

Colwell

Grady

Rhaiti

(1995). Computer games, self-esteem and gratification of needs in adolescents. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2450050308

25.

Connelly

B. L.

Tihanyi

Crook

T. R.

Gangloff

K. A.

(2014). Tournament theory: Thirty years of contests and competitions. Journal of Management, 40(1), 16–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313498902

26.

Danilov

Harbring

Irlenbusch

(2019). Helping under a combination of team and tournament incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 162, 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.03.013

27.

Deutsch

(1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204

28.

Devece

Ribeiro-Soriano

D. E.

Palacios-Marques

(2019). Coopetition as the new trend in inter-firm alliances: Literature review and research patterns. Review of Managerial Science, 13(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0245-0

29.

Drago

Garvey

G. T.

(1998). Incentives for helping on the job: Theory and evidence. Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 1–25.

30.

Eitam

Higgins

E. T.

(2010). Motivation in mental accessibility: Relevance of a Representation (ROAR) as a new framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00309.x

31.

Fehr

Gächter

(2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a

32.

Fischbacher

(2007). Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4

33.

Frey

Osterloh

Ros

(2023). The rationality of qualified lotteries. European Management Review, 20(4), 698–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12550

34.

Garcia

S. M.

Tor

(2009). The N-effect, more competitors, less competition. Psychological Science, 20(7), 871–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02385.x

35.

Gernsheimer

Kanbach

D. K.

Gast

(2021). Coopetition research: A systematic literature review on recent accomplishments and trajectories. Industrial Marketing Management, 96, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.05.001

36.

Hansson

Persson

Davidai

Tinghög

(2021). Losing sense of fairness: How information about a level playing field reduces selfish behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 190, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.07.014

37.

Hargrove

B. M.

Becker

W. S.

Hargrove

D. F.

(2015). The HRD eustress model: Generating positive stress with challenging work. Human Resource Development Review, 14(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315598086

38.

Johnson

D. W.

Johnson

R. T.

(1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.

39.

Johnson

D. W.

Johnson

R. T.

(1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

40.

Johnson

M. D.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Humphrey

S. E.

Ilgen

D. R.

Jundt

Meyer

C. J.

(2006). Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(11), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785533

41.

Kent

(2020). Comparing alternative estimation methods of a public goods game. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 6(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-020-00092-3

42.

Kilduff

G. J.

Galinsky

A. D.

Gallo

Reade

J. J.

(2016). Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1508–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0545

43.

Krane

Joyce

Rafeld

(1994). Competitive anxiety, situation criticality, and softball performance. The Sport Psychologist, 8(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.8.1.58

44.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Köpetz

(2009). What is so special (and non-special) about goals? A view from the cognitive perspective. In Moskowitz

G. B.

Grant

(Eds.), The psychology of goals (pp. 25–55). Guilford Press.

45.

Lazear

E. P.

(1989). Pay equality and industrial politics. Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1086/261616

46.

Lazear

E. P.

Rosen

(1981). Rank order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864. https://doi.org/10.1086/261010

47.

Leander

N. P.

Shah

J. Y.

Chartrand

T. L.

(2011). The object of my protection: Shielding fundamental motives from the implicit motivational influence of others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1078–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.016

48.

Lindenberg

Foss

(2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal- framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500–525. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0021

49.

Lindenberg

Papies

E. K.

(2019). Two kinds of nudging and the power of cues: Shifting salience of alternatives and shifting salience of goals. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 13(3–4), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000110

50.

Lundgren-Henriksson

Tidström

(2021). Temporal distancing and integrating: Exploring coopetition tensions through managerial sensemaking dynamics. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 37(3), Article 101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101168

51.

Lupien

S. J.

Leclaire

Majeur

Raymond

(2019). Are we good judges of our stress? A study of the association between subjective reports of stress and physiological stress markers. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 100, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.12.193

52.

Merrett

(2012). Estimation of public goods game data (Economics Working Paper Series 2012(9)). University of Sidney.

53.

Niederle

Vesterlund

(2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067

54.

Osterloh

Frey

(2019). Dealing with randomness. Management Review-Socioeconomic Studies, 30(4), 331–345.

55.

Otten

(2020). When upward social mobility leads to frustration: Boudon’s game-theoretic model of relative deprivation and experimental evidence. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 65, Article 100440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2019.100440

56.

Page

Garboua

L. L.

Montmarquette

(2007). Aspiration levels and educational choices: An experimental study. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.06.001

57.

Pattinson

Nicholson

Lindgreen

(2018). Emergent coopetition from a sensemaking perspective: A multi-level analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.005

58.

Pleasant

Barclay

(2018). Why hate the good guy? Antisocial punishment of high cooperators is greater when people compete to be chosen. Psychological Science, 29(6), 868–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617752642

59.

Raza-Ullah

Bengtsson

Kock

(2014). The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.001

60.

Shahrier

Kotani

Kakinaka

(2016). Social value orientation and capitalism in societies. PLOS ONE, 11(10), Article e0165067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165067

61.

Smith

H. J.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(2015). Advances in relative deprivation theory and research. Social Justice Research, 28, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0231-5

62.

Smith

H. J.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Pippin

G. M.

Bialosiewicz

(2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825

63.

Spencer

Zanna

Fong

(2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845

64.

Stanne

M. B.

Johnson

D. W.

Johnson

R. T.

(1999). Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 133.

65.

Steinel

De Dreu

C. K. W.

(2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.419

66.

Sutton-Smith

(1997). The ambiguity of play. Harvard University Press.

67.

Swab

R. G.

Johnson

P. D.

(2019). Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competition and competitiveness in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2340

68.

Tidström

(2014). Managing tensions in coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.001

69.

Tjosvold

Johnson

D. W.

Johnson

R. T.

Sun

(2003). Can interpersonal competition be constructive within organizations? Journal of Psychology, 137(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600600

70.

Tjosvold

Wong

A. S.

Chen

N. Y. F.

(2014). Constructively managing conflicts in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091306

71.

Vadera

A. K.

Pathki

C. S.

(2021). Competition and cheating: Investigating the role of moral awareness, moral identity, and moral elevation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(8), 1060–1081.

72.

von Dawans

Fischbacher

Kirschbaum

Ernst Fehr

Heinrichs

(2012). The social dimension of stress reactivity: Acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychological Science, 23(6), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611431576

73.

von Dawans

Trueg

Kirschbaum

Fischbacher

Heinrichs

(2018). Acute social and physical stress interact to influence social behavior: The role of social anxiety. PLOS ONE, 13(10), Article e0204665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204665

74.

Wilder

D. A.

Shapiro

P. N.

(1989). Role of competition-induced anxiety in limiting the beneficial impact of positive behavior by an out-group member. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.56.1.60

75.

Yamagishi

(1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.72 MB