Recent research documents that thinking about God encourages intergroup prosociality among believers. An open question is whether such increased prosociality is dampened by intergroup conflict. We conducted preregistered field experiments with two ethno-religious populations in Fiji: indigenous Christian iTaukei (N = 324) and Hindu Indo-Fijians (N = 280). In each study, we manipulated (between-person) whether participants thought about intergroup conflict before completing a dictator game in which we manipulated (within-person) whether participants thought about God’s preferences when allocating real money to an outgroup member. Although participants who reflected on intergroup conflict gave less money away to outgroup members, thinking about God led to significant and comparable increases in intergroup prosociality regardless of whether participants thought about conflict. Results challenge widely-held assumptions about the role of religious belief in intergroup conflict and raise questions about mechanisms that are often theorized to explain the spread of religious beliefs themselves.
AtranS.HenrichJ. (2010). The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory, 5, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00018
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
7.
BauerM.CassarA.ChytilováJ.HenrichJ. (2014). War’s enduring effects on the development of egalitarian motivations and in-group biases. Psychological Science, 25(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613493444
8.
BillingsleyJ.GomesC. M.McCulloughM. E. (2018). Implicit and explicit influences of religious cognition on Dictator Game transfers. Royal Society Open Science, 5(8), 170238. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170238
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
11.
BrysbaertM. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72
12.
BushJ. E. (2000). Land and communal faith: Methodist belief and ritual in Fiji. Studies in World Christianity, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.3366/swc.2000.6.1.21
13.
CaluoriN.JacksonJ. C.GrayK.GelfandM. (2020). Conflict changes how people view God. Psychological Science, 31(3), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619895286
GingesJ.SheikhH.AtranS.ArgoN. (2016). Thinking from God’s perspective decreases biased valuation of the life of a nonbeliever. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 113(2), 316–319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512120113
19.
GomesC. M.McCulloughM. E. (2015). The effects of implicit religious primes on dictator game allocations: A preregistered replication experiment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), e94–e104. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000027
20.
HarrisS. (2006). Letter to a Christian nation. Knopf.
21.
HenrichJ. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(4), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005
HoxJ. J. (1998). Multilevel modeling: When and why. In BalderjahnI.MatharR.SchaderM. (Eds.), Classification, data analysis, and data highways (pp. 147–154). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72087-1_17
JohnsonD. (2016). God is watching you: How the fear of God makes us human. Oxford University Press.
28.
JohnsonD.BeringJ. (2006). Hand of God, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology, 4(1), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490600400119
29.
KellyJ. M.KramerS. R.ShariffA. F. (2024). Religiosity predicts prosociality, especially when measured by self-report: A meta-analysis of almost 60 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 150(3), 284–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000413
30.
KimE.BadrinathanS.ChoiD. D.KarimS.ZhouY.-Y. (2022). Navigating “insider” and “outsider” status as researchers conducting field experiments. PS: Political Science & Politics, 55(4), 754–758. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000208
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
33.
LalB. V. (1992). Broken waves: A history of the Fiji islands in the twentieth century. University of Hawaii Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824846893
LangM.PurzyckiB. G.ApicellaC. L.AtkinsonQ. D.BolyanatzA.CohenE.HandleyC.KlocováE. K.LesorogolC.MathewS.McNamaraR. A.MoyaC.PlacekC. D.SolerM.VardyT.WeigelJ. L.WillardA. K.XygalatasD.NorenzayanA.HenrichJ. (2019). Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1898), Article 20190202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0202
36.
LangM.XygalatasD.KavanaghC. M.Craciun BoccardiN. A.HalberstadtJ.JacksonC.MartínezM.ReddishP.TongE. M.VázquezA.WhitehouseH.YamamotoM. E.YukiM.GomezA. (2022). Outgroup threat and the emergence of cohesive groups: A cross-cultural examination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(7), 1739–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211016961
37.
MercierB.KramerS. R.ShariffA. F. (2018). Belief in God: Why people believe, and why they don’t. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418754491
NorenzayanA.ShariffA. F.GervaisW. M.WillardA. K.McNamaraR. A.SlingerlandE.HenrichJ. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14001356
41.
PasekM. H.KellyJ. M.ShacklefordC. M.WhiteC. J. M.VishkinA.SmithJ. M.NorenzayanA.ShariffA.GingesJ. (2023). Thinking about God encourages prosociality toward religious outgroups: A cross-cultural investigation. Psychological Science, 34(6), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231158576
42.
PasekM. H.ShacklefordC.SmithJ. M.VishkinA.LehnerA.GingesJ. (2020). God values the lives of my out-group more than I do: Evidence from Fiji and Israel. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 1032–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620904516
43.
PisorA. C.SurbeckM. (2019). The evolution of intergroup tolerance in nonhuman primates and humans. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 28(4), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21793
44.
PrestonJ. L.RitterR. S. (2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499937
45.
PurzyckiB. G.ApicellaC.AtkinsonQ. D.CohenE.McNamaraR. A.WillardA. K.XygalatasD.NorenzayanA.HenrichJ. (2016). Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature, 530, 327–330. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16980
46.
RadM. S.MartinganoA. J.GingesJ. (2018). Toward a psychology ofHomo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 115(45), 11401–11405. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721165115
47.
RameshS. (2008). Fiji: Inter-group competitions and in-group fragmentation. Peace and Conflict Review, 2(2), 1–14.
48.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Version 4.2.3]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
SahlinsM. (1972). Stone Age economics. Aldine Atherton.
51.
ShacklefordC. M.PasekM. H.VishkinA.GingesJ. (2024). Palestinians and Israelis believe the other’s God encourages intergroup benevolence: A case of positive intergroup meta-perceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, Article 104551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104551
52.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2015). A question of reliability or of boundary conditions? Comment on Gomes and McCullough (2015). Journal of experimental psychology. General, 144(6), e105–e106. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000111
53.
ShariffA. F.WillardA. K.AndersenT.NorenzayanA. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314568811
54.
SmithJ. M.PasekM. H.VishkinA.JohnsonK. A.ShacklefordC.GingesJ. (2022). Thinking about God discourages dehumanization of religious outgroups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(10), 2586–2603. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001206
55.
SosisR.RuffleB. J. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: Testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. Current Anthropology, 44(5), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1086/379260
56.
StarkR. (1996). The rise of Christianity: How one obscure, marginal, Jesus movement became the dominant religious force. Princeton University Press.
57.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Voigt-GrafC. (2008). Transnationalism and the Indo-Fijian diaspora: The relationship of Indo-Fijians to India and its people. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(1), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860701759956
62.
ZuckermanP. (2007). Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns. In MartinM. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism (pp. 47–65). Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
