The aim of this research was to investigate interrelationships among social identity complexity, national glorification, and exclusion of immigrants, conceptualized as relational exclusivity. The concept of relational exclusivity reflects the conditions newcomers are expected to meet in order to be welcomed and allowed to settle in the host country. The findings across four studies (three correlational and one experimental; total N = 2,002) consistently indicated that complex identity is negatively, whereas glorification is positively, associated with relational exclusivity. Furthermore, in all studies, we consistently demonstrated that the relationship between social identity complexity and relational exclusivity is mediated by reduced glorification. Consequently, the findings suggest that social identity complexity has the capacity to reduce national glorification and, subsequently, indirectly reduce the exclusion of immigrants.
AdornoT. W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harpers.
2.
BoehnkeK.SchieferD.van EgmondM. C.HankeK.KlarY.RoccasS. (2020). Conceiving one’s national group as transgenerational: Effects on attitudes towards “foreign” and diaspora migrants. PLoS One, 15(4), Article e0230303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230303
3.
BrewerM. B.GonsalkoraleK.van DommelenA. (2013). Social identity complexity: Comparing majority and minority ethnic group members in a multicultural society. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212468622
4.
BrewerM. B.PierceK. P. (2005). Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271710
BrownJ.JiménezA. L.SabanathanD.SekamanyaS.HoughM.SuttonJ.RodríguezJ.García CollC. (2018). Factors related to attitudes toward diversity in Australia, Malaysia, and Puerto Rico. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28(4), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1428137
7.
CoendersM.ScheepersP. (2003). The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: An international comparison. Political Psychology, 24(2), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00330
8.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM. (2007). Multiple social categorization. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 163–254). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39004-1
9.
FiskeA. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. Free Press.
10.
FiskeA. P. (2000). Complementarity theory: Why human social capacities evolved to require cultural complements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_7
11.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
12.
KendeJ.SarrasinO.ManatschalA.PhaletK.GreenE. G. T. (2022). Policies and prejudice: Integration policies moderate the link between immigrant presence and anti-immigrant prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(2), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000376
13.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647
KunstJ. R.SamD. L. (2014). “It’s on time that they assimilate” – Differential acculturation expectations towards first and second generation immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39, 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.10.007
16.
MalokuE.DerksB.van LaarC.EllemersN. (2019). Stimulating interethnic contact in Kosovo: The role of social identity complexity and distinctiveness threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(7), 1039–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218808884
17.
MillerK. P.BrewerM. B.ArbuckleN. L. (2009). Social identity complexity: Its correlates and antecedents. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208098778
18.
PolitiE.RoblainA.GaleJ.LicataL.StaerkléC. (2020). If you want to be one of us, then become like us: The evaluation of naturalization applicants by host nationals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2663
19.
PolitiE.SarrasinO.StaerkléC. (2023). Citizenship deservingness justifies exclusive national boundary making: A socio-dynamic mixed-methods approach to social representations of citizenship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12586
20.
PratiF.CrispR. J.PrattoF.RubiniM. (2016). Encouraging majority support for immigrant access to health services: Multiple categorization and social identity complexity as antecedents of health equality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(4), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216629814
21.
PratiF.CrispR. J.RubiniM. (2021). 40 years of multiple social categorization: A tool for social inclusivity. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 47–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1830612
22.
PratiF.MoscatelliS.PrattoF.RubiniM. (2018). Multiple and counterstereotypic categorization of immigrants: The moderating role of political orientation on interventions to reduce prejudice. Political Psychology, 39(4), 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12445
23.
ReeskensT.HoogheM. (2010). Beyond the civic–ethnic dichotomy: Investigating the structure of citizenship concepts across thirty-three countries. Nations and Nationalism, 16(4), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00446.x
24.
ReijerseA.VanbeselaereN.DuriezB.FicheraG. (2015). Accepting immigrants as fellow citizens: Citizenship representations in relation to migration policy preferences. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(5), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.916812
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
27.
RoccasS.SagivL.SchwartzS.HalevyN.EidelsonR. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319225
28.
RothiD. M.LyonsE.ChryssochoouX. (2005). National attachment and patriotism in a European nation: A British study. Political Psychology, 26(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00412.x
29.
RuparM.Jamróz-DolińskaK.KołeczekM.SekerdejM. (2021). Is patriotism helpful to fight the crisis? The role of constructive patriotism, conventional patriotism, and glorification amid the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(6), 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2777
30.
SanatkarS.PaoliniS.DamigellaD.LicciardelloO. (2018). Identity and deprovincialization: Identity complexity and inclusiveness encourage EU-wide behavioural intentions via reduced intergroup concerns and increased optimism. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), Article e23. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.151
31.
SchatzR. T. (2018). A review and integration of research on blind and constructive patriotism. In SardocM. (Ed.), Handbook of patriotism (pp. 1–19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_30-1
32.
SchatzR. T.StaubE.LavineH. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.001
33.
SchmidK.HewstoneM.TauschN.CairnsE.HughesJ. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of social identity complexity: Intergroup contact, distinctiveness threat, and outgroup attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209337037
34.
SchoemannA. M.BoultonA. J.ShortS. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
35.
SekerdejM.RoccasS. (2016). Love versus loving criticism: Disentangling conventional and constructive patriotism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(3), 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12142
36.
ShayeghJ.StoreyL.TurnerR. N.BarryJ. (2022). A social identity approach to how elite outgroups are invoked by politicians and the media in nativist populism. Political Psychology, 43(6), 1009–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12798
37.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.MorrisonK. R. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. (pp. 43–59). Psychology Press.
38.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relation (pp. 7–24). Hall Publishers.
39.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
40.
VerkuytenM.KollarR.GaleJ.YogeeswaranK. (2022). Right-wing political orientation, national identification and the acceptance of immigrants and minorities. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, Article 111217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111217
41.
VerkuytenM.MartinovicB. (2015). Behind the ethnic–civic distinction: Public attitudes towards immigrants’ political rights in the Netherlands. Social Science Research, 53, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.05.002
42.
VerkuytenM.YogeeswaranK. (2020). Interculturalism and the acceptance of minority groups: The role of political orientation. Social Psychology, 51(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000404
43.
WegscheiderC.NeziR. (2021). Who belongs to “the people”? The societal boundaries of national and European notions of citizenship. In BayerM.SchwarzO.StarkT. (Eds.), Democratic citizenship in flux: Conceptions of citizenship in the light of political and social fragmentation (pp. 173–192). Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839449493
44.
Willis-EsquedaC.DelgadoR. H.PedrozaK. (2017). Patriotism and the impact on perceived threat and immigration attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1184125
45.
WolfL. J.WeinsteinN.MaioG. R. (2019). Anti-immigrant prejudice: Understanding the roles of (perceived) values and value dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(5), 925–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000177
46.
WollastR.LüdersA.NugierA.KhamzinaK.SablonnièreR.GuimondS. (2022). Social dominance and anti-immigrant prejudice: A cross-national and prospective test of the mediating role of assimilation, multiculturalism, colour blindness, and interculturalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2895
47.
XinS.XinZ.LinC. (2016). Effects of trustors’ social identity complexity on interpersonal and intergroup trust. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2156
48.
ZhaoX.BiernatM. (2022). Status of immigrants’ country of origin and Americans’ assimilation expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(3), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000370.supp
49.
ZhirkovK.VerkuytenM.PonarinE. (2021). Social conformity and prejudice toward immigrants: The role of political messaging. Social Influence, 16(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2021.1989028
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
