Social psychological research has used strategies to increase recognition of and motivation to combat personal or systemic bias, but with little attention to whether single strategies might influence both personal and systemic outcomes. We investigated whether single strategies are effective in both bias domains and potential underlying mechanisms. Across two experiments, non-Black participants were exposed to information concerning (a) their personal racial biases, (b) multiple Black individuals’ discrimination experiences across institutional contexts, or (c) race-unrelated information (control condition). Discrimination experiences exposure (vs. control) increased recognition of systemic bias and motivation to combat both systemic and personal bias (Studies 1 and 2), and we found statistical support for empathy as a mediator (Study 2). In contrast, strategies for highlighting personal bias had weaker effects on personal bias outcomes and no effects on systemic bias outcomes. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of discrimination experiences exposure for combatting systemic and personal bias.
AdamsG.EdkinsV.LackaD.PickettK. M.CheryanS. (2008). Teaching about racism: Pernicious implications of the standard portrayal. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802502309
2.
AmodioD. M.DevineP. G.Harmon-JonesE. (2007). A dynamic model of guilt: Implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psychological Science, 18(6), 524–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01933.x
3.
BanajiM. R.FiskeS. T.MasseyD. S. (2021). Systemic racism: Individuals and interactions, institutions and society. Cognitive Research, 6, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00349-3
4.
BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Delacorte Press.
5.
BoboL. D. (2001). Racial attitudes and relations at the close of the twentieth century. In SmelserN. J.WilsonW. J.MitchelF. (Eds.), American becoming: Racial trends and their consequences (pp. 264–301). National Academy Press.
6.
BonamC. M.Nair DasV.ColemanB. R.SalterP. (2019). Ignoring history, denying racism: Mounting evidence for the Marley hypothesis and epistemologies of ignorance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617751583
7.
BordersA.WileyS. (2020). Rumination about discrimination mediates the unique association between anger and collective action intentions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(7), 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219875214
8.
BurnsM. D.MonteithM. J.ParkerL. R. (2017). Training away bias: The differential effects of counterstereotype training and self-regulation on stereotype activation and application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.003
9.
CarterE. R.MurphyM. C. (2017). Consensus and consistency: Exposure to multiple discrimination claims shapes Whites’ intergroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.001
10.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T. (2018). The endurance of interpersonal confrontations as a prejudice reduction strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741344.
11.
CortlandC. I.CraigM. A.ShapiroJ. R.RichesonJ. A.NeelR.GoldsteinN. J. (2017). Solidarity through shared disadvantage: Highlighting shared experiences of discrimination improves relations between stigmatized groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000100
12.
CoxW. L. T.DevineP. G. (2019). The prejudice habit-breaking intervention: An empowerment-based confrontation approach. In MalletR.MonteithM. J. (Eds.), Confronting prejudice and discrimination: The science of changing minds and behaviors (pp. 250–274). Academic Press.
13.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026481
14.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the psychological foundations of conflict and coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415611252
15.
CummingsJ. J.BailensonJ. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740
16.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple datasets. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914
17.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250923
18.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J.MarkA. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784–803. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784
19.
DaumeyerN. M.OnyeadorI. N.BrownX.RichesonJ. A. (2019). Consequences of attributing discrimination to implicit vs. explicit bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103812.
20.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
21.
DevineP. G.ForscherP. S.AustinA. J.CoxW. T. L. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/j.jesp.2012.06.003
22.
DixE. L.DevineP. G. (2024). “It’s not an overreaction”: Increasing White people’s acceptance of the reality of bias and receptivity to Black people’s bias concerns. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, 104545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104545
23.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science, 11(4), 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00262
24.
DovidioJ. F.ten VergertM.StewartT. L.GaertnerS. L.JohnsonJ. D.EssesV. M.RiekB. M.PearsonA. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1537–1549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271177
25.
EberhardtJ. L. (2020). Biased: Uncovering the hidden prejudice that shapes what we see, think, and do. Penguin.
26.
FeaginJ. R. (2014). Racist America: Roots, current realities, and future reparations (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
27.
FinlayK. A.StephanW. G. (2000). Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1720–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02464.x
28.
ForscherP. S.MitamuraC.DixE. L.CoxW. T. L.DevineP. G. (2017). Breaking the prejudice habit: Mechanisms, time course, and longevity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.009
29.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
30.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
31.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
32.
HahnA.GawronskiB. (2019). Facing one’s implicit biases: From awareness to acknowledgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 769–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000155
33.
HahnA.JuddC. M.HirshH. K.BlairI. V. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1369–1392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035028
34.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
35.
HenryP. J. (2010). Institutional bias. In DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. M. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 426–440). Sage.
HildebrandL. K.MonteithM. J.ArriagaX. B. (2024). The role of trust in reducing confrontation-related social costs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(2), 240–261.
38.
HoltL. F.SweitzerM. D. (2018). More than a Black and White issue: Ethnic identity, social dominance orientation, and support for the Black Lives Matter movement. Self and Identity, 19(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2018.1524788
39.
HowellJ. L.GaitherS. E.RatliffK. A. (2015). Caught in the middle: Defensive responses to IAT feedback among whites, blacks, and biracial black/whites. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614561127
KaiserC. R.DruryB. J.SpaldingK. E.CheryanS.O’BrienL. T. (2009). The ironic consequences of Obama’s election: Decreased support for social justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.006
42.
LaiC. K.MariniM.LehrS. A.CerrutiC.ShinJ. L.Joy-GabaJ.HoA. K.TeachmanB. A.WojcikS. P.KolevaS. P.FrazierR. S.HeiphetzL.ChenE. E.TurnerR. N.HaidtJ.KesebirS.HawkinsC. B.SchaeferH. S.RubichiS.. . . NosekB. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143(4), 1765–1785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036260
43.
MasseyD. S.RughJ. S. (2017). The intersections of race and class: Zoning, affordable housing, and segregation in US metropolitan areas. In SquiresG. (Ed.), The fight for fair housing: Causes, consequences and future implications of the 1968 federal fair housing act (pp. 245–265). Taylor & Francis.
44.
MilesE.CrispR. J. (2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Process & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573
45.
MonteithM. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.469
46.
MonteithM. J.Ashburn-NardoL.VoilsC. I.CzoppA. M. (2002). Putting the brakes on prejudice: On the development and operation of cues for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1029–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1029
47.
MonteithM. J.VoilsC. I. (1998). Proneness to prejudiced responses: Toward understanding the authenticity of self-reported discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.901
48.
MonteithM. J.VoilsC. I.Ashburn-NardoL. (2001). Taking a look underground: Detecting, interpreting, and reacting to implicit racial bias. Social Cognition, 19(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.4.395.20759
49.
Moss-RacusinC. A.PietriE. S.HennesE. P.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.RoussosG.HandelsmanJ. (2018). Reducing STEM gender bias with VIDS (video interventions for diversity in STEM). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(2), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000144
50.
NelsonJ. C.AdamsG.SalterP. S. (2013). The Marley hypothesis: Denial of racism reflects ignorance of history. Psychological Science, 24(2), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612451466
51.
O’BrienL. T.CrandallC. S.Horstman-ReserA.WarnerR.AlsbrooksA.BlodornA. (2010). But I’m no bigot: How prejudiced White Americans maintain unprejudiced self-images. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 917–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00604.x
PendryL. F.DriscollD. M.FieldS. C. (2007). Diversity training: Putting theory into practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X118397
55.
PerryS. P.MurphyM. C.DovidioJ. F. (2015). Modern prejudice: Subtle, but unconscious? The role of bias awareness in Whites’ perceptions of personal and others’ biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.007
PietriE. S.HennesE. P.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.BaileyA. H.Moss-RacusinC. A.HandelsmanJ. (2019). Addressing unintended consequences of gender diversity interventions on women’s sense of belonging in STEM. Sex Roles, 80, 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0952-2
59.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
60.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
61.
RapaL. J.BoldingC. W.JamilF. M. (2020). Development and initial validation of the short critical consciousness scale (CCS-S). Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 70, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101164
62.
RichesonJ. A.SommersS. R. (2016). Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115115
63.
RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2021a). Toward an understanding of structural racism: Implications for criminal justice. Science, 374(6565), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj7779
64.
RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2021b). Beliefs about the interpersonal vs. structural nature of racism and responses to racial inequality. In TileagaC.AugoustinosM.DurrheimK. (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 13–25). Routledge.
65.
ShinR. Q.EzeoforI.SmithL. C.WelchJ. C.GoodrichK. M. (2016). The development and validation of the contemporary critical consciousness measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000137
66.
SimonS.MossA. J.O’BrienL. T. (2019). Pick your perspective: Racial group membership and judgments of intent, harm, and discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(2), 215–232.
67.
Skinner-DorkenooA. L.GeorgeM.WagesJ. E.IIISánchezS.PerryS. P. (2023). A systemic approach to the psychology of racial bias within individuals and society. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00190-z
68.
TaylorV. J.ValladaresJ. J.SiepserC.YantisC. (2020). Interracial contact in virtual reality: Best practices. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220943638
69.
ToddA. R.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Perspective-taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12116
70.
TroppL. R.UluğÖ. M.UysalM. S. (2021). How intergroup contact and communication about group differences predict collective action intentions among advantaged groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 80, 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.10.012
71.
UluğÖ. M.TroppL. R. (2021). Witnessing racial discrimination shapes collective action for racial justice: Enhancing awareness of privilege among advantaged groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(3), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12731
72.
VescioT. K.SechristG. B.PaolucciM. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.163
73.
VitriolJ. A.MoskowitzG. B. (2021). Reducing defensive responding to implicit bias feedback: On the role of perceived moral threat and efficacy to change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 96, 104165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104165
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
