The present research aims to explore the relationship between group identification and emotional synchronization in a series of collective gatherings and evaluate their respective effects on key social-psychological variables. Thirteen studies were conducted in highly varied contexts, studying naturally happening phenomena, and focusing on a wide range of collective gatherings (N = 2,260 participants). The results of factor analyses and a random-model meta-analysis strongly support the idea that group identification and emotional synchronization constitute two differentiated constructs that are systematically positively associated. At the aggregate level, results of multilevel models show that both group identification and emotional synchronization are significant predictors of key social-psychological variables. These findings suggest that an integrative approach is most needed to capture the experience of collective gatherings.
AlnabulsiH.DruryJ.VignolesV. L.OoginkS. (2020). Understanding the impact of the Hajj: Explaining experiences of self-change at a religious mass gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(2), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2623
4.
BastianB.JettenJ.FerrisL. J. (2014). Pain as social glue: Shared pain increases cooperation. Psychological Science, 25(11), 2079–2085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614545886
5.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
6.
BlumerH. (1939). Collective behavior. In ParkR. E. (Ed.). Principles of sociology (pp. 219–288). Barnes & Noble.
7.
BouchatP.RiméB.van EyckenR.NilsF. (2020). The virtues of collective gatherings: A study on the positive effects of a major scouting event. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12649
8.
CarnesN. C.LickelB. (2018). Moral binding: How emotions, convictions, and identity fusion shape progroup behavior. Self and Identity, 17(5), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2018.1451362
9.
CollinsR. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press.
10.
CostelloA. B. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
11.
CummingG. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
12.
da CostaS.PáezD.Martí-GonzálezM.DíazV.BouchatP. (2023). Social movements and collective behavior: an integration of meta-analysis and systematic review of social psychology studies. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1096877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096877
13.
de RiveraJ. (1992). Emotional climate: Social structure and emotional dynamics. In StrongmanK. T. (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (Vol. 2, pp. 197–218). John Wiley & Sons.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
16.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model of crowd behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2(4), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299024005
17.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231
18.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x
19.
DurkheimÉ. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse [The elementary forms of religious life]. Presses universitaires de France.
20.
DurkheimÉ. (1915). The elementary forms of religious life (SwanJ. D., Trans.). Georges Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1912)
21.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.12.2.121
22.
FredricksonB. (2009). Positivity: Groundbreaking research reveals how to embrace the hidden strength of positive emotions, overcome negativity, and thrive. Crown Publishers/Random House.
23.
FreudS. (1921). Massenpsychologie und Ich-analyse [Group psychology and the analysis of the ego]. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.
24.
GarciaD.RiméB. (2019). Collective emotions and social resilience in the digital traces after a terrorist attack. Psychological Science, 30(4), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831964
25.
GómezA.BrooksM. L.BuhrmesterM. D.VázquezA.JettenJ.SwannW. B. (2011). On the nature of identity fusion: insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022642
26.
GöritzA. S.RennungM. (2019). Interpersonal synchrony increases social cohesion, reduces work-related stress and prevents sickdays: A longitudinal field experiment. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 50(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-019-00450-8
27.
HenrichJ. (2020). The weirdest people in the world. Penguin Books.
28.
HertelG.KerrN. L. (2001). Priming in-group favoritism: The impact of normative scripts in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1447
29.
HobsonN. M.SchroederJ.RisenJ. L.XygalatasD.InzlichtM. (2018). The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3), 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317734944
30.
HopkinsN.ReicherS. (2015). The psychology of health and well-being in mass gatherings: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 6(2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2015.06.001
31.
HopkinsN.ReicherS. D.KhanS. S.TewariS.SrinivasanN.StevensonC. (2016). Explaining effervescence: Investigating the relationship between shared social identity and positive experience in crowds. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1015969
32.
HopkinsN.ReicherS.StevensonC.PandeyK.ShankarS.TewariS. (2019). Social relations in crowds: Recognition, validation and solidarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1283–1297. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2586
33.
HughesM. E.WaiteL. J.HawkleyL. C.CacioppoJ. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574
34.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
35.
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1222–1233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1222
36.
JongJ.WhitehouseH.KavanaghC.LaneJ. (2015). Shared negative experiences lead to identity fusion via personal reflection. PLoS One, 10(12), Article e0145611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145611
37.
JorgensenT. D.PornprasertmanitS.SchoemannA. M.RosseelY. (2019). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R package Version 0.5-2) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=semTools
38.
KhanS. S.HopkinsN.ReicherS.TewariS.SrinivasanN.StevensonC. (2015). How collective participation impacts social identity: A longitudinal study from India. Political Psychology, 37(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12260
39.
LawsonK. M.RobinsR. W. (2021). Sibling constructs: What are they, why do they matter, and how should you handle them?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(4), 344–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211047101
40.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.OuwerkerkJ. W.SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
41.
Le BonG. (1895). Psychologie des foules [The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind]. Alcan.
42.
LiebstL. S. (2019). Exploring the sources of collective effervescence: A multilevel study. Sociological Science, 6(2), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a2
43.
LiuY.TaoL. (2019). Rituals and solidarity: The effects of synchrony and complementarity on cooperation. Advances in Group Processes, 36, 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-614520190000036008
44.
LovakovA.AgadullinaE. R. (2021). Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2752
45.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
46.
MorinA. J. S.McLarnonM. J. W.LitalienD. (2020). Mixture modeling for organizational behavior research. In GriepY.HansenS. D.VantilborghT.HofmansJ. (Eds.), Handbook of dynamic organizational behavior (pp. 351–379). Edward Elgar.
NevilleF.ReicherS. (2011). The experience of collective participation: Shared identity, relatedness and emotionality. Contemporary Social Science, 6(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2012.627277
49.
NovelliD.DruryJ.ReicherS.StottC. (2013). Crowdedness mediates the effect of social identification on positive emotion in a crowd: A survey of two crowd events. PLoS One, 8(11), Article e78983. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078983
50.
PáezD.RiméB.BasabeN.WlodarczykA.ZumetaL. (2015). Psychosocial effects of perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000014
51.
PáezD.RuizJ. I.GaillyO.KornblitA. L.WiesenfeldE.VidalC. M. (1997). Clima emocional: su concepto y medición mediante una investigación transcultural. Revista de Psicología social, 12(1), 79–98.
PelletierP. (2018). The pivotal role of perceived emotional synchrony in the context of terrorism: Challenges and lessons learned from the March 2016 attack in Belgium. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(9), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12526
55.
PizarroJ. J.BasabeN.AmutioA.TelletxeaS.HarizmendiM.van GordonW. (2020). The mediating role of shared flow and perceived emotional synchrony on compassion for others in a mindful-dancing program. Mindfulness, 11, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01200-z
56.
PizarroJ. J.TelletxeaS.BobowikM.ZumetaL. N. (2017). Experimental ritual: Humanizing immigrants or utilitarian prejudice in Europe?Universitas Psychologica, 16(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-5.erhi
57.
PizarroJ. J.ZumetaL.BouchatP.WlodarczykA.RiméB.BasabeN.AmutioA.PáezD. (2022). Emotional processes, collective behavior and social movements: A meta-analytic review of collective effervescence outcomes during collective gatherings and demonstrations. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 974683. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974683
58.
RaiT. S.FiskeA. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867
59.
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Version 4.3.2) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
60.
ReicherS. (1984). The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420140102
61.
ReicherS. (2017). “La beauté est dans la rue”: Four reasons (or perhaps five) to study crowds. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217712835
62.
RennungM.GöritzA. S. (2016). Prosocial consequences of interpersonal synchrony: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 224(3), 168–189. http://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000252
63.
RiméB.PáezD. (2023). Why we gather: A new look, empirically documented, at Émile Durkheim’s theory of collective assemblies and collective effervescence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 1306–1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221146388
RosseelY. (2014). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
SchwartzS. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: théorie, mesures et applications. Revue française de sociologie, 47(4), 929–968.
68.
SchwartzS. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
69.
SohiK. K.SinghP.BopannaK. (2018). Ritual participation, sense of community, and social well-being: A study of seva in the Sikh community. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(6), 2066–2078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0424-y
70.
SpurkD.HirschiA.WangM.ValeroD.KauffeldS. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, Article 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
71.
StanleyD. J.SpenceJ. R. (2018). Reproducible tables in psychology using the apaTables package. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918773743
72.
SwannW. B.JrGómezA.SeyleD. C.MoralesJ. F.HuiciC. (2009). Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013668
73.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
74.
TempletonA.DruryJ.PhilippidesA. (2018). Walking together: Behavioural signatures of psychological crowds. Royal Society Open Science, 5(7), Article 180172. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180172
75.
Van KleefG. A.FischerA. H. (2016). Emotional collectives: How groups shape emotions and emotions shape groups. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1081349
76.
VazquezC.HervasG. (2013). Addressing current challenges in cross-cultural measurement of well-being: The Pemberton Happiness Index. In KnoopH. H.Delle FaveA. (Eds.), Well-being and cultures: Perspectives from positive psychology (pp. 31–49). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4611-4_3
77.
VestergrenS.DruryJ.ChiriacE. H. (2018). How collective action produces psychological change and how that change endures over time: A case study of an environmental campaign. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12270
Watson-JonesR. E.LegareC. H. (2016). The social functions of group rituals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415618486
80.
WhitehouseH. (2002). Modes of religiosity: Towards a cognitive explanation of the sociopolitical dynamics of religion. Method & Theory in The Study of Religion, 14(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006802320909738
81.
WhitehouseH.JongJ.BuhrmesterM. D.GómezÁ.BastianB.KavanaghC. M.NewsonM.MatthewsM.LanmanJ. A.McKayR.GavriletsS. (2017). The evolution of extreme cooperation via shared dysphoric experiences. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44292
82.
WhitehouseH.LanmanJ. A. (2014). The ties that bind us: Ritual, fusion, and identification. Current Anthropology, 55(6), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1086/678698
83.
WlodarczykA.ZumetaL.BasabeN.RiméB.PáezD. (2023). Religious and secular collective gatherings, perceived emotional synchrony and self-transcendent emotions: Two longitudinal studies. Current Psychology, 42(6), 4754–4771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01826-0
84.
WlodarczykA.ZumetaL.PizarroJ. J.BouchatP.HatibovicF.BasabeN.RiméB. (2020). Perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings: Validation of a short scale and proposition of an integrative measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1721. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01721
85.
WooS. E.JebbA. T.TayL.ParrigonS. (2018). Putting the “person” in the center: Review and synthesis of person-centered approaches and methods in organizational science. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 814–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117752467
ZumetaL.BasabeN.WlodarczykA.BobowikM.PáezD. (2016). Shared flow and positive collective gatherings. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 32(3), 717–727. https://doi.org/10.6018/anale sps.32.3.261651
88.
ZumetaL. N.Castro-AbrilP.MéndezL.PizarroJ. J.WłodarczykA.BasabeN.Navarro-CarrilloG.Padoan-De LucaS.da CostaS.Alonso-ArbiolI.Torres-GómezB.CakalH.DelfinoG.TechioE. M.AlzugarayC.BilbaoM.VillagránL.López-LópezW.Ruiz-PérezJ. I.. . . PintoI. R. (2020). Collective effervescence, self-transcendence, and gender differences in social well-being during 8 March Demonstrations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 607538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607538
89.
ZumetaL. N.OriolX.TelletxeaS.AmutioA.BasabeN. (2016). Collective efficacy in sports and physical activities: Perceived emotional synchrony and shared flow. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1960. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01960
