The investigation of attitudes towards different groups is crucial for improving intergroup relations and increasing acceptance of diversity. The present research examined the potential of metacognitive understanding of cultural self in improving attitudes towards migrants, as individuals reflectively consider their cultural assumptions in evaluating migrants. We tested the effect of individuals’ awareness of culture’s influence on the self (i.e., cultural self-awareness) and how such an effect was moderated by how much individuals’ life experience involved foreign cultures (i.e., multicultural involvement). Study 1 measured American participants’ cultural self-awareness and attitudes towards immigrants. Studies 2 and 3 manipulated Taiwanese participants’ cultural self-awareness and measured their attitudes towards Southeast Asian migrant workers (Studies 2 and 3) and marriage immigrants (Study 3). Results showed that cultural self-awareness had a more positive effect on attitudes towards migrants for low (vs. high) multicultural involvement individuals. The positive role of metacognitive cultural self in intergroup relations and the boundary conditions for such positive effect are discussed.
AdamH.ObodaruO.LuJ. G.MadduxW. W.GalinskyA. D. (2018). The shortest path to oneself leads around the world: Living abroad increases self-concept clarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 145, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.01.002
2.
Al-KireR. L.PasekM. H.TsangJ.-A.LemanJ.RowattW. C. (2022). Protecting America’s borders: Christian nationalism, threat, and attitudes toward immigrants in the United States. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 354–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220978291
3.
AngS.Van DyneL.KohC.NgK. Y.TemplerK. J.TayC.ChandrasekarN. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x
4.
BadeaC.ShermanD. K. (2019). Self-affirmation and prejudice reduction: When and why?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418807705
BaumgardnerA. H. (1990). To know oneself is to like oneself: Self-certainty and self-affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.58.6.1062
7.
BoyrazG.WaitsJ. B. (2015). Reciprocal associations among self-focused attention, self-acceptance, and empathy: A two-wave panel study. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.042
8.
CampbellJ. D.TrapnellP. D.HeineS. J.KatzI. M.LavalleeL. F.LehmanD. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.141
9.
CaoJ.GalinskyA. D.MadduxW. W. (2014). Does travel broaden the mind? Breadth of foreign experiences increases generalized trust. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(5), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613514456
10.
ChaoM. M.KungF. Y. H.YaoD. J. (2015). Understanding the divergent effects of multicultural exposure. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 47, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.032
11.
ChaoM. M.OkazakiS.HongY. (2011). The quest for multicultural competence: Challenges and lessons learned from clinical and organizational research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(5), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00350.x
12.
ChengH. (2016). On migrant workers’ social status in Taiwan: A critical analysis of mainstream news discourse. International Journal of Communication, 10, 2509–2529. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3905
13.
ChengS. Y. Y.RosnerJ. L.ChaoM. M.PengS.ChenX.LiY.KwongJ. Y. Y.HongY.ChiuC. (2011). One world, One dream? Intergroup consequences of the 2008 Beijing Olympics. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.07.005
14.
ChuaR. Y. J.MorrisM. W.MorS. (2012). Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.009
DavisM. H.ConklinL.SmithA.LuceC. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 713–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.713
17.
DimaggioG.LysakerP. H.CarcioneA.NicolòG.SemerariA. (2008). Know yourself and you shall know the other. . . to a certain extent: Multiple paths of influence of self-reflection on mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 778–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.005
18.
EfklidesA. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
19.
FussellE. (2014). Warmth of the welcome: Attitudes toward immigrants and immigration policy in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043325
20.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.AnastasioP. A.BachmanB. A.RustM. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004
21.
HoggM. A.AbramsD.BrewerM. B. (2017). Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690909
22.
JoiremanJ. A.IiiL. P.HammerslaJ. (2002). Empathy and the self-absorption paradox: Support for the distinction between self-rumination and self-reflection. Self and Identity, 1(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/152988602317232803
23.
LeeT. L.FiskeS. T. (2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content Model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.005
24.
LeungA. K.-y.ChiuC.-y. (2010). Multicultural experience, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5–6), 723–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110361707
25.
LuC.WanC. (2018). Cultural self-awareness as awareness of culture’s influence on the self: Implications for cultural identification and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(6), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217752117
26.
LuC.WanC.HuiP. P.TongY. (2020). In response to cultural threat: Cultural self-awareness on collective movement participation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119888795
27.
MacInnisC. C.Page-GouldE. (2015). How can intergroup interaction be bad if intergroup contact is good? Exploring and reconciling an apparent paradox in the science of intergroup relations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568482
28.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V.MilneA. B. (1998). Saying no to unwanted thoughts: Self-focus and the regulation of mental life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.578
Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. Taiwan. (2013). Statistical yearbook of interior.
31.
MorS.MorrisM. W.JohJ. (2013). Identifying and training adaptive cross-cultural management skills: The crucial role of cultural metacognition. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(3), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0202
32.
PehrsonS.VignolesV. L.BrownR. (2009). National identification and anti-immigrant prejudice: Individual and contextual effects of national definitions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200104
33.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
34.
RosenthalL.LevyS. R. (2010). The colorblind, multicultural, and polycultural ideological approaches to improving intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01022.x
35.
SmithS. M.FabrigarL. R.MacDougallB. L.WiesenthalN. L. (2008). The role of amount, cognitive elaboration, and structural consistency of attitude-relevant knowledge in the formation of attitude certainty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.447
36.
SparkmanD. J.EidelmanS. (2018). We are the “human family”: Multicultural experiences predict less prejudice and greater concern for human rights through identification with humanity. Social Psychology, 49(3), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000337
37.
SparkmanD. J.EidelmanS.BlancharJ. C. (2016). Multicultural experiences reduce prejudice through personality shifts in Openness to Experience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(7), 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2189
38.
StephanW. G.Diaz-LovingR.DuranA. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031002006
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Eds.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
TadmorC. T.HongY.ChaoM. M.CohenA. (2018). The tolerance benefits of multicultural experiences depend on the perception of available mental resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 398–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000125
42.
TadmorC. T.HongY.ChaoM. M.WiruchnipawanF.WangW. (2012). Multicultural experiences reduce intergroup bias through epistemic unfreezing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 750–772. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029719
43.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
44.
ThomasD. C.ElronE.StahlG.EkelundB. Z.RavlinE. C.CerdinJ.-L.PoelmansS.BrislinR.PekertiA.AycanZ.MaznevskiM.AuK.LazarovaM. B. (2008). Cultural intelligence: Domain and assessment. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595808091787
45.
TrapnellP. D.CampbellJ. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 284–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.284
TurnerR. N.WestK.ChristieZ. (2013). Out-group trust, intergroup anxiety, and out-group attitude as mediators of the effect of imagined intergroup contact on intergroup behavioral tendencies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E196–E205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12019
48.
Van AckerK.PhaletK.DeleersnyderJ.MesquitaB. (2014). Do “they” threaten “us” or do “we” disrespect “them”: Majority perceptions of intergroup relations and everyday contacts with immigrant minorities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(5), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214536062
49.
VerkuytenM. (2021). Public attitudes towards migrants: Understanding cross-national and individual differences. World Psychiatry, 20(1), 132–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20819
50.
VerkuytenM.MephamK.KrosM. (2018). Public attitudes towards support for migrants: The importance of perceived voluntary and involuntary migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(5), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1367021
51.
WanM.YangY.LiuY.LiJ. (2016). Do multicultural experiences facilitate global processing style?: Multicultural experiences and processing style. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(3), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12144
52.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
53.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60017-9
54.
YangW.-y.ChangY.-w. (2014). Who opposes immigration? Interest conflicts and cultural exclusion explanations. Taiwanese Journal of Political Science, 60, 43–84. https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.60(43-84)
55.
ZimmermannJ.NeyerF. J. (2013). Do we become a different person when hitting the road? Personality development of sojourners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033019
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
