Introduction to the Special Issue of Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Less than Human: What People who are Dehumanized Think,Feel,and Do

Abstract

Over recent years, social psychological research has investigated dehumanization (viewing and treating people as less than human) by primarily focusing on those who dehumanize—the perpetrators. Less is known about those who are dehumanized—the targets of dehumanization. This Special Issue aims to address this gap by assembling empirical works on metadehumanization (when targets perceive that they are being dehumanized by others) and self-dehumanization (when targets come to see themselves in dehumanized ways). In this introductory article, we summarize the state of the science and suggest a research agenda for further studying dehumanization from the target’s perspective, by considering: (a) the impact of dehumanizing portrayal used in media; (b) the role of cultural or societal features in shaping our humanness; (c) the individual or situational variables that trigger a dehumanizing versus rehumanizing reaction to dehumanization; (d) the influence of risk- or protective factors on the emerging of metadehumanizing or self-dehumanizing feelings; and (e) the phenomenon of ingroup dehumanization.

Keywords

dehumanization metadehumanization self-dehumanization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrighetto

Baldissarri

Gabbiadini

Sacino

Valtorta

R. R.

Volpato

(2018). Objectified conformity: Working self-objectification increases conforming behavior. Social Influence, 13, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2018.1439769

Andrighetto

Riva

Gabbiadini

Volpato

(2016). Excluded from all humanity: Animal metaphors exacerbate the consequences of social exclusion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35, 628–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16632267

Auzoult

(2020). Can meaning at work guard against the consequences of objectification ? Psychological Reports, 123, 872–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119826891

Auzoult

Personnaz

(2016). The role of organizational culture and self-consciousness in self-objectification in the workplace. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 23, 271–284. doi:10.4473/TPM23.3.1

Baldissarri

Andrighetto

(2021). Being treated as an instrument: Consequences of instrumental treatment and self-objectification on task engagement and performance. Human Performance, 34, 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.1878182

Baldissarri

Andrighetto

Gabbiadini

Volpato

(2017). Work and freedom? Working self-objectification and belief in personal free will. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 250–269. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12172

Baldissarri

Andrighetto

Volpato

(2014). When work does not ennoble man: Psychological consequences of working objectification. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.3.7

Baldissarri

Andrighetto

Volpato

(2022). The longstanding view of workers as objects: Antecedents and consequences of working objectification. European Review of Social Psychology, 33, 81–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1956778

Baldissarri

Pagliaro

Teresi

Andrighetto

(2022). Humanness in times of uncertainty: On the link between job insecurity, self-objectification and well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2897

10.

Bandura

(1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3

11.

Bar-Tal

(1989). Delegitimization: The extreme case of stereotyping and prejudice. In Bar-Tal

Graumann

C. F.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Stroebe

(Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice. Changing conceptions (pp. 169–182). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3582-8_8

12.

Bastian

Crimston

(2014). Self-dehumanization. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.3.1

13.

Bastian

Haslam

(2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022

14.

Bastian

Haslam

(2011). Experiencing dehumanization: Cognitive and emotional effects of everyday dehumanization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.614132

15.

Bastian

Jetten

Chen

Radke

H. R.

Harding

J. F.

Fasoli

(2013). Losing our humanity: The self-dehumanizing consequences of social ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 156–169. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0146167212471205

16.

Bastian

Jetten

Radke

H. R.

(2012). Cyber-dehumanization: Violent video game play diminishes our humanity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 486–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212471205

17.

Bell

C. M.

Khoury

(2016). Organizational powerlessness, dehumanization, and gendered effects of procedural justice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 570–585. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1108/JMP-09-2014-0267

18.

Borinca

Tropp

L. R.

Ofosu

(2021). Meta-humanization enhances positive reactions to prosocial cross-group interaction. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 60, 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12435.

19.

Brison

Stinglhamber

Caesens

(2022). Organizational dehumanization. Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.902

20.

Bustillos

Demoulin

López

Vázquez

Zobllina

(2022). Approaching Dehumanizing Interactions: Joint consideration of other-, meta-, and self-dehumanization. Current Opinion in Behavioural Sciences. Manuscript in press.

21.

Caesens

Nguyen

Stinglhamber

(2019). Abusive supervision and organizational dehumanization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9592-3

22.

Caesens

Stinglhamber

Demoulin

De Wilde

(2017). Perceived organizational support and employees’ well-being: The mediating role of organizational dehumanization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 527–540. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1319817

23.

Čehajić

Brown

González

(2009). What do I care? Perceived ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 715–729. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1368430209347727

24.

Cheng

Hao

Zhu

Wang

(2022). Objectification limits authenticity: Exploring the relations between objectification, perceived authenticity, and subjective well-being. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61, 622–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12500

25.

Chevallereau

Maurage

Stinglhamber

Demoulin

(2021). Sex-based and beauty-based objectification: Metadehumanization and emotional consequences among victims. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60, 1218–1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12446

26.

Demoulin

Leyens

J. P.

Paladino

M. P.

Rodriguez-Torres

Rodriguez-Perez

Dovidio

(2004). Dimensions of “uniquely” and “non-uniquely” human emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71–96. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/02699930244000444

27.

Demoulin

Maurage

Stinglhamber

(2021). Exploring metadehumanization and self-dehumanization from a target perspective. In Kronfeldner

(Ed.), The Routledge handbook of dehumanization (pp. 260–274). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492464

28.

Demoulin

Nguyen

Chevallereau

Fontesse

Bastart

Stinglhamber

Maurage

(2021). Examining the role of fundamental psychological needs in the development of metadehumanization: A multi-population approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60, 196–221. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/bjso.12380

29.

El-Hout

Salomon

(2022). Villains or vermin? The differential effects of criminal and animal rhetoric on immigrant cardiovascular responses. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 1939–1957.

30.

Fontesse

Demoulin

Stinglhamber

de Timary

Maurage

(2021). Metadehumanization and self-dehumanization are linked to reduced drinking refusal self-efficacy and increased anxiety and depression symptoms in patients with severe alcohol use disorder. Psychologica Belgica, 61, 238. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb.1058

31.

Fontesse

Rimez

Maurage

(2021). Stigmatization and dehumanization perceptions towards psychiatric patients among nurses: A path-analysis approach. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 35, 153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2020.12.005

32.

Fontesse

Stinglhamber

Demoulin

Chevallereau

de Timary

Cappeliez

Bon

Geus

Talent

Maurage

(2020). Metadehumanization in severe alcohol-use disorders: Links with fundamental needs and clinical outcomes. Addictive Behaviors, 107, 106425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106425

33.

Gelfand

M. J.

Nishii

L. H.

Raver

J. L.

(2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225

34.

Graham

Haidt

(2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-001

35.

Gray

H. M.

Gray

M. K.

Wegner

D. M.

(2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475

36.

Hartley

Percaya

Fincher

(2022). The role of metadehumanization in explaining sacred conflict. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 1958–1982.

37.

Haslam

(2006) Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4

38.

Haslam

Stratemeyer

(2016). Recent research on dehumanization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 25–29. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.009

39.

Hochschild

A. R.

(1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.4050030365

40.

Howe

L.C.

Schumann

Walton

G.M.

(2022). Am I not human?: Reasserting humanness in response to group-based dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 2042–2065.

41.

Kouchaki

Dobson

K. S.

Waytz

Kteily

N. S.

(2018). The link between self-dehumanization and immoral behavior. Psychological Science, 29, 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618760784

42.

Kteily

Bruneau

(2017a) Backlash: The politics and real-world consequences of minority group dehumanization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216675334

43.

Kteily

N. S.

Bruneau

(2017b). Darker demons of our nature: The need to (re)focus attention on blatant forms of dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417708230

44.

Kteily

Hodson

Bruneau

(2016). They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000044

45.

Kteily

N. S.

Landry

A. P.

(2022). Dehumanization: trends, insights, and challenges. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26, 222–240. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.tics.2021.12.003

46.

Lachowicz-Tabaczek

Lewandowska

Kochan-Wójcik

Andrzejewska

B. E.

Juszkiewicz

(2021). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism as predictors of the tendency to objectify other people. Current Psychology, 40, 5637–5647. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s12144-019-00569-3

47.

Lagios

Caesens

(2022). Organizational dehumanization and displaced aggression: A trickle-out model. Organizational dehumanization: Its nomological network and measurement [Symposium]. Eighty-second annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA, United States.

48.

Lagios

Restubog

S. L. D.

Caesens

(2022, May). Organizational dehumanization and supervisor dehumanization: Test of a trickle-down model [Poster presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Belgian Association for Psychological Science, Leuven, Belgium.

49.

Landry

A. P.

Ihm

Kwit

Schooler

J. W.

(2021). Metadehumanization erodes democratic norms during the 2020 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12253

50.

Landry

A. P.

Ihm

Schooler

J. W.

(2022). Hated but still human: Metadehumanization leads to greater hostility than metaprejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220979035

51.

Leyens

J.-P.

Paladino

P. M.

Rodriguez-Torres

Vaes

Demoulin

Rodriguez-Perez

Gaunt

(2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06

52.

Loughnan

Baldissarri

Spaccatini

Elder

(2017). Internalizing objectification: Objectified individuals see themselves as less warm, competent, moral, and human. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12188

53.

Loughnan

Haslam

Kashima

(2009). Understanding the relationship between attribute-based and metaphor-based dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209347726

54.

Mekawi

Watson-Singleton

N. N.

(2021). Examining racial discrimination’s association with depressive symptoms through metadehumanization among African Americans: Does racial identity matter? Journal of Black psychology, 47, 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420983664

55.

Moor

Ben-Meir

Golan-Shapira

Farchi

(2013). Rape: A trauma of paralyzing dehumanization. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 22, 1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2013.848965

56.

Moradi

(2013). Discrimination, objectification, and dehumanization: Toward a pantheoretical framework. In Gervais

S. J.

(Ed.), Objectification and (de)humanization: 60th Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 153–181). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_7

57.

Murray

A. J.

Durrheim

Dixon

(2022). Everyday dehumanization: Negative contact, humiliation, and the lived experience of being treated as ‘less than human’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61, 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12524

58.

Nguyen

Maurage

Stinglhamber

(2022). Organizational metadehumanization and mechanistic self-dehumanization: The role of surface acting. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 1983–2002.

59.

Nguyen

Dao

Q. A.

Nhan

T. L. A.

Stinglhamber

(2021). Organizational dehumanization and emotional labor: A cross-cultural comparison between Vietnam and the United Kingdom. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52, 43–60. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0022022120972183

60.

Nguyen

Stinglhamber

(2020). Workplace mistreatment and emotional labor: A latent profile analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09803-8

61.

Pavetich

Stathi

(2021). Meta-humanization reduces prejudice, even under high intergroup threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120, 651–671. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspi0000259

62.

Pizzirani

Karantzas

G. C.

Mullins

E. R.

(2019). The development and validation of a dehumanization measure within romantic relationships. Frontiers Psychology, 10, 2754 https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2019.02754

63.

Poon

K. T.

Chen

Teng

Wong

W. Y.

(2020). The effect of objectification on aggression. Journal of experimental social psychology, 87, 103940. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103940

64.

Ruttan

R. L.

Lucas

B. J.

(2018). Cogs in the machine: The prioritization of money and self-dehumanization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.08.007

65.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

66.

Sainz

Baldissarri

(2021). Abusive leadership versus objectifying job features: Factors that influence organizational dehumanization and workers’ self-objectification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51, 825–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12803

67.

Sainz

Delgado

Moriano

J. A.

(2021). The link between authentic leadership, organizational dehumanization and stress at work. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 37, 85–92. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5093/jwop2021a9

68.

Sainz

Martínez

Moya

Rodríguez-Bailón

Vaes

(2021). Lacking socio-economic status reduces subjective well-being through perceptions of meta-dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60, 470–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12412

69.

Sakalaki

Richardson

Fousiani

(2016). Self-dehumanizing as an effect of enduring dispositions poor in humanness. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 13, 104–115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313748202_Self-dehumanizing_as_an_effect_of_enduring_dispositions_poor_in_humanness

70.

Stinglhamber

Nguyen

Josse

Demoulin

(2022). The development of prison officers’ job satisfaction and its impact on depersonalization of incarcerated persons: The role of organizational dehumanization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49, 1600–1617. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221087182

71.

Taskin

Parmentier

Stinglhamber

(2019). The dark side of office designs: Towards de-humanization. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34, 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12150

72.

Tipler

Ruscher

J. B.

(2014). Agency’s role in dehumanization: Non-human metaphors of out-groups. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12100

73.

Vaes

Orabona

Muslu

Ö.

Piazza

(2022). The tethered humanity hypothesis among victims of interpersonal harm: The role of apologies, forgiveness, and the relation between self-, other-, and meta-perceptions of humanity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 2021–2041.

74.

Vaes

Bastian

(2021). Tethered humanity: Humanizing self and others in response to interpersonal harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2744

75.

Valtorta

R. R.

Baldissarri

Andrighetto

Volpato

(2021). Seeing others as a disease: The impact of physical (but not moral) disgust on biologization. International Review of Social Psychology, 34, 7. http://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.407

76.

Valtorta

R. R.

Baldissarri

Volpato

Andrighetto

(2022). Intergroup biologization and outgroup prejudice in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fjasp.12831

77.

Volpato

Andrighetto

(2015). Dehumanization. In: Wright

James D.

(Editor-in-Chief), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed, Vol. 6; pp. 31–37). Elsevier.

78.

Wang

Chen

Shi

Chen

(2022). Threatened humanity in a tight world: Cultural tightness results in self-objectification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 2003–2020.

79.

Yang

Jin

Fan

Zhu

(2015). The impact of power on humanity: Self-dehumanization in powerlessness. PloS One, 10, e0125721. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125721

80.

Zhang

Chan

D. K. S.

Xia

Tian

Zhu

(2017). Cognitive, emotional, and motivational consequences of dehumanization. Social Cognition, 35, 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.18