The purpose of this study was to examine the reciprocal longitudinal associations between different measures of direct and extended intergroup contact and various intergroup outcomes among majority and minority adolescents from four intergroup contexts in the Republic of Croatia. The research was carried out in two waves on a sample of 1,150 elementary and high school students, members of Croatian majority, and Serbian, Hungarian, Czech, and Italian minority. Cross-lagged path analysis revealed that direct contacts predict less social distance and more prosocial behavior, while extended contacts predict lower ingroup bias over time. However, we found even more effects in the reversed temporal direction. Lower initial bias and social distance, as well as greater prosocial behavior predicted more direct and extended contacts over time. Furthermore, none of the examined longitudinal associations differed between majority and minority members or across the four intergroup contexts.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
2.
BagciS. C.ÇelebiE. (2017). Cross-group friendships and outgroup attitudes among Turkish-Kurdish ethnic groups: Does perceived interethnic conflict moderate the friendship-attitude link?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(2), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12413
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.MaquilA.DemoulinS.LeyensJ.-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013470
5.
ChristO.HewstoneM.TauschN.WagnerU.VociA.HughesJ.CairnsE. (2010). Direct contact as a moderator of extended contact effects: Cross-sectional and longitudinal impact on outgroup attitudes, behavioral intentions, and attitude certainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1662–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386969
6.
ChristO.WagnerU. (2013). Methodological issues in the study of intergroup contact: Towards a new wave of research. In HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 233–261). Psychology Press.
7.
CooperJ.HoggM. A. (2007). Feeling the anguish of others: A theory of vicarious dissonance. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (1st ed., Vol. 39, pp. 359–403). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39007-7
8.
Corkalo BiruskiD. (2012). Lessons learned from the former Yugoslavia: The case of Croatia. In LandisD.AlbertR. D. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnic conflict: International perspectives (pp. 327–348). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0448-4_13
9.
Čorkalo BiruškiD.AjdukovićD. (2012). Što određuje međuetničke stavove adolescenata u podijeljenoj zajednici? [What determines adolescents’ interethnic attitudes in a divided community?]. Društvena Istraživanja, 21(4), 901–921. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.21.4.05
10.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411103
11.
De Tezanos-PintoP.BrattC.BrownR. (2010). What will the others think? In-group norms as a mediator of the effects of intergroup contact. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X471020
12.
DhontK.Van HielA.De BolleM.RoetsA. (2012). Longitudinal intergroup contact effects on prejudice using self- and observer-reports. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02039.x
13.
Di BernardoG. A.VezzaliL.StathiS.CadamuroA.CortesiL. (2017). Vicarious, extended and imagined intergroup contact: A review of interventions based on indirect contact strategies applied in educational settings. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 24(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM24.1.1
14.
DixonJ.DurrheimK.TredouxC. (2005). Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(7), 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.697
15.
EllerA.AbramsD. (2003). “Gringos” in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001012
16.
EllerA.AbramsD. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.194
17.
EllerA.AbramsD.GómezA. (2012). When the direct route is blocked: The extended contact pathway to improving intergroup relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(5), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.03.005
18.
EllerA.AbramsD.ZimmermannA. (2011). Two degrees of separation: A longitudinal study of actual and perceived extended international contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210391120
19.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
20.
FeddesA. R.NoackP.RutlandA. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children’s interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80(2), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01266.x
21.
GómezA.TroppL. R.FernandezS. (2011). When extended contact opens the door to future contact: Testing the effects of extended contact on attitudes and intergroup expectancies in majority and minority groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210391119
22.
HässlerT.UllrichJ.BernardinoM.ShnabelN.Van LaarC.ValdenegroD.SebbenS.TroppL. R.VisintinE. P.GonzálezR.DitlmannR. K.AbramsD.SelvanathanH. P.BrankovićM.WrightS.von ZimmermannJ.PasekM.AydinA. L.ŽeželjI. . . . UgarteL. M. (2020). A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z
HewstoneM.RamiahA.Al, SchmidK.FloeC.ZalkM.van, WölferR.NewR. (2018). Influence of segregation versus mixing: Intergroup contact and attitudes among White-British and Asian-British students in high schools in Oldham, England. Theory and Research in Education, 16(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518779879
25.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
26.
JelićM.Čorkalo BiruškiD.AjdukovićD. (2014). Ideološki stavovi većinske grupe u dvije višeetničke sredine [Ideological attitudes of majority groups in two multiethnic environments]. Revija za Socijalnu Politiku, 21(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v21i1.1149
27.
KaoG.JoynerK. (2004). Do race and ethnicity matter among friends? Activities among interracial, interethnic, and intraethnic adolescent friends. The Sociological Quarterly, 45(3), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02303.x
28.
LemmerG.WagnerU. (2015). Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2079
29.
LevinS.van LaarC.SidaniusJ. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001013
30.
LewickiR. J.TomlinsonE. C. (2014). Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In ColemanP. T.DeutschM.MarcusE. C. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 104–136). Jossey-Bass.
31.
McGillR. K.WayN.HughesD. (2012). Intra- and interracial best friendships during middle school: Links to social and emotional well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(4), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00826.x
32.
McKeownS.DixonJ. (2017). The “contact hypothesis”: Critical reflections and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), Article e12295. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12295
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup friendship effects: Testing the moderating role of the affective-cognitive bases of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1406–1420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304788
35.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 770–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262848
36.
PeharL.Čorkalo BiruškiD.Pavin IvanecT. (2020). The role of peer, parental, and school norms in predicting adolescents’ attitudes and behaviours of majority and different minority ethnic groups in Croatia. PLOS ONE, 15(1), Article e0227512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227512
37.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232006
PettigrewT. F.HewstoneM. (2017). The single factor fallacy: Implications of missing critical variables from an analysis of intergroup contact theory. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12026
40.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
41.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
42.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons.
43.
SaguyT.KteilyN. (2014). Power, negotiations, and the anticipation of intergroup encounters. European Review of Social Psychology, 25(1), 107–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.957579
44.
SchneiderB. H.DixonK.UdvariS. (2007). Closeness and competition in the inter-ethnic and co-ethnic friendships of early adolescents in Toronto and Montreal. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431606294822
45.
SchroederJ.RisenJ. L. (2016). Befriending the enemy: Outgroup friendship longitudinally predicts intergroup attitudes in a coexistence program for Israelis and Palestinians. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214542257
46.
StarkT. H. (2015). Understanding the selection bias: Social network processes and the effect of prejudice on the avoidance of outgroup friends. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514565252
47.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2017). Intergroup threats. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 131–148). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316161579.007
48.
SwartH.HewstoneM.ChristO.VociA. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024450
49.
ŠtambukM. (2019). Prosocijalno ponašanje u situacijama međuetničkih sukoba: Što određuje otpor vlastitoj grupi? [Prosocial behaviour in interethnic conflict: What determines resistance to the in-group?]. In JelićM.TomasJ. (Eds.), 24. Dani Ramira i Zorana Bujasa (p. 55). Filozofski fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Odsjek za psihologiju.
50.
TauschN.HewstoneM.SchmidK.HughesJ.CairnsE. (2011). Extended contact effects as a function of closeness of relationship with ingroup contacts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390534
51.
TroppL. R. (2006). Stigma and intergroup contact among members of minority and majority status groups. In LevinS.van LaarC. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 171–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52.
TroppL. R. (2015). Dismantling an ethos of conflict: Strategies for improving intergroup relations. In HalperinE.SharvitK. (Eds.), The social psychology of intractable conflicts (pp. 159–171). Springer.
53.
TroppL. R.HawiD. R.O’BrienT. C.GheorghiuM.ZetesA.ButzD. A. (2017). Intergroup contact and the potential for post-conflict reconciliation: Studies in Northern Ireland and South Africa. Peace and Conflict, 23(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000236
54.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between integroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority groups. Psychological Science, 16(12), 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
55.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
56.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.VonofakouC. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011434
57.
van BuurenS.Groothuis-OudshoornK. (2011). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
58.
VezzaliL.HewstoneM.CapozzaD.GiovanniniD.WölferR. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25(1), 314–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.982948
59.
VociA.HewstoneM.SwartH.VenezianiC. A. (2015). Refining the association between intergroup contact and intergroup forgiveness in Northern Ireland: Type of contact, prior conflict experience, and group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(5), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215577001
WölferR.SchmidK.HewstoneM.van ZalkM. (2016). Developmental dynamics of intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: Long-term efects in adolescence and early adulthood. Child Development, 87(5), 1466–1478. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12598
62.
WrightS. C.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73
63.
ZhouS.Page-GouldE.AronA.MoyerA.HewstoneM. (2018). The extended contact hypothesis: A meta-analysis on 20 years of research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318762647
64.
ŽeželjI. L.IoannouM.FrancR.PsaltisC.MartinovicB. (2017). The role of inter-ethnic online friendships in prejudice reduction in post-conflict societies: Evidence from Serbia, Croatia and Cyprus. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.041
