Research has found that people’s perceptions of the extent to which authority figures behave in a procedurally just (or unjust) manner have powerful effects on a variety of outcomes. Procedural justice has been shown to influence people’s sense of obligation to obey and willingness to cooperate with the law and its agents, as well as people’s willingness to comply with the law and legal authorities. Yet very little research has examined the causal mechanisms through which the perceived fairness of procedures influences these outcomes. One possibility is that procedural injustice may trigger affective responses such as anger, frustration, or fear. In this study, we test the effects of three procedural justice conditions on a variety of outcomes using a laboratory-style experiment that simulates a police traffic stop. At the same time, we test the extent to which the relationships between procedural justice and these outcomes are mediated by people’s self-reported levels of anger. Our findings reveal that the treatment conditions had strong effects on self-reported anger, with the procedural justice condition decreasing anger, and the procedural injustice condition increasing anger. Moreover, the findings reveal that the treatment conditions also exerted indirect effects on all outcomes through anger. Taken together, these findings reinforce the importance of emotion in mediating the effects of procedural justice on a variety of outcomes during intergroup encounters.
AgnewR. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 319–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427801038004001
BarclayL. J.KieferT. (2014). Approach or avoid? Exploring overall justice and the differential effects of positive and negative emotions. Journal of Management, 40, 1857–1898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312441833
4.
BarkworthJ. M.MurphyK. (2015). Procedural justice policing and citizen compliance behaviour: The importance of emotion. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.951649
5.
BeijersbergenK. A.DirkzwagerA. J.EichelsheimV. I.van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2015). Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners’ misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550710
6.
BladerS. L.TylerT. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013935
7.
Blount-HillK.-L. (2021). Exploring a social identity theory of shared narrative: Insights from resident stories of police contact in Newark, New Jersey, and Cleveland, Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48, 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820969751
8.
BradfordB. (2014). Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing and Society, 24, 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2012.724068
9.
BradfordB.MurphyK.JacksonJ. (2014). Officers as mirrors: Policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu021
10.
ChebatJ.SlusarczykW. (2005). How emotions mediate the effects of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 58, 664–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.005
11.
ChoiC. W.GilesH. (2012). Intergroup messages in policing the community. In GilesH. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 286–299). Routledge.
12.
ClaytonS. D. (1992). The experience of injustice: Some characteristics and correlates. Social Justice Research, 5, 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048378
13.
CobbinaJ. (2019). Hands up, don’t shoot: Why the protests in Ferguson and Baltimore matter and how they changed America. New York University Press.
DaiM.FrankJ.SunI. (2011). Procedural justice during police–citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.01.004
16.
De CremerD.WubbenM. J. J.BrebelsL. (2008). When unfair treatment leads to anger: The effects of other people’s emotions and ambiguous unfair procedures. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2518–2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00402.x
17.
DixonT. L.SchellT. L.GilesH.DrogosK. L. (2008). The influence of race in police–civilian interactions: A content analysis of videotaped interactions taken during Cincinnati police traffic stops. Journal of Communication, 58, 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00398.x
18.
DrakulichK.Rodriguez-WhitneyE.RoblesJ. (2022). Why White Americans more frequently fail to view the police critically: A subtle but vital shift in focus. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X22000133
19.
EkinsE. (2017). Policing in America: Understanding public attitudes toward the police. Results from a national survey. Cato Institute.
20.
EppC. R.Maynard-MoodyS.Haider-MarkelD. (2014). Pulled over: How police stops define race and citizenship. University of Chicago Press.
21.
FoxS.SpectorP. E.MilesD. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotion. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1803
22.
GordijnE. H.YzerbytV.WigboldusD.DumontM. (2006). Emotional reactions to harmful intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.296
23.
HaganJ.SheddC.PayneM. R. (2005). Race, ethnicity and youth perceptions of criminal injustice. American Sociological Review, 70, 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000302
24.
HagedoornM.BuunkB. P.van de VliertE. (1998). Opening the black box between justice and reactions to unfavorable outcomes in the workplace. Social Justice Research, 11, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022180903964
25.
HoggM. A. (2013). Intergroup relations. In DeLamaterJ.WardA. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 533–561). Springer.
26.
JohnsonD.WilsonD. B.MaguireE. R.Lowrey-KinbergB. V. (2017). Race and perceptions of police: Experimental results on the impact of procedural (in)justice. Justice Quarterly, 34, 1184–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1343862
KrehbielP. J.CropanzanoR. (2000). Procedural justice, outcome favorability and emotion. Social Justice Research, 13, 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007670909889
29.
KushinsE. R. (2014). Sounding like your race in the employment process: An experiment on speaker voice, race identification, and stereotyping. Race and Social Problems, 6, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-014-9123-4
30.
LambertA. J.EadehF. R.HansonE. J. (2019). Anger and its consequences for judgment and behavior: Recent developments in social and political psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 103–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.12.001
31.
LowreyB. V.MaguireE. R.BennettR. R. (2016). Testing the effects of procedural justice and overaccommodation in traffic stops: A randomized experiment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 1430–1449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816639330
32.
Lowrey-KinbergB. (2021). Language in traffic stop interactions: Patterns in language use and recommendations for fostering trust and compliance. In GilesH.MaguireE. R.HillS. (Eds.), The Rowman & Littlefield handbook of policing, communication, and society (pp. 263–273). Rowman & Littlefield.
33.
MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (2017). Group-based emotion in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 658–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217702725
34.
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35.
MacQueenS.BradfordB. (2015). Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: Results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0
36.
MaguireE. R.Atkin-PlunkC. A.WellsW. (2021). The effects of procedural justice on cooperation and compliance among inmates in a work release program. Justice Quarterly, 38, 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1634753
37.
MaguireE. R.GilesH. (2022). Public expressions of empathy and sympathy by U.S. criminal justice officials after controversial police killings of African-Americans. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41, 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211057238
38.
MaguireE. R.LowreyB. V.JohnsonD. (2017). Evaluating the relative impact of positive and negative encounters with police: A randomized experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9276-9
39.
MaitnerA. T.SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2017). Intergroup emotions theory: Prejudice and differentiated emotional reactions toward outgroups. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 111–130). Cambridge University Press.
40.
MasseyD. S.LundyG. (2001). Use of Black English and racial discrimination in urban housing markets: New methods and findings. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870122184957
41.
MastrofskiS. D.SnipesJ. B.SupinaA. E. (1996). Compliance on demand: The public’s response to specific police requests. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 269–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427896033003001
42.
MazerolleL.BennettS.AntrobusE.EgginsE. (2012). Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: Main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9160-1
43.
MikulaG.SchererK. R.AthenstaedtU. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298247009
44.
MikulaG.SchlambergerK. (1985). What people think about an unjust event: Toward a better understanding of the phenomenology of experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150104
MurphyK.TylerT. R. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.502
47.
MuthénB. O.MuthénL. K.AsparouhovT. (2016). Regression and mediation analysis using Mplus. Muthén & Muthén.
48.
MyersP.GilesH.ReidS. A.NabiR. L. (2008). Law enforcement encounters: The effects of officer accommodativeness and crime severity on interpersonal attributions are mediated by intergroup sensitivity. Communication Studies, 59, 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970802467361
PeckJ. H. (2015). Minority perceptions of the police: A state-of-the-art review. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38, 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-01-2015-0001
51.
PryceD. K.OlaghereA.BrownR. A.DavisV. M. (2021). A neglected problem: Understanding the effects of personal and vicarious trauma on African Americans’ attitudes toward the police. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48, 1366–1389. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211006756
52.
RebellonC. J.ManasseM. E.van GundyK. T.CohnE. S. (2012). Perceived injustice and delinquency: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.02.001
53.
RengifoA.SlocumL. (2020). The identity prism: How racial identification frames perceptions of police contact, legitimacy, and effectiveness. Law & Social Inquiry, 45, 590–617. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.72
54.
RosenbaumD. P.SchuckA. M.CostelloS. K.HawkinsD. F.RingM. K. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8, 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104271085
55.
SahinN. M. (2014). Legitimacy, procedural justice and police–citizen encounters: A randomized controlled trial of the impact of procedural justice on citizen perceptions of the police during traffic stops in Turkey [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University.
56.
SchoeferK.DiamantopoulosA. (2008). The role of emotions in translating perceptions of (in)justice into postcomplaint behavioral responses. Journal of Service Research, 11, 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670508319091
57.
ShermanL. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 445–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030004006
58.
ShermanL. W. (2010). Defiance, compliance, and consilience: A general theory of criminology. In McLaughlinE.NewburnT. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of criminological theory (pp. 360–390). Sage.
SkoganW. G.FrydlK. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. The National Academies Press.
61.
SparksR.BottomsA. E.HayW. (1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Clarendon Press.
62.
StottC.HoggettJ.PearsonG. (2012). ‘Keeping the peace’: Social identity, procedural justice and the policing of football crowds. British Journal of Criminology, 52(2), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azr076
63.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
64.
TylerT. R. (2005). Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104271105
65.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
66.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation.
69.
Van YperenN. W.HagedoornM.ZweersM.PostmaS. (2000). Injustice and employees’ destructive responses: The mediating role of state negative affect. Social Justice Research, 13, 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026411523466
70.
WarrenP. Y. (2011). Perceptions of police disrespect during vehicle stops: A race-based analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708316177
71.
WeissH. M.SuckowK.CropanzanoR. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.786
WeitzerR.TuchS. A. (2005). Racially biased policing: Determinants of citizen perceptions. Social Forces, 83, 1009–1030. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0050
75.
WilliamsS. (1999). The effects of distributive and procedural justice on performance. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599732
76.
WortleyS.HaganJ.MacmillanR. (1997). Just des(s)erts? The racial polarization of perceptions of criminal injustice. Law and Society Review, 31, 637–676. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053983
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
