Economic inequality is a main issue in current societies, and it affects people’s psychological processes. In this research, we propose that perceived economic inequality might affect how people perceive men and women. In two experiments carried out in Spain (N = 170) and Mexico (N = 215), we tested whether high (vs. low) economic inequality leads to changes in the perceived agency and communion of both men and women. Our findings suggest that when economic inequality is high (vs. low), the communal content in social perceptions of both men and women decreases. Specifically, under high (vs. low) inequality, the difference in agency and communion ascribed to a man becomes greater (i.e., men are perceived as even more agentic than communal), whereas this difference becomes smaller for women (i.e., women are still perceived as more communal than agentic, but this difference is smaller). We discuss these findings’ implications regarding the psychosocial effects of economic inequality.
AbeleA. E.HaukeN.PetersK.LouvetE.SzymkowA.DuanY. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness–communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810
2.
AbeleA. E.UchronskiM.SuitnerC.WojciszkeB. (2008). Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.575
3.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
4.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
5.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2019). Introduction: The Big Two of agency and communion as an overarching framework in psychology. In AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 1–12). Routledge.
6.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592. https://doi.org/7/0278-6133.19.6.586
7.
AschS. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In GuetzkowH. (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press.
8.
BlakeK. R.BastianB.DensonT. F.GrosjeanP.BrooksR. C. (2018). Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 115, 8722–8727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717959115
9.
BlakeK. R.BrooksR. C. (2019). Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 116, 25029–25033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909806116
10.
BrooksR.ScottI. M.MaklakovA. A.KasumovicM. M.ClarkA. P.Penton-VoakI. S. (2011). National income inequality predicts women’s preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 810–812. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0964
11.
Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LundbergK. B.McKeeS. (2017). Political action in the age of high-economic inequality: A multilevel approach. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11, 232–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12032
12.
ButtrickN. R.OishiS. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304
13.
CampbellD. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950
14.
ChanT.WangI.YbarraO. (2019). Connect and strive to survive and thrive: The evolutionary meaning of communion and agency. In AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 13–24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703663-2
15.
ChancelL.PikettyT.SaezE.ZucmanG.BajardF.BurqF.NeefT.RobilliardA.-S.MoshrifR.DufloE.BanerjeeA. (2022). World inequality report 2022. World Inequality Database. https://wir2022.wid.world/
16.
ChengL.HaoM.WangF. (2021). Beware of the “bad guys”: Economic inequality, perceived competition, and social vigilance. International Review of Social Psychology, 34, 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.497
17.
CheungF.LucasR. E. (2016). Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000059
18.
CheungF.LucasR. E. (2020). Income inequality and well-being: The role of social comparison. In SulsJ.CollinsR. L.WheelerL. (Eds.), Comparison, judgment, and behavior (pp. 623–645). Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190629113.003.0022
19.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
20.
ConnorP.VarneyJ.KeltnerD.ChenS. (2021). Social class competence stereotypes are amplified by socially signaled economic inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220916640
21.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.KwanV. S. Y.GlickP.DemoulinS.LeyensJ.-P.BondM. H.CroizetJ.-C.EllemersN.SleebosE.HtunT. T.KimH.-J.MaioG.PerryJ.PetkovaK.TodorovV.Rodríguez-BailónR.MoralesE.MoyaM.. . .ZieglerR. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X314935
22.
CuddyA. J. C.WolfE. B.GlickP.CrottyS.ChongJ.NortonM. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 622–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000027
23.
Del Fresno-DíazÁ.Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.WillisG. B. (2021). I choose to be powerful: Economic inequality encourages preferences of power over status positions. Social Science Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1949547
24.
DelheyJ.DragolovG. (2014). Why inequality makes Europeans less happy: The role of distrust, status anxiety, and perceived conflict. European Sociological Review, 30, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct033
25.
DiekmanA. B.EaglyA. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs : Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001
26.
DuranteF.Bearns TablanteC.FiskeS. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the stereotype content model. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12208
27.
DuranteF.FiskeS. T.KervynN.CuddyA. J. C.AkandeA. D.AdetounB. E.AdewuyiM. F.TserereM. M.Al RamiahA.MastorK. A.BarlowF. K.BonnG.TafarodiR. W.BosakJ.CairnsE.DohertyC.CapozzaD.ChandranA.ChryssochoouX.. . .StorariC. C. (2013). Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 726–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12005
EaglyA. H.KoenigA. M. (2021). The vicious cycle linking stereotypes and social roles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211013775
31.
EaglyA. H.NaterC.MillerD. I.KaufmannM.SczesnyS. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75, 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
32.
EaglyA. H.SczesnyS. (2019). Gender roles in the future? Theoretical foundations and future research directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1965), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01965
33.
EaglyA. H.SteffenV. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
34.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/68.4.1297
35.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2016). Social role theory of sex differences. In NaplesN.HooglandR. C.WickramasingheM.WongW. C. A. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies (pp. 1–3). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183
36.
ElgarF. J.AitkenN. (2011). Income inequality, trust and homicide in 33 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 21, 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq068
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
39.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
40.
FiskeS. T.DupreeC. H.NicolasG.SwencionisJ. K. (2016). Status, power, and intergroup relations: The personal is the societal. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.012
41.
FiskeS. T.DuranteF. (2019). Mutual status stereotypes mantain inequality. In JettenJ.PetersK. (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 335–348). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_21
GraaflandJ.LousB. (2019). Income inequality, life satisfaction inequality and trust: A cross country panel analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 1717–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0021-0
46.
GrigoryanL.BaiX.DuranteF.FiskeS. T.FabrykantM.HakobjanyanA.JavakhishviliN.KadirovK.KotovaM.MakashviliA.MalokuE.Morozova-LarinaO.MullabaevaN.SamekinA.VerbilovichV.YahiiaievI. (2020). Stereotypes as historical accidents: Images of social class in postcommunist versus capitalist societies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 927–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219881434
47.
HainesE. L.DeauxK.LofaroN. (2016). The times they are a-changing . . . or are they not ? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081
HentschelT.HeilmanM. E.PeusC. V. (2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011
HofstedeG. (1991). Masculinity/Femininity as a dimension of culture. In Masculinity and Femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures (pp. 3–28). SAGE Publications.
52.
HofstedeG. (1996). Gender stereotypes and partner preferences of Asian women in masculine and feminine cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022196275003
53.
HofstedeG. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
JachimowiczJ. M.DavidaiS.Goya-TocchettoD.SzasziB.DayM. V.TepperS.PhillipsT.MirzaM. U.OrdabayevaN.HauserO. P. (2020). Inequality in researchers’ minds: Four guiding questions for studying subjective perceptions of economic inequality. Journal of Economic Surveys. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12507
56.
JettenJ.MolsF.PostmesT. (2015). Relative deprivation and relative wealth enhances anti-immigrant sentiments: The V-curve re-examined. PLoS ONE, 10(10), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139156
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
59.
JostJ. T.GaucherD.SternC. (2015). “The world isn’t fair”: A system justification perspective on social stratification and inequality. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 317–340). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14342-012
60.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
61.
KawachiI.KennedyB. P.GuptaV.Prothrow-StithD. (1999). Women’s status and the health of women and men: A view from the States. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00286-x
62.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357
63.
KulichC.ChipeauxM. (2019). Gender inequality in economic resources. In JettenJ.PetersK. (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 35–51). Springer International Publishing.
64.
LayteR.WhelanC. T. (2014). Who feels inferior? A test of the status anxiety hypothesis of social inequalities in health. European Sociological Review, 30, 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu057
65.
López-ZafraE.García-RetameroR. (2021). Are gender stereotypes changing over time? A cross-temporal analysis of perceptions about gender stereotypes in Spain. International Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2021.1882227
66.
LoughnanS.KuppensP.AllikJ.BalazsK.de LemusS.DumontK.GargurevichR.HidegkutiI.LeidnerB.MatosL.ParkJ.RealoA.ShiJ.SojoV. E.TongY.-y.VaesJ.VerduynP.YeungV.HaslamN.. . .YeungV. (2011). Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception. Psychological Science, 22, 1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417003
67.
MalinoskiM. (2012). On culture and income inequality: Regression analysis of Hofstede’s international cultural dimensions and the Gini coefficient. Xavier Journal of Politics, 3, 32–48.
68.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
69.
MelitaD.WillisG. B.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2021). Economic inequality increases status anxiety through perceived contextual competitiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 637365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637365
70.
MijsJ. J. B. (2018). Inequality is a problem of inference: How people solve the social puzzle of unequal outcomes. Societies, 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030064
71.
MijsJ. J. B. (2021). The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review, 19, 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051
72.
Moreno-BellaE.WillisG. B.MoyaM. (2019). Economic inequality and masculinity–femininity: The prevailing perceived traits in higher unequal contexts are masculine. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01590
NishiA.ShiradoH.RandD. G.ChristakisN. A. (2015). Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature, 526, 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15392
PaskovM.DewildeC. (2012). Income inequality and solidarity in Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30, 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.06.002
78.
PaskovM.GërxhaniK.van de WerfhorstH. G. (2013). Income inequality and status anxiety. Growing Inequality Impacts, 90, 1–46.
79.
PhillipsT.TepperS.Goya-TocchettoD.DavidaiS.OrdabayevaN.MirzaM. U.SzasziB.DayM. V.HauserO. P.JachimowiczJ. M. (2020). Inequality in people’s minds. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vawh9
80.
PrenticeD. A.CarranzaE. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066
81.
RidgewayC. L.BourgC. (2004). Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In EaglyA. H.BeallA. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 217–241). Guilford Press.
82.
Rodríguez-BailónR.Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.García-SánchezE.PetkanopoulouK.WillisG. B. (2020). Inequality is in the air: Contextual psychosocial effects of power and social class. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.004
83.
RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C. (2018). The agentic–communal model of advantage and disadvantage: How inequality produces similarities in the psychology of power, social class, gender, and race. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 71–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.04.001
84.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.JettenJ.WillisG. B.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2019). High economic inequality makes us feel less wealthy. International Review of Social Psychology, 32, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.333
85.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.Rodríguez-BailónR.WillisG. B. (2022). Economic inequality affects perceived normative values. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220968141
86.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.WillisG. B. (2021). Manipulando la desigualdad económica. In Rentería-PérezE.MalvezziS.García-SánchezE. (Eds.), Ejemplos de método e investigaciones sociales. Aplicaciones en psicología organizacional y del trabajo y en psicología social (pp. 1–32). Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle.
87.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.WillisG. B.JettenJ.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2019). Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2557
88.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.WillisG. B.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2019). Economic and social distance: Perceived income inequality negatively predicts an interdependent self-construal. International Journal of Psychology, 54, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12437
89.
SchmalorA.HeineS. J. (2021). The construct of subjective economic inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621996867
90.
SczesnyS.NaterC.EaglyA. H. (2019). Agency and communion: Their implications for gender stereotypes and gender identities. In AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 103–116). Routledge.
91.
SherifM. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper.
92.
SommetN.ElliotA. J.JamiesonJ. P.ButeraF. (2019). Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach–avoidance motivation. Journal of Personality, 87, 767–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12432
93.
SommetN.WeissmanD. L.ElliotA. J. (2022). Income inequality predicts competitiveness and cooperativeness at school. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000731
94.
SprongS.JettenJ.WangZ.PetersK.MolsF.VerkuytenM.BastianB.AriyantoA.AutinF.AyubN.BadeaC.BestaT.ButeraF.Costa-LopesR.CuiL.FantiniC.FinchilescuG.GaertnerL.GollwitzerM.. . .WohlM. J. A. (2019). “Our country needs a strong leader right now”: Economic inequality enhances the wish for a strong leader. Psychological Science, 30, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619875472
95.
SteinmetzJ.BosakJ.SczesnyS.EaglyA. H. (2014). Social role effects on gender stereotyping in Germany and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12044
96.
TajfelH. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In IsraelJ.TajfelH. (Eds.), The context of social psychology (pp. 69–121). Academic Press.
97.
TanjitpiyanondP.JettenJ.PetersK. (2022). How economic inequality shapes social class stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, Article 104248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104248
98.
TriandisH. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. McGraw-Hill.
TurnerJ. C. (1981). Some considerations in generalizing experimental social psychology. In StephensonG. M.DavisJ. H. (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (pp. 3–34). Wiley.
101.
UkhovaD. (2015). Gender inequality and inter-household economic inequality in emerging economies: Exploring the relationship. Gender and Development, 23, 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2015.1055082
102.
UskulA. K.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, Article 12094. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806656105
103.
ÜskülA. K.OishiS. (2018). Socio-economic environment and human psychology: Social, ecological, and cultural perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Velandia-MoralesA.Rodríguez-BailónR.MartínezR. (2022). Economic inequality increases the preference for status consumption. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 809101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.809101
107.
WilkinsonR. G.PickettK. E. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. Penguin.
108.
WilkinsonR. G.PickettK. E. (2017). The enemy between us: The psychological and social costs of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2275
109.
WillisG. B.García-SánchezE.Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.García-CastroJ. D.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2022). The psychosocial effects of economic inequality depend on its perception. Nature Reviews Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00044-0
110.
WojciszkeB.AbeleA. E. (2019). Agency and communion in social cognition. In AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 25–38). Routledge.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
