Police must rely on the public’s cooperation; however, youths’ views of police are historically low. To understand the dynamics of these intergroup relations, this study integrates two theoretical perspectives: the cognitive developmental perspective, which posits that age-graded cognitive enhancements enable children to begin critically evaluating police; and the group engagement model, which suggests that views of police impact law-related behavior. Utilizing a sample of 424 community youth (37.97% Hispanic/Latinx, 19.81% Native American), this study tested four novel hypotheses: H1: Age is negatively associated with youths’ willingness to cooperate (WTC) with police; H2: Age is negatively associated with normative alignment with police; H3: Normative alignment is positively associated with WTC; and H4: Normative alignment is more strongly associated with older youths’ WTC. All four hypotheses were supported. The article discusses the implications of both the integration of these theoretical perspectives and the findings for understanding the effects of these intergroup dynamics.
BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (1993). A cognitive-developmental approach to racial stereotyping and reconstructive memory in Euro-American children. Child Development, 64, 1507–1518. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131549
3.
BladerS. L.TylerT. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013935
4.
BlakemoreS. J.ChoudhuryS. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x
5.
BolgerP. C.WaltersG. D. (2019). The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.01.001
6.
BradfordB.HuqA.JacksonJ.RobertsB. (2014). What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa. Regulation & Governance, 8, 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12012
7.
BradfordB.MurphyK.JacksonJ. (2014). Officers as mirrors: Policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu021
8.
BrewK.ClarkT.Feingold-LinkJ.BarthH. (2021). Do demand characteristics contribute to minimal ingroup preferences?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 204, Article 105043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105043
9.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In LernerR. M.DamonW. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). Wiley.
10.
BrunsonR.WadeB. (2019). “Oh hell no, we don’t talk to police”: Insights on the lack of cooperation in police investigations of urban gun violence. Criminology & Public Policy, 18, 623–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12448
ButtelmannD.BöhmR. (2014). The ontogeny of the motivation that underlies in-group bias. Psychological Science, 25, 921–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516802
13.
ChiassonV.Vera-EstayE.LalondeG.DooleyJ. J.BeauchampM. H. (2017). Assessing social cognition: Age-related changes in moral reasoning in childhood and adolescence. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31, 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1268650
14.
ChoiC. W.GilesH. (2012). Intergroup messages in policing the community. In GilesH. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 264–277). Routledge.
15.
CohnE. S.BucoloD.RebellonC. J.van GundyK. (2010). An integrated model of legal and moral reasoning and rule-violating behavior: The role of legal attitudes. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9185-9
16.
CohnE. S.WhiteS. O. (1990). Legal socialization. Springer.
17.
ColeL. M.KelleyD. C.HenniganP. J.RebellonC. J.van GundyK. T.CohnE. S. (2021). Emotion: The forgotten component of legal socialization. Journal of Social Issues, 77, 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12444
18.
DecetyJ.MichalskaK. J.KinzlerK. D. (2012). The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: A neurodevelopmental study. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr111
19.
Del ToroJ.LloydT.BuchananK. S.RobinsS. J.BencharitL. Z.SmiedtM. G.ReddyK. S.PougetE. R.KerrisonE. M.GoffP. A. (2019). The criminogenic and psychological effects of police stops on adolescent Black and Latino boys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 116, 8261–8268. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808976116
FineA. D.AmemiyaJ.FrickP.SteinbergL.CauffmanE. (2021). Perceptions of police legitimacy and bias from ages 13 to 22 among Black, Latino, and White justice-involved males. Law and Human Behavior, 45, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000445
23.
FineA. D.DonleyS.CavanaghC.CauffmanE. (2020). Youth perceptions of law enforcement and worry about crime from 1976 to 2016. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47, 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820903752
24.
FineA. D.PadillaK. E.TomK. E. (2022). Police legitimacy: Identifying developmental trends and whether youths’ perceptions can be changed. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18, 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09438-7
25.
FineA.TrinknerR. (2022). Legal socialization. In GurungR. (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of psychology in the real world. Routledge.
GarriganB.AdlamA. L.LangdonP. E. (2018). Moral decision-making and moral development: Toward an integrative framework. Developmental Review, 49, 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.06.001
28.
GibbsJ. C. (2019). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. Oxford University Press.
29.
GilesH.HillS. L.MaguireE. R.AngusD. (2021). Conclusion: New directions in policing and communication. In GilesH.MaguireE. R.HillS. L. (Eds.), The Rowman & Littlefield handbook of policing, communication, and society: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 371–390). Rowman & Littlefield.
30.
GilesH.MaguireE. R.HillS. L. (2021). Policing through the lens of intergroup communication: Introduction. In GilesH.MaguireE. R.HillS. L. (Eds.), The Rowman & Littlefield handbook of policing, communication, and society: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 1–14). Rowman & Littlefield.
31.
GönültaşS.MulveyK. L. (2019). Social-developmental perspective on intergroup attitudes towards immigrants and refugees in childhood and adolescence: A roadmap from theory to practice for an inclusive society. Human Development, 63, 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503173
32.
Guassi MoreiraJ. F.van BavelJ. J.TelzerE. H. (2017). The neural development of “us and them.”Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw134
33.
HaglerD. J.Jr.HattonS.CornejoM. D.MakowskiC.FairD. A.DickA. S.SutherlandM. T.CaseyB. J.BarchD. M.HarmsM. P.WattsR.BjorkJ. M.GaravanH. P.HilmerL.PungC. J.SicatC. S.KupermanJ.BartschH.XueF.. . . DaleA. M. (2019). Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. NeuroImage, 202, Article 116091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116091
JacksonD. B.FahmyC.VaughnM. G.TestaA. (2019). Police stops among at-risk youth: Repercussions for mental health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65, 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.05.027
38.
JacksonJ.Brunton-SmithI.BradfordB.OliveiraT. R.PóschK.SturgisP. (2021). Police legitimacy and the norm to cooperate: Using a mixed effects location-scale model to estimate the strength of social norms at a small spatial scale. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37, 547–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-020-09467-5
39.
JindalM.MistryK. B.TrentM.McRaeA.ThorntonR. L. (2021). Police exposures and the health and well-being of Black youth in the US: A systematic review. JAMA Pediatrics, 176, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2929
40.
JusticeB.MearesT. L. (2014). How the criminal justice system educates citizens. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 651, 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213502929
41.
KaganJ. (2008). Morality and its development. In Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (pp. 297–313). MIT Press.
42.
KilfordE. J.GarrettE.BlakemoreS. J. (2016). The development of social cognition in adolescence: An integrated perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.016
43.
KyprianidesA.BradfordB.JacksonJ.YesbergJ.StottC.RadburnM. (2021). Identity, legitimacy and cooperation with police: Comparing general-population and street-population samples from London. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27, 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000312
44.
LettE.AsaborE. N.CorbinT.BoatrightD. (2021). Racial inequity in fatal US police shootings, 2015–2020. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75, 394–397. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-215097
45.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer Science & Business Media.
46.
LisdahlK. M.SherK. J.ConwayK. P.GonzalezR.EwingS. W. F.NixonS. J.TapertS.BartschH.GoldsteinR. Z.HeitzegM. (2018). Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study: Overview of substance use assessment methods. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 32, 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.02.007
47.
LunaB.GarverK. E.UrbanT. A.LazarN. A.SweeneyJ. A. (2004). Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Development, 75, 1357–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00745.x
48.
MacDonaldK.SchugM.ChaseE.BarthH. (2013). My people, right or wrong? Minimal group membership disrupts preschoolers’ selective trust. Cognitive Development, 28, 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.11.001
49.
MartinC. L.HalversonC. F.Jr. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129498
50.
MazerolleL.AntrobusE.BennettS.TylerT. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51, 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x
51.
MurphyK. (2014). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and policing. In BruinsmaG.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 4024–4034). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_65
52.
MurphyK. (2015). Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults’ and youths’ willingness to collaborate with police. Policing and Society, 25, 53–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.802786
53.
MurphyK.MazerolleL. (2018). Policing immigrants: Using a randomized control trial of procedural justice policing to promote trust and cooperation. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865816673691
54.
MurphyK.SargeantE.CherneyA. (2015). The importance of procedural justice and police performance in shaping intentions to cooperate with the police: Does social identity matter?European Journal of Criminology, 12, 719–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815587766
55.
NesdaleD. (2004). Social identity processes and children’s ethnic prejudice. In BennettM.SaniF. (Eds.), The development of the social self (pp. 219–246). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203391099_chapter_8
56.
NivetteA.EisnerM.RibeaudD. (2020). Evaluating the shared and unique predictors of legal cynicism and police legitimacy from adolescence into early adulthood. Criminology, 58, 70–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12230
RadburnM.StottC. (2019). The social psychological processes of “procedural justice”: Concepts, critiques and opportunities. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 19, 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818780200
59.
RadburnM.StottC.BradfordB.RobinsonM. (2018). When is policing fair? Groups, identity and judgements of the procedural justice of coercive crowd policing. Policing and Society, 28, 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1234470
60.
ReisigM.LloydC. (2009). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime: Results from a survey of Jamaican adolescents. Police Quarterly, 12, 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611108327311
61.
RengifoA. F.SlocumL. A.ChillarV. (2019). From impressions to intentions: Direct and indirect effects of police contact on willingness to report crimes to law enforcement. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56, 412–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818817338
62.
SandersR. A. (2013). Adolescent psychosocial, social, and cognitive development. Pediatrics in Review, 34, 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.34.8.354
63.
SchroedelJ. R.ChinR. J. (2020). Whose lives matter: The media’s failure to cover police use of lethal force against Native Americans. Race and Justice, 10, 150–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717734614
64.
SkinnerA. L.MeltzoffA. N. (2019). Childhood experiences and intergroup biases among children. Social Issues and Policy Review, 13, 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/10.1111/sipr.12054
65.
SkinnerA. L.OlsonK. R.MeltzoffA. N. (2020). Acquiring group bias: Observing other people’s nonverbal signals can create social group biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 824–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000218
SudoM. (2021). Blurred boundaries between us and them: Do young children affiliate with outgroup members with shared preferences?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 208, Article 105150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105150
68.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
69.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
TappJ. L.LevineF. J. (1974). Legal socialization: Strategies for an ethical legality. Stanford Law Review, 27, 1–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1227929
72.
ThompsonA.PickettJ. (2021). Asymmetry in process-based model relationships: A longitudinal study of adjudicated adolescents. Criminology, 59, 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12279
73.
TurielE. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. Cambridge University Press.
74.
TylerT. R. (1990). Why people obey the law? Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Yale University Press.
75.
TylerT. R. (2005). Policing in Black and White: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104271105
TylerT. R.JacksonJ. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034514
78.
TylerT. R.LindE. A. (2002). Procedural justice. In SandersJ.HamiltonV. (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 65–92). Springer.
Van OverwalleF. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20547
81.
Vera-EstayE.SeniA. G.ChampagneC.BeauchampM. H. (2016). All for one: Contributions of age, socioeconomic factors, executive functioning, and social cognition to moral reasoning in childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00227
82.
VerkuytenM. (2021). Understanding intergroup relations in childhood and adolescence. Review of General Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211050016
