Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

When is the expression of prejudice seen as authentic? Perceived authenticity refers to how much one judges another’s behavior to reflect the beliefs, attitudes, goals, and desires of that person. We investigate whether perceived authenticity can operate as a vicarious justification for prejudice—a way for prejudiced people to defend the prejudiced statements of others. In six studies, prejudice was positively related to perceived authenticity of similarly prejudiced statements: People are more likely to label prejudiced statements they agree with as authentic. We develop a vicarious justification account of “authentic prejudice.” People need not justify what is socially acceptable; if authenticity serves as a justification for prejudice, it will be reported only when the prejudice is nonnormative. Three studies demonstrate that the positive relationship between prejudice and perceived authenticity is heightened when the expressed prejudice is seen as unacceptable. People call “authentic” what they agree with but feel they cannot express.

Keywords

authenticity norms justification–suppression model prejudice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abernathy

(2017, August 14). An honest conversation about race is not allowed. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/an-honest-conversation-about-race-is-not-allowed/2017/08/14/62f159b8-8111-11e7-b359-15a3617c767b_story.html

Allport

G. W

. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Basavaraju

(2016). The damage Donald Trump has already done. The Odyssey Online. https://www.theodysseyonline.com/the-damage-donald-trump-has-already-done

Bebout

Garcia

J. E.

(2016, June 6). Our turn: Is Donald Trump a bigot or a racist of convenience? AZCentral. https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/2016/06/06/trump-racial-discrimination/85361398/

Becker

Marecek

. (2008). Dreaming the American dream: Individualism and positive psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1767–1780. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00139.x

Becker

B. J.

(2007). The synthesis of regression slopes in meta-analysis. Statistical Science, 22, 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS243

Beverland

M. B.

Farrelly

F. J.

(2010). The quest for authenticity on consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 838–856. https://doi.org/10.1086/615047

Biernat

Crandall

C. S.

(1999). Racial attitudes. In Robinson

J. P.

Shaver

P. R.

Wrightsman

L. S.

(Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 297–411). Academic Press.

Boyle

(2003). Authenticity: Brands, fakes, spin and the lust for real life. HarperCollins.

10.

Braver

S. L.

Thoemmes

F. J.

Rosenthal

(2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614529796

11.

Brehm

J. W.

(1999). The intensity of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_1

12.

Bullock

J. G.

Green

D. P.

S. E.

(2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018933

13.

Choi

Crandall

C. S.

(2014). Permission to be prejudiced: Legitimacy credits in the evaluation of advertisements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12217

14.

Cohen

E. L.

Tyler

W. J.

(2016). Examining perceived distance and personal authenticity as mediators of the effects of ghost-tweeting on parasocial interaction. Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 342–346. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0657

15.

Crandall

C. S.

(1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.882

16.

Crandall

C. S.

Eshleman

(2003). A justification–suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414

17.

Crandall

C. S.

Eshleman

O’Brien

(2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.359

18.

Crandall

C. S.

Ferguson

M. A.

Bahns

A. J.

(2013). When we see prejudice: The normative window and social change. In Stangor

Crandall

C. S.

(Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 53–69). Psychology Press.

19.

Curran

P. J.

Hussong

A. M

. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914

20.

Delacre

Lakens

Leys

(2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82

21.

Dickerson

(2004, August 11). Racist like me. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/high_concept/2004/08/racist_like_me.html

22.

Enli

(2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 31, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802

23.

Estepa

. (2017, August 31). Canada’s Justin Trudeau on President Trump: “He’s authentic.” USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/08/31/canada-justin-trudeau-calls-president-trump-authentic/620360001/

24.

Fallon

Gray

Offenberg

(2017, June 27). One “Bachelorette” contestant perfectly explained anti-Black racism. HuffPost. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/one-bachelorette-contestant-perfectly-explained-anti-black-racism_us_5951bf13e4b05c37bb78e8f7

25.

Gallagher

B. J.

(2016, August 3). The downside of political correctness: Authentic speech in the age of Trump. HuffPost. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/bj-gallagher/the-down-side-of-politica_b_11311066.html

26.

Gjersoe

N. L.

Newman

G. E.

Chituc

Hood

(2014). Individualism and the extended-self: Cross-cultural differences in the valuation of authentic objects. PLoS ONE, 9, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090787

27.

Grayson

Martinec

(2004). Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/422109

28.

Hahl

Kim

Sivan

E. W. Z.

(2018). The authentic appeal of the lying demagogue: Proclaiming the deeper truth about political illegitimacy. American Sociological Review, 83, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417749632

29.

Holland

P. W.

(1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models. Sociological Methodology, 18, 449–484. https://doi.org/10.2307/271055

30.

Hornsey

M. J.

(2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x

31.

Imai

Keele

Tingley

(2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15, 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761

32.

Johnson

(2016, February 10). Donald Trump’s shock-jock campaign: The White nationalist stole his whole shtick from Michael Savage. Salon. https://www.salon.com/2016/02/10/donald_trump_shock_jock_candidate_partner/

33.

Johnson

(2017, August 29). Even in visiting hurricane-ravaged Texas, Trump keeps the focus on himself. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/even-in-visiting-hurricane-ravaged-texas-trump-keeps-the-focus-on-himself/2017/08/29/3037a4a6-8cc3-11e7-84c0-02cc069f2c37_story.html

34.

Krueger

J. I.

(2007). From social projection to social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701284645

35.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

36.

Lee

J. C.

Quealy

(2018, January 3). The 598 people, places and things Donald Trump has insulted on Twitter: A complete list. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html

37.

Lenth

R. V

. (2021). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least squares means. R package version 1.7.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans

38.

Leonhardt

Philbrick

I. P.

(2018, January 15). Donald Trump’s racism: The definitive list. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/01/15/opinion/leonhardt-trump-racist.html

39.

Litman

Robinson

Abberbock

(2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z

40.

Liu

Perrewe

P. L.

(2006). Are they for real? The interpersonal and intrapersonal outcomes of perceived authenticity. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 1, 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2006.010788

41.

Manning

Penfold-Mounce

Loader

B. D.

Vromen

Xenos

(2017). Politicians, celebrities and social media: A case of informalisation? Journal of Youth Studies, 20, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1206867

42.

Maxwell

S. E.

Lau

M. Y.

Howard

G. S.

(2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70, 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400

43.

Merelli

(2017, September 1). Justin Trudeau says Trump is the same in private as in public— and he thinks that’s surprising. Quartz. https://qz.com/1067295/justin-trudeau-tells-the-skimm-trump-is-the-same-in-private-as-in-public-and-he-thinks-thats-surprising/

44.

Miller

D. T.

Effron

D. A.

(2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 115–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43003-8

45.

Monin

Miller

D. T.

(2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.8I.I.33

46.

Pearl

Mackenzie

(2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.

47.

Pedersen

Griffiths

Watt

S. E.

(2008). Attitudes of out-groups and the perception of consensus: All feet do not wear one shoe. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18, 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.964

48.

Pillow

D. R.

Crabtree

M. A.

Galvan

M. J.

Hale

W. J.

(2017). Not simply in the eye of the beholder: Authenticity as a product of candidate preference and unfettered speech. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12440

49.

Plant

E. A.

Devine

P. G.

(1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811

50.

Reston

(2015, September 14). Donald Trump is being honest with you. The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/122796/donald-trump-being-honest-you

51.

Rosenblum

Schroeder

Gino

(2020). Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000206

52.

Sargent

(2015, December 11). Who is the “authenticity” candidate of 2016? Yup: It’s Donald Trump. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/12/11/who-is-the-authenticity-candidate-of-2016-yup-its-donald-trump/

53.

Schmidt

F. L.

(1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.115

54.

Serazio

(2017). Branding politics: Emotion, authenticity, and the marketing culture of American political communication. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540515586868

55.

Stanley

D. J.

Spence

J. R.

(2014). Expectations for replications: Are yours realistic? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528518

56.

Taylor

Molyneux

(2016). An honest conversation about race. Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/AnHonestConversationAboutRaceJaredTaylorAndStefanMolyneux

57.

Ten Have

T. R.

Joffe

M. M

. (2012). A review of causal estimation of effects in mediation analyses. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 21, 77–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280210391076

58.

Turner

J. C.

Hogg

M. A.

Oakes

P. J.

Reicher

S. D.

Wetherell

M. S.

(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.

59.

Watt

S. E.

Larkin

(2010). Prejudiced people perceive more community support for their views: The role of own, media, and peer attitudes in perceived consensus. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 710–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00594.x

60.

White

M. H.

II Crandall

C. S.

(2017). Freedom of racist speech: Ego and expressive threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000095

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Perceived authenticity as a vicarious justification for prejudice

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material