Intraminority solidarity research has previously focused on how similarities in discrimination experiences can facilitate stigma-based solidarity. Yet, research on a lay theory of generalized prejudice has demonstrated that people tend to perceive attitudes towards stigmatized social groups as co-occurring. Integrating these lines of research, the present studies sought to examine if the extent to which prejudices are perceived to co-occur can facilitate stigma-based solidarity for marginalized social groups, and in turn promote interest in coalitional justice. Recruiting heterosexual Black Americans (Study 1), White women (Studies 2–3), and White men (Study 4), the present research demonstrates that perceiving prejudices as co-occurring increases stigma-based solidarity that in turn produces greater interest in coalitional justice efforts that include the ingroup. The present findings demonstrate the importance of focusing on beliefs about perpetrators’ attitudes when examining intraminority solidarity and highlight the limitations of a lay theory of generalized prejudice to fight prejudices broadly.
AlbujaA. F.SanchezD. T.ChaneyK. E. (2021). A road map to others’ “-isms”: A two-dimensional cognitive map of perceived generalized prejudice. Manuscript under review.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books.
3.
AsbrockF.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.746
ChaneyK. E. (2020). Examining the automaticity of a lay theory of generalized prejudice: Vigilance facilitates social distancing for White women in STEM contexts [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University–School of Graduate Studies.
6.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T. (2018). Gender-inclusive bathrooms signal fairness across identity dimensions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617737601
7.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.AltN. P.ShihM. (2021). The breadth of confrontations as a prejudice reduction strategy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620919318
8.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.HimmelsteinM. S.ManuelS. K. (2021). Lay theory of generalized prejudice moderates cardiovascular stress responses to racism for White women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 24(6), 998–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220929078
9.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.MaimonM. (2019). Stigmatized-identity cues in consumer spaces. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1075
10.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2016). Organizational identity safety cue transfers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1564–1576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216665096
11.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2018). We are in this together: How the presence of similarly stereotyped allies buffers against identity threats. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.005
12.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2021). Dual cues: Women of color anticipate both gender and racial bias in the face of a single identity cue. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(7), 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220942844
13.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 § 7, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq (1964).
14.
CortlandC. I.CraigM. A.ShapiroJ. R.RichesonJ. A.NeelR.GoldsteinN. J. (2017). Solidarity through shared disadvantage: Highlighting shared experiences of discrimination improves relations between stigmatized groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000100
15.
CraigM. A.BadaanV.BrownR. M. (2020). Acting for whom, against what? Group membership and multiple paths to engagement in social change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.002
16.
CraigM. A.DeHartT.RichesonJ. A.FiedorowiczL. (2012). Do unto others as others have done unto you? Perceiving sexism influences women’s evaluations of stigmatized racial groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1107–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212445210
17.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026481
18.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014a). Discrimination divides across identity dimensions: Perceived racism reduces support for gay rights and increases anti-gay bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.008
19.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014b). On the precipice of a “majority-minority” America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25, 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614527113
20.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the psychological foundations of conflict and coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415611252
21.
CraigM. A.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2018). The pitfalls and promise of increasing racial diversity: Threat, contact, and race relations in the 21st century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727860
22.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist policies. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139–167. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500480-5
23.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614
24.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
25.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
26.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.AnastasioP. A.BachmanB. A.RustM. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–26). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004
27.
GayC. (2006). Seeing difference: The effect of economic disparity on Black attitudes toward Latinos. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 982–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00228.x
28.
GlasfordD. E.CalcagnoJ. (2012). The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality, and political solidarity between minority groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.001
29.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
30.
KnowlesE. D.TroppL. R.MogamiM. (in press). When White Americans see “non-Whites” as a group: Belief in minority collusion and support for White identity politics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211030009
31.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
32.
NairR.VollhardtJ. R. (2019). Intersectional consciousness in collective victim beliefs: Perceived intragroup differences among disadvantaged groups. Political Psychology, 40, 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12593
33.
SanchezD. T.ChaneyK. E.ManuelS. K.RemediosJ. D. (2018). Theory of prejudice and American identity threat transfer for Latino and Asian Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 972–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218759288
34.
SanchezD. T.ChaneyK. E.ManuelS. K.WiltonL. S.RemediosJ. D. (2017). Stigma by prejudice transfer: Why racism threatens White women and sexism threatens men of color. Psychological Science, 28, 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616686218
35.
SchmittM. T.SpearsR.BranscombeN. R. (2003). Constructing a minority group identity out of shared rejection: The case of international students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.131
36.
SellersR. M.RowleyS. A. J.ChavousT. M.SheltonJ. N.SmithM. A. (1997). Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity: A preliminary investigation of reliability and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.805
37.
SubašićE.SchmittM. T.ReynoldsK. J. (2011). Are we all in this together? Co-victimization, inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02073.x
VollhardtJ. R. (2013). “Crime against humanity” or “crime against Jews”? Acknowledgment in construals of the Holocaust and its importance for intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12008
40.
VollhardtJ. R. (2015). Inclusive victim consciousness in advocacy, social movements, and intergroup relations: Promises and pitfalls. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12011
41.
VollhardtJ. R.NairR.TroppL. R. (2016). Inclusive victim consciousness predicts minority group members’ support for refugees and immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12368
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
