In male-dominated STEM fields, workplace culture is often cited as a factor for women’s attrition. In the present research, we used longitudinal field data to examine how changes in the perceived normative support for gender-inclusive policies and practices over 6 months relate to changes in women’s and men’s experiences of fit and commitment to their organization. Longitudinal analyses of survey data from a sample of 181 engineers revealed that increased perceptions of support for gender-inclusive policies and practices predicted increased organizational commitment only among women, an effect that was mediated by an increase in organizational value fit. Additional analyses suggest that perceptions of change in normative attitudes toward inclusive policies were more predictive of women’s organizational commitment than the awareness that the policies were in place or that one has personally benefitted from them. The implications of an inclusive workplace culture for supporting women’s retention in STEM are discussed.
AdedokunO. A.BessenbacherA. B.ParkerL. C.KirkhamL. L.BurgessW. D. (2013). Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students’ aspirations for research careers: Mediating effects of research self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 940–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21102
2.
AschS. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
3.
ApfelbaumE.StephensN.ReagansR. (2016). Beyond one-size-fits-all: Tailoring diversity approaches to the representation of social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000071
4.
BairdC. L. (2018). Male-dominated stem disciplines: How do we make them more attractive to women. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 21(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/mim.2018.8360911
BlockK.HallW. M.SchmaderT.InnessM.CroftE. (2018). Should I stay or should I go: Women’s implicit associations predict their commitment and fit in STEM. Social Psychology, 49, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000343
7.
CableD. M.DeRueD. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
8.
CaiH.OcampoA. C. G.RestubogS. L. D.KiazadK.DeenC. M.LiM. (2018). Career commitment in STEM: A moderated mediation model of inducements, expected contributions, and organizational commitment. Journal of Career Assessment, 26, 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717695586
9.
CardadorM. T. (2017). Promoted up but also out? The unintended consequences of increasing women’s representation in managerial roles in engineering. Organization Science, 28(4), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1132
10.
CarlessS. A. (2005). Person–job fit versus person–organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X25995
11.
CharlestonL. J.GeorgeP. L.JacksonJ. F. L.BerhanuJ.AmechiM. H. (2014). Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of Black women in U.S. computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(3), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036632
12.
CheryanS.MarkusH. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209
13.
CheryanS.PlautV. C.DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
14.
ChudekM.HellerS.BirchS.HenrichJ. (2012). Prestige-biased cultural learning: Bystander’s differential attention to potential models influences children’s learning. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.005
15.
CohenA.HudecekN. (1993). Organizational commitment-turnover relationship across occupational groups: A meta-analysis. Group & Organization Management, 18(2), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601193182004
16.
CohenG. L.GarciaJ. (2008). Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00607.x
17.
CookJ.WallT. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1980.tb00005.x
18.
CraigM. A.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2017). The pitfalls and promise of increasing racial diversity: Threat, contact, and race relations in the 21st century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727860
19.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359
20.
DiekmanA. B.SteinbergM.BrownE. R.BelangerA. L.ClarkE. K. (2017). A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: Understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316642141
21.
DitlmannR. K.PaluckE. L. (2015). Field Experiments. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 128–134). Elsevier.
22.
DuntonB. C.FazioR. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233009
23.
EarleM.HodsonG. (2020). Questioning white losses and anti-white discrimination in the United States. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(2), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0777-1
24.
EmersonK.MurphyM. (2014). Identity threat at work: How social identity threat and situational cues contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the workplace. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035403
25.
EmersonK.MurphyM. (2015). A company I can trust? Organizational lay theories moderate stereotype threat for women. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214564969
26.
FestingerL.SchachterS.BackK. (1950). Social Pressures in informal groups; a study of human factors in housing. Harper.
27.
FouadN. A.ChangW.-H.WanM.SinghR. (2017). Women’s Reasons for Leaving the Engineering Field. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875
28.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 96(5), 1029—1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
29.
GrantA. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
30.
GroverS. L.CrookerK. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48, 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01757.x
31.
HallW.SchmaderT.AdayA.CroftE. (2019). Decoding the dynamics of social identity threat in the workplace: A within-person analysis of women’s and men’s interactions in STEM. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618772582
32.
HallW. M.SchmaderT.CroftE. (2015). Engineering exchanges: Daily social identity threat predicts burnout among female engineers. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615572637
33.
HallW. M.SchmaderT.AdayA.InnessM.CroftE. (2018). Climate control: Cultural predictors of social identity threat for women in engineering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000137
34.
HartJ. (2016). Dissecting a gendered organization: implications for career trajectories for mid-career faculty women in STEM. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(5), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2016.0024
HoffmanB. J.WoehrD. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.003
37.
HoggM.TerryD. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/259266
38.
HumphreyS. E.NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
39.
JaimeL. (2010). Women in male-dominated career and technical education programs at community colleges: Barriers to participation and success. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(1), 51–66.
40.
KaiserC.MajorB.JurcevicI.DoverT.BradyL.ShapiroJ. (2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030838
41.
KalevA.DobbinF.KellyE. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100404
42.
KalokerinosE.von HippelC.ZacherH. (2014). Is stereotype threat a useful construct for organizational psychology research and practice?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12167
43.
KangS.InzlichtM. (2014). Stereotype threat spillover: Why stereotype threat is more useful for organizations than it seems. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 452–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12179
44.
KatzI.HassR. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and american value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of personality and social psychology, 55(6), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893
45.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–prganization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
46.
KuchynkaS. L.BossonJ. K.VandelloJ. A.PuryearC. (2018). Zero-sum thinking and the masculinity contest: Perceived intergroup competition and workplace gender bias. Journal of Social Issues, 74, 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12281
47.
LogelC.WaltonG. M.SpencerS. J.IsermanE. C.von HippelW.BellA. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015703
48.
Marco-BujosaL. M.JoyL.SorrentinoR. (2021). Nevertheless, she persisted: A comparison of male and female experiences in community college STEM programs. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 45(8), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2020.1727382
49.
MasterA.CheryanS.MoscatelliA.MeltzoffA. N. (2017). Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013
50.
MorgesonF. P.HumphreyS. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
51.
MorrisonK. R.PlautV. C.YbarraO. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386118
52.
MurphyM. C.WaltonG. M. (2013). From prejudiced people to prejudiced places: A social-contextual approach to prejudice. In StangorC.CrandallC. S. (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 181–203). Psychology Press.
53.
MurrarS.CampbellM. R.BrauerM. (2020). Exposure to peers’ pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(9), 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0899-5
54.
NeelR.ShapiroJ. (2012). Is racial bias malleable? Whites’ lay theories of racial bias predict divergent strategies for interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028237
55.
NishiiL. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1754–1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
56.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406922
57.
OngM.SmithJ. M.KoL. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21417
58.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/t03881-000
59.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC.DaviesP.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
60.
RaytonB.YalabikZ. Y.RaptiA. (2019). Fit perceptions, work engagement, satisfaction and commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(6), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-02-2018-0074
61.
RenoR. R.CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. The Free Press.
64.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
65.
RuderB.PlazaD.WarnerR.BothwellM. (2018). STEM women faculty struggling for recognition and advancement in a “men’s club” culture exploring the toxicity of lateral violence and microaggressions: Poison in the water cooler. In ChoC. L.CorkettJ. K.SteeleA. (Eds.), Exploring the toxicity of lateral violence and microaggressions (pp. 121–149). Springer International Publishing.
66.
ScheinE. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons
67.
SchmaderT.BergsiekerH. B.HallW. M. (2020). Cracking the Culture Code. In ForgasJ. P.CranoW. D.FiedlerK. (pp. 334–355). Routledge.
68.
SchmaderT.HallW.CroftA. (2015). Stereotype threat in intergroup relations. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.DovidioJ. F.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Group Processes (pp. 447–471). American Psychological Association.
69.
SchmaderT.BergsiekerH. B.HallW. M. (2020). Cracking the culture code: A tri-level model for cultivating inclusion in organizations. In ForgasJ.CranoB.FiedlerK. (Eds.), Applications of social psychology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367816407
70.
SchmaderT.SedikidesC. (2018). State authenticity as fit to environment (SAFE): Implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 228–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317734080
71.
SeronC.SilbeyS. S.CechE.RubineauB. (2016). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 43, 178–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888415618728
72.
SherifM.SherifC. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension; an integration of studies of intergroup relations. Harper & Brothers.
73.
SilverthorneC. (2004). The impact of organizational culture and person-organization fit on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(7), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410561477
74.
SomersM. J. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160107
75.
SparkmanG.WaltonG. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychological Science, 28, 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950
76.
TankardM. E.PaluckE. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10, 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022
77.
TellhedU.BäckströmM.BjörklundF. (2017). Will i fit in and do well? The importance of social belongingness and self-efficacy for explaining gender differences in interest in STEM and HEED majors. Sex Roles, 77(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0694-y
78.
TettR. P.MeyerJ. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel psychology, 46, 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
79.
ThomasK. M.PlautV. C. (2008). The many faces of diversity resistance in the workplace. In ThomasK. M. (Ed.), Diversity resistance in organizations (pp. 1–22). Erlbaum.
80.
TsuiA. S.PearceJ. L.PorterL. W.TripoliA. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee–organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off?Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089–1121. https://doi.org/10.2307/256928
81.
Van BeurdenJ.Van VeldhovenM.NijendijkKVan De VoordeK. (2017). Teachers’ remaining career opportunities: The role of value fit and school climate. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.002
82.
Van OostenE. B.BuseK.BilimoriaD. (2017). The leadership lab for women: Advancing and retaining women in STEM through professional development. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02138
83.
VerquerM. L.BeehrT. A.WagnerS. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00036-2
84.
Von HippelC.IssaM.MaR.StokesA. (2011). Stereotype threat: Antecedents and consequences for working women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.749
85.
WaltonG. M.CarrP. B. (2012). Social belonging and the motivation and intellectual achievement of negatively stereotyped students. In InzlichtM.SchmaderT. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 89–106). Oxford University Press.
86.
WaltonG.MurphyM.RyanA. (2015). Stereotype threat in organizations: Implications for equity and performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322
87.
WiltonL.SanchezD.UnzuetaM.KaiserC.CaluoriN. (2019). In good company: When gender diversity boosts a company’s reputation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318800264
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
