While research has demonstrated that confrontations of prejudice serve as effective prejudice reduction tools and as a coping mechanism for targets of prejudice, research has yet to identify a validated measurement of prejudice confrontation styles. The present research develops the Prejudice Confrontation Styles (PCS) Scale, which includes five styles of prejudice confrontation: Educational, Argumentative, Help-seeking, Empathy, and Humor. The factor structure of the PCS Scale is identified across two diverse samples employing exploratory (Study 1) and confirmatory (Study 2) factor analyses. Moreover, the PCS Scale demonstrates construct validity, predicting imagined confrontation styles two weeks later among women confronting prejudice, and prejudice confrontation styles moderated autonomy, rumination, and perceived effectiveness of prejudice confrontations (Study 3). Thus, the present research identifies and develops a tool to measure prejudice confrontation styles and demonstrates that prejudice confrontation styles are associated with divergent psychological health outcomes.
AltN. P.ChaneyK. E.ShihM. (2019). “But that was meant to be a compliment!”: Evaluative costs of confronting positive racial stereotypes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218756493
2.
Ashburn-NardoL.BlancharJ. C.PeterssonJ.MorrisK. A.GoodwinS. A. (2014). Do you say something when it’s your boss? The role of perpetrator power in prejudice confrontation. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 615–636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josi.12082
3.
BeckerJ. C.BarretoM. (2014). Ways to go: Men’s and women’s support for aggressive and nonaggressive confrontation of sexism as a function of gender identification. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 668– 686. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12085
4.
BlanchardF. A.CrandallC. S.BrighamJ. C.VaughnL. A. (1994). Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 993–997. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.993
5.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
6.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press.
7.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
8.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T. (2018). The endurance of interpersonal confrontations as a prejudice reduction strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741344
9.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.AltN. P.ShihM. (2021). The breadth of interpersonal confrontations as a prejudice reduction strategy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(3), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620919318
10.
ChaneyK. E.YoungD. M.SanchezD. T. (2015). Confrontation’s Health Outcomes and Promotion of Egalitarianism (C-HOPE) framework. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000042
11.
CitronA. F.CheinI.HardingJ. (1950). Anti-minority remarks: A problem for action research. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 45, 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061855
CoxeS.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634175
14.
CroizetJ. C.DesprésG.GauzinsM. E.HuguetP.LeyensJ. P.MéotA. (2004). Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204263961
15.
CzoppA. M. (2011). The sexist sound of silence: Interpersonal consequences of failing to confront bias. Poster presented at the 2011 Annual Conference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.
16.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 532–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250923
17.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J.MarkA. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784–803. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784
18.
DickterC. L.KittelJ. A.GyurovskiI. I. (2012). Perceptions of non-target confronters in response to racist and heterosexist remarks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 112–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.855
19.
DickterC. L.NewtonV. A. (2013). To confront or not to confront: Non-targets’ evaluations of and responses to racist comments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12022
FosterM. D. (2013). Everyday confrontation of discrimination: The well-being costs and benefits to women over time. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 5, 135–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v5n3p135
22.
FosterM. D. (2015). Tweeting about sexism: The well-being benefits of a social media collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12101
23.
GervaisS. J.HillardA. L.VescioT. K. (2010). Confronting sexism: The role of relationship orientation and gender. Sex Roles, 63(7– 8), 463–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9838-7
24.
GoodJ. J.Moss-RacusinC. A.SanchezD. T. (2012). When do we confront? Perceptions of costs and benefits predict confronting discrimination on behalf of the self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 210–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0361684312440958
25.
HammerM. R. (2005). The intercultural conflict style inventory: A conceptual framework and measure of intercultural conflict resolution approaches. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 675–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.08.010
26.
HaslettB. B.LipmanS. (1997). Micro inequalities: Up close and personal. In BenokraitisN.V. (Ed.), Subtle sexism: Current practice and prospects for change (pp. 34–53). Sage.
27.
HillL. K.HoggardL. S. (2018). Active coping moderates associations among race-related stress, rumination, and depressive symptoms in emerging adult African American women. Development and Psychopathology, 30(5), 1817–1835.
28.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. 10.1080/ 10705519909540118
29.
HyersL. L. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women’s assertive responses to anti- Black racism, anti-Semitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles, 56(1–2), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9142-8
MallettR. K.MelchioriK. J. (2014). Goal preference shapes confrontations of sexism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 646–656. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214521468
32.
MartinR. A.KuiperN. A.OlingerL. J.DanceK. A. (1993). Humor, coping with stress, self-concept, and psychological well-being. HUMOR, 6(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.1.89
33.
MillerC. T.KaiserC. R. (2001). A theoretical perspective on coping with stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00202
34.
MuthenL. K.MuthenB. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Muthen & Muthen.
35.
Nolen-HoeksemaS. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.569
RasinskiH. M.CzoppA. M. (2010). The effect of target status on witnesses’ reactions to confrontations of bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 8–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973530903539754
39.
RichardsJ. M.GrossJ. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 410–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.410
40.
RogerD.NajarianB. (1998). The relationship between emotional rumination and cortisol secretion under stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 531–538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00204-3
41.
RubinM.PaoliniS.SubašićE.GiacominiA. (2019). A confirmatory study of the relations between workplace sexism, sense of belonging, mental health, and job satisfaction among women in male-dominated industries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(5), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12577
42.
SalomonK.BurgessK. D.BossonJ. K. (2015). Flash fire and slow burn: Women’s cardiovascular reactivity and recovery following hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000061
43.
SanchezD. T.HimmelsteinM. S.YoungD. M.AlbujaA. F.GarciaJ. A. (2016). Confronting as autonomy promotion: Speaking up against discrimination and psychological well-being in racial minorities. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(9), 1999–2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315569619
44.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A.SalvatoreJ.HillD. M. (2006). Silence is not golden: The intrapersonal consequences of not confronting prejudice. In LevinS.Van LaarC. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 65–81). Erlbaum.
45.
SheltonJ. N.StewartR. E. (2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 215–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.x
46.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L. (1999). Excuse me – What did you just say?! Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1370
47.
SwimJ. K.ThomasM. A. (2006). Responding to everyday discrimination: A synthesis of research on goal-directed, self-regulatory coping behaviors. In LevinS.Van LaarC. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 119–140). Erlbaum.
ThurstoneL. L. (1947). Multiple-factor analysis. The University of Chicago Press.
50.
Van PraagB. M.FrijtersP.Ferrer-i-CarbonellA. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00140-3
51.
WeiM.AlvarezA. N.KuT.-Y.RussellD. W.BonettD. G. (2010). Development and validation of a Coping with Discrimination Scale: Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(3), 328–344. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019969
WoodzickaJ. A.MallettR. K.HendricksS.PruittA. V. (2015). It’s just a (sexist) joke: Comparing reactions to sexist versus racist communications. Humor, 28(2), 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0025
54.
WoodzickaJ. A.MallettR. K.MelchiproK. J. (2020). Gender differences in using humor to respond to sexist jokes. Humor. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2019-0018.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
