Individuals express support for civil liberties and human rights, but when threatened tend to restrict rights for both others and themselves. However, the question of whether or not rights are restricted to punish others or protect ourselves remains unclear. This meta-analysis integrates the findings of the effect of perceived threats on support for restrictions of civil liberties from 1997 to 2019. It includes 163 effect-size estimates from 46 different articles involving 91,716 participants. The presence of threat increased support for restrictions against outgroup members significantly more than ingroup members, providing a possible punitive explanation for support for restrictions of civil liberties. These findings contribute to the debate on rights and their relationship with deservingness, suggesting that we delineate those who deserve human rights and those who do not.
AbersonC. (2019). Indirect effects of threat on the contact–prejudice relationship: A meta-analysis. Social Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000364
2.
AbramsD.VyverJ. V.HoustonD. M.VasiljevicM. (2017). Does terror defeat contact? Intergroup contact and prejudice toward Muslims before and after the London bombings. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23(3), 260–268. 10.1037/pac0000167
3.
AkramiN.EkehammarB.ArayaT. (2000). Classical and modern racial prejudice: A study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 521–532. 10.1002/1099-0992(200007/08)30:4<521::AID-EJSP5>3.0.CO;2-N
4.
Al HusseinZ. R. (2018, June18). Opening statement and global update of human rights concerns by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein at 38th session of the Human Rights Council. Speech presented at Human Rights Council in Switzerland, Geneva.
5.
Amnesty International. (2012). Amnesty International report 2012: The state of the world’s human rights (Rep.). Amnesty International.
6.
AsbrockF.FritscheI. (2013). Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: Who is being threatened, the Me or the We?International Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 35–49. 10.1080/00207594.2012.695075
7.
AveryP. G. (1988). Political tolerance among adolescents. Theory & Research in Social Education, 16(3), 183–201. 10.1080/00933104.1988.10505564
8.
BallietD.WuJ.De DreuC. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1556–1581. 10.1037/a0037737.
9.
BarthM.JugertP.WutzlerM.FritscheI. (2015). Absolute moral standards and global identity as independent predictors of collective action against global injustice: Moral and identity-based collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 918–930. 10.1002/ejsp.2160
10.
BeckC. L.PlantE. A. (2018). The implications of right-wing authoritarianism for non-muslims’ aggression toward muslims in the United States. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. Advance online publication. 10.1111/asap.12163.
11.
BestS. J.McDermottM. L. (2007). Measuring opinions vs. non-opinions: The case of the US Patriot Act. The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics, 5, 1–27.
12.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigghinsJ. P. T.RothesteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.
13.
BozzoliC.MüllerC. (2011). Perceptions and attitudes following a terrorist shock: Evidence from the UK. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, S89–S106. 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.06.005
14.
BretonC. (2015). Making national identity salient: Impact on attitudes toward immigration and multiculturalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 48, 357–381. 10.1017/S0008423915000268
15.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. 10.1111/0022-4537.00126
16.
Brief for American Civil Liberties Union et al. as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondents, Apple Inc. vs US Government. (2016). 5:16-cm-00010-SP, 57, 1–29.
17.
BucklerK.SwattM. L.SalinasP. (2009). Public views of illegal migration policy and control strategies: A test of the core hypotheses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 317–327. 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.06.008
18.
ByrneA. J. (2006). Sacrificing civil liberties in exchange for security: The impact of age and sociopolitical attitudes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, 2006). Colorado State University.
19.
CanettiD.HalperinE.HobfollS. E.ShapiraO.Hirsch-HoeflerS. (2009). Authoritarianism, perceived threat and exclusionism on the eve of the Disengagement: Evidence from Gaza. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 463–474. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.12.007
20.
Canetti-NisimD.HalperinE.SharvitK.HobfollS. E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53, 363–389. 10.1177/0022002709333296
21.
CarpenterJ. R.SchwarzerG.RückerG.KünstlerR. (2009). Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 624–631.
22.
CarriereK. R. (2019a). Threats to human rights: A general review. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7, 8–32.
23.
CarriereK. R. (2019b). Ingroup and outgroup differentiation in supporting civil liberties under threat. (Doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University.
24.
CarriereK. R.GarneyG.MoghaddamF. M. (2018). Terrorism as a form of violence. In VazsonyiA. T.FlanneryD.DeLisiM. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression (2nd ed., pp. 626–644). Cambridge University Press.
25.
CarriereK. R.HallahanA.MoghaddamF. M. (2020). The effects of perceived threat on human rights: A meta-analysis [Data analysis files]. Open Science Framework. https://0.17605/OSF.IO/M6EGW
26.
CarriereK. R.HendricksM. J.MoghaddamF. M. (2019). Sophisticated but scared: The effects of political sophistication, right-wing authoritarianism, and threat on civil liberty restrictions. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 10.1111/asap.12186
27.
CesarioJ. (2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 40–48. 10.1177/1745691613513470
28.
ChiltonA.CopeK.CrabtreeC.VersteegM. (2020). Support for restricting liberty for safety: Evidence during the Covid-19 pandemic from the United States, Japan, and Israel. SSRN. 10.2139/ssrn.3591270
29.
ChiuC.-Y.GelfandM.YamagishiT.ShteynbergG.WanC. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 482–493.
30.
ChomaB. L.HajiR.HodsonG.HoffarthM. (2016). Avoiding cultural contamination: Intergroup disgust sensitivity and religious identification as predictors of interfaith threat, faith-based policies, and islamophobia. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 50–55. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.013
31.
CingranelliD.Fajardo-HeywardP.FilippovM. (2013). Principals, agents and human rights. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 605–630. 10.1017/s0007123413000070
32.
CohrsJ. C.AsbrockF. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 270–289. 10.1002/ejsp.545
33.
CohrsJ. C.KielmannS.MaesJ.MoschnerB. (2005). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5(1), 263–276. 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00071.x
34.
ConradC. R.CrocoS. E.GomezB. T.MooreW. H. (2018). Threat perception and American support for torture. Political Behavior, 40, 989–1009. 10.1007/s11109-017-9433-5
35.
CookC. L.LiY. J.NewellS. M.CottrellC. A.NeelR. (2018). The world is a scary place: Individual differences in belief in a dangerous world predict specific intergroup prejudices. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 584–596. 10.1177/1368430216670024
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014). Not in my backyard! Authorianism, social dominance orientation, and support for strict immigration policies at home and abroad. Political Psychology, 35. 10.1111/pops.12078
38.
CrowsonH. M. (2007). Authoritarianism, perceived threat, and human rights attitudes in US law students: A brief look. Individual Differences Research, 5(4), 260–266. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-18918-002
39.
CrowsonH. M. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation as mediators of worldview beliefs on attitudes related to the war on terror. Social Psychology, 40(2), 93–103. 10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.93
40.
CrowsonH. M.DebackerT. K.ThomaS. J. (2005). Does authoritarianism predict post-9/11 attitudes?Personality and Individual Differences, 39(7), 1273–1283. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.005
41.
CrowsonH. M.DebackerT. K.ThomaS. J. (2006). The role of authoritarianism, perceived threat, and need for closure or structure in predicting post-9/11 attitudes and beliefs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(6), 733–750. 10.3200/SOCP.146.6.733-750
42.
DainesS. (2020, May13). USA Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2020. Congressional Record 166:90 p. S2396. LexisNexis® Congressional.
DavidY.RoslerN.EllisD.MaozI. (2016). Gendering human rights: Threat and gender perceptions as predictors of attitudes toward violating human rights in asymmetric conflict. Peace and Conflict Studies, 23, 1–29. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol23/iss2/1
45.
DavisD. W.SilverB. D. (2004). Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 28. 10.2307/1519895
DjupeP. A.CalfanoB. R. (2013). Religious value priming, threat, and political tolerance. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 768–780. 10.1177/1065912912471203
48.
DoosjeB.ZimmermannA.KüpperB.ZickA.MeertensR. (2009). Terrorist threat and perceived Islamic support for terrorist attacks as predictors of personal and institutional outgroup discrimination and support for anti-immigration policies: Evidence from 9 European countries. Revue Internationale de Pscyhologie Sociale, 22, 203–233. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-30633-009
49.
DroletC. E. (2014). Perceived deservingness and the toleration of human rights violations: The problem and a possible solution (Unpublished master’s thesis). Brock University.
50.
DroletC. E.HaferC. L.HeuerL. (2016). The role of perceived deservingness in the toleration of human rights violations. Social Justice Research, 29(4), 429–455.
51.
DunwoodyP. T.McFarlandS. G. (2018). Support for anti-Muslim policies: The role of political traits and threat perception. Political Psychology, 39(1), 89–106. 10.1111/pops.12405
52.
DuvalS. (2006). The trim and fill method. In (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments (pp. 127–144). John Wiley & Sons.
53.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
54.
EspinosaA.GuerraR.SanatkarS.PaoliniS.DamigellaD.LicciardelloO.GaertnerS. L. (2018). Identity inclusiveness and centrality: Investigating identity correlates of attitudes toward immigrants and immigration policies. Journal of Social Issues, 74(4), 674–699. 10.1111/josi.12293
55.
EthierK. A.DeauxK. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 243–251.
56.
FeinS.SpencerS. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31–44.
57.
FeldmanS.StennerK. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741–770. 10.1111/0162-895X.00077
58.
FischerP.GreitemeyerT.FreyD.KastenmullerA.OswaldS. (2006). Terror salience and punishment: Does terror salience induce threat to social order?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(6), 964–971. 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.004
59.
FoddyM.PlatowM.YamagishiT. (2009). Group-based trust in strangers: The role of stereotypes and expectations. Psychological Science, 20(4), 419–422. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02312.x
60.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 156–168. 10.1177/25152459198472
61.
GarciaB. E.GevaN. (2016). Security versus liberty in the context of counterterrorism: An experimental approach. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28, 30–48. 10.1080/09546553.2013.878704
62.
GelmanA.FaganJ.KissA. (2007). An analysis of the New York city police department’s “stop-and-frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 813–823.
63.
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
64.
GolebiowskaE. A. (1999). Gender gap in political tolerance. Political Behavior, 21(1), 43–66. 10.1023/a:1023396429500
65.
HackettJ. D.OmotoA. M.MatthewsM. (2015). Human rights: The role of psychological sense of global community. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(1), 47–67.
66.
HaferC. L. (2012). The psychology of deservingness and acceptance of human rights. In KalsE.MaesJ. (Eds.), Justice and conflicts theoretical and empirical contributions (pp. 407–427). Springer.
67.
Haider-MarkelD. P.VieuxA. (2008). Gender and conditional support for torture in the war on terror. Politics & Gender, 4(1). 10.1017/s1743923x08000019
68.
HarrisonL. A.AbrishamiG. (2004). Dating violence attributions: Do they differ for ingroup and out-group members who have a history of dating violence?Sex Roles, 51, 543–550. 10.1007/s11199-004-5464-6
69.
Henderson-KingE.Henderson-KingD.HathawayL. (2009). Group favoritism and support for government policies as a function of patriotic orientation and perceived threat. Revue Internationale de Pscyhologie Socaile, 22, 235–266.
70.
HenmiM.CopasJ. B. (2010). Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias. Statistics in Medicine, 29, 2969–2983.
71.
HetheringtonM.SuhayE. (2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 546–560. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00514.x
72.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. 10.1002/sim.1186
73.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
74.
HitlanR. T.CarrilloK.ZárateM. A.AikmanS. N. (2007). Attitudes toward immigrant groups and the September 11 terrorist attacks. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13(2), 135–152. 10.1080/10781910701270970
75.
Hoppe-GraffS.KimH. (2005). Understanding rights and duties in different cultures and contexts: Observations from German and Korean adolescents. In FinkelN. J.MoghaddamF. M. (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 49–74). American Psychological Association.
76.
HouckS. C.ConwayL. G. (2013). What people think about torture: Torture is inherently bad . . . unless it can save someone I love. Journal of Applied Security Research, 8(4), 429–454. 10.1080/19361610.2013.825750
77.
HouckS. C.ConwayL. G.RepkeM. A. (2014). Personal closeness and perceived torture efficacy: If torture will save someone I am close to, then it must work. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20(4), 590–592. 10.1037/pac0000058
78.
HuddyL.FeldmanS.WeberC. (2007). The political consequences of perceived threat and felt insecurity. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 614(1), 131–153. 10.1177/0002716207305951
79.
Human Rights Watch. (2018). World report 2018: Events of 2017 (Rep.). Sven Stories Press.
80.
HuntC. V. (2011). When worldviews collide: The role of emotion in reactions to symbolic threats (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota.
81.
Internet Association. (2020). Survey on data privacy. Internet Association.
82.
KerrW. A. (1944). Correlates of politico-economic liberalism-conservatism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), 61–77. 10.1080/00224545.1944.9918831
83.
KinderD. R.SearsD. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.414
84.
KnappG.HartungJ. (2003). Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Statistics in Medicine, 22(17), 2693–2710. 10.1002/sim.1482
85.
KossowskaM.TrejtowiczM.de LemusS.BukowskiM.Van HielA.GoodwinR. (2011). Relationships between right-wing authoritarianism, terrorism threat, and attitudes towards restrictions of civil rights: A comparison among four European countries. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 245–259. 10.1348/000712610X517262
86.
LahavG.CourtemancheM. (2012). The ideological effects of framing threat on immigration and civil liberties. Political Behavior, 34(3), 477–505. 10.1007/s11109-011-9171-z
87.
LeidnerB.CastanoE.ZaiserE.Giner-SorollaR. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), 1115–1129. 10.1177/0146167210376391
88.
LevinS.PrattoF.MatthewsM.SidaniusJ.KteilyN. (2012). A dual process approach to understanding prejudice toward Americans in Lebanon: An extension to intergroup threat perceptions and emotions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(2), 139–158. 10.1177/1368430212443866
89.
Loi n° 2015–1501. (2015, November20). Prorogeant l’application de la loi n° 55–385 du 3 avril 1955 relative à l’état d’urgence et renforçant l’efficacité de ses dispositions (Loi n’appelant pas de décret d’application).
90.
Lopez-RodríguezL.NavasM.CuadradoI.CoutantD.WorchelS. (2014). The majority’s perceptions about adaptation to the host society of different immigrant groups: The distinct role of warmth and threat. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 40, 34–48. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.02.001
91.
LutzJ. M.UlmschneiderG. W. (2019). Civil liberties, national security, and US courts in times of terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(6), 43–57.
92.
MaozI.McCauleyC. (2008). Threat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 93–116. 10.1177/0022002707308597
MarshallS. R.ShapiroJ. R. (2018). When “scurry” vs. “hurry” makes the difference: Vermin metaphors, disgust, and anti-immigrant attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 74(4), 744–789. 10.1111/josi.12298
95.
McFarlandS. (2010). Personality and support for universal human rights: A review and test of a structural model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1735–1764. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00668.x
96.
McFarlandS. (2015). Culture, individual differences, and support for human rights: A general review. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(1), 10–27. 10.1037/pac0000083
97.
McFarlandS.BrownD.WebbM. (2013). Identification with all humanity as a moral concept and psychological construct. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 194–198. 10.1177/0963721412471346
98.
McFarlandS.MathewsM. (2005). Do Americans care about human rights?Journal of Human Rights, 4(3), 305–319. 10.1080/14754830500257539
99.
McFarlandS.WebbM.BrownD. (2012). All humanity is my ingroup: A measure and studies of identification with all humanity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 830–853. 10.1037/a0028724
100.
MentovichA.YudkinD.TylerT.TropeY. (2016). Justice without borders: The influence of psychological distance and construal level on moral exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1349–1363. 10.1177/0146167216659477
101.
MoghaddamF. M.RileyC. J. (2005). Toward a cultural theory of rights and duties in human development. In FinkelN. J.MoghaddamF. M. (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 75–104). American Psychological Association.
102.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1006–1012. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
103.
NagarR.MaozI. (2014). (Non)acknowledgement of rights as a barrier to conflict resolution: Predicting Jewish Israeli attitudes towards the Palestinian demand for national self-determination. Dynamics of Asymmteric Conflict, 7(2–3), 150–164. 10.1080/17467586.2014.980281
104.
NewmanB. J.HartmanT. K.TaberC. S. (2012). Foreign language exposure, cultural threat, and opposition to immigration. Political Psychology, 33, 635–657. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00904.x
105.
ObaidiM.KunstJ. R.KtielyN.ThomsenL.SidaniusJ. (2018). Living under threat: Mutual threat perception drives anti-Muslim and anti-Western hostility in the age of terrorism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 567–584. 10.1002/ejsp.2362
106.
ParkerC. S. (2010). Symbolic versus blind patriotism: Distinction without difference?Political Research Quarterly, 63(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908327228
107.
PartlettC.RileyR. D. (2017). Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation. Statistics in Medicine, 36(2), 301–317. 10.1002/sim.7140
108.
PassiniS. (2012). Adolescents’ commonsense understanding of rights and duties: The effect of the individualization of rights on a rights dilemma. Youth & Society, 46(4), 460–477. 10.1177/0044118X12438905
109.
PassiniS.EmilianiF. (2009). Social representations of rights and duties in young Italians and Albanians. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 68(2), 89–98. 10.1024/1421-0185.68.2.89
110.
PehrsonS.GheorghiuM. A.IrelandT. (2011). Cultural threat and anti-immigrant prejudice: The case of Protestants in Northern Ireland. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(2), 111–124. 10.1002/casp.1105
111.
PetersJ. L.SuttonA. J.JonesD. R.AbramsK. R.RushtonL. (2007). Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 4544–4562.
PooleC.GreenlandS. (1999). Random-effects meta-analysis are not always conservative. American Journal of Epidemiology, 150, 469–475.
115.
PrattoF.StallworthL. M.SidaniusJ. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.x
116.
RaijmanR.HochmanO. (2011). National attachments, economic competition, and social exclusion of non-ethnic migrants in Israel: A mixed-methods approach. Quality & Quantity, 45, 1151–1174. 10.1007/s11135-009-9284-1
117.
RaijmanR.SemyonovM. (2004). Perceived threat and exclusionary attitudes towards foreign workers in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27, 780–799. 10.1080/0141987042000246345
RappC. (2015). More diversity, less tolerance? The effect of type of cultural diversity on the erosion of tolerance in Swiss municipalities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38, 1779–1797. 10.1080/01419870.2015.1015582
120.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 336–353. 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
121.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the ingroup’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 698–711. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
122.
RoebroeckE.GuidmondS. (2018). Intergroup threat, social dominance, and the malleability of ideology: The importance of conceptual replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 134–149. 10.1002/ejsp.2311
123.
RosenbaumP. J.ValsinerJ. (2011). The un-making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory & Psychology, 21, 47–65. 10.1177/0959354309352913
124.
RosenbergM. S. (2005). The file-drawer problem revisited: A general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59, 464–468. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01004.x
125.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
126.
RuhsM. (2012). The human rights of migrant workers: Why do so few countries care?American Behavioral Scientist, 56(9), 1277–1293. 10.1177/0002764212443815
127.
RupinskiM. T.DunlapW. P. (1996). Approximating Pearson product-moment correlations from Kendall’s Tau and Spearman’s Rho. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(3), 419–429. 10.1177/0013164496056003004
128.
Sadowski-SmithC.LiW. (2016). Return migration and the profiling of non-citizens: Highly skilled BRIC migrants in the Mexico–US borderlands and Arizona’s SB 1070. Population, Space, and Place, 22, 487–500.
129.
SchruijerS.BlanzM.MummendeyA.TedeschiJ.BanfaiB.DittmarH.KleibaumhüterP.MahjoubA.Mandrosz-WroblewskaJ.MolinariL.PetillonX. (1994). The group-serving bias in evaluating and explaining harmful behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(1), 47–53. 10.1080/00224545.1994.9710882
130.
SeateA. (2012). Understanding the role of emotions in mediated intergroup threat: A cultivation and appraisal theory approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Arizona.
131.
SekerdejM.KossowskaM. (2011). Motherland under attack! Nationalism, terrorist threat, and support for the restriction of civil liberties. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 42(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-011-0003-0
132.
SemyonovM.RaijmanR.TovA. Y.SchmidtP. (2004). Population size, perceived threat, and exclusion: A multiple-indicators analysis of attitudes toward foreigners in Germany. Social Science Research, 33(4), 681–701. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.11.003
133.
ShepherdL.FasoliF.PereiraA.BranscombeN. (2018). The role of threat, emotions, and prejudice in promoting collective action against immigrant groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 447–459. 10.1002/ejsp.2346
134.
ShitritL. B.Elad-StrengerJ.Hirsch-HoeflerS. (2017). Gender differences in support for direct and indirect political aggression in the context of protracted conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 54(6), 733–747. 10.1177/0022343317714301
135.
SkitkaL. J. (2005). Patriotism or nationalism? Understanding post-September 11, 2001, flag-display behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1995–2011. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02206.x
136.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.MullenE. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 743–756. 10.1177/0146167204263968
137.
SpryC.HornseyM. (2007). The influence of blind and constructive patriotism on attitudes toward multiculturalism and immigration. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59, 151–158. 10.1080/00049530701449489
138.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.BachmanG. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2221–2237. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00107.x
139.
SterneJ. A.RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (2006). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In EggerM. (Ed.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments (pp. 99–110). John Wiley & Sons.
140.
SterneJ. A.SuttonA. J.IoannidisJ. P. A.TerrinN.JonesD. R.LauJ.CarpenterJ.RückerG.HarbordR. M.SchmidC. H.TetzlaffJ.DeeksJ. J.PetersJ.MacaskillP.SchwarzerG.DuvalS.AltmanD. G.MoherD.HigginsJ. P. (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 343. 10.1136/bmj.d4002
141.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178. 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
142.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G. (Ed.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks Cole.
143.
TarrantM.BranscombeN. R.WarnerR. H.WestonD. (2012). Social identity and perceptions of torture: It’s moral when we do it. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 513–518. 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.017
144.
ThomsO. N.RonJ. (2007). Do human rights violations cause internal conflict?Human Rights Quarterly, 29(3), 674–705.
145.
ThörnerS. (2014). Anti-Muslim backlash and changing political ideologies. The consequences of perceived threat from Islamist terrorism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Philipps-Universität Marburg.
146.
ThuminF. J. (1972). The relation of liberalism to sex, age, academic field and college grades. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 160–164. 10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:23.0.co;2-y
147.
TransueJ. E. (2007). Identity salience, identity acceptance, and racial policy attitudes: American national identity as a uniting force. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 78–91.
148.
TwoseG.CohrsJ. C. (2015). Psychology and human rights: Introduction to the special issue. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(1), 3–9. 10.1037/pac0000087
149.
United Nations. (2002). Human rights: A compilation of international instruments. United Nations.
150.
United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights: General Assembly resolution 217A. United Nations.
151.
Van der NollJ. (2010). Support for a ban on headscarves: A cross-national perspective. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 191–204. 10.4119/UNIBI/ijcv.76
152.
VerkuytenM. (2009). Support for multiculturalism and minority rights: The role of national identification and out-group threat. Social Justice Research, 22, 31–52. 10.1007/s11211-008-0087-7
153.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/
154.
WalshJ. I.PiazzaJ. A. (2010). Why respecting physical integrity rights reduces terrorism. Comparative Political Studies, 43(5), 551–577.
155.
WelchK. (2016). Middle Eastern terrorist stereotypes and anti-terror policy support: The effect of perceived minority threat. Race and Justice, 6(2), 117–145. 10.1177/2153368715590478
156.
WemlingerE. (2014). The gender gap and torture: Opposition to torture among men and women in the USA. The Social Science Journal, 51(1), 113–119. 10.1016/j.soscij.2013.06.002
157.
WhiteC.DuckJ. M.NewcombeP. A. (2012). The impact of media reliance on the role of perceived threat in predicting tolerance of Muslim cultural practice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(12), 3051–3082. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00973.x
158.
WorchelS. (2005). The rightful place of human rights: Incorporating individual, group, and cultural perspectives. In FinkelN. J.MoghaddamF. M. (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 197–220). American Psychological Association.
159.
WydenR. (2020, May13). USA Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2020. Congressional Record 166:90 p. S2399. LexisNexis® Congressional.
160.
ZagefkaH.NigburD.GonzalezR.TipL. (2013). Why does ingroup essentialism increase prejudice against minority members?International Journal of Psychology, 48, 60–68. 10.1080/00207594.2012.729841
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
