Integrating past research on women of color, stigma transfers, and generalized prejudice, the present research examined the extent to which threats and safety cues to one identity dimension (e.g., gender) results in threat or safety to women of color’s other stigmatized identity dimension (e.g., race). Across three experimental studies (Total N = 638), the present research found support for a dual cue hypothesis, such that Black and Latina women anticipated gender bias from a racial identity threat (Studies 1 and 2) and anticipated racial bias from a gender identity threat (Study 2) resulting in greater overall anticipated bias compared to White women (Study 3). Moreover, Black and Latina women anticipated racial identity safety from a gender identity safety cue (Study 3) supporting a dual safety hypothesis. These studies add to work on double jeopardy by extending a dual threat framework to anticipation of discrimination and highlighting the transferability of threat and safety cues for women of color.
BealeF. (1979). Double jeopardy: To be black and female. In CadeT. (Ed.), The Black woman (pp. 90–100). New American Library.
2.
BerdahlJ. L.MooreC. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426
3.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.HimmelsteinM. S.ManuelS. K. (in press). Lay theory of generalized prejudice moderates cardiovascular stress responses to racism for White women. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220929078
4.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.MaimonM. R. (2019). Stigmatized-identity cues in consumer spaces. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 130–141.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1075
5.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2016). Organizational identity safety cue transfers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(11), 1564–1576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216665096
6.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2018). We are in this together: How the presence of similarly stereotyped allies buffer against identity threats. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.005
7.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. The American Psychologist, 64, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
8.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist policies. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500480-5
9.
CrockerJ.MajorB. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96(4), 608–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.608
10.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614
11.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
12.
GhavamiN.PeplauL. A. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464203
13.
GoffP. A.ThomasM. A.JacksonM. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9505-4
14.
HimmelsteinM. S.YoungD. M.SanchezD. T.JacksonJ. S. (2015). Vigilance in the discrimination-stress model for Black Americans. Psychology & Health, 30(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.966104
15.
JohnsonK. L.FreemanJ. B.PaukerK. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025335
16.
KingK. R. (2003). Racism or sexism? Attributional ambiguity and simultaneous membership in multiple oppressed groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01894.x
17.
LevinS.SinclairS.VeniegasR. C.TaylorP. L. (2002). Perceived discrimination in the context of multiple group memberships. Psychological Science, 13(6), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00498
18.
LogelC.WaltonG. M.SpencerS. J.IsermanE. C.von HippelW.BellA. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015703
McConahayJ. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–126). Academic Press.
21.
PetskoC. D.BodenhausenG. V. (2019). Racial stereotyping of gay men: Can a minority sexual orientation erase race?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.002
22.
PietriE. S.DrawbaughM. L.LewisA. N.JohnsonI. R. (2019). Who encourages Latina women to feel a sense of identity-safety in STEM environments?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103827
23.
PietriE. S.JohnsonI. R.OzgumusE. (2018). One size may not fit all: Exploring how the intersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.021
24.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
25.
RemediosJ. D.ChasteenA. L.PaekJ. D. (2012). Not all prejudices are experienced equally: Comparing experiences of racism and sexism in female minorities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211411594
26.
RemediosJ. D.SnyderS. H. (2015). How women of color detect and respond to multiple forms of prejudice. Sex Roles, 73(9–10), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0453-5
27.
RemediosJ. D.SnyderS. H. (2018). Intersectional oppression: Multiple stigmatized identities and perceptions of invisibility, discrimination, and stereotyping. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12268
28.
RemediosJ. D.SnyderS. H.LizzaC. A. (2016). Perceptions of women of color who claim compound discrimination: Interpersonal judgments and perceived credibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215591041
29.
RosetteA. S.LivingstonR. W. (2012). Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1162–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.002
30.
SalomonK.BurgessK. D.BossonJ. K. (2015). Flash fire and slow burn: Women’s cardiovascular reactivity and recovery following hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000061
31.
SanchezD. T.ChaneyK. E.ManuelS. K.RemediosJ. D. (2018). Theory of prejudice and American identity threat transfer for Latino and Asian Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 972–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218759288
32.
SanchezD. T.ChaneyK. E.ManuelS. K.WiltonL. S.RemediosJ. D. (2017). Stigma by prejudice transfer: Racism threatens White women and sexism threatens men of color. Psychological Science, 28(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616686218
33.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R. (2002). The internal and external causal loci of attributions to prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 620–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202288006
34.
SettlesI. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9029-8
35.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226
36.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
37.
SwimJ. K.AikinK. J.HallW. S.HunterB. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199
38.
WarnerL. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5
39.
Woods-GiscombéC. L.LobelM. (2008). Race and gender matter: A multidimensional approach to conceptualizing and measuring stress in African American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.14.3.173
40.
ZouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
