Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

When the ultimate goal of the group is found to be unattainable via the chosen means (i.e., a subgoal), effective goal management requires group members to disengage from that failing subgoal and reengage with a feasible alternative. The present study investigated the combined role of group members’ value orientation and their self-concept in collective goal revision in task groups. In a laboratory experiment involving 55 three-person groups, we induced either a collectivistic or individualistic value orientation and made salient either an independent or interdependent self-concept. As expected, groups that combined a collectivistic value orientation and an independent self-concept were less likely to be entrapped in a failing subgoal and more likely to reengage with the ultimate group goal via an available alternative. Also as expected, this effect was mediated by the degree of goal-related reflection among the members during group interaction. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

collective goal revision goal reflection self-concept value orientation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

W. T.

Kwong

Y. Y.

(2004). Measurements and effects of social-value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In Suleiman

Budescu

D. V.

Fischer

Messick

D. M.

(Eds.), Contemporary research on social dilemmas (pp. 71–98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Austin

J. T.

Vancouver

J. B.

(1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 338–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338

Baumeister

R. F.

Scher

S. J.

(1988). Self-defeating behavior patterns among normal individuals: Review and analysis of common self-destructive tendencies. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.3

Bazerman

M. H.

Giuliano

Appelman

(1984). Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90017-5

Bechtoldt

M. N.

Choi

H.-S.

Nijstad

B. A.

(2012). Individuals in mind, mates by heart: Individualistic self-construal and collective value orientation as predictors of group creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 838–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.014

Brewer

M. B.

Chen

Y. R.

(2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133

Brockner

Rubin

J. Z.

Lang

(1981). Face-saving and entrapment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(81)90007-X

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

(2001). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Chatman

J. A.

Polzer

J. T.

Barsade

S. G.

Neale

M. A.

(1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749–780. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393615

10.

Chentsova-Dutton

Y. E.

Tsai

J. L.

(2010). Self-focused attention and emotional reactivity: The role of culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018534

11.

Choi

H.-S.

Cho

S.-J.

Seo

J.-G.

Bechtoldt

M. N.

(2018). The joint impact of collectivistic value orientation and independent self-representation on group creativity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216638539

12.

Choi

H.-S.

Euh

(2018). Being nice isn’t enough: Prosocial orientation and perceptions of self-uniqueness jointly promote outgroup reparation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218801078

13.

Choi

H.-S.

Seo

J. G.

Hyun

Bechtoldt

(2019). Collectivistic independence promotes group creativity by reducing idea fixation. Small Group Research, 50, 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419827990

14.

Choi

H.-S.

Yoon

Y. J.

(2018). Collectivistic values and an independent mindset jointly promote group creativity: Further evidence for a synergy model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 22, 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000093

15.

Cross

S. E.

Hardin

E. E.

Gercek-Swing

(2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310373752

16.

Dietz-Uhler

(1996). The escalation of commitment in political decision-making groups: A social identity approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<611::AID-EJSP781>3.0.CO;2-6

17.

Driskell

J. E.

Salas

(1992). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors, 34, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400303

18.

Earley

P. C.

Gibson

C. B.

(1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism–collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80063-4

19.

Fishbach

Dhar

Zhang

(2006). Subgoals as substitutes or complements: The role of goal accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.232

20.

Gersick

C. J.

(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41. https://doi.org/10.5465/256496

21.

Gersick

C. J.

Hackman

J. R.

(1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90047-D

22.

Gilovich

(1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1110–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1110

23.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In Higgins

E. T.

Sorrentino

R. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 53–92). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

24.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(2012). Mindset theory of action phases. In van Lange

Kruglanski

A. W.

Higgins

E. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 526–545). London, UK: SAGE.

25.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

Sheeran

(2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1

26.

Goncalo

J. A.

Staw

B. M.

(2006). Individualism–collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.003

27.

Gunia

B. C.

Sivanathan

Galinsky

A. D.

(2009). Vicarious entrapment: Your sunk costs, my escalation of commitment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1238–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.004

28.

Hackman

J. R.

(1998). Why teams don’t work. In Tindale

R. S.

Heath

(Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 245–267). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

29.

Hackman

J. R.

Wageman

(2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30, 269–287. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387885

30.

Haslam

S. A.

Reicher

(2006). Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1037–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037

31.

Haslam

S. A.

Wegge

Postmes

(2009). Are we on a learning curve or a treadmill? The benefits of participative group goal setting become apparent as tasks become increasingly challenging over time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.546

32.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

33.

Heckhausen

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(1986). Information processing before and after the formation of an intent. In Klix

Hagendorf

(Eds.), In memoriam Hermann Ebbinghaus: Symposium on the Structure and Function of Human Memory (pp. 1071–1082). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press.

34.

Heckhausen

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992338

35.

Heckhausen

Wrosch

Schulz

(2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117, 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017668

36.

Higgins

E. T.

Scholer

A. A.

(2015). Goal pursuit functions: Working together. In Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology Vol. 1: Attitudes and social cognition (pp. 843–889). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

37.

Hofstede

(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

38.

Hogg

M. A.

Terry

D. I.

(2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791606

39.

Howell

D. C.

(2012). Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.

40.

Jackson

C. L.

Colquitt

J. A.

Wesson

M. J.

Zapata-Phelan

C. P.

(2006). Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 884–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.884

41.

Kağitçibaşi

Ç.

(2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275959

42.

Kameda

Sugimori

(1993). Psychological entrapment in group decision making: An assigned decision rule and a groupthink phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.282

43.

Karau

S. J.

Williams

K. D.

(1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681

44.

Kelly

J. R.

McGrath

J. E.

(1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.395

45.

Kitayama

Duffy

Uchida

(2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In Kitayama

Cohen

(Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 136–174). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

46.

Komorita

S. S.

Parks

C. D.

(1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.001151

47.

Konradt

Otte

K. P.

Schippers

M. C.

Steenfatt

(2016). Reflexivity in teams: A review and new perspectives. The Journal of Psychology, 150, 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1050977

48.

Konradt

Schippers

M. C.

Garbers

Steenfatt

(2015). Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1005608

49.

Lee

Adair

W. L.

Mannix

E. A.

Kim

(2012). The relational versus collective “we” and intergroup allocation: The role of nested group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.008

50.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

51.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Fairchild

A. J.

Fritz

M. S.

(2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542

52.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

53.

Moreland

R. L.

McMinn

J. G.

(2010). Group reflexivity and performance. In Thye

Lawler

(Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 63–95). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

54.

Murphy

R. O.

Ackermann

K. A.

(2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501745

55.

Oyserman

Lee

S. W. S.

(2007). Priming “culture”: Culture as situated cognition. In Kitayama

Cohen

(Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 255–279). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

56.

Powers

W. T.

(1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

57.

Schippers

M. C.

Den Hartog

D. N.

Koopman

P. L.

(2007). Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00250.x

58.

Schippers

M. C.

Den Hartog

D. N.

Koopman

P. L.

van Knippenberg

(2008). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity. Human Relations, 61, 1593–1616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708096639

59.

Schippers

M. C.

Edmondson

A. C.

West

M. A.

(2014). Team reflexivity as an antidote to team information-processing failures. Small Group Research, 45, 731–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414553473

60.

Schwartz

S. H.

Bilsky

(1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550

61.

Sedikides

Gaertner

Luke

M. A.

O’Mara

E. M.

Gebauer

J. E.

(2013). A three-tier hierarchy of self-potency: Individual self, relational self, collective self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 235–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407188-9.00005-3

62.

Shah

J. Y.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(2008). The challenge of change in goal systems. In Shah

J. Y.

Gardner

W. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 217–229). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

63.

Shrout

P. E.

Fleiss

J. L.

(1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

64.

Sleesman

D. J.

Conlon

D. E.

McNamara

Miles

J. E.

(2012). Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 541–562. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0696

65.

Smith

C. M.

Tindale

R. S.

Steiner

(1998). Investment decisions by individuals and groups in sunk cost situations: The potential impact of shared representations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430298012005

66.

Staw

B. M.

(1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577–587. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1981.4285694

67.

Tjosvold

Chen

Y. F.

(2010). The effects of collectivistic and individualistic values on conflict and decision making: An experiment in China. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2904–2926. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00686.x

68.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

(1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337

69.

Wagner

J. A.

(2002). Utilitarian and ontological variation in individualism–collectivism. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 301–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24009-5

70.

Walton

G. M.

(2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413512856

71.

West

M. A.

(1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In West

M. A.

(Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 555–579). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

72.

West

M. A.

(2000). Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In Beyerlein

M. M.

Johnson

D. A.

(Eds.), Product development teams (pp. 1–29). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

73.

Whyte

(1993). Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1018

74.

Widmer

P. S.

Schippers

M. C.

West

M. A.

(2009). Recent developments in reflexivity research: A review. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 2, 2–11.

75.

Wieber

Thürmer

J. L.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(2015). Attenuating the escalation of commitment to a faltering project in decision-making groups: An implementation intention approach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614568158

76.

Woltin

K. A.

Sassenberg

(2015). Showing engagement or not: The influence of social identification and group deadlines on individual control strategies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214542254

77.

Wrosch

Heckhausen

(1999). Control processes before and after passing a developmental deadline: Activation and deactivation of intimate relationship goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.415

78.

Wrosch

Scheier

M. F.

Carver

C. S.

Schulz

(2003). The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial. Self and Identity, 2, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309021

Crossing back over the Rubicon: Collectivistic value orientation and independent self-concept jointly promote effective goal revision in task groups

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References