Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-8
How do conflict narratives shape conflict- and peace-related outcomes among majority group members? The role of competitive victimhood in intractable conflicts
Previous research in the Turkish–Kurdish conflict context highlighted two opposing conflict narratives: (a) a terrorism narrative and (b) an independence narrative. In this article, we argue that these narratives are relevant to protracted and asymmetrical intergroup conflict (e.g., independence struggles), and therefore have consequences for conflict- and peace-related outcomes regardless of conflict contexts. We tested this generalizability hypothesis in parallel studies in the context of Turkish–Kurdish (Study 1) and Israeli–Palestinian relations (Study 2) among majority group members (Turks and Jewish Israelis, respectively). We also investigated competitive victimhood as a potential mediating variable in the relationship between conflict narratives on the one side and support for non-violent conflict resolution, forgiveness, and support for aggressive policies on the other, in parallel studies with the two aforementioned contexts. We argue that the terrorism narrative is essentially a negation of the narrative of the other group, and the independence narrative is a consideration of that narrative; therefore, competitive victimhood would be lower/higher when the narrative of the other is acknowledged/denied. Results point to the crucial relationship between endorsing conflict narratives and conflict- and peace-related outcomes through competitive victimhood, and to the possibility that these conflict narratives may show some similarities across different conflict contexts.
AdelmanL.LeidnerB.ÜnalH.NahhasE.ShnabelN. (2016). A whole other story: Inclusive victimhood narratives reduce competitive victimhood and intergroup hostility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(10), 1416–1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216662868
2.
AktaşM. (2014). Kuzey İrlanda barış süreci ve alınacak dersler [Northern Ireland peace process and lessons to learn]. In AktaşM. (Ed.), Çatışma çözümleri ve barış [Conflict resolutions and peace] (pp. 225–267). İletişim Yayınları. https://doi.org/10.19059/mukaddime.96849
3.
BambergM.AndrewsM. (2004). Considering counter narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.4
4.
Bar-TalD. (1998). Societal beliefs in times of intractable conflict: The Israeli case. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(1), 22–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022803
5.
Bar-TalD. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302462
6.
BilaliR.ÇelikA. B.OkE. (2014). Psychological asymmetry in minority–majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.09.002
7.
BilaliR.VollhardtJ. R. (2019). Victim and perpetrator groups’ divergent perspectives on collective violence: Implications for intergroup relations. Political Psychology, 40, 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12570
8.
BruneauE. G.SaxeR. (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of “perspective-giving” in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.017
9.
CanettiD.Elad-StrengerJ.LaviI.GuyD.Bar-TalD. (2017). Exposure to violence, ethos of conflict, and support for compromise: Surveys in Israel, East Jerusalem, West Bank, and Gaza. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(1), 84–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715569771
10.
ČehajićS.BrownR. (2010). Silencing the past: Effects of intergroup contact on acknowledgment of in-group responsibility. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609359088
11.
CohrsJ. C.UluğÖ. M.StahelL.KışlıoğluR. (2015). Ethos of conflict and beyond: Differentiating social representations of conflict. In HalperinE.SharvitK. (Eds.), The social psychology of intractable conflicts: Celebrating the legacy of Daniel Bar-Tal (Vol. 1, pp. 33–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–17861–5_3
12.
ColemanP. T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Towards the development of a framework-I. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327949PAC0901_01
13.
ElcherothG.DoiseW.ReicherS. (2011). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32, 729–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9221.2011.00834.x
14.
ElcherothG.SpiniD. (2015). Can there be a general theory of intractable conflict? In HalperinE.SharvitK. (Eds.), The social psychology of intractable conflicts: Celebrating the legacy of Daniel Bar-Tal (Vol. 1, pp. 17–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–17861–5_2
15.
FisherR. J. (2006). Intergroup conflict. In DeutschM.ColemanP. T.MarcusE. C. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 176–196). Jossey-Bass.
16.
GrabeS.DuttA. (2015). Counter narratives, the psychology of liberation, and the evolution of a women’s social movement in Nicaragua. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000080
17.
GublerJ.HalperinE.HirschbergerG. (2015). Humanizing the outgroup in contexts of protracted intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2014.20
18.
HammackP. L. (2006). Identity, conflict, and coexistence: Life stories of Israeli and Palestinian adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 323–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558406289745
NadlerA.ShnabelN. (2008). Instrumental and socio-emotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the need-based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37–56). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300314.003.0003
21.
NoorM.BrownR.GonzalezR.ManziJ.LewisC. A. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208315555
22.
NoorM.BrownR.PrenticeG. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X238751
23.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440048
24.
NoorM.VollhardtJ. R.MariS.NadlerA. (2017). The social psychology of collective victimhood. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2300
PhillipsL. T.LoweryB. S. (2015). The hard-knock life? Whites claim hardships in response to racial inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.008
27.
QoutaS.PunamäkiR. L.El SarrajE. (1995). The impact of the peace treaty on psychological well-being: A follow-up study of Palestinian children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(10), 1197–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145–2134(95)00080-R
SubašićE.ReynoldsK. J.TurnerJ. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308323223
32.
SullivanD.LandauM. J.BranscombeN. R.RothschildZ. K. (2012). Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 778–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026573
33.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks-Cole.
34.
UluğÖ. M.CohrsJ. C. (2016). An exploration of lay people’s Kurdish conflict frames in Turkey. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22, 109–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pac0000165
35.
UluğÖ. M.CohrsJ. C. (2017a). “If we become friends, maybe I can change my perspective”: Intergroup contact, endorsement of conflict narratives, and peace-related attitudes in Turkey. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23(3), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000216
36.
UluğÖ. M.CohrsJ. C. (2017b). How do experts differ from politicians in understanding a conflict? A comparison of track I and track II actors. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 35(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21208
37.
UluğÖ. M.CohrsJ. C. (2017c). “Who will resolve this conflict if politicians don’t?”: Understandings of the Kurdish conflict among members of parliament in Turkey. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28, 245–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-10-2015-0071
38.
UluğÖ. M.CohrsJ. C. (2019). Examining the ethos of conflict by exploring lay people’s representations of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 36(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894216674969
39.
UluğÖ. M.OdağÖ.CohrsJ. C.HoltzP. (2017). Understanding the Kurdish conflict through the eyes of Kurds and Turks: New conflict reflections from lay people in Turkey. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28(4), 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-05–2016–0035
40.
van LeeuwenE.MashuriA. (2013). Intergroup helping in response to separatism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(12), 1647–1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499613
41.
VollhardtJ. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace?Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781910802544373
42.
VollhardtJ. R. (2012). Collective victimization. In TroppL. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 136–157). Oxford University Press.
43.
VollhardtJ. R.BilaliR. (2015). The role of inclusive and exclusive victim consciousness in predicting intergroup attitudes: Findings from Rwanda, Burundi, and DRC. Political Psychology, 36(5), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12174
44.
VollhardtJ. R.BilewiczM.OlechowskiM. (2015). Victims under siege: Lessons for Polish–Jewish relations and beyond. In HalperinE.SharvitK. (Eds.), The social psychology of intractable conflicts: Celebrating the legacy of Daniel Bar-Tal (Vol. 1, pp. 75–87). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–17861–5_6
YıldızK. (2014). Çözüm ve dönüşüm süreçlerine ilişkin teorik ve pratik yaklaşımlar [Theoretical and practical approaches to the resolution and transformation processes]. In AktaşM. (Ed.), Çatışma çözümleri ve barış [Conflict resolutions and peace] (pp. 269–307). İletişim Yayınları.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
