National and European policies aim to facilitate the integration of Roma people into mainstream society. Yet, Europe’s largest ethnic group continues to be severely discriminated. Although prejudice has been identified to be at the core of this failure, social psychological research on anti-Gypsyism remains scarce. We conducted a study in six countries using student and community samples (N = 2,089; Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Norway, Italy, Spain) to understand how anti-Gypsyism among majority-group members predicts unfavorable acculturation preferences toward Roma people. Openly negative stereotypes predicted acculturation preferences strongly across the countries. However, stereotypes about the Roma receiving undeserved benefits were also relevant to some degree in East-Central Europe, implying that intergroup relations are framed there as realistic conflict. Stereotypes about traditional Roma culture did not play a central role in acculturation preferences. Our findings highlighted that anti-Gypsyism may be an impediment to integration efforts, and efforts should be context-specific rather than pan-national.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2011). IBM SPSS AMOS 20 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: IBM.
2.
BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
BigazziS. (2012). Self-image – Gypsy-image. The social representation of Gypsies in the Hungarian and in the Italian context. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 67, 631–652. http://doi.org/10.1556/MPSzle.67.2012.4.1
7.
BigazziS.CsertőI. (2016). Minority identity strategies bound by prejudice: Restricted perspectives of people categorized as Gypsies. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 189–206. http://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2241
8.
BogardusE. (1925). Measuring social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299–308.
ByeH. H.HerrebrødenH.HjetlandG. J.RøysetG. Ø.WestbyL. L. (2014). Stereotypes of Norwegian social groups. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 469–476. http://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12141
12.
CarreraS. (2016). Integration of immigrants versus social inclusion: A typology of integration programmes in the EU. In BalzacqT. (Ed.), Security versus freedom? (pp. 101–126). London, UK: Routledge.
ClarkC. (1998). Counting backwards: The Roma “numbers game” in Central and Eastern Europe. Radical Statistics, 69, 35–46.
15.
CoendersM.ScheepersP.SnidermanP. M.VerberkG. (2001). Blatant and subtle prejudice: Dimensions, determinants, and consequences; some comments on Pettigrew and Meertens. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 281–297. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.44
16.
CookB.WayneG. F.ValentineA.LessiosA.YehE. (2013). Revisiting the evidence on health and health care disparities among the Roma: A systematic review 2003–2012. International Journal of Public Health, 58, 885–911. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0518-6
CsepeliG. (2010). Gypsies and gadje: The perception of Roma in Hungarian society. Central European Political Science Review, 11, 62–78.
19.
CsepeliG.SimonD. (2004). Construction of Roma identity in Eastern and Central Europe: Perception and self-identification. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30, 129–150. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369183032000170204
DalsklevM.KunstJ. R. (2015). The effect of disgust-eliciting media portrayals on outgroup dehumanization and support of deportation in a Norwegian sample. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 47, 28–40. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.028
22.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism: Historical trends and contemporary approaches. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science, 11, 315–319. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00262
24.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
25.
DunbarE.SimonovaL. (2003). Individual difference and social status predictors of anti-Semitism and racism US and Czech findings with the prejudice/tolerance and right wing authoritarianism scales. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 507–523. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00051-8
26.
EnyediZ.FábiánZ.SikE. (2004). Is prejudice growing in Hungary? Changes in anti-Semitism, anti-Roma feeling and xenophobia over the last decade. In KolosiT.TóthI. G.VukovichG. (Eds.), Social report 2004 (Vol. 21, pp. 363–385). Budapest, Hungary: Tárki.
FontanellaL.VillanoP.Di DonatoM. (2016). Attitudes towards Roma people and migrants: A comparison through a Bayesian multidimensional IRT model. Quality & Quantity, 50, 471–490. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0158-9
36.
GonzálezR.SirlopúD.KesslerT. (2010). Prejudice among Peruvians and Chileans as a function of identity, intergroup contact, acculturation preferences, and intergroup emotions. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 803–824. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01676.x
37.
HelloE.ScheepersP.GijsbertsM. (2002). Education and ethnic prejudice in Europe: Explanations for cross-national variances in the educational effect on ethnic prejudice. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 5–24. http://doi.org/10.1080/00313830120115589
38.
KendeA.HadaricsM.LášticováB. (2017). Anti-Roma attitudes as expressions of dominant social norms in Eastern Europe. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 60, 12–27. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.06.002
39.
KendeA.McGartyC. (2019). A model for predicting prejudice and stigma expression by understanding target perceptions: The effects of visibility, politicization, responsibility, and entitativity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 839–856. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2550
40.
KligmanG. (2001). On the social construction of “otherness”: Identifying “the Roma” in post-socialist communities. Review of Sociology, 7, 61–78. http://doi.org/10.1556/RevSoc.7.2001.2.4
41.
KteilyN.BruneauE.WaytzA.CotterillS. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 901–931. http://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000048
42.
KuklinskiJ. H.SnidermanP. M.KnightK.PiazzaT.TetlockP. E.LawrenceG. R.MellersB. (1997). Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 402–419. http://doi.org/10.2307/2111770
43.
KunstJ. R.SadeghiT.TahirH.SamD.ThomsenL. (2016). The vicious circle of religious prejudice: Islamophobia makes the acculturation attitudes of majority and minority members clash. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 249–259. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2174
44.
LargentE. A.GradyC.MillerF. G.WertheimerA. (2012). Money, coercion, and undue inducement: A survey of attitudes about payments to research participants. IRB Ethics and Human Research, 34, 1–8.
45.
LášticováB.FindorA. (2016). Developing explicit measures of stereotypes and anti-Roma prejudice in Slovakia: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Human Affairs, 26, 233–252. http://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2016-0022
46.
LeachC. W.PengT. R.VolckensJ. (2000). Is racism dead? Comparing (expressive) means and (structural equation) models. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 449–465. http://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164507
LjujicV.VedderP.DekkerH.van GeelM. (2012b). Serbian adolescents’ Romaphobia and their acculturation orientations towards the Roma minority. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 53–61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.11.015
49.
LjujicV.VedderP.DekkerH.van GeelM. (2013). Romaphobia among Serbian and Dutch adolescents: The role of perceived threat, nationalistic feelings, and integrative orientations. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 352–362. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.661060
50.
López CatalánÓ. (2012). The genesis of a “Romanian Roma issue” in the metropolitan area of Barcelona: Urban public spaces, neighbourhood conflicts and local politics. Revista de Estudios Urbanos y Ciencias Sociales, 2, 95–117.
51.
LovelandM. T.PopescuD. (2016). The Gypsy threat narrative explaining anti-Roma attitudes in the European Union. Humanity & Society, 40, 329–352. http://doi.org/10.1177/0160597615601715
MagazziniT.PiemonteseS. (2016). Roma migration in the EU: The case of Spain between “new” and “old” minorities. Migration Letters, 13, 228–241. http://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v13i2.304
54.
Marushiakova-PopovaE.PopovV. (2015). European policies for social inclusion of Roma: Catch 22?Social Inclusion, 3, 19–31. http://doi.org/10.17645/si.v3i5.241
55.
McConahayJ. B. (1983). Modern racism and modern discrimination: The effects of race, racial attitudes, and context on simulated hiring decisions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 551–558. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283094004
56.
MušinkaA.ŠkoblaD.HurrleJ.MatlovičováK.KlingJ. (2014). ATLAS rómskych komunít na Slovensku 2013 [Atlas of Roma communities in Slovakia 2013]. Bratislava, Slovakia: UNDP.
57.
NarimanH. S.HadaricsM.SoufizadehA. M.KendeA. (2020). The mediating role of moral exclusion between authoritarianism and outgroup discrimination. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 74, 1–6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.10.001
58.
NgR. V. (2017). Evaluating the treatment of the Roma population within the EU. In Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union. http://doi.org/10.5642/urceu.201701.11
59.
OroszG.BruneauE.TroppL. R.SebestyénN.Tóth-KirályI.BőtheB. (2018). What predicts anti-Roma prejudice? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of everyday sentiments about the Roma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48, 317–328. http://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12513
60.
PásztorI. Z.PénzesJ. (2013). Studying the number of the Gypsy minority in Hungary and their involvement in local governments on the example of the North Great Plain region. Revista Română de Geografie Politică, 15, 17–26.
61.
PedersenA.BevenJ.WalkerI.GriffithsB. (2004). Attitudes toward indigenous Australians: The role of empathy and guilt. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 233–249. http://doi.org/10.1002/casp.771
62.
PérezJ. A.MoscoviciS.ChulviB. (2007). The taboo against group contact: Hypothesis of Gypsy ontologization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 249–272. http://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X111301
63.
PettigrewT. F.MeertensR. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106
64.
PhinneyJ. S.HorenczykG.LiebkindK.VedderP. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration, and well-being: An interactional perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 493–510. http://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00225
65.
PiontkowskiU.FlorackA.HoelkerP.ObdrzálekP. (2000). Predicting acculturation attitudes of dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 1–26. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0147-1767(99)00020-6
66.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
67.
PopoviciuS.TileagăC. (2019). Subtle forms of racism in strategy documents concerning Roma inclusion. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2430
RudminF. W.AhmadzadehV. (2001). Psychometric critique of acculturation psychology: The case of Iranian migrants in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 41–56. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00213
71.
SándorJ.KósaZ.BoruzsK.BorosJ.TokajiI.McKeeM.ÁdányR. (2017). The decade of Roma inclusion: Did it make a difference to health and use of health care services?International Journal of Public Health, 62, 803–815. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0954-9
72.
SchwartzS. H.BardiA. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–290. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002
73.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
74.
SherifM. (1966). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
75.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
SigonaN. (2005). Locating “the Gypsy problem.” The Roma in Italy: Stereotyping, labelling and “nomad camps.”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 741–756. http://doi.org/10.1080/13691830500109969
77.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78.
StewartM. S. (2012). The Gypsy menace: Populism and the new anti-Gypsy politics. London, UK: Hurst & Company.
TodosijevicB.EnyediZ. (2002). Authoritarianism vs. cultural pressure: Anti-Gypsy prejudice in Hungary. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 31, 31–54. http://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405400531
UrbiolaA.WillisG. B.Ruiz-RomeroJ.MoyaM. (2018). Does a multicultural perspective shape unbiased minds? The moderating role of outgroup threat. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48, 608–617. http://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12551
83.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. http://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
84.
VáradiL. (2014). Youths trapped in prejudice: Hungarian adolescents’ attitudes towards the Roma. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business.
85.
VillanoP.FontanellaL.FontanellaS.Di DonatoM. (2017). Stereotyping Roma people in Italy: IRT models for ambivalent prejudice measurement. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 57, 30–41. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.01.003
86.
WeinerováR. (2014). Anti-Gypsyism in the Czech Republic: Czechs’ perception of Roma in cultural stereotypes. Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, 59, 211–221. http://doi.org/10.1556/AEthn.59.2014.1.10
87.
YannirisC. (2017). Diversified economic governance in a multi-speed Europe: A buffer against political fragmentation?Journal of Contemporary European Research, 13, 1412–1421.
88.
ZagefkaH.BinderJ.BrownR.KesslerT.MummendeyA.FunkeF.. . . MaquilA. (2014). The relationship between acculturation preferences and prejudice: Longitudinal evidence from majority and minority groups in three European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 578–589. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2044
89.
ZagefkaH.BrownR. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: Immigrant–majority relations in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 171–188. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.73
90.
ZagefkaH.BrownR.BroquardM.MartinS. L. (2007). Predictors and consequences of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Belgium and Turkey: The role of acculturation preferences and economic competition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 153–169. http://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X111185
91.
ZagefkaH.BrownR.GonzálezR. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of acculturation preferences of non-indigenous Chileans in relation to an indigenous minority: Longitudinal survey evidence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 558–575. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.550
ZickA.WagnerU.van DickR.PetzelT. (2001). Acculturation and prejudice in Germany: Majority and minority perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 541–557. http://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00228
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
