This field experiment tested whether inducing common inclusive representations (i.e., one group, dual identity) during contact influences intergroup relations differently for ethnic majority and minority children by changing their metaperceptions and intergroup emotions differently. White (N = 113) and Black (N = 111) 8- to 10-year-old children were exposed to interactive mixed-ethnicity sessions in schools emphasizing either categorization as one group (national group), dual identity (national group with ethnic subgroups), or two ethnic groups. Overall, as predicted, for White children, one-group, but not dual-identity perceptions, improved behavioral intentions by influencing metaperceptions. For Black children, dual-identity, but not one-group, perceptions improved behavioral intentions through metaperceptions. Contrary to the expected, both dual-identity and one-group perceptions were associated with White and Black children’s intergroup emotions.
AboudF. E.TredouxC.TroppL. R.BrownC. S.NiensU.NoorN. M. (2012). Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review. Developmental Review, 32, 307–336. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.05.001
2.
AbramsD.RutlandA.PelletierJ.FerrellJ. (2009). Children’s group nous: Understanding and applying peer exclusion within and between groups. Child Development, 80, 224–243. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01256.x
3.
AlexandreJ.WaldzusS.WenzelM. (2016). Complex inclusive categories of positive and negative valence and prototypicality claims in asymmetric intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 457–483. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12148
4.
BarlowF. K.HornseyM. J.ThaiM.SenguptaN. K.SibleyC. G. (2013). The wallpaper effect: The contact hypothesis fails for minority group members who live in areas with a high proportion of majority group members. PLoS One, 8. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082228
5.
BaysuG.PhaletK.BrownR. (2014). Relative group size and minority school success: The role of intergroup friendship and discrimination experiences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 328–349. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12035
6.
BeatonA. M.MongerT.LeblancD.BourqueJ.LeviY.JosephD. J.. . . ChouinardO. (2012). Crossing the divide: The common in-group identity model and intergroup affinity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 365–376. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.12.003
7.
BeelmannA.HeinemannK. S. (2014). Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 10–24. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.002
8.
BellmoreA. D.CillessenA. H. (2006). Reciprocal influences of victimization, perceived social preference, and self-concept in adolescence. Self and Identity, 5, 209–229. http://doi.org/10.1080/15298860600636647
9.
BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248–264. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018474
10.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.. . . LeyensJ. P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0013470
11.
BrownR.BaysuG.CameronL.NigburD.RutlandA.WattersC.. . . LandauA. (2013). Acculturation attitudes and social adjustment in British South Asian children: A longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1656–1667. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213500149
12.
ByrneB. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
CameronL.RutlandA.BrownR.DouchR. (2006). Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77, 1208–1219. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.x
14.
CameronL.RutlandA.HossainR.PetleyR. (2011). When and why does extended contact work? The role of high quality direct contact and group norms in the development of positive ethnic intergroup attitudes amongst children. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 193–206. http://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390535
15.
CameronL.TurnerR. N. (2016). Confidence in contact: A new perspective on promoting cross-group friendship among children and adolescents. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10, 212–246. http://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12023
16.
CillessenA. H.BellmoreA. D. (1999). Accuracy of social self-perceptions and peer competence in middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 650–676. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23093376
17.
CillessenA. H. N.BellmoreA. D. (2011). Social skills and social competence in interactions with peers. In SmithP. K.HartC. H. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of child social development (pp. 393–412). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
18.
De AmicisL. (2009). The role of emotions in children’s responses to intergroup contexts (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
19.
DimitrovaR.ChasiotisA.van de VijverF. (2016). Adjustment outcomes of immigrant children and youth in Europe: A meta-analysis. European Psychologist, 21, 150–162. http://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000246
20.
DoerrC.PlantE. A.KunstmanJ. W.BuckD. (2011). Interactions in black and white: Racial differences and similarities in response to interracial interactions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 31–43. http://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210375250
21.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872
22.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.NiemannY. F.SniderK. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and cultural differences in responding to distinctiveness and discrimination on campus: Stigma and common group identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 167–188. http://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00207
23.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.SaguyT. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3–20. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308326751
24.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.UfkesE. G.SaguyT.PearsonA. R. (2016). Included but invisible? Subtle bias, common identity, and the darker side of “we.”Social Issues and Policy Review, 10, 6–46. http://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12017
25.
DumontM.YzerbytV.WigboldusD.GordijnE. H. (2003). Social categorization and fear reactions to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1509–1520. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256923
26.
DurkinK.HunterS.LevinK. A.BerginD.HeimD.HoweC. (2012). Discriminatory peer aggression among children as a function of minority status and group proportion in school context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 243–251. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.870
27.
EssesV. M.WagnerU.WolfC.PreiserM.WilburC. J. (2006). Perceptions of national identity and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration in Canada and Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 653–669. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.07.002
28.
FeddesA. R.NoackP.RutlandA. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children’s interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80, 377–390. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01266
29.
FreyF. E.TroppL. R. (2006). Being seen as individuals versus as group members: Extending research on metaperception to intergroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 265–280. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_5
30.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
31.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.GuerraR.RebeloM.MonteiroM. B.HouletteM.RiekB. (2008). The common ingroup identity model: Applications to adults and children. In LevyS. R.KillenM. (Eds.), Intergroup relations: An integrative developmental and social psychological perspective (pp. 204–219). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
GaertnerS. L.GuerraR.RebeloM.DovidioJ. F.HehmanE.DeeganM. P. (2016). The common ingroup identity model and the development of a functional perspective: A cross-national collaboration. In ValaJ.WaldzusS.CalheirosM. (Eds.), The social developmental construction of violence and intergroup conflict (pp. 105–120). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
33.
GaertnerS. L.MannJ.MurrellA.DovidioJ. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239–249. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.239
34.
GaertnerS. L.RustM. C.DovidioJ. F.BachmanB. A.AnastasioP. A. (1996). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. In NyeJ. L.BrowerA. M. (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? (pp. 230–260). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
35.
GómezA.HuiciC. (2008). Vicarious intergroup contact and the role of authorities in prejudice reduction. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600004169
36.
GonzálezR.BrownR. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.140
37.
GonzálezR.BrownR. (2006). Dual identities in intergroup contact: Group status and size moderate the generalization of positive attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 753–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.021
38.
GordijnE.YzerbytV. Y.WigboldusD.DumontM. (2006). Emotional reactions to harmful intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.296
39.
GuerraR.RebeloM.MonteiroM. B.GaertnerS. L. (2013). Translating recategorization strategies into an antibias educational intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00976.x
40.
GuerraR.RebeloM.MonteiroM. B.RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2010). How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209355651
41.
HartleyB. L.SuttonR. M. (2013). A stereotype threat account of boys’ academic underachievement. Child Development, 84, 1716–1733. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12079
42.
HehmanE.GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.ManiaE. W.GuerraR.WilsonD. C.FrielB. M. (2012). Group status drives majority and minority integration preferences. Psychological Science, 23, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611423547
43.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2000). Intergroup similarity and subgroup relations: Some implications for assimilation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610005
44.
HouletteM.GaertnerS. L.JohnsonK. M.BankerB. S.RiekB. M.DovidioJ. F. (2004). Developing a more inclusive social identity: An elementary school intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00098.x
45.
Jasinskaja-LahtiI.MähönenT. A.LiebkindK. (2011). Ingroup norms, intergroup contact and intergroup anxiety as predictors of the outgroup attitudes of majority and minority youth. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.06.001
46.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonF. P. (1975). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47.
JonesS. E.LivingstoneA. G.MansteadA. S. (2017). Bullying and belonging. In MavorK.PlatowM. J.BizumicB. (Eds.), Self and social identity in educational contexts (pp. 70–90). New York, NY: Routledge.
48.
JonesS. E.MansteadA. S. R.LivingstoneA. (2009). Birds of a feather bully together: Group processes and children’s responses to bullying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 853–873. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X390267
49.
JugertP.FeddesA. (2017). Children’s and adolescents’ cross-ethnic friendships. In RutlandA.NesdaleD.BrownC. S. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of group processes in children and adolescents (pp. 373–392). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
LammersJ.GordijnE. H.OttenS. (2008). Looking through the eyes of the powerful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.015
52.
LopesD. (2003). Percepção de discriminação e imagens da sociedade portuguesa em contexto intergrupal [Perceptions of discrimination and images of Portuguese society in an intergroup context]. In ValaJ. (Ed.), Simetrias e identidades: Jovens negros em Portugal [Symmetries and identities: Black youth in Portugal] (pp. 173–198). Lisboa, Portugal: Celta Editora.
53.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602
54.
MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (2015). Intergroup emotions. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.DovidioJ. F.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 2. Group processes (pp. 263–293). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55.
MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (2017). Group-based emotion in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 658–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217702725
56.
MalloyT. E.AlbrightL.ScarpatiS. (2007). Awareness of peers’ judgments of oneself: Accuracy and process of metaperception. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407080590
57.
McKownC.StramblerM. J. (2009). Developmental antecedents and social academic consequences of stereotype-consciousness in middle childhood. Child Development, 80, 1643–1659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01359.x
58.
McKownC.WeinsteinR. S. (2003). The development and consequences of stereotype-consciousness in middle childhood. Child Development, 74, 498–515. https://doi.org/0009-3920/2003/7402-0012
59.
MummendeyA.OttenS.BergerU.KesslerT. (2000). Positive–negative asymmetry in social discrimination: Valence of evaluation and salience of categorization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1258–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262007
60.
MuscaS. C.KamiejskiR.NugierA.MéotA.Er-RafiyA.BrauerM. (2011). Data with hierarchical structure: Impact of intraclass correlation and sample size on Type-I error. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00074
61.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
62.
NealJ. W.NealZ. P.CappellaE. (2016). Seeing and being seen: Predictors of accurate perceptions about classmates’ relationships. Social Networks, 44, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.002
63.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
64.
PlantE. A. (2004). Responses to interracial interactions over time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264244
65.
RayD. G.MackieD. M.RydellR. J.SmithE. R. (2008). Changing categorization of self can change emotions about outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1210–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.014
66.
RyanC. S.HuntJ. S.WeibleJ.PetersonC. R.CasasJ. F. (2007). Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207084105
67.
SaguyT.DovidioJ. F. (2013). Insecure status relations shape preferences for the content of intergroup contact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1030–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213487078
68.
SaguyT.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2008). Beyond contact: Intergroup contact in the context of power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311200
69.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
70.
SelmanR. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York, NY: Academic Press.
71.
SheltonJ. N. (2003). Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006002003
72.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116
73.
StathiS.CameronL.HartleyB.BradfordS. (2014). Imagined contact as a prejudice reduction intervention in schools: The underlying role of similarity and attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12245
74.
SwartH.HewstoneM.ChristO.VociA. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024450
75.
ThijsJ.VerkuytenM. (2014). School ethnic diversity and students’ interethnic relations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12032
76.
TrawalterS.RichesonJ. A. (2008). Let’s talk about race, baby! When Whites’ and Blacks’ interracial contact experiences diverge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1214–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.013
77.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
78.
TroppL. R.RamiahA. A. (2017). Contact strategies for improving intergroup relations among youth. In RutlandA.NesdaleD.BrownC. S. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of group processes in children and adolescents (pp. 355–372). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.
79.
TurnerR. N.CameronL. (2016). Confidence in contact: A new perspective on promoting cross-group friendship among children and adolescents. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10, 212–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12023
80.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
81.
ÜlgerZ.Dette-HagenmeyerD. E.ReichleB.GaertnerS. L. (2017). Improving outgroup attitudes in schools: A meta-analytic review. Journal of School Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.10.002
82.
Umaña-TaylorA. J. (2016). A post-racial society in which ethnic-racial discrimination still exists and has significant consequences for youths’ adjustment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415627858
83.
VezzaliL.GiovanniniD.CapozzaD. (2010). Longitudinal effects of contact on intergroup relations: The role of majority and minority group membership and intergroup emotions. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20, 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1058
84.
VorauerJ. D. (2008). Unprejudiced and self-focused: When intergroup contact is experienced as being about the ingroup rather than the outgroup. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 912–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.002
85.
VorauerJ. D.SasakiS. J. (2009). Helpful only in the abstract? Ironic effects of empathy in intergroup interaction. Psychological Science, 20, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02265.x
86.
YuanK.-H.BentlerP. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165–200. http://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
87.
YzerbytV.DumontM.WigboldusD.GordijnE. (2003). I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322595266
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
