Negative attitudes toward vegetarians/vegans (i.e., veg*ns) are common, particularly among those who desire/like/consume meat more. In two studies, we replicated and extended past work, showing that visual reminders of meat’s animal origins (vs. images of meat alone) decreased meat consumption willingness via increased empathy for animals, distress about meat consumption, and disgust for meat. We also assessed how animal–meat reminders influence antiveg*n attitudes. In Study 1 (N = 299) experimental animal–meat reminders (vs. meat-alone images) indirectly reduced negative attitudes toward veg*ns via increased empathy and distress (together, but not independently). The same manipulation in Study 2 (N = 280) lowered antiveg*n attitudes through greater empathy and lowered veg*n threat through greater distress. Implications for promoting less antiveg*n attitudes are discussed.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
AmiotC. E.BastianB. (2015). Toward a psychology of human–animal relations. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 6–47. doi:10.1037/a0038147
3.
AsbrockF.ChristO.DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2012). Differential effects of intergroup contact for authoritarians and social dominators: A dual process model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 477–490. doi:10.1177/0146167211429747
4.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
5.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
6.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. (2013). Not in my backyard! Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and support for strict immigration policies at home and abroad. Political Psychology, 35, 417–429. doi:10.1111/pops.12078
7.
CraigW. J. (2009). Health effects of vegan diets. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89, 1627–1633. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736N
8.
DhontK.HodsonG. (2014). Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption?Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 12–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.002
9.
DhontK.HodsonG.CostelloK.MacInnisC. C. (2014). Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human–human and human–animal relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 61–62, 105–108. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.020
10.
DhontK.HodsonG.LeiteA. C. (2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human–animal relations model (SD-HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30, 507–522. doi:10.1002/per.2069
11.
DhontK.van HielA. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022
12.
EarleM.HodsonG. (2017). What’s your beef with vegetarians? Predicting anti-vegetarian prejudice from pro-beef attitudes across cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 52–55. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.034
13.
FritzM. S.MacKinnonD. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
14.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 297–350. doi:10.1017/S0140525X13001192
16.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.. . . StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. doi:10.1037/pspi0000033
17.
HodsonG.ChomaB. L.BoisvertJ.HaferC.MacInnisC. C.CostelloK. (2013). The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 195–205. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.002
18.
HodsonG.EarleM. (2018). Conservatism predicts lapses from vegetarian/vegan diets to meat consumption (through lower social justice concerns and social support). Appetite, 120, 75–81. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.027
19.
HodsonG.HarryH.MitchellA. (2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525. doi:10.1002/ejsp.558
20.
HorbergE. J.KeltnerD.OveisC.CohenA. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 97, 963–976. doi:10.1037/a0017423
21.
HyersL. (2006). Myths used to legitimize the exploitation of animals: An application of social dominance theory. Anthrozoös, 19, 194–210. doi:10.2752/089279306785415538
22.
JostJ. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38, 167–208. doi:10.1111/pops.12407
23.
KunstJ. R.HohleS. M. (2016). Meat eaters by dissociation: How we present, prepare and talk about meat increases willingness to eat meat by reducing empathy and disgust. Appetite, 105, 758–774. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.009
24.
KunstJ. R.Palacios HaugestadC. A. (2018). The effects of dissociation on willingness to eat meat are moderated by exposure to unprocessed meat: A cross-cultural demonstration. Appetite, 120, 356–366. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.016
25.
LaumannE.GagnonJ. H.MichaelR. T.MichaelsS. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
LeroyF.DegreefF. (2015). Convenient meat and meat products. Societal and technological issues. Appetite, 94, 40–46. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.022
27.
LoughnanS.BastianB.HaslamN. (2014). The psychology of eating animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 104–108. doi:10.1177/0963721414525781
28.
MacInnisC. C.HodsonG. (2017). It ain’t easy eating greens: Evidence of bias toward vegetarians and vegans from both source and target. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 721–744. doi:10.1177/1368430215618253
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Multivariate applications series. Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
MacKinnonD. P.KrullJ. L.LockwoodC. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. doi:10.1.1.319.6835
MinsonJ. A.MoninB. (2012). Do-gooder derogation: Disparaging morally motivated minorities to defuse anticipated reproach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 200–207. doi:10.1177/1948550611415695
34.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
35.
NailP.McGregorI.DrinkwaterA.SteeleG.ThompsonA. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 901–907. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.013
PiazzaJ. (in press). Why people love animals yet continue to eat them. In DhontK.HodsonG. (Eds.), Why people love and exploit animals: Bridging insights from academia and advocacy. Routledge.
PliskinR.Bar-TalD.SheppesG.HalperinE. (2014). Are leftists more emotion-driven than rightists? The interactive influence of ideology and emotions on support for policies. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1681–1697. doi:10.1177/0146167214554589
40.
PlousS. (2003). Understanding prejudice and discrimination. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
41.
PruntyJ.AppleK. J. (2013). Painfully aware: The effects of dissonance on attitudes toward factory farming. Anthrozoös, 2, 265–278. doi:10.2752/175303713X13636846944367
42.
RothgerberH. (2014). Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters. Appetite, 79, 32–41. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.003
43.
RubyM. B. (2012). Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. Appetite, 58, 141–150. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019
44.
RubyM. B.AlvarengaM. S.RozinP.KirbyT. A.RicherE.RutszteinG. (2016). Attitudes toward beef and vegetarians in Argentina, Brazil, France, and the USA. Appetite, 96, 546–554. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.018
45.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
SheponA.EshelG.NoorE.MiloR. (2018). The opportunity cost of animal based diets exceeds all food losses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 3804–3809. doi:10.1073/pnas.1713820115
48.
SkitkaL. J.MullenE.GriffinT.HutchinsonS.ChamberlinB. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470–487. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.470
49.
ThoemmesF.MacKinnonD. P.ReiserM. R. (2010). Power analysis for complex mediational designs using Monte Carlo methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 510–534. doi:10.1080/10705511.2010.489379
WolfJ.AsrarG. R.WestT. O. (2017). Revised methane emissions factors and spatially distributed annual carbon fluxes for global livestock. Carbon Balance and Management, 12, 1–24. doi:10.1186/s13021-017-0084-y
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
