One of the major challenges in divided societies is finding ways to overcome geographical partition by increasing readiness for cohabitation in mixed areas. Cyprus has faced a protracted situation of division (between Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots) for the last 44 years. In this paper, we explore the role of intergroup contact (both quantity and quality of contact) in enhancing the willingness of members of these two communities to reestablish cohabitation, using representative survey samples from both communities. We hypothesize that such an effect is mediated by a decrease in the levels of prejudice between the two communities and an increase in the levels of trust. In addition, we hypothesize that the direct effect of intergroup contact and the indirect effect of intergroup contact through trust and prejudice are both moderated by age. To explore these hypotheses, we collected data from a representative sample of 502 Greek Cypriots and 504 Turkish Cypriots. The hypotheses are tested among the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot samples separately. In both samples, the results show that the positive effect of intergroup contact on willingness for renewed cohabitation is mediated by both trust and prejudice. There is also some support for the moderating effect of age for both the direct and indirect effects of intergroup contact.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2.
BarlowF. K.PaoliniS.PedersenA.HornseyM. J.RadkeH. R. M.HarwoodJ.. . .SibleyC. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643. doi:10.1177/0146167212457953
3.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.. . .LeyensJ.-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856. doi:10.1037/a0013470
BrattC. (2002). Contact and attitudes between ethnic groups: A survey-based study of adolescents in Norway. Acta Sociologica, 45, 107–125. doi:10.1080/00016990260068076
7.
BrehmJ.RahnW. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999–1023. doi:10.2307/2111684
8.
BrownR.EllerA.LeedsS.StaceK. (2007). Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 692–703. doi:10.1002/ejsp.384
9.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–342). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
10.
BrownR.MarasP.MasserB.VivianJ.HewstoneM. (2001). Life on the ocean wave: Testing some intergroup hypotheses in a naturalistic setting. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 81–97. doi:10.1177/1368430201004002001
11.
ChristO.SchmidK.LolliotS.SwartH.StolleD.TauschN.HewstoneM. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 3996–4000. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320901111
12.
ConverseJ. M.PresserS. (1986). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
13.
CoxF. D.SiskT. D.HesterE. (2017). Introduction. In CoxF.SiskT. (Eds.), Peacebuilding in deeply divided societies. Rethinking political violence (pp. 1–12). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
DelheyJ.NewtonK. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism?European Sociological Review, 21, 311–327. doi:10.1093/esr/jci022
15.
De Tezanos-PintoP.MazziottaA.FeuchteF. (2017). Intergroup contact and reconciliation among Liberian refugees: A multilevel analysis in a multiple groups setting. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 228–238. doi:10.1037/pac0000251
16.
DixonJ.LevineM.ReicherS.DurrheimK. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411–425. doi:10.1017/s0140525x11002214
17.
DovidioJ. F.LoveA.SchellhaasF. M. H.HewstoneM. (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 606–620. doi:10.1177/1368430217712052
18.
EisingaR.TeGrotenhuisM.PelzerB. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman–Brown?International Journal of Public Health, 58, 637–642. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
19.
EllerA.AbramsD. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229–256. doi:10.1002/ejsp.194
20.
FreitagM.BauerP. C. (2016). Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers. The Social Science Journal, 53, 467–476. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2015.12.002
21.
GawronskiB.PetersK. R.BrochuP. M.StrackF. (2008). Understanding the relations between different forms of racial prejudice: A cognitive consistency perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 648–665. doi:10.1177/0146167207313729
22.
HagendoornL.DrogendijkR.TumanovS.HrabaJ. (1998). Inter-ethnic preferences and ethnic hierarchies in the former Soviet Union. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 483–503. doi:10.1016/s0147-1767(98)00020-0
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
HewstoneM.KenworthyJ. B.CairnsE.TauschN.HughesJ.TamT.. . .PinderC. (2008). Stepping stones to reconciliation in Northern Ireland: Intergroup contact, forgiveness and trust. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group reconciliation (pp. 199–226). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
HewstoneM.LolliotS.SwartH.MyersE.VociA.RamiahA. A.. . .CairnsE. (2014). Intergroup contact and intergroup conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 39–53. doi:10.1037/a0035582
26.
HodsonG.CostelloK.MacInnisC. C. (2013). Is intergroup contact beneficial among intolerant people? Exploring individual differences in the benefits of contact on attitudes. In HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 49–80). London, UK: Psychology Press.
27.
HusnuS.CrispR. J. (2015). Perspective taking mediates the imagined contact effect. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 29–34. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.11.005
28.
HusnuS.MertanB.CicekO. (2018). Reducing Turkish Cypriot children’s prejudice toward Greek Cypriots: Vicarious and extended intergroup contact through storytelling. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 178–192. doi:10.1177/1368430216656469
29.
IoannouM.FilippouG.LordosA. (2015). The Cyprus SCORE: Finding new ways to resolve a frozen conflict. In Predicting peace: The Social Cohesion and Reconciliation Index as a tool for conflict transformation (pp. 98–141). Nicosia, Cyprus: UNDP-ACT.
30.
IslamM. R.HewstoneM. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700–710. doi:10.1177/0146167293196005
31.
JohnstonB. M.GlasfordD. E. (2017). Intergroup contact and helping: How quality contact and empathy shape outgroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1368430217711770
32.
KenworthyJ. B.VociA.Al RamiahA.TauschN.HughesJ.HewstoneM. (2016). Building trust in a post-conflict society: An integrative model of intergroup contact and intergroup emotions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60, 1041–1070. doi:10.1177/0022002714564427
33.
KteilyN. S.HodsonG.DhontK.HoA. K. (2017). Predisposed to prejudice but responsive to intergroup contact? Testing the unique benefits of intergroup contact across different types of individual differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1368430217716750
34.
LatifD.SitasA. (2012). The potential for reconciliation, forgiveness, and social transformation. In TrimikliniotisN.BozkurtU. (Eds.), Beyond a divided Cyprus: A state and society in transformation (pp. 201–216). New York, NY: MacMillan Palgrave.
35.
LewickiR. J.TomlinsonE. C. (2003). Trust and trust building, beyond intractability. In BurgessG.BurgessH. (Eds.), Conflict Information Consortium (pp. 305–315). Boulder: University of Colorado.
36.
LewickiR. J.WiethoffC. (2000). Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In DeutschM.ColemanP. T. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 86–107). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
LytrasE.PsaltisC. (2011). Formerly mixed-villages in Cyprus: Representations of the past, present and future. Nicosia, Cyprus: UNDP-ACT.
38.
McKeownS.PsaltisC. (2017). Intergroup contact and the mediating role of intergroup trust on outgroup evaluation and future contact intentions in Cyprus and Northern Ireland. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 392–404. doi:10.1037/pac0000275
39.
McKeownS.TaylorL. K.(2017). Intergroup contact and peacebuilding: Promoting youth civic engagement in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 415–434. doi:10.5964/jspp.v5i2.769
40.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM.HusnuS.JoyceN.HewstoneM. (2014). Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 548–562. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2029
41.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
42.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504
43.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R.WagnerU.ChristO. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
44.
PsaltisC. (2012). Intergroup trust and contact in transition: A social representations perspective on the Cyprus conflict. In MarkováI.GillespieA. (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 83–104). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
45.
PsaltisC. (2016). Collective memory, social representations of intercommunal relations and conflict transformation in divided Cyprus. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22, 19–27. doi:10.1037/pac0000145
46.
PsaltisC.CakalH. (2016). Social identity in divided Cyprus. In McKeownS.HajiR.FergusonN. (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory: Contemporary global perspectives (pp. 229–243). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
47.
PsaltisC.LoizidesN.LaPierreA.StefanovicD. (2019). Transitional justice and acceptance of cohabitation in Cyprus. Ethnic and Racial Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1574508
48.
ReeskensT.HoogheM. (2008). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust. Evidence from the European Social Survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicators Research, 85, 515–532. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9100-z
49.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow database on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
51.
ShamlooS. E.CarnaghiA.FantoniC. (2018). Investigating the relationship between intergroup physical contact and attitudes towards foreigners: The mediating role of quality of intergroup contact. PeerJ, 6. doi:10.7717/peerj.5680
SnijdersC.KerenG. (2001). Do you trust? Whom do you trust? When do you trust?Advances in Group Processes, 18, 129−160. doi:10.1016/S0882-6145(01)18006-9
54.
StathiS.HusnuS.PendletonS. (2017). Intergroup contact and contact norms as predictors of post-conflict forgiveness. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/gdn0000060
55.
StephanW. G.Diaz-LovingR.DuranA. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 240–259. doi:10.1177/0022022100031002006
56.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57.
SturgesJ. E.HanrahanK. J. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4, 107–118. doi:10.1177/1468794104041110
58.
TamT.HewstoneM.CairnsE.TauschN.MaioG.KenworthyJ. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Island. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–135. doi:10.1177/1368430207071345
59.
TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ.CairnsE. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 45–59. doi:10.1177/0146167208325004
60.
Ten TeijeI.CoendersM.VerkuytenM. (2013). The paradox of integration. Immigrants and their attitude toward the native population. Social Psychology, 44, 278–288. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000113
61.
TroppL. R. (2008). The role of trust in intergroup contact: Its significance and implications for improving relations between groups. In WagnerU.TroppL. R.FinchilescuG.TredouxC. (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 91–106). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
62.
TroppL. R.BarlowF. K. (2018). Making advantaged racial groups care about inequality: Intergroup contact as a route to psychological investment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 194–199. doi:10.1177/0963721417743282
63.
TroppL. R.HawiD. R.O’BrienT. C.GheorghiuM.ZetesA.ButzD. A. (2017). Intergroup contact and the potential for post-conflict reconciliation: Studies in Northern Ireland and South Africa. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 239–249. doi:10.1037/pac0000236
64.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
65.
TurnerR. N.WestK.ChristieZ. (2013). Outgroup trust, intergroup anxiety, and outgroup attitude as mediators of the effect of imagined intergroup contact on intergroup behavioural tendencies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E196–E205. doi:10.1111/jasp.12019
66.
VezzaliL.HewstoneM.CapozzaD.GiovanniniD.WölferR. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 314–389. doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.982948
67.
VikiG. T.CulmerM. J.EllerA.AbramsD. (2006). Race and willingness to cooperate with the police: The roles of quality of contact, attitudes towards the behaviour and subjective norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 285–302. doi:10.1348/014466605X49618
68.
VociA.HadziosmanovicE.HewstoneM.CakalH.VenezianiC. (2017). Impact of pre-war and post-war intergroup contact on intergroup relations and mental health: Evidence from a Bosnian sample. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 250–259. doi:10.1037/pac0000222
69.
VociA.HewstoneM. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001011
70.
VoglS. (2013). Telephone versus face-to-face interviews: Mode effect on semi-structured interviews with children. Sociological Methodology, 43, 133–177. doi:10.1177/0081175012465967
71.
VollhardtJ. R.BilaliR. (2015). The role of inclusive and exclusive victim consciousness in predicting intergroup attitudes: Findings from Rwanda, Burundi, and DRC. Political Psychology, 36, 489–506. doi:10.1111/pops.12174
72.
ŽeželjI.IoannouM.FrancR.PsaltisC.MartinovicB. (2017). The role of inter-ethnic online friendships in prejudice reduction in post-conflict societies: Evidence from Serbia, Croatia and Cyprus. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 386–395. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.041
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
