A 2 x 2 x 2 experiment examined effects of the acculturation orientations seen to be endorsed by immigrants (of two different religions) on intergroup relations in Sweden. Swedish majority participants (N = 448) read interviews with Iraqi immigrants in which the immigrants’ religion (Muslim vs. Christian), desired level of contact with the host society (high vs. low), and desire to maintain their own culture (high vs. low) were manipulated. Overall, immigrants who were perceived to favour contact elicited more favourable intergroup attitudes. Desire for contact also interacted with immigrants’ religion: contact among Muslim minorities increased majority members’ support for multiculturalism. In addition, majority members identified more with being Swedish when Christian minorities appeared to endorse contact and reject their heritage culture, which corresponds to an acculturation strategy of assimilation. These findings demonstrate the complex role of religious similarity in intergroup relations. Implications for future research are proposed.
AwadG. H. (2010). The impact of acculturation and religious identification on perceived discrimination for Arab/Middle Eastern Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 59–67. doi:10.1037/a0016675
2.
BerryJ. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46, 5–34. doi:10.1111/j.1464–0597.1997.tb01087.x
3.
BerryJ. W.KalinR. (1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada: An overview of the 1991 National Survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 301–320. doi:10.1037/0008–400X.27.3.301
BourhisR. Y.MoiseL. C.PerreaultS.SenécalS. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369–386. doi:10.1080/002075997400629
6.
BrownR. J. (1984a). The effects of intergroup similarity and cooperative vs. competitive orientation on intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 21–33. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00605.x
7.
BrownR. J. (1984b). The role of similarity in intergroup relations. In TajfelH. (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 603–623). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrownR.CondorS.MathewsA.WadeG.WilliamsJ. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273–286. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00230.x
9.
BrownR.ZagefkaH. (2011). The dynamics of acculturation: An intergroup perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 129–184. doi:10.1016/ B978-0-12-385522-0.00003-2
10.
CelesteL.BrownR.TipL.MateraC. (2014). Acculturation is a two way street: Majority–minority perspectives of outgroup acculturation preferences and intergroup outcomes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 304–320. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.10.002
11.
CohenA. B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204. doi:10.1037/a0015308
12.
ErdfelderE.FaulF.BuchnerA. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1–11. doi:10.3758/BF03203630
GingesJ.CairnsD. (2000). Social representations of multiculturalism: A faceted analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1345–1370. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02524.x
15.
GüngörD.FleischmannF.PhaletK. (2011). Religious identification, beliefs, and practices among Turkish Belgian and Moroccan Belgian Muslims: Intergenerational continuity and acculturative change. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1356–1374. doi:10.1177/0022022111412342
16.
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222–1233. doi:10.1037/00223514.71.6.12 22
17.
JettenJ.SpearsR.PostmesT. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862–879. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.862
LichtermanP. (2008). Religion and the construction of civic identity. American Sociological Review, 73, 83–104. doi:10.1177/000312240807300105
20.
MateraC.StefanileC.BrownR. (2011). The role of immigrant acculturation preferences and generational status in determining majority intergroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 776–785. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011. 03.007
21.
MateraC.StefanileC.BrownR. (2012). Host culture adoption or intercultural contact? Comparing different acculturation conceptualizations and their effects on host members’ attitudes towards immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 459–471. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.03.002
22.
MateraC.StefanileC.BrownR. (2015). Majority–minority acculturation preferences concordance as an antecedent of attitudes towards immigrants: The mediating role of perceived symbolic threat and metastereotypes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 45, 96–103. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.02.001
23.
McLarenL.JohnsonM. (2007). Resources, group conflict and symbols: Explaining anti-immigration hostility in Britain. Political Studies, 55, 709–732. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00680.x
24.
MontreuilA.BourhisR. Y. (2001). Majority acculturation orientations toward “valued” and “devalued” immigrants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 698–719. doi:10.1177/0022022101032006004
25.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
26.
PfafferottI.BrownR. (2006). Acculturation preferences of majority and minority adolescents in Germany in the context of society and family. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 703–717. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.03.005
27.
PiontkowskiU.FlorackA.HoelkerP.ObdrzálekP. (2000). Predicting acculturation attitudes of dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 1–26. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00020-6
28.
PiontkowskiU.RohmannA.FlorackA. (2002). Concordance of acculturation attitudes and perceived threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 221–232. doi:10.1177/1368430202005003003
29.
RohmannA.PiontkowskiU.van RandenborghA. (2008). When attitudes do not fit: Discordance of acculturation attitudes as an antecedent of intergroup threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 337–352. doi:10.1177/014616720 7311197
30.
Schalk-SoekarS. R.van de VijverF. J. (2008). The concept of multiculturalism: A study among Dutch majority members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2152–2178. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00385.x
31.
StephanW. G. (2014). Intergroup anxiety theory, research, and practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 239–255. doi:10.1177/1088868314530518
32.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x
33.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W.GudykunstW. B. (1999). Anxiety in intergroup relations: A comparison of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 613–628. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00012-7
35.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.BachmanG. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2221–2237. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb0 0107.x
36.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
37.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago IL: Nelson Hall.
38.
TipL. K. (2012). Causes and consequences of public and private acculturation preferences: Views of minority and majority group members in three countries (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
39.
TipL. K.ZagefkaH.GonzálezR.BrownR.CinnirellaM.NaX. (2012). Is support for multiculturalism threatened by… threat itself?International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 22–30. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.09.011
40.
TriandafyllidouA. (1998). National identity and the “other.”Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21, 593–612. doi:10.1080/014198798329784
41.
Van OschY. M.BreugelmansS. M. (2012). Perceived intergroup difference as an organizing principle of intercultural attitudes and acculturation attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 801–821. doi:10.1177/0022022111407688
42.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.EissesA. M. (1998). Integration and assimilation of Moroccan immigrants in Israel and the Netherlands. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 293–307. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00009-1
43.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.PrinsK. S.BuunkB. P. (1998). Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 995–1013. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<995::AI D-EJSP908>3.0.CO;2-8
44.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.WardC.MasgoretA. M. (2006). Patterns of relations between immigrants and host societies. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 637–651. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.09.001
45.
Velasco GonzálezK.VerkuytenM.WeesieJ.PoppeE. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 667–685. doi:10.1348/014466608X284443
46.
VignolesV. L.SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK. (2011). Introduction: Toward an integrative view of identity. In SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK.VignolesV. L. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 1–27). New York, NY: Springer.
47.
WardC.KennedyA. (1994). Acculturation strategies, psychological adjustment, and sociocultural competence during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18, 329–343. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(94)90036-1
48.
WillsT. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245
49.
ZagefkaH.BinderJ.BrownR.KesslerT.MummendeyA.FunkeF.. . .MaquilA. (2014). The relationship between acculturation preferences and prejudice: Longitudinal evidence from majority and minority groups in three European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 578–589. doi:10.1002/ejsp. 2044
50.
ZagefkaH.BrownR. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: Immigrant–majority relations in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 171–188. doi:10.1002/ejsp.73
51.
ZagefkaH.BrownR.BroquardM.MartinS. L. (2007). Predictors and consequences of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Belgium and Turkey: The role of acculturation preferences and economic competition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 153–169. doi:10.1348/014466606X111185
52.
ZagefkaH.BrownR.GonzálezR. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of acculturation preferences of non-indigenous Chileans in relation to an indigenous minority: Longitudinal survey evidence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 558–575. doi:10.1002/ejsp.550
